logo
How well your stock market portfolio performs depends on whether you vote red or blue

How well your stock market portfolio performs depends on whether you vote red or blue

Daily Mail​2 days ago
The success of investors' stock market portfolios is increasingly dependent on how they vote, new research has found.
Americans are increasingly buying and selling stocks based on their political associations with profound consequences for their portfolios.
There is currently a 47 percentage point gap between Republicans thinking stocks will rise in the next six months compared to their more bearish Democrat peers.
Meanwhile Democrats who expect stocks to fall over the next six months exceed Republicans by 59 percentage points.
It is the largest sentiment gap on the stock market's trajectory since 2001, according to Gallup data.
This 'optimism' gap is leading both political persuasions to make different trading decisions.
Wealthy individuals who voted red or blue are also increasingly buying different stocks, The Wall Street Journal reported.
Investors who lean towards the Democrats are selling off American assets, fearful that Trump's policies are going to tank the stock market. However those who voted for the Republicans, and are more optimistic about the market's chances, are buying or sticking with American companies.
Buying and selling based on political beliefs can be disastrous.
For example, those who sold as Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements sent stocks on a 20 percent plunge would have lost out on a full recovery to all-time highs.
The long-term consequences can be even more dramatic.
Investing $1,000 in 1953 but only holding stock when a Republican was president would yield $29,000 today, according to Paul Hickey at Bespoke Investment Group.
Doing the same but only investing when a Democrat was in the White House would roughly double the sum.
However, neither strategy would beat simply buying and holding throughout the entire period, which would leave the investor with $1.9 million today.
The divide between Red and Blue voters' portfolios began in 2013 under Barack Obama's presidency.
The gap continued to widen in the following years following Trump's election in 2016, according to Elena Pikulina who collected and studied data from more than 300 independent investment advisers.
Some Americans are looking to pull all of their assets out of the US
Others are convinced the stock market will thrive under Trump's administration
Financial advisor David Sadkin says his clients' stock market views depend on who they voted for
Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs sent stocks nose-diving, but they have since recovered
'If I know how people voted, I could tell you how they feel about the stock market,' David Sadkin, partner at Bel Air Investment Advisors, told the Journal.
Sadkin recalled how one of his wealthy clients, who do not approve of the President, inquired about moving all their assets abroad because they were afraid they would sink under Trump's second term.
On the other hand, Trump voter Bruce Besten, 68, told the Journal that he believes his investments will do well under the current administration.
'In general, when a person with his mindset is in office, it's good for the business environment,' the restaurant owner from Louisville, Kentucky explained.
'What's good for the business environment is good for the stock market.'
He told the outlet that media 'hype' about how tariffs would batter the economy created buying opportunities for him during the market collapse in April, when he bought American stocks including Nvidia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. citizen who helped Russia from inside Ukraine granted passport by Putin
U.S. citizen who helped Russia from inside Ukraine granted passport by Putin

NBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • NBC News

U.S. citizen who helped Russia from inside Ukraine granted passport by Putin

, a U.S. citizen who helped the Kremlin target Ukrainian troops and was then spirited out of eastern Ukraine by Russian special forces, has received a Russian passport in Moscow. Russian state television broadcast a report on Tuesday showing Martindale, with a trim beard and dressed in a suit and tie, smiling as he received his new documents. 'I, Daniel Richard Martindale, voluntarily and consciously, accepting the citizenship of the Russian Federation, swear to observe the constitution,' he said in Russian. 'The belief that Russia is not just my home, but also my family — I am extremely glad that this is not only in my heart, but also by law,' Martindale told television cameras, holding up the Russian passport. Martindale grew up on farms in upstate New York and Indiana, the child of missionaries who later moved to rural China, according to a Wall Street Journal report. A brief trip over the border into Russia's Far East during the family's time in China sparked Martindale's interest in Russia. In 2018, Martindale, now in his early 30s, moved to Vladivostok, a Russian port city on the Pacific, where he studied Russian and taught English, before being deported a year later for violating labour laws, the Journal said. He moved to southern Poland, but was keen to return to Russia, the Journal said. In 2022, Martindale entered Ukraine just days before President Vladimir Putin ordered thousands of troops into Ukraine. Martindale told reporters at a press conference last November that he established contact with pro-Russian forces via Telegram and passed them information on Ukrainian military facilities from the Donetsk region in the country's east. Reuters was not able to contact Martindale to ask about his motivation for helping Russia. A spokesperson for the U.S. embassy in Moscow did not immediately reply to a request for comment. On Tuesday, Denis Pushilin, the Moscow-installed leader of the Russian-controlled part of Donetsk region, presented Martindale with his Russian documents, which he said were awarded by a decree from Putin. Pushilin expressed gratitude to Martindale, saying some of the information he had shared formed the basis for Russian planning to seize Kurakhove, a town near the key Ukrainian logistics hub of Pokrovsk. Martindale 'has long since proven with his loyalty and actions that he is one of us.' 'For us, this (the Russian passport) is a sign of respect and a sign of gratitude for what Daniel has done.'

Gov. Gavin Newsom unloads on ‘son of a b***h' Trump over ‘Newcsum' moniker
Gov. Gavin Newsom unloads on ‘son of a b***h' Trump over ‘Newcsum' moniker

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Gov. Gavin Newsom unloads on ‘son of a b***h' Trump over ‘Newcsum' moniker

California Gov. Gavin Newsom launched a broadside against President Trump Monday, calling him a 'son of a b*****' for the president' s frequently used moniker 'Gavin Newscum.' The governor told podcast host Shawn Ryan about his values to begin the show, saying, 'I'm not anti-gun at all. He then drilled down that he was more concerned about 'common sense around background checks and age appropriateness. He then moved on to chastise Trump for branding him 'Gavin Newscum' and said the matter had now led to his child receiving taunts in school. 'I don't like bullies. It goes to why I have strong opinions about Trump, man. It's like it triggers me. All of us have that. I don't like people talking down to people, past people. I don't like people exploiting weakness,' Newsom said. 'That's what I don't like about this son of a *****. I don't. And forgive me, I know he's the president of the United States, yeah, he calls me 'Newscum', yeah, come on. How do I explain that to my kid?' Newsom went on to scold Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who brushed off a conversation with Trump about Jeffrey Epstein at the weekend and who Newsom said is 'a son of a b***** in every goddamn campus, progressive parts of the country.' Just days before the interview, Newsom wrote 'Trump calls me 'Newscum' — but he's the real scum,' in response to a KTLA5 video of protestors and suspected raid targets, fleeing from tear gas being sprayed by officers in Camarillo, California on X. Moreover, Newsom told Ryan, 'I got my kid's friends calling my kids 'Newscum' – that I get because I was called that in seventh grade, but not by a 79-year-old.' He called on the president to 'model better, goddamn behavior, man,' adding, 'Forgive the goddamn, it's what I don't like about him.' Newsom said the feud between him and Trump would only ever be resolved 'when it doesn't get any attention,' but added that the administration is determined to 'test the boundaries.' In early June, Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration calling for an end to the 'illegal and unnecessary takeover of a CalGuard unit' during the LA riots, which erupted after controversial ICE raids in California. Newsom believes that Trump's heightened military response to the protests 'needlessly escalated chaos and violence in the Los Angeles region.' Equally, the governor claims the president failed to give him a 'heads up' the night before on the decision to deploy the National Guard, stating that he was left entirely in the dark. 'Not one f****** word on the topic,' Newsom said, claiming that the pair talked about everything the night before except the violence that was unfolding on LA streets at the time. 'He completely lied about that conversation and totally surprised me with the National Guard.' Newsom feels that the Trump administration is using the second presidential term as a 'petri dish' to test the limits of executive power.

Supreme Court allows Trump to dismantle education department
Supreme Court allows Trump to dismantle education department

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Supreme Court allows Trump to dismantle education department

The US Supreme Court let Donald Trump resume dismantling the department of education by lifting a lower court order that required the reinstatement of as many as 1,400 workers. Granting an emergency request from the administration over three dissents, the justices put on hold a federal district court ruling that said Mr Trump's purge would leave the department unable to perform duties required under US law. The Supreme Court order will apply while the case continues on appeal. The court's three liberals dissented. Writing for the group, Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the decision as 'indefensible' and said it gave the president 'the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out.' 'The majority is either wilfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave,' said Justice Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The ruling reinforces the Supreme Court's decision last week to let Mr Trump broadly move ahead with a push to dramatically reduce the size of the federal workforce. The July 8 decision didn't address the lawfulness of individual agency plans, and the latest ruling could boost the administration as it defends against legal challenges to those actions. Trump has 'ultimate authority' Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said in an emailed statement: 'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious. 'The president of the United States, as the head of the executive branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organisation, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies.' Ms McMahon announced on March 11 that the department was cutting half its staff through a reduction in force. Mr Trump followed with a March 20 executive order that said McMahon should 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the department of education.' The effort is being challenged in two lawsuits, one brought primarily by states led by Democrats and the other filed by several Massachusetts public school systems and unions. Skye Perryman, the president of Democracy Forward which represents schools and unions, said: 'Without explaining to the American people its reasoning, a majority of justices on the US Supreme Court have dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children.' The New York attorney general's office, which led the coalition of states, didn't immediately return requests for comment. US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled in May that the personnel cuts would 'likely cripple the department.' He said the challengers would probably succeed in showing that Mr Trump was effectively dissolving the department by getting rid of its employees, closing regional offices and moving programmes to other federal agencies. 'A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all,' Mr Joun wrote. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself.' The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's ruling, paving the way for Mr Trump's Supreme Court request. The case is the latest to address Mr Trump's authority to dismantle entities created by Congress, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the US Agency for International Development and the US Institute of Peace.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store