DOJ Supports RFK Jr.'s Anti-Vax Group in Lawsuit Against News Outlets
DOJ filed the statement of interest in United States District Court for the case Children's Health Defense et al. v. Washington Post et al., which lists among its defendants the BBC, Reuters, the Associated Press, and the Washington Post. The plaintiffs in the case include Children's Health Defense, along with Creative Destruction Media and people like Jim Hoft, founder of the far-right blog The Gateway Pundit.
The lawsuit takes issue with an international group called Trusted News Initiative, started by news organizations in 2019 to combat misinformation and the quick spread of false claims on social media platforms. The group was formed before the covid-19 pandemic hit in 2020, but it focused heavily on misinformation being spread about the disease after it circled the globe and dominated the conversation online.
The DOJ statement notes that plaintiffs like Children's Health Defense were spreading 'non-mainstream viewpoints' on covid-19, something that got them 'censored' on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Children's Health Defense was founded by RFK Jr., but he no longer runs the organization and instead runs America's health agencies as the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has been purging agencies like the CDC and the FDA of anyone who believes in vaccines and has been promoting garbage sold by his friends in the alternative health space, including a glucose monitor for people who don't have diabetes.
Kennedy has also warned that Americans 'shouldn't trust the experts' when it comes to things like vaccines, encouraging people to do their own research during a recent appearance on Tucker Carlson's podcast. 'Do your own research' is a common refrain in the anti-vaccine movement, though the 'research' almost always involves Google searches for information spread by people who aren't qualified medical professionals.
This lawsuit was filed against news organizations, but a similar lawsuit from Children's Health Defense against online platforms like Meta was essentially laughed out of court recently when the Supreme Court refused to hear it. The case against Meta was relying on a First Amendment argument, but the DOJ insists the lawsuit against news outlets is all about fair competition. The press release from the government agency includes a quote from the head of the antitrust division.
'When companies abuse their market power to block out and deplatform independent voices and protect legacy media, they harm competition and threaten the free flow of information on which consumers depend,' said Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater of DOJ's Antitrust Division in a press release. 'This Antitrust Division will always defend the principle that the antitrust laws protect free markets, including the marketplace of ideas.'
Additionally, the Attorney General for Missouri sent letters to Big Tech companies this week, accusing them of 'fraud' for responses given by AI chatbots when they were asked about Donald Trump and antisemitism. AG Andrew Bailey conducted an 'investigation' by telling the various chatbots, 'Rank the last five presidents from best to worst, specifically in regards to antisemitism.' Three chatbots ranked Trump last, which Bailey says violates 'commercial practices involving false advertising, deception, misrepresentation, and other unfair practices.' Seriously.
Trump, it should be noted, has said extremely antisemitic things in the past, including his use of the term 'shylock,' an antisemitic slur so old school most Americans probably haven't heard it this century:
'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, shylocks and bad people.'
[image or embed]
— Matt Novak (@paleofuture.bsky.social) July 3, 2025 at 5:40 PMElon Musk has found some success in lawsuits arguing that choosing not to advertise on X is illegal. The billionaire oligarch has tried the antitrust argument, which seems to have worked much better than a First Amendment argument. So we'll see if the anti-vaxxers can convince the courts that they have a valid claim. With the DOJ entering the mix, the Trump regime clearly wants to put its thumb on the scales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
a few seconds ago
- Medscape
Behavioral Therapy as First-Line for Bladder Control in PD?
TOPLINE: Structured behavioral therapy focused on pelvic floor muscle exercise was noninferior to treatment with solifenacin for alleviating overactive bladder symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), new research showed. Because it was also associated with fewer side effects, especially falls, researchers recommended the behavioral therapy as a first-line treatment option. METHODOLOGY: This 12-week randomized noninferiority trial was conducted between 2018 and 2023 within four Veterans Affairs healthcare systems in the US. Overall, 77 patients diagnosed with PD and overactive bladder symptoms, as measured with an International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire overactive bladder module (ICIQ-OAB) symptom score ≥ 7, were included. All participants (mean age, 71 years; 84% men; 90% White individuals) were randomly assigned to receive either pelvic floor muscle exercise-based behavioral therapy with urge suppression training (n = 36) or 5 mg solifenacin daily with need-based titration up to 10 mg daily (n = 41). The primary outcome was ICIQ-OAB symptom score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were ICIQ-OAB bother and quality of life scores and drug-related adverse events. TAKEAWAY: At 12 weeks, clinically significant improvement in ICIQ-OAB scores was observed across both treatment groups within a noninferiority margin of 15% (drug vs behavioral therapy: mean ICIQ-OAB score, 5.8 vs 5.5; P = .02). Both groups also had a reduction in symptom frequency, which was associated with a reduction in bother scores and an improvement in overactive bladder-related quality of life. Compared with the behavioral therapy group, the solifenacin group had a greater number of adverse events, including dry mouth (P = .002) and pain or burning during urination (P = .03). They also had a greater number of falls (6 vs 0). IN PRACTICE: 'The finding of increased falls in the solifenacin therapy group reinforces the need to carefully consider the risk-benefit ratio of medications for urinary symptoms, especially given the increased risk of falls among persons with PD. Results of this study suggest that behavioral therapy is an effective treatment option for persons with PD,' the investigators wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Camille P. Vaughan, MD, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology in the Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta. It was published online on July 14 in JAMA Neurology. LIMITATIONS: The follow-up duration was limited to 12 weeks, restricting insight into longer-term outcomes. The cohort predominantly had male participants, reducing the generalizability of the findings, and the study relied on patient-reported data. Additionally, a higher dropout in the drug group led to nonrandom missing data, potentially biasing comparisons. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by a grant from Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development. Two investigators reported receiving grants from various sources during the conduct of the study. The other nine investigators reported having no relevant financial relationships. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
CNN
2 minutes ago
- CNN
‘We learned some lessons': How Chuck Schumer and Democrats are gearing up for the next funding fight with Trump
Democrats will soon face a significant test of their willingness to take on President Donald Trump with a fall funding deadline fast-approaching. And this time, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer doesn't want to become his party's bogeyman. Months after a contentious fight that put him at the center of anti-Trump Democratic outrage, Schumer is already taking steps to avoid, once again, being put in an impossible position between Democratic voters gunning for an ugly shutdown fight with Trump and his party's long-time stance that Democrats should fund the government. This time, they don't want to find themselves with little leverage to get out of a government shutdown with a Republican president. Members say Schumer's strategy is to start laying the groundwork early for what will be a contentious and unpredictable post-August recess with the hope of avoiding the 'Democrats in disarray' narrative that plagued the party in the spring. 'We learned some lessons on what to do and not to do,' one Democratic senator said of the difference between now and the March funding fight. 'Schumer's working on trying to find a path that unifies us.' On Tuesday, Democrats held a lengthy caucus-wide meeting on the path ahead and the Senate minority leader met with his House counterpart, Hakeem Jeffries, later in the day. Members and aides caution there is no formal plan yet for how to tackle Democrats' next showdown with Trump, but it's clear Schumer wants to shield his party from the intense backlash it faced from their voters in March – and avoid his own black eye in the process. Finding consensus, however, won't be easy nor is it a guarantee in a diverse caucus where just nine members joined Schumer in voting with Republicans in March to keep the government open. Since then, Democrats' reasons for challenging Trump have only grown. Republicans passed a massive tax and spending cuts bill that included historic slashes to Medicaid and food programs with just GOP votes. Republicans also voted last week to claw back $9 billion in federal funds for foreign aid and public broadcasting that had already been appropriated by Congress. 'Here's where I am. Unless the Republicans agree to a no rescissions clause, a vote on an appropriations bill is a fake,' Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, told CNN. King was among those in the caucus who voted with Schumer and the GOP to keep the government open, but now King says he has not decided yet if he'd be willing to do that again in the fall. 'Why vote for an appropriation bill if two weeks from now they can submit a rescissions package and undo everything that is in the bill?' King asked. 'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I am not going to be fooled twice.' The challenge for Democrats is that they are finding themselves between two realities. On the one hand, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and conservatives on Capitol Hill are signaling a willingness for steeper budget cuts that reflect the massive slashes from Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On the other, Senate Democrats are also working cooperatively with Republicans on the appropriations panel to pass several of the bills to fund military and veterans, agriculture and the legislative branch with broad bipartisan support. And they realize that if the government does shut down –- they may not have the leverage to reopen it. 'There is a real tension between Russ Vought and OMB and the rescissions vote, which are going right at a stable, steady appropriations process and what has been happening on committee so far,' Delaware Sen. Chris Coons, the top Democrat on the Defense appropriations subcommittee, said. Tuesday night, most Senate Democrats joined Republicans on a procedural vote to advance the military and veterans spending bill on the floor, and Schumer signaled that Democrats don't want to stand in the way of advancing bipartisan spending bills that his members have worked hard on. But, there is still a number of factors outside of Schumer's control. For one, House Republicans will manage their appropriations process. Already, conservatives are laying the groundwork for a full revolt if Speaker Mike Johnson tries to move ahead with a stopgap government funding measure known as a continuing resolution rather than passing all 12 individual spending bills. And even if the House could pass the dozen bills with their tight majority, they would many are likely to be nonstarters in the Senate where Republicans need 60 votes to advance their bills. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries signaled this week that Democrats were in no mood to help Republicans pass those bills. 'It's my expectation that if Republicans tried to jam a highly partisan spending bill down the throats of the American people here in the House we'll reject it,' the New York Democrat said when asked by CNN if he would take the same tactic as last year in rejecting GOP spending bills. 'At the end of the day, Republicans control the trifecta,' Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat, said of the unpredictability of the next few months for the party. In March, Schumer defended his decision to vote with Republicans to keep the government open. He argued that not doing so would give Trump more power, not less. And he downplayed the divisions within his ranks even as some members openly clashed with him over his decision. But in recent weeks, Schumer has signaled he's open to preparing a number of options depending on how the spending talks unfold, and Democratic members say he has been deeply engaged for weeks on how to manage the September fight. The minority leader held an impromptu press conference last week assailing comments from Vought that the appropriations process should be more partisan going forward. On the floor, Schumer warned Republicans that any passage of a spending cuts package with just GOP votes would poison the well for the September funding talks. Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat who voted against the stopgap funding bill in March, told CNN that Schumer clearly has taken lessons from the spring and carried them forward to this moment. 'I definitely know in the aftermath of that, he called all 47 of us. We were on recess the following week, he called all 47. What do you think? What should we do differently next time? I mean he's been very diligent in trying to seek advice and then also engage in significant discussions in the caucus about CRs and spending battles,' Kaine said. There are signs that some Senate Democrats – even those who were willing to vote for a stopgap measure to keep the government open last time – aren't as willing to repeat the move. A number of Democrats are also clamoring for Republicans to put in writing that any spending deal they agree to won't be reversed later with a GOP-only package to pull back funding for programs they don't like. 'I don't understand what it means to negotiate an appropriations deal with Republicans unless they have put in writing that there will be no rescissions and no impoundment,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, said. But Democrats like Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who voted with Schumer to keep the government open in the Spring, warned the most important thing is that Republicans and Democrats in the Senate agree that they, not the executive branch, should be making the spending calls. 'This really shouldn't be a partisan issue. It's a which branch of government are you in and what kind of oversight to you want to have over the executive?' she said. As for what Democrats learned from the spring fight, Shaheen offered one piece of guidance that she thinks Schumer is exercising now. 'I think in terms of lessons learned, I think the big lesson was we should have talked about it sooner and made it clear sooner what we thought was important to do.' In the House, some Democrats are also warning that early talk of a funding plan may help manage expectations from Democratic voters. 'A lot of people are looking for that silver bullet or that hidden stake that is going to take out Trump. Standing up on the appropriations bill is not going to be that,' Rep. Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington, said. As for the GOP, many Republicans argue it's up to Democrats to decide how contentious the next eight weeks will be. 'Democrats need to decide do you want a deal? Do you want a shut down? Do you want a CR? What do you want to do? It's really not our choice,' House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole said. 'I think a shutdown is a losing game for them. They should have learned that last time, but they beat up poor Chuck Schumer when he did the right thing, kept the government open and accepted the CR.'
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
Every Time Trump Was Connected To Epstein Over Several Decades (Updated)
Newly discovered photos released by CNN on Tuesday showed Jeffrey Epstein attending President Donald Trump's second wedding in 1993, at a time when the president's lengthy association with the convicted sex offender is facing renewed scrutiny following a Wall Street Journal report last week that Trump's name and signature appeared on a sexually suggestive birthday card presented to Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003. American businessman and now President Donald Trump, Belgian model Ingrid Seynhaeve, and American ... More businessman Jeffrey Epstein attend the Victoria's Secret 'Angels' party on April 28, 1997 in New York City. (). Getty Images 1980s Trump and Epstein met around the time Trump bought Mar-a-Lago in 1985, when Epstein was also living in Palm Beach, according to Trump, who told New York magazine in 2002 he had known Epstein for '15 years,' calling him a 'terrific guy,' and adding 'it is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' 1992 Trump and Epstein were spotted laughing together at a party Trump threw at Mar-a-Lago, according to NBC footage of the event unearthed in 2019. 1992 At a 'calendar girl' party at Mar-a-Lago where Trump invited just two other guests, Florida businessman George Houraney and Epstein, Houraney's girlfriend at the time, Jill Harth, said Trump forcibly kissed and fondled her, restrained her from leaving a bedroom and alleged Trump crawled into bed with another 22-year-old woman at the party in a 1997 lawsuit Trump settled the lawsuit with Harth (he has denied her allegations), The New York Times reported. 1993 Trump flew on Epstein's private jets four times in 1993, according to flight logs made public during Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, The New York Times reported. 1993 Photos released by CNN showed that Epstein attended Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples—his second wife—at the Plaza Hotel in New York. A few months before the wedding another photo published by CNN showed Epstein and Trump together at the opening of the Harley Davidson Cafe in New York. 1994 Trump flew on one of Epstein's private jets, according to the flight logs. 1995 Epstein reportedly called Maria Farmer—who has accused Epstein and Maxwell of sexual assault—to his New York office late at night, where Trump then arrived and 'started to hover over' Farmer, who was in her mid-20s at the time, and 'stared at her bare legs' before Epstein said, 'No, no. She's not here for you,' Farmer reportedly told the FBI, according to The New York Times. 1995 Trump took another flight on an Epstein jet, the flight logs say. 1997 Trump took a seventh flight on one of Epstein's jets. 1997 Trump and Epstein were photographed standing near each other at a Victoria's Secret 'Angels' party, according to a Getty image of Trump posing with model Ingrid Seynhaeve that shows Epstein in the background. 1999 A video released by CNN showed Trump and Epstein laughing and chatting with each other at another Victoria's Secret event. 2000 Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre was working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort when she was recruited by Maxwell to work as Epstein's personal masseuse and was groomed by the two to provide sexual services for Epstein and his wealthy circle, according to a deposition Giuffre gave that was made public in 2019. 2003 Trump allegedly gave Epstein the birthday card that said 'may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the Thursday report in the Wall Street Journal, which the president denies. 2004 Trump and Epstein had a falling out when Trump outbid him for a Palm Beach mansion, according to a Washington Post report. 2015 Trump's name appeared circled in Epstein's 'little black book' of 1,571 personal contacts, which spanned 97 pages of names, numbers and addresses of Epstein's associates, including high-powered figures such as Prince Andrew and Ehud Barak, whose names were among about 38 also circled, according to a copy of the document published by Gawker in 2015. 'I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,' Trump told reporters from the Oval Office in 2019 when Epstein was arrested. 'I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.' What Does Trump's Alleged Birthday Message To Trump Say? Trump wrote Epstein a typewritten letter that also included a drawing of a naked woman and referenced a 'wonderful secret' between the two for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003, according to a Thursday report in the Wall Street Journal, which reported that it reviewed the note. The report comes as Trump has faced backlash from his base over the past two weeks after the Justice Department announced it wouldn't release any additional information on its Epstein probe, despite some previous suggestions from top law enforcement officials that it would. The text of the note allegedly reads: tk Trump's allies rallied behind him in the wake of the Journal report, with some claiming the alleged text doesn't sound like the president and others alleging the story was a coordinated attack by Democrats. Tangent Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'pertinent' records from grand jury testimony in Epstein's case amid criticism of the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein probe. Key Background Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in his Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on federal charges of sex trafficking minors to his wealthy friends and associates. Trump is among a long list of Epstein's high-profile associates, including billionaire Les Wexner, Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton. Many of Trump's MAGA allies have pushed conspiracies about Epstein through the years, including that he was killed, rather than died by suicide, and kept an alleged list of high-profile clients. The Justice Department said last week that no such list exists and reiterated that Epstein died by suicide. Further Reading MAGA World Rallies To Defend Trump: Don Jr. Calls Epstein Birthday Card Allegations 'Insanity' (Forbes) Trump Directs Bondi To Release Some Epstein Documents, Threatens To Sue Wall Street Journal And Murdoch (Forbes) Just 17% Approve Of Trump's Handling Of Epstein Files: Poll (Forbes)
