logo
The Pentagon's DEI purge ignores lessons from America's biggest military disasters

The Pentagon's DEI purge ignores lessons from America's biggest military disasters

CNN26-05-2025

Some soldiers prove their valor in battle. Lt. Roland Christensen revealed his character on another proving ground—with a split-second decision that would change another Navy pilot's life.
On March 17, 1947, Christensen gathered with other flight instructors at a naval air base in Glenview, Illinois. They appraised a group of nervous trainees who had assembled for the first day of selective flight training. The stakes were high — an average of 10 pilots per day washed out of Glenview.
One of the trainees had another reason for nerves. He was a slim, Black man named Jesse Leroy Brown. The son of Mississippi sharecroppers, Brown was attempting to become the Navy's first Black pilot. One flight instructor told him 'You'll never sit your Black a** in a Navy plane.' Others dubbed him 'oil slick' or called him 'n***er.' The other instructors ignored Brown as they greeted trainees and peeled off for their first training flights.
But Christensen approached him with an outstretched hand.
'You'll be flying with me today,' Christensen said, ignoring the snickers and glares from the other White trainers. Brown snapped to attention with a hearty, 'Yessir!'
Brown would go on to break the Navy's color barrier, becoming its first Black pilot. He would earn the Distinguished Flying Cross for valor during the Korean War. A Navy ship would eventually be named after him, and his life would inspire a bestselling book and movie.
But Brown never would have taken off without Christensen's moral courage. These are the type of stories that have long helped make the modern US military so distinctive. The military is the most racially integrated institution in America. This is not just reflected in numbers but also in power: Although problems with deep-rooted racism persist, people of color have risen to the top echelons of the US military.
That integration, though, goes beyond race. The military is one of the few large institutions left in America where citizens voluntarily form close relationships with people of different religions, socio-economic backgrounds and ethnicities — all in service of a common national purpose.
Combat veterans in particular talk about the brotherhood, and sisterhood, formed in battle.
'The enduring emotion of war, when everything else has faded, is comradeship,' William Broyles Jr., a combat veteran in Vietnam, wrote in a classic essay. 'A comrade in war is a man you can trust with anything, because you trust him with your life.'
But now some of America's leaders are telling a different story. The Trump administration has launched a purge of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives throughout the armed forces and military academies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says a culture of 'wokeness and weakness' has made the military less lethal.
Hegseth, who wrote in a book published last year that 'America's white sons and daughters are walking away' from military service, says he wants to restore the 'warrior' mentality to America's military.
'I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is 'Our diversity is our strength,' Hegseth said in February in a speech at the Pentagon.
But the strongest rebuttal to Hegseth's argument is military history itself. Many of the nation's biggest military blunders occurred because there wasn't enough diversity in the armed forces.
Consider one the worst military disasters to befall the US: the Japanese's navy's 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, which triggered the nation's entrance into World War II. Most history books describe the event simply as a Japanese sneak attack. At least 2,400 Americans were killed and images of the massive USS Arizona destroyer, engulfed in flames and billowing black smoke, represent one of the nation's most humiliating military failures.
But the US had ample warnings that the Japanese might attack. Why didn't they heed those warnings?
One factor was racism, some military historians say.
America's military leadership in the mid-20th century was all-White, and many commanders harbored stereotypes about the Japanese. When Admiral Husband Kimmel, commander of Pearl Harbor's navy base, was later asked about the intelligence failures that led to the attack, he said, 'I never thought those little yellow sons of bitches could pull off such an attack, so far from Japan.'
US military leaders had succumbed to 'groupthink,' which often occurs when there's not enough diversity in a decision-making body.
The term was popularized by psychologist Irving Janis. It comes from an essay he wrote in the 1970s that described how groupthink leads to military failures. It describes a dynamic where a group unwittingly creates a culture of conformity when making decisions. The desire for group consensus blocks out alternative points of view. No one feels empowered to disagree. The risk for groupthink increases with homogeneous groups, or groups with members who share the same background and experience.
Janis wrote that American military commanders didn't pay attention to warnings of an impending attack in part because of groupthink. They saw Japan 'as a midget that would not dare to strike a blow against a powerful giant.'
He also wrote that groupthink led to other American military blunders, including the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba under President Kennedy and President Truman's ill-fated decision to invade North Korea, which brought China into the Korean War.
Groupthink also led to the debacle in Vietnam. The Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Barbara Tuchman wrote the US lost that war in part because the Kennedy and Johnson administrations lacked anyone with a deep understanding of Vietnamese culture, politics and history.
She had a term for that groupthink failure: 'The March of Folly.'
With its DEI purge, the Trump administration is making the same mistake that American military leaders made in the past, says Kyle Bibby, an infantry captain in the US Marines who served in Afghanistan. He cited several recent decisions: Trump's firing of Charles Q. Brown, the second Black person to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (Colin Powell was the first); and Hegseth's firing of Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the chief of the Navy.
The Defense Department has also banned using official resources to celebrate cultural awareness events such as Black History and Hispanic Heritage months. The US Naval Academy last month banned nearly 400 books in its library that dealt with racial justice, gender and LGBTQ+ issues. The library, however, reportedly still retained two copies of 'Mein Kampf' by Adolf Hitler.
'They're trying to make a very clear statement to the military that this is a White man's military and the rest of you will fall in line,' says Bibby, co-founder of the Black Veterans Project, a group that preserves the legacy of Black veterans and secures restitution for Black soldiers denied benefits.
Bibby says the purge doesn't make business sense, either.
'There's no one on Earth who genuinely thinks that having differing opinions and experiences wile coming together to solve issues or build products is a bad thing for a team,' Bibby tells CNN. 'The only people who think like that are people who believe in groupthink.'
Yet research shows it's not enough for a military to be diverse. Numbers don't mean much if women or non-White soldiers don't feel valued and heard. This belief led to one of the most important victories in the Iraq War, one American general recently wrote in an essay.
Gen. Mark Hertling was commanding an Army division during the Iraq War in 2008 when he noticed an increase in suicide bombings carried out by Iraqi women, often in crowded public places. He couldn't figure out how to stop it. Cultural prohibitions prevented men from touching and searching women.
The solution came from a junior female officer. At her suggestion, the military arranged a conference for Iraqi women to convince them that they had a stake in their country's future. Within months, 60 female officers were fanning out across Iraqi provinces.
Would a woman officer feel comfortable approaching a male general with an out-of-the-box suggestion in today's anti-woke culture?
Hertling, who is now retired and a CNN commentator, doesn't answer that question in his essay, but he says that female officer saved lives.
'By the time 1st armored division rotated home, not only was the female suicide-vest cell almost completely destroyed, but the overall level of violence in northern Iraq was down significantly,' Hertling wrote.
The scenario Hertling described would not have possible not too long ago. This is not the US military's first DEI purge. The voices and contributions of women and people of color were overlooked and erased through much of America's military history.
Black soldiers were routinely treated as second-class citizens, held menial jobs such as cooks and were forced to serve in racially segregated units. Women in the military routinely experienced — and still do — discrimination and sexual harassment.
President Truman began to change this culture in 1948 when he issued an executive order desegregating the US military. Today, 32% of active-duty members are racial minorities and 17.7% are women, according to a 2023 Department of Defense study.
The military's march to diversity faced some of its stiffest challenges in Vietnam. The racial tensions of 1960s America spilled over into the battlefield. There were constant reports of 'fragging,' incidents in which US soldiers killed their comrades. Racial tensions between White and Black soldiers led to many fragging incidents.
The military created many of its diversity programs after Vietnam because they learned that a racially divided army cost lives, says Matthew Delmont, author of 'Half-American: The Epic Story of African Americans Fighting World War II at Home and Abroad.'
'It wasn't about being politically correct,' Delmont says. 'It was about we're going to be less effective fighting wars if we can't sort out this racial business.'
One Vietnam veteran recalls how racial tension affected his soldiers. Karl Marlantes, was then a young White man from a coastal logging town in Oregon when he commanded a platoon in Vietnam. He recalls the sensation of fighting two battles—one against the North Vietnamese, and another to hold marines together in the rear.
'I can just remember the sadness I felt in my platoon,' says Marlantes, who wrote about his war experiences in 'Matterhorn,' and 'What It Is Like to Go to War.' 'We would all work together in the bush but when we got off the chopper, all the Black kids are in one part and the White kids in another part.'
Marlantes tells CNN he once tried to persuade a Black soldier to hang out with White soldiers as well but the soldier refused.
'He said I don't want to be the one Black guy hanging out with a bunch of White guys when suddenly there's a riot,' Marlantes says. 'There was a lot of fear.'
That type of fear can lead to defeat. Armies that are divided by racial and ethnic tensions that bleed over from civilian life underperform, says Jason Lyall, author of 'Divided Armies: Inequality and Battlefield Performance in Modern War.'
Lyall says he studied nearly 850 armies in 250 wars fought since 1800 and made a discovery: inclusive armies fight harder, suffer lower rates of desertion and exhibit more creative problem solving on the battlefield.
'Victory on the battlefield over the past 200 years has usually gone to the most inclusive armies,' Lyall wrote in a 2020 essay, 'not the largest or best equipped.'
There was another reason the American military decided to become more diverse after World War II. They saw what happened to Nazi Germany.
People sometimes forget that Nazi Germany was built on, and destroyed by, racism. A racist demagogue persuaded Germans that other groups were inherently inferior. The Nazis' demonization of ethnic and religious minorities, as well as political opponents, led to the Holocaust.
Many of the American soldiers who liberated the concentration camps were stunned that an advanced country like Germany could turn so barbaric. Some of them were Black veterans like Leon Bass, who simmered in anger over the racist treatment he received in the segregated Army. Then he entered the Buchenwald Concentration camp.
There he encountered what he called the 'walking dead'— emaciated survivors who wordlessly stumbled toward him with sores across their naked bodies.
'Segregation, racism, can lead to the ultimate (horror) … that's what I saw in Buchenwald,' says Bass, who died at 90 in 2015.
Fear of a similar democratic collapse motivated Americans like Bass after World War II. They resolved to, as the author David Brooks said, never 'fall for the strongman's deductive promise of domination.' They invoked, without irony, America's traditional motto, 'E Pluribus unum,' meaning 'Out of many one.'
No other idea captured the nation's imagination like racial integration during the 1950s and '60s, says Leonard Steinhorn, co-author of 'By The Color Of Our Skin.'
'We saw ourselves as the big melting pot where everyone blended together and all the characteristics of different groups added to the pot,' Steinhorn tells CNN. 'We wanted to believe that we could be better, that we weren't bound by the prejudices, hatreds and outdated ideologies of old.'
But in recent years the desire for common ground seems to have evaporated. Our schools and communities remain widely segregated. Diversity programs are being driven out of academia and corporate America. People are self-sorting into political enclaves where they have little contact with people with different opinions.
The military is a last bastion of integration in America. Not even college and pro sports teams approach its commitment to the concept. Communities with large military installations dominate the list of the least segregated metropolitan areas of the US. There are higher rates of intermarriage among military members.
That diversity serves a vital military interest, some of the country's leading military leaders recently said. Thirty-five retired senior defense officials, including four former chairmen of the joint chiefs of staff, signed an amicus brief in 2022 supporting diversity as vital for the nation's armed services.
'History has shown that placing a diverse Armed Forces under the command of a homogeneous leadership is a recipe of internal resentment, discord, and violence,' they wrote.
That diversity is also needed more than ever because of another factor: In recent years the military has faced a severe recruiting shortage. The Army, for example, missed its recruitment goal by nearly 25% in 2022 and 2023. An uptick in recruiting that began last summer has carried over into 2025 so far. But a fundamental challenge remains: an all-volunteer force must consistently attract large numbers of people of color if it's going to remain effective.
Here's another intangible reason why diversity makes the military stronger. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of this diversity are White men. They may become hidden casualties in this war on wokeness.
Diversity not only increases the chance that they will succeed in war zones. It teaches them how to negotiate differences with someone who is different — a vital skill for preserving a multiracial and multicultural democracy.
Bibby says Black Marines swelled with pride when they saw his captain bars, but it was also important that White soldiers saw him. There are numerous historical examples of White soldiers who harbored racist attitudes being transformed by serving with, and fighting alongside, Black soldiers.
'We don't talk enough about how much it means to young White men who have never seen a Black captain to understand that I'm a part of this damn story,' Bibby says. 'It's important that they see Black and women officers and they understand that we're all part of the same team.'
Marlantes says he has a comfort level with Black people he probably wouldn't have otherwise if not for his experiences in the Marines. He says he met all sorts of soldiers who expanded his perspective.
'We had an artillery forward observer whose great-grandfather owned Hilton Head,' says Marlantes of the popular South Carolina tourist destination. 'He was rich. And he was in there with us, eating cold beans and being miserable while trying to save our ass by bringing in artillery.'
Christensen, the naval instructor who taught the Navy's first Black pilot, was also transformed by an unlikely friendship. A descendent of Danish immigrants, he grew up on a Nebraska farm where he knew no Black people. But he was also poor and knew what it felt like to be an outsider.
He bonded with Brown over those shared experiences. The two men later exchanged letters that Christensen kept in a cedar chest in his home for more than 60 years.
Their friendship reflected the profound bonds that often form between people who serve together in the armed forces. 'It is,' Philip Caputo wrote in his classic Vietnam War memoir, 'A Rumor of War, 'unlike marriage, a bond that cannot be broken by a word, by boredom or divorce, or by anything other than death.'
Their friendship ended when Brown was killed in action in 1950 during the Korean War. He was shot down and died before a rescue helicopter could ferry him to safety. After hearing about Brown's death, Christensen became a helicopter rescue pilot and saved six pilots during the Korean War.
Before he died at 91 in 2014, he made an admission to his daughter, Nancy King.
'He told me that there wasn't a single week that had gone by since 1950 that he didn't think about Jesse Brown,' King said. 'He said, 'I dream about it.' '
Critics of DEI will say that the friendship between Brown and Christensen fulfills their vision of a colorblind military. They want a military meritocracy, where only competence matters.
But integration of any kind never happens naturally in any large institution. The old hierarchies from civilian life can easily reassert themselves in the military. Armies splinter, groupthink leads to disasters and people die.
The Trump administration's DEI purge ignores those hard-won lessons. It will go down as an epic case of friendly fire, a self-inflicted wound that harms more than helps.
It's another march of folly.
John Blake is a CNN senior writer and author of the award-winning memoir, 'More Than I Imagined: What a Black Man Discovered About the White Mother He Never Knew.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wilmington man hits Delaware Lottery twice in a week. Here's where he bought his tickets
Wilmington man hits Delaware Lottery twice in a week. Here's where he bought his tickets

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wilmington man hits Delaware Lottery twice in a week. Here's where he bought his tickets

Lady Luck smiled on a Wilmington man not once, but twice. A 34-year-old Wilmington man hit Delaware Lottery's PLAY 5 game twice in four days, winning more than $300,000, according to the Delaware Lottery. The man, who has chosen to remain anonymous, claimed two $50,000 tickets and two $10,000 tickets from the June 9 PLAY 5 day drawing after matching all five winning numbers: 1-0-0-0-0. He returned to Delaware Lottery headquarters on June 16 to claim another stunning prize – $200,000 from the June 13 day drawing where he had four tickets each worth $50,000. The winning numbers on the second victory were 5-0-1-5-9. The tickets were purchased at the New Castle Shell in New Castle. The Wilmington man said he's played the lottery for five years and spends about $50 on tickets each time. He picks his numbers. For the June 9 win, he based his number selection on his old phone number. For the second victory, the number was inspired by his grandfather, who often played 5-0-1-5 in PLAY 4. The winner decided to build off that tradition by adding a fifth digit, and it paid off. Lottery winner: New Castle man wins $50,000 playing Delaware Lottery. See where he bought his ticket PLAY 5 is a daily numbers game in which you pick your favorite 5-digit number, then you choose a bet amount and bet type. You can play your favorite numbers day or night or both. PLAY 5 drawings are held seven days a week. Day drawings are at 1:58 p.m. and play up to 1:40 p.m. Night drawings are at 7:57 p.m. and play up to 7:30 p.m. Here's how to play PLAY 5, according to the Delaware Lottery: Mark your drawing time: day, night or both (remember to use blue or black ink or a pencil). Mark the number of drawings you want to enter, up to seven. To enter today's drawing only, leave this section blank. To enter future drawings, mark one or more days up to a week in advance. You can play up to five games on each playslip. For each game you want to play, it's as easy as ... Mark four numbers, one in each column, from 0 to 9. If you make a mistake, check the VOID box and use the next game panel; don't erase. If you want the computer to pick numbers for you, mark the Quick Pick box. Mark the amount you want to bet: 50 cents or $1. Mark the bet type you want: Straight: Play any five-digit number. Must match winning numbers exactly. Box: Play any five-digit number. Must match winning numbers in any order. Front 4: First four digits must match winning numbers exactly. Back 4: Last four digits must match winning numbers exactly. Front 3: First three digits must match winning numbers exactly. Back 3: Last three digits must match winning numbers exactly. Front Pair: First two digits must match winning numbers exactly. Back Pair: Last two digits must match winning numbers exactly. Check out the Prizes & Odds page for a detailed explanation of each bet type. To enter your PLAY 5 bets, give your completed playslip to the retailer, or you may use a PHD terminal. The odds depend on which game you play. Straight: The odds of matching all five numbers is 1-in-100,000. Box: The odds of winning the box range from 1-in-833 for a 120-way box to 1-in-20,000 for a 5-way box. Front 4: The odds are 1-in-10,000. Back 4: The odds are 1-in-10,000. Front 3: The odds are 1-in-1,000. Back 3: The odds are 1-in-1,000. Front pair: The odds are 1-in-100. Back pair: The odds are 1-in-100. This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Wilmington man wins Delaware Lottery game twice in a week

Married Men Are Revealing The "Hardest Parts" Of Marriage That Surprised Them The Most
Married Men Are Revealing The "Hardest Parts" Of Marriage That Surprised Them The Most

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Married Men Are Revealing The "Hardest Parts" Of Marriage That Surprised Them The Most

We recently asked the married men of the BuzzFeed Community to tell us the "hardest parts" of marriage that surprised them the most. They revealed the difficult lessons and challenges they never expected to encounter in married life, and their answers range from heartbreaking to thought-provoking. Here's what they had to say: 1."Love is amazing. Kids are amazing. Things change, and you become different people at different times, creating tension. Maybe one of you can't accept who the other is at a given time. That's hard. It can be easy to lose sight of all the good when you are not in a good place. I've been with my partner for about 25 years now, married for 14 of them." "I really want to believe that forever love is real. Some part of me, coming from broken homes, just really needs to believe it can work. And that's hard too. Because when it's good, it's good, and when it's bad, I just… don't know why we keep doing this to ourselves. Then I wonder, did this ever work? Was it always a fairytale we just told ourselves? Or are we just so warped and broken now by this world we've allowed to be built in our name that there is nothing we can do other than just spiral off into our own individually customized algorithms of madness? I'm scared for my kids." —Anonymous, 41, Michigan 2."Not my experience, but something a friend shared with me: 'You know how some women don't speak up because they aren't being hit, so it can't be abuse? Men don't speak up even when they are being hit because no one cares, or if they do, they think it's funny, so it doesn't matter if it's abuse. You don't tick enough boxes on the humanity test in this category.'" —dazzlinggoose126 "My first wife physically abused me regularly, and absolutely nobody cared. Most women I spoke to at the time's first reaction was to laugh, and when the neighbors finally called the police, their first response was to arrest ME. The only places I ended up finding any support were in men's mental health groups several years later." —metrofan 3."The biggest one I have struggled with is the intimacy plateau. When I first met your wife, it was on and popping every day, maybe several times a day, and in exciting and adventurous ways. But 'everyone knows' that after a couple of years (or decades), things cool down. The honeymoon phase ends, and that pisses me off." "Why is it that everything she wanted when we first got together (communication, dates, 'just thinking about you' gifts, etc.) is non-negotiable and has to continue forever, but I have to accept that things aren't going to be as hot and heavy as when we first met? And if I left because that chemistry dimmed down, I'm the bad guy. I get that we have kids, and work stress, and we're not getting younger, but all those same things are reasons I don't really feel like making connection efforts either. Except I love my wife and want her to be happy, so I keep making the EFFORT to do the things I know she likes." —Anonymous, 41, Canada 4."The constant worrying. For example, I had Achilles surgery, and the most stressful part of my day was when my wife had to walk our dog after dark. I never want anything bad to happen to her, but I was unable to walk, and if something did, I was helpless. Just the idea of anything happening to her created terror each day for me until she was back in the house and safe. I worry about things 50 years from now for no reason." —Anonymous, 39, Colorado 5."That just because they read vows doesn't mean they are prepared for a partnership. Make sure they are prepared to have the hard conversations and work together before you trust your future with someone." —Anonymous, 39, USA 6."The hardest part of marriage has been learning when to listen. It's easy to say you are listening just because you hear an audible noise and let your spouse say their piece, maybe even without interruption. The hard part is knowing when to lay your position down and actually listening to what they are saying without circling it back to you, especially when you think you have a point to prove." "This can be very challenging. Success can be found when you learn how to take turns talking and listening." —Anonymous, 36, Indiana 7."When both people in the relationship are neglected. We're so busy with maintaining everything else in life. The connection is no longer there, and we're just trying to stay afloat day by day. It's depressing to think about." —Anonymous, 34, USA 8."Men are stressed, too. Maybe for different reasons, but just like our spouse, we, too, are overwhelmed. We don't show or talk about it because we aren't supposed to or considered weak or less of a man." —Anonymous, 40, Indiana 9."Hardest part of marriage? All of it. Honestly, at times, you will wonder if you made the right choice; other times, you feel like you did make the right choice. At some point, you both will have different views on the world. One of you will keep score, and the other will feel trapped. Marriage is extremely hard work, and having kids makes it harder. Forget late-night gaming sessions, going out and drinking, and just staying in bed and doing nothing. One of you will always have something to do or want to do." "Don't tell my wife, but every couple of months, I take a vacation day on my last work day of the week and don't tell her. I do the usual stuff I do for work, except I take a change of clothes and see a movie or hang out with a friend that I haven't seen. If I don't, I won't get any time for myself; she plans my every weekend, and if she knows I take a vacation day, she also plans every second of that." —Anonymous, 35, Kentucky 10."Communication. Make the effort to tell your spouse what you love about them, just as often as you tell them what they're doing or not doing that's making your life harder. Your spouse always wants to make your life better, and if you're worth your weight in salt, you want the same for them. Tell each other you're loved and tell each other if something bothers you." "If you can't or don't like having both of these conversations, marriage will be unpleasant at best." —Anonymous, 40, USA 11."When your spouse tells you she doesn't express love, you desire it. When your spouse decides not to work outside the home, doesn't show any inclination for intimacy, refuses to participate in counseling, and has her loyalty to our daughter." —Anonymous, 71, California 12."When your spouse dies." —Anonymous, 64, Mexico 13."No matter what you do, no matter how hard you work for your family and how much you do for your kids, if your wife disagrees, then she will be seen as correct. She will believe she is correct, even if it's just a philosophical difference. It feels like because you're a man, you're wrong because the mother knows best. Even if you have justification and solid reasoning that you are correct, what you believe, and how to best nurture your children, if your wife disagrees, it doesn't matter; the father is wrong." —Anonymous, 56, Wisconsin 14."I've been on my third marriage for six years now, and this one is the most difficult by far. I'm the one who has to change behaviors, and she takes the blame for nothing. Everything is all my fault, no matter what. I want out, but she keeps pulling me back in by showering me with love, and it becomes a cycle. I just can't take it anymore, and I'm losing my mind. How do I get out?" —Anonymous, New Jersey 15."When you have to put up with your spouse's habits and not say anything." —Anonymous, 72, Wisconsin 16."The hardest part is when things get real, finances will be tougher. You have to compromise on things you don't fully agree on, and learn not to take one another for granted. Both parties need to do what it takes to make a marriage work. Marriage is definitely not like the movies; it takes so much work." "Fights will happen, and some of those fights can be soul-crushing, but you have to put your ego aside. If you're not ready to make it work, then forget it." —Anonymous, 38, Connecticut And finally... 17."Honestly, my parents (my partner's in-laws). I'm sure there are a lot of good in-laws out there; my in-laws are great. I was not anticipating how my parents would treat my spouse as soon as wedding planning started. Their relationship was perfectly fine before then. After? Nope. They started questioning everything. Everything they didn't like was my spouse's fault. It got worse as time passed, especially when we started setting boundaries and not letting people walk all over us anymore. My spouse blames themselves for the breakdown in my relationship with my parents, but I don't. They've gone above and beyond to maintain a relationship, but my parents have given them nothing except rudeness (my mother didn't even speak to them the last time she was here). It hasn't strained my marriage, but we both wish things could be different." "In-law relationships can be so tricky, especially when their attitudes change for seemingly no reason. The important thing is to remember that your husband/wife/spouse is your main family now, and if your parents are mistreating them, back them up." —Anonymous, 40, Canada Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Fellow married men, what are the "hardest parts" of marriage that surprised you the most? Tell us in the comments, or if you prefer to remain anonymous, use this form below.

Elgin High School educator Melissa Evon named as Oklahoma's 2025 teacher of the year
Elgin High School educator Melissa Evon named as Oklahoma's 2025 teacher of the year

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elgin High School educator Melissa Evon named as Oklahoma's 2025 teacher of the year

An Elgin educator has been chosen as Oklahoma's 2025 teacher of the year. Melissa Evon, who teaches family and consumer sciences at Elgin High School in Comanche County, was announced as the winner of the honor on the night of Friday, June 27, at the Oklahoma State Department of Education's annual InspireOK conference, held this year in Norman. 'Melissa represents the very best Oklahoma has to offer,' said state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters. 'She has the heart of a teacher and unmatched passion for her students and we are so proud to recognize her exemplary work.' Evon has worked as an educator since 1992, according to the state agency. She is the first Elgin Public Schools teacher to receive the honor since Oklahoma named its first state teacher of the year in 1955. When the list of 10 finalists for the award was announced in March, Evon – in a social media post from the agency – discussed her love of teaching. 'Teaching is a profession where the most extraordinary moments occur in the unexpected connections, the collaborative discoveries, and the triumphs of students realizing their own potential,' she said. 'Each day, as I step into my Family and Consumer Sciences classroom, I'm grateful for the opportunity to be a part of my students' learning journeys. 'I see my role as similar to that of a silversmith, patiently refining, uncovering potential, and revealing the brilliance within each student. I believe in the lasting impact of acts of kindness and in fostering an environment where these bright young minds can thrive and discover their unique strengths.' Nate Meraz, the superintendent of Elgin Public Schools, said Evon has been named three times as that district's teacher of the year -- first as a high school history teacher, then as a middle school history teacher and now as a consumer science teacher. "Everything Melissa touches turns gold," Meraz told The Oklahoman. "She is one of the best human beings you'll ever meet. Go to your Facebook page and enter her name in the search bar right now; you'll see how many people mentioned her and have stories about how she has impacted their lives. It is truly amazing! "She seeks zero attention or praise and actually would shun the spotlight, but, our parents, school staff and our community all keep putting her in the spotlight with the amazing stories of how she impacts our students' lives on a daily basis." Each of the 10 state finalists were named as the teacher of the year at their school site, then within their school district. It's unclear who made the decision to choose the 10 finalists. The state Department of Education said in March the finalists would be evaluated by a panel of Oklahomans, but never said who would serve on that panel. According to the state Department of Education, Evon will spend the next year serving as the Oklahoma Ambassador of Teaching, sharing knowledge and resources with other educators around the state. She also will represent the state in the national teacher-of-the-year competition. The other nine finalists were Shelly Austin of Cushing High School, G. Bruce Riggs of Claremore High School, Paula Caudill of Collinsville Upper Elementary School, Jennifer Meyer of Grove Elementary School, Melissa Lytle of Bixby North Intermediate School, Chrystal Reis of L.W. Westfall Elementary School in Choctaw, Shaunda Usry of Robert E. Lee Early Childhood Center in Durant, Lauren Draper of Tuttle Middle School and Stacey Barker of Merritt Elementary School. The 2024 state teacher of the year was Rachel Keith from Ada High School. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Elgin High School educator named as 2025 Oklahoma teacher of the year

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store