logo
EXCLUSIVE Life on 'tyrannical' millionaires' island: Exclusive club where pampered elite are too terrified to speak out... until now

EXCLUSIVE Life on 'tyrannical' millionaires' island: Exclusive club where pampered elite are too terrified to speak out... until now

Daily Mail​10 hours ago
There's a 216-acre artificial paradise off the coast of Miami that markets itself as 'an indulgent retreat for those who appreciate the ultimate in privacy and exclusivity.'
Accessible only by helicopter or boat, and with an average price tag of $7.2 million a home, when residents step onto the rarified sands of Fisher Island, they do so safe in the satisfying knowledge that they just entered the wealthiest zip code in America.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bilt hits $10.75bn valuation
Bilt hits $10.75bn valuation

Finextra

time21 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Bilt hits $10.75bn valuation

Neighbourhood loyalty platform Bilt has raised $250 million in primary funding, sending its valuation soaring to $10.75 billion. 0 The round was led by General Catalyst and GID with further investment from United Wholesale Mortgage and more than triples Bilt's valuation from a $150 million round just a year ago. Launched in 2021, Bilt began as the first platform enabling US consumers to earn rewards on their largest monthly expenditure - rent - and then use the rewards via a card at local merchants. The firm's network of homes has now signed one in four apartment buildings across the United States and partnered with over 40,000 merchants nationwide. It has also grown from a card business into a full loyalty ecosystem, with more than 85% of members now using its platform via ACH, debit cards, credit cards, and more. Meanwhile, it drives business to merchants in its local network through an AI-powered 'neighbourhood concierge' that introduces members to those merchants and offers personalized recommendations. With new funding in place, Bilt is now expanding to all housing categories: condo, student housing and mortgage payments. Says CEO Ankur Jain: "What makes Bilt special isn't just our scale—it's our flywheel effect. More properties in our network attract more merchants, which creates more value for residents, which attracts more properties. This virtuous cycle, powered by our AI-driven commerce platform and comprehensive merchant integrations, creates an ecosystem that becomes stronger with each new participant."

Electricity companies plot massive 142% bill hike despite increasing risk of blackouts
Electricity companies plot massive 142% bill hike despite increasing risk of blackouts

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Electricity companies plot massive 142% bill hike despite increasing risk of blackouts

Major electricity companies are plotting a 142 percent bill increase for individual consumers to pass on the cost of energy guzzling data centers. The booming demand for data centers is being driven by the relentless rise of AI in every area of life. Power providers have asked regulators to approve $29 billion in rate increases in the first half of the year. The figures mark a 142 percent rise on the hikes seen in the same period last year, according to a new report. It comes as President Donald Trump's Energy Secretary warned that the demand of data centers could inflict 800 hours of energy blackouts a year by 2030. 'This report affirms what we already know: The United States cannot afford to continue down the unstable and dangerous path of energy subtraction previous leaders pursued,' Secretary Chris Wright said in a statement. 'In the coming years, America's reindustrialization and the AI race will require a significantly larger supply of around-the-clock, reliable, and uninterrupted power,' he explained. Among those set to hike prices is National Grid, which serves customers in New York and Massachusetts. The company was given the green light by regulators to hike consumer's bills by $50 a month - a total windfall of $708 million. 'What we're seeing is a deer-in-headlights dynamic,' Charles Hua, executive director of PowerLines, an energy affordability advocacy group that compiled the report, told the Financial Times. 'A lot of states don't have a playbook for how they can meet rising [data center] demand while balancing affordability and utility bills.' PG&E, which serves 5.5 million billpayers across California, requested permission for a $3.1 billion bill hike in April. The request was followed swiftly by a $834 million proposal to regulators by Texas provider Oncor, which provides energy to 13 million households. Utility giants insist the bill increases will go towards repairing damaged infrastructure which is being battered by the effects of climate change. Investment is also needed to upgrade the ageing electricity grid to meet the demands of rapid growth. However, consumer advocates argue the electricity demands of AI and its data centers are being billed to ordinary Americans rather than corporations. While some utility companies are charging big energy users such as data centers large-load fees, it is not clear how evenly the costs are being distributed as most deals take place in private. 'These closed door proceedings are problematic as the regulator doesn't get the benefit of multiple parties weighing in and we don't know,' Ari Peskoe, director at Harvard Law School's electricity law initiative, told the FT. 'Meanwhile the utility is spending billions of dollars on infrastructure,' he added.

How well your stock market portfolio performs depends on whether you vote red or blue
How well your stock market portfolio performs depends on whether you vote red or blue

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

How well your stock market portfolio performs depends on whether you vote red or blue

The success of investors' stock market portfolios is increasingly dependent on how they vote, new research has found. Americans are increasingly buying and selling stocks based on their political associations with profound consequences for their portfolios. There is currently a 47 percentage point gap between Republicans thinking stocks will rise in the next six months compared to their more bearish Democrat peers. Meanwhile Democrats who expect stocks to fall over the next six months exceed Republicans by 59 percentage points. It is the largest sentiment gap on the stock market's trajectory since 2001, according to Gallup data. This 'optimism' gap is leading both political persuasions to make different trading decisions. Wealthy individuals who voted red or blue are also increasingly buying different stocks, The Wall Street Journal reported. Investors who lean towards the Democrats are selling off American assets, fearful that Trump's policies are going to tank the stock market. However those who voted for the Republicans, and are more optimistic about the market's chances, are buying or sticking with American companies. Buying and selling based on political beliefs can be disastrous. For example, those who sold as Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements sent stocks on a 20 percent plunge would have lost out on a full recovery to all-time highs. The long-term consequences can be even more dramatic. Investing $1,000 in 1953 but only holding stock when a Republican was president would yield $29,000 today, according to Paul Hickey at Bespoke Investment Group. Doing the same but only investing when a Democrat was in the White House would roughly double the sum. However, neither strategy would beat simply buying and holding throughout the entire period, which would leave the investor with $1.9 million today. The divide between Red and Blue voters' portfolios began in 2013 under Barack Obama's presidency. The gap continued to widen in the following years following Trump's election in 2016, according to Elena Pikulina who collected and studied data from more than 300 independent investment advisers. Some Americans are looking to pull all of their assets out of the US Others are convinced the stock market will thrive under Trump's administration Financial advisor David Sadkin says his clients' stock market views depend on who they voted for Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs sent stocks nose-diving, but they have since recovered 'If I know how people voted, I could tell you how they feel about the stock market,' David Sadkin, partner at Bel Air Investment Advisors, told the Journal. Sadkin recalled how one of his wealthy clients, who do not approve of the President, inquired about moving all their assets abroad because they were afraid they would sink under Trump's second term. On the other hand, Trump voter Bruce Besten, 68, told the Journal that he believes his investments will do well under the current administration. 'In general, when a person with his mindset is in office, it's good for the business environment,' the restaurant owner from Louisville, Kentucky explained. 'What's good for the business environment is good for the stock market.' He told the outlet that media 'hype' about how tariffs would batter the economy created buying opportunities for him during the market collapse in April, when he bought American stocks including Nvidia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store