Asian refiners seek more Mideast oil after spot premiums jump on Israel-Iran conflict
Spot premiums for Middle East benchmarks rose above $3 a barrel on Thursday, the highest levels in four months, on fears of supply disruption after fighting broke out between Israel and Iran last week. 'We are receiving additional interest from our customers in Asia,' a source at a Middle East crude supplier said, adding that the requests are for cargoes loading in August and September.
A source at an Asian refiner said the official selling prices (OSPs) for Middle East crude are lower than spot levels, making it more economical to seek more term supplies.
Two sources at Indian refineries said they will be receiving more July-loading term crude supply from Middle East suppliers as they anticipate lower supplies from Russia.
The sources declined to be named as they are not authorised to speak to the media. Producers such as Saudi Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC) and Iraq's SOMO typically notify term customers on their allotted volumes a month before cargoes are due to load.
It is not immediately clear if the producers will supply more oil, three sources said, although one of them pointed to rising output from the bloc.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, are unwinding supply cuts, planning to increase output by 1.37 million barrels per day between April and July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump's tariffs send Asian FX markets reeling
BENGALURU: Asian currencies fell to multi-month lows on Friday with South Korea's won and Malaysia's ringgit bearing the heaviest losses as investors abandoned riskier regional assets after the US imposed new tariffs on dozens of trading partners. The won weakened 0.69% to an over two-month low of 1,401.53 against the dollar, while the ringgit dropped 0.5% to its weakest since June 23. Both currencies are set for their worst weekly performance since late February and late January, respectively. Among other currencies, the Taiwan dollar and Thai baht declined more than 0.3%, while the Philippine peso recovered from earlier six-month lows to trade flat. The MSCI emerging market currency gauge fell over 1% this week, abruptly ending a six-month rally in July and highlighting the vulnerability of regional assets to trade policy shifts. Late Thursday, US President Donald Trump signed executive orders imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on US imports from dozens of countries, utilising emergency powers and pressuring foreign leaders ahead of his self-imposed Friday deadline. India faces 25% levies on its US-bound exports, Taiwan 20%, Thailand and Malaysia 19%, while South Korea secured reduced 15% rates after intensive negotiations. Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan, and Cambodia have already secured agreements. 'Tariff rates settling at 15-20% for most of the region outside of China will hurt producers, narrow profit along the supply chain and curtail US demand,' said Alex Holmes, regional director for Asia Pacific at EIU, noting that core emerging market countries with stronger fundamentals are expected to prove more resilient than frontier economies. The broad-based tariff structure leaves emerging markets 'between a rock and a hard place,' forcing difficult choices between China and US trade relationships as they seek alternative strategies to mitigate economic fallout, Holmes added. The greenback rose 0.3% on Friday on greater clarity around Trump's trade policies. The dollar index climbed 2.5% this week to two-month highs. Regional equities showed mixed performance, with Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta shares rising over 1%, while Seoul tumbled 3.5% after the government proposed rolling back recent tax cuts. Central bank policy remains in focus, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Bank of Japan maintaining current rates alongside the US Federal Reserve. Thailand's rate decision looms this month, while India's central bank meets next week. 'A number of emerging market central banks appear to be shifting toward a more accommodative stance,' with India expected to deliver 'a dovish pause' before likely cutting rates in October, Barclays analysts said.
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Indian rupee steady
MUMBAI: The Indian rupee nudged higher on Friday, supported by likely intervention from the Reserve Bank of India, but still logged its worst weekly drop since late 2022 due to worries over US tariffs and sustained foreign portfolio outflows. The rupee closed at 87.5300 against the US dollar on Friday, a tad higher than its close at 87.5950 in the previous session. On the week, the currency declined 1.2%, its worst performance since December 2022. The South-Asian currency fell to 87.74 on Thursday, just shy of its all-time low of 87.95 in February, following President Donald Trump's announcement of a steeper-than-expected 25% tariff on Indian imports. Firm intervention by the central bank on Friday helped the rupee find some footing, but traders and analysts expect a depreciation bias in the near term. Consistent foreign outflows from local stocks alongside elevated corporate dollar demand are likely to keep the local currency under pressure, traders said. Foreign investors net sold $2 billion of Indian equities in July.
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
A deal in need of clarity
EDITORIAL: The considerable optimism surrounding what is being hailed as a ground-breaking US-Pakistan deal – encompassing trade ties and a framework for oil exploration and development – is understandable, given the historically transactional, largely security-focused and till recently quite frosty nature of the bilateral relationship. However, this new-found positivity must be tempered, as the deal's practical implications remain uncertain and hinge on how it is ultimately operationalised. President Donald Trump had announced on July 30 that the two countries had concluded an agreement to jointly develop Pakistan's oil reserves. This was followed by Pakistani officials announcing that a trade deal had been signed, although there was no immediate confirmation regarding the agreed tariff rate for our exports to the US. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif was quick to term the agreement as a 'landmark' one, and much official commentary has echoed this sentiment, projecting it as a turning point in bilateral ties and a potential catalyst for accelerated economic growth. With the White House now confirming a 19 percent tariff rate for Pakistani exports – down from the 29 percent initially declared in April under the Trump Administration's so-called Liberation Day tariffs – there is indeed cause for some guarded relief. However, we must not ignore that even this reduced rate could hurt export performance, given the prohibitively high-cost structures of many of our industries and the heavy reliance on the US as Pakistan's single-largest export destination, with limited diversification in our export markets, leaving us particularly vulnerable to this tariff rate. The celebratory rhetoric that pointed to the 25 percent tariff imposed on Indian exports also needs to be tempered. India's much stronger industrial base, leaner cost structures and more diversified trading relationships make it better equipped to absorb such shocks, even if many of its sectors will face disruptions, at least in the short term. Moreover, although President Trump has been highly critical of India's continued oil imports from Russia, recent reports suggest that Indian state-owned refineries have halted such purchases, signalling a recalibration of New Delhi's policy in order to remain in Washington's good graces. As a result, any space created for Pakistani exports in American markets due to increased tariffs on Indian products may prove limited at best. Also worth noting here is Pakistan's announcement of importing one million barrels of oil from the US in October. While diversifying energy sources beyond traditional Middle Eastern suppliers may have strategic value, it also raises questions about the potential impact on foreign exchange reserves and the balance of payments, given the potentially higher shipping and transaction costs. Regarding the oil exploration aspect of the agreement, there is genuine potential in Pakistan's largely untapped mineral wealth, and US support could help unlock long underutilised opportunities. Yet past experiences – most recently during the last PTI government – show that hopes around resource discoveries have often ended in disappointment. Still, credible assessments, including a 2015 report by the US Energy Information Administration, highlight a promising shale oil and gas potential in the Indus Basin. And given Pakistan's limited exploration capacity, US collaboration could open important economic avenues. That said, the lack of clarity around the agreement raises important questions. Even if actual exploration and extraction lie well into the future, a transparent, unambiguous and equitable mechanism for managing costs and dividing returns must be established from the outset. Clarity is also needed on the role of the provinces, which, under the Constitution, have a defined mandate in mineral exploration and development. How provincial roles are factored in the agreement will be crucial to avoid discord and internal divisions. Despite the substantial ambiguities and unanswered questions, this renewed push for US-Pakistan economic cooperation is, nevertheless, a welcome shift. However, our economic managers must temper optimism with realism, anticipate potential risks and take steps to mitigate them. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
