SF schools to replace ethnic studies curriculum amid backlash
Why it matters: San Francisco high schools' ethnic studies classes, which started as an elective in 2010, became the target of controversy in recent months as some parents accused the district of peddling division and promoting antisemitism, among other concerns.
Driving the news: SFUSD will opt for an off-the-shelf package instead of its home-grown curriculum starting this August.
There will be an audit of current materials, and the school board will have to sign off before the district officially adopts another curriculum.
The year-long ethnic studies course requirement for freshmen, first implemented last year, will remain in place, though students can choose to waive it.
What they're saying: "There is general consensus that ethnic studies as a course is really important," but the district's curriculum has evolved to include lessons that don't reflect its "true tenets," Su told the San Francisco Chronicle Monday.
She did not cite specifics but said generally that parents have complained the curriculum "has flaws."
"We want to ensure that all of our educators are adopting the curriculum in a consistent manner," she said. "I'm putting in more guardrails."
Su did not immediately return a request for comment, while SFUSD directed Axios to its press release on the announcement.
Between the lines: Controversy surrounding ethnic studies has largely centered on how to approach the subject — whether it should focus on appreciating cultures other than your own or systemic racism and white supremacy.
In one case, a unit on social movements included references to the Chinese Red Guards as a push for "change and justice" despite their use of murder, torture and public humiliation to crack down on dissent against Mao Zedong, the San Francisco Standard reports.
Some parents have also argued that lessons perpetrate discrimination against white students, pointing to a reading about white male privilege from 2012.
The big picture: California became the first state to establish a one-semester ethnic studies course as a graduation requirement for public high school students when AB101 was signed into law in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Ukraine struck Russian warplanes at a base its fighter-bombers flee to when other airfields are in danger, intel says
Ukrainian forces launched an attack on a Russian airbase that's used as a fallback spot for fighter jets pulled from more vulnerable locations, a new Western intelligence assessment said. Ukraine used long-range drones on Friday to strike the Marinovka airbase in Russia's Volgograd region, over 270 miles from the front lines, destroying at least two Su-34 fighter-bomber aircraft. Russia uses Marinovka for its daily combat operations, but it has also functioned as a haven for dispersed aircraft taken from other threatened airbases, Britain's defense ministry said in a Tuesday intel update that confirmed some details of the attack. Su-34 fighter-bomber aircraft were relocated to Marinovka from Morozovsk airbase, which is closer to the front lines, after it was hit by Ukrainian drones in August 2024. However, "despite these dispersal efforts to protect their aircraft, Russian aviation remains vulnerable" to Kyiv's attacks, the defense ministry said. The attack on Marinovka on Friday was a joint operation carried out by Ukraine's SBU internal security agency, its Special Operations Forces, and other elements of the military. The SBU said that the attack destroyed two Su-34 and damaged two other aircraft, while the military said all four planes were destroyed. Ukraine also noted that the drone attacks caused a fire in the maintenance and repair areas of the airbase. Business Insider could not immediately confirm the details of the operation. The Su-34 "Fullback" fleet has been a serious problem for Ukraine, as Russia arms these aircraft with its highly destructive glide bombs and employs them to devastating effect. Glide bombs are unguided dumb bombs fitted with special kits that turn them into precision-guided munitions. With short flight times, small radar signatures, and non-ballistic trajectories, they are incredibly difficult to intercept and have been used in deadly strikes on Ukrainian cities. Russia's defense industry produces glide bombs in a range of different sizes. Among the larger munitions is one that weighs more than 6,000 pounds, which is very destructive on impact. Britain's defense ministry said Russia relies on its Su-34 fleet to execute "huge amounts of daily sorties launching glide bombs" across the front lines. It further added that Moscow has now lost more than 30 of these aircraft since its full-scale invasion began in February 2022. Ukraine has made it a priority to curb the glide bomb threat and has carried out a number of deep strikes over the past year aimed at Su-34 aircraft, the airfields they're based at, and storage sites for these munitions. The glide bombs continue to be a major challenge for Kyiv. On Sunday, for instance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russian warplanes had launched nearly 1,100 of these munitions over the previous week. The Marinovka attack comes amid Ukraine's relentless efforts to degrade Russian aviation capabilities. Over the weekend, Kyiv carried out another drone strike that targeted helicopter operations at a base in the occupied Crimean peninsula.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump knew what the (expletive deleted) he was saying
President Donald Trump is now a truly historic president. He said 'f—' on national television. Very deliberately. Referring to Israel and Iran, the full quote was: 'They don't know what the f— they're doing.' Maybe. But he did. I don't wish to be overly prudish here. Most of us engage in the use of this particular word from time to time. A 'common Anglo-Saxon rejoinder' is the way a philologist would define it, and it is common. In fact, I had to call my editor to gently inquire as to San Francisco Chronicle style regarding f—. 'F—' is the preferred style. Not 'f***.' Please make a f—ing note of it. Next. Ever been on a golf course? Watched your team lose? Stub your toe? You've likely said it. Don't lie. If you are, you're f—ing with me. Trump's deployment of the F-bomb while simultaneously making a statement about bombing is rich, like Fordo enriched uranium rich. Naturally, the use of profanity by national political leaders in private is well-known. In 1962, in response to steel industry CEOs lying to him about not raising prices, led President John F. Kennedy to say, 'My father told me that all businessmen were SOBs, but I never believed him until now.' This casual remark led to a little firestorm among businessmen and anti-profanity Americans. Later in 1962, Kennedy was said to remark during the Cuban Missile Crisis after getting dressed down by some congressional leaders, 'They can have this f—ing job.' 'Perhaps apocryphal,' as they say, but likely true. Kennedy was in the Navy after all, where this sort of linguistic laxity was a common occurrence. When Oval Office tapes of President Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal were released, the transcripts were rife with the phrase 'expletive deleted.' This led to a lot of tut-tutting among the easily offended, and really dinged up Nixon's image. Was anyone really surprised that Nixon used that kind of language in private? No. He was in the Navy, too. The thing is, he never used that language in public, on camera, and neither has any president, ever. Until now. Trump has been flinging around 'hell', 'damn', 's—', 'bastards' and variations thereof for years. Biden also has been known to say 'hell' and 'damn' in public speaking as well. Biden's most famous foray into the F-word was when he described Obamacare as a 'big f—ing deal' on a hot mic at a White House ceremony in 2010. Indeed it was, but a hot mic moment is way different than Trump deliberately screaming it over the Marine One rotor noise. As president in 2022, Biden was caught on another hot mic after an event with Gov. Ron DeSantis. He told the mayor of Fort Myers Beach that 'no one f—s with a Biden.' Again, it was a definite Scranton Joe moment, but it wasn't said before a bank of microphones as a public policy pronouncement. Perhaps if Biden had said this during his catastrophic debate performance with Trump, it might have helped. During the 1976 presidential campaign, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was photographed giving the finger to a group of hecklers who had been giving him the same digital riposte. Did you expect him to fuhgeddabout it? He's from New York. Gimme a f—ing break here, pal. Astute political observers may have also noticed an uptick in public use of profanity in the past few years. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., said to the group in 2019 that 'we're gonna impeach the motherf—er,' which drew a lot of critical commentary. Had she said it on the House floor, the parliamentarian would have 'taken down' the remark and stricken it from the record, a capital/Capitol crime. It's now common to hear governors, senators, and representatives say 'hell' and 'damn' on television. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who, shall we say, is charmingly tart in private, is also known to say 'hell' and 'damn' in public a lot, but he also strongly objected to former San Francisco Supervisor Chris Daly's New Year's resolution to say 'f—' at every board meeting in 2010. In the House of Representatives, rules say that 'the context of the debate itself must be considered in determining whether the words objected to constitute disorderly criticism or do in fact fall within the boundaries of appropriate parliamentary discourse. The present-day meaning of language, the tone and intent of the Member speaking, and the subject of the remarks, must all be taken into account by the Speaker.' Depends on who the House Speaker is, I guess, but Speaker Mike Johnson, an evangelical Christian, seems like that guy who says 'heck' and 'golly' a lot. The thing about the use of the word 'f—' is that the bar is lowered, yet again. It isn't just Trump, although not to be a stick in the mud, using the F-word in public is, at baseline, yet another thing we have to explain to our kids. When President Bill Clinton was caught in flagrante with not-Mrs. Clinton, one of my kids walked around the house saying, 'Listen to me … I did not have etc.…' That I had to explain anything like that to a child was, well, f—ed up. Nixon was right. Presidents should delete at least one of those expletives going forward, people. Unless they stub their toe.
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
SF schools to replace ethnic studies curriculum amid backlash
The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) is overhauling its ethnic studies curriculum to add what superintendent Maria Su called "guardrails" in a Monday interview. Why it matters: San Francisco high schools' ethnic studies classes, which started as an elective in 2010, became the target of controversy in recent months as some parents accused the district of peddling division and promoting antisemitism, among other concerns. Driving the news: SFUSD will opt for an off-the-shelf package instead of its home-grown curriculum starting this August. There will be an audit of current materials, and the school board will have to sign off before the district officially adopts another curriculum. The year-long ethnic studies course requirement for freshmen, first implemented last year, will remain in place, though students can choose to waive it. What they're saying: "There is general consensus that ethnic studies as a course is really important," but the district's curriculum has evolved to include lessons that don't reflect its "true tenets," Su told the San Francisco Chronicle Monday. She did not cite specifics but said generally that parents have complained the curriculum "has flaws." "We want to ensure that all of our educators are adopting the curriculum in a consistent manner," she said. "I'm putting in more guardrails." Su did not immediately return a request for comment, while SFUSD directed Axios to its press release on the announcement. Between the lines: Controversy surrounding ethnic studies has largely centered on how to approach the subject — whether it should focus on appreciating cultures other than your own or systemic racism and white supremacy. In one case, a unit on social movements included references to the Chinese Red Guards as a push for "change and justice" despite their use of murder, torture and public humiliation to crack down on dissent against Mao Zedong, the San Francisco Standard reports. Some parents have also argued that lessons perpetrate discrimination against white students, pointing to a reading about white male privilege from 2012. The big picture: California became the first state to establish a one-semester ethnic studies course as a graduation requirement for public high school students when AB101 was signed into law in 2021.
