logo
Tariffs threaten Asian beauty product boom in US

Tariffs threaten Asian beauty product boom in US

NEW YORK (AP) — When Amrita Bhasin, 24, learned that products from South Korea might be subject to a new tax when they entered the United States, she decided to stock up on the sheet masks from Korean brands like U-Need and MediHeal she uses a few times a week.
'I did a recent haul to stockpile,' she said. 'I bought 50 in bulk, which should last me a few months.'
South Korea is one of the countries that hopes to secure a trade deal before the Aug. 1 date
President Donald Trump set
for enforcing nation-specific tariffs. A not-insignificant slice of the U.S. population has skin in the game when it comes to Seoul avoiding a 25% duty on its exports.
Asian skin care has been a booming global business for a more than a decade, with consumers in Europe, North and South America, and increasingly the Middle East, snapping up creams, serums and balms
from South Korea
, Japan and China.
In the United States and elsewhere, Korean cosmetics, or K-beauty for short, have dominated the trend. A craze for all-in-one 'BB creams' — a combination of moisturizer, foundation and sunscreen — morphed into a fascination with
10-step rituals
and ingredients like snail mucin, heartleaf and rice water.
Vehicles
and electronics may be South Korea's top exports to the U.S. by value, but the country shipped more
skin care
and cosmetics to the U.S. than any other last year, according to data from market research company Euromonitor. France, with storied beauty brands
like L'Oreal
and Chanel, was second, Euromonitor said.
Statistics compiled by the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency, show the U.S. imported $1.7 billion worth of South Korean cosmetics in 2024, a 54% increase from a year earlier.
'Korean beauty products not only add a lot of variety and choice for Americans, they really embraced them because they were offering something different for American consumers,' Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said.
Along with media offerings
such as 'Parasite'
and 'Squid Games,' and the popularity of
K-pop bands like BTS
, K-beauty has helped boost South Korea's profile globally, she said.
'It's all part and parcel really of the same thing,' Lovely said. 'And it can't be completely stopped by a 25% tariff, but it's hard to see how it won't influence how much is sold in the U.S. And I think what we're hearing from producers is that it also really decreases the number of products they want to offer in this market.'
Senti Senti, a retailer that sells international beauty products at two New York boutiques and through an e-commerce site, saw a bit of 'panic buying' by customers when Trump
first imposed
punitive tariffs on goods from specific countries, manager Winnie Zhong said.
The rush slowed down after the president paused the new duties for 90 days and hasn't picked up again, Zhong said, even with Trump
saying on July 7
that a 25% tax on imports from Japan and South Korea would go into effect on Aug. 1.
Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia subsequently
reached agreements
with the Trump administration that lowered the tariff rates their exported goods faced — in Japan's case, from 25% to 15% — still higher than the current baseline of 10% tariff.
But South Korea has yet to clinch an agreement, despite
having a free trade agreement
since 2012 that allowed cosmetics and most other consumer goods to enter the U.S. tax-free.
Since the first store owned by Senti Senti opened 16 years ago, beauty products from Japan and South Korea became more of a focus and now account for 90% the stock. The business hasn't had to pass on any tariff-related costs to customers yet, but that won't be possible if the products are subject to a 25% import tax, Zhong said.
'I'm not really sure where the direction of K-beauty will go to with the tariffs in place, because one of the things with K-beauty or Asian beauty is that it's supposed to be accessible pricing,' she said.
Devoted fans of Asian cosmetics will often buy direct from Asia and wait weeks for their packages to arrive because the products typically cost less than they do in American stores. Rather than stocking up on their favorite sunscreens, lip tints and toners, some shoppers are taking a pause due to the tariff uncertainty.
Los Angeles resident Jen Chae, a content creator with over 1.2 million YouTube subscribers, has explored Korean and Japanese beauty products and became personally intrigued by Chinese beauty brands over the last year.
When the tariffs were first announced, Chae temporarily paused ordering from sites such as
YesStyle.com
, a shopping platform owned by an e-commerce company based in Hong Kong. She did not know if she would have to pay customs duties on the products she bought or the ones brands sent to her as a creator.
'I wasn't sure if those would automatically charge the entire package with a blanket tariff cost, or if it was just on certain items,' Chae said. On its website, YesStyle says it will give customers store credit to reimburse them for import charges.
At Ohlolly, an online store focused on Korean products, owners Sue Greene and Herra Namhie are taking a similar pause.
They purchase direct from South Korea and from licensed wholesalers in the U.S., and store their inventory in a warehouse in Ontario, California. After years of no duties, a 25% import tax would create a 'huge increase in costs to us,' Namhie said.
She and Greene made two recent orders to replenish their stock when the tariffs were at 10%. But they have put further restocks on hold 'because I don't think we can handle 25%,' Namhie said. They'd have to raise prices, and then shoppers might go elsewhere.
The business owners and sisters are holding out on hope the U.S. and Korea settle on a lower tariff or carve out exceptions for smaller ticket items like beauty products. But they only have two to four months of inventory in their warehouse. They say that in a month they'll have to make a decision on what products to order, what to discontinue and what prices will have to increase.
Rachel Weingarten, a former makeup artist who writes a daily beauty newsletter called 'Hello Gorgeous!,' said while she's devoted to K-beauty products like lip masks and toner pads, she doesn't think stockpiling is a sound practice.
'Maybe one or two products, but natural oils, vulnerable packaging and expiration dates mean that your products could go rancid before you can get to them,' she said.
Weingarten said she'll still buy Korean products if prices go up, but that the beauty world is bigger than one country. 'I'd still indulge in my favorites, but am always looking for great products in general,' she said.
Bhasin, in Menlo Park, California, plans to keep buying her face masks too, even if the price goes up, because she likes the quality of Korean masks.
'If prices will go up, I will not shift to U.S. products,' she said. 'For face masks, I feel there are not a ton of solid and reliable substitutes in the U.S.'
___
AP audience engagement editor Karena Phan in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump trade wins leave voters, businesses wanting more
Trump trade wins leave voters, businesses wanting more

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump trade wins leave voters, businesses wanting more

The Trump administration has struck trade pacts in recent months that seem to benefit the U.S. over its trading partners, giving President Trump ample opportunity to tout his dealmaking skills. But Americans don't appear to be giving him a pat on the back as the U.S. starts to feel the impact of tariffs already imposed. Recent polls show the president's job approval rating slipping to the lowest point of his second term and his tariff policy only satisfying about 36 percent of those surveyed, according to an Emerson College poll. While consumer confidence is improving, there is anxiety among the public that Trump's tariffs on goods will ultimately be passed down from company to consumer. Consumer confidence increased from 95.2 to 97.2 in June, according to The Conference Board survey, and the expectations for consumer confidence in the future rated from 69.9 to 74.4. But the business group said consumers are still nervous about the end result of Trump's trade battles, The Wall Street Journal reported. Inflation also ticked up to a 2.6-percent annual increase in June from 2.3 percent in the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures price index, exceeding expectations of economists for a 2.5 percent increase. Businesses are bracing for what the threats mean and what the deals entail, while many of them have been struck within just a week of the tariffs being put into place to avoid Trump setting higher rates himself. 'They're not genuine trade agreements of the traditional sort, which are a voluntary in nature— countries negotiate, agree, sign, and then ratify,' said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum. He added, 'These are handshake agreements at the point of a gun, and I don't see that as a particularly durable way to think about trade policy. So, we'll see how that plays out.' Meanwhile, an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to reach tariff deals with the U.S. or risk the Trump administration imposing 'reciprocal tariffs' looms. Trump struck trade deals with the European Union and Japan to impose a 15 percent tariff on both nations. He also announced a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, imposing a 15 percent on goods from there as well. For countries that don't have deals, Trump said they would face a tariff between 15 and 20 percent. He has also threatened a 35 percent tariff on Canada, one of many major U.S. trading partners that haven't struck a deal yet. The White House has eagerly touted Trump's dealmaking spree while laughing off the dire predictions from economists, who are bracing for a much bigger hit from new import taxes. 'What we are watching is President Trump rebuilding the greatest economy in the history of the world and simultaneously providing the so-called economic experts wrong at every turn,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Those wins are coming as Trump's approval rating dropped to 40 percent in the latest Economist/YouGov poll and just over 44 percent in the Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ) average. Meanwhile, Trump received a 34 percent approval rating on his handling of inflation and prices in The Economist/YouGov poll released this week. The majority of Americans also said Trump's tariffs will increase prices, with only seven percent of those surveyed saying they will have no effect. 'The average voter doesn't follow trade deals, but only what things cost and what they're paid, and these big deal announcements — though promising — have not yet impacted anyone's day-to-day,' said Bruce Mehlman, who served as assistant secretary of Commerce for technology policy under former President George W. Bush. Trump has stood firm on the Aug. 1 deadline, after punting it several times since he first rolled out the 'reciprocal tariffs' April 2. The tariff plan was paused a week later, following intense pressure from Wall Street and Republicans to ease the chaotic markets at the time. 'The White House is trying to declare victory on the process. But the real question is whether the policy is a good idea or not,' said Holtz-Eakin. 'They will be judged on that outcome and what it does to the economy.' The impact on prices will be seen before the end of the year, once the tariffs hit companies and if companies pass them along to consumers, he said. 'The two big moments are going to be school and Christmas shopping. Those are the ultimate litmus tests. And I think over the next two quarters, third and fourth quarter, we'll see the shape of the impacts— in the next six months,' said Holtz-Eakin. Many of Trump's trade deals, including with the Philippines and Indonesia, include that U.S. exports will not face tariffs, which gave Trump the sweeter side of the deal. Leavitt on Thursday cited that the European Union trade deal includes the same open market for American goods. 'The deal guarantees that American businesses will have unprecedented levels of access to the European Union markets to export our American made goods,' Leavitt said. Monica Gorman, former special assistant to President Biden for manufacturing and industrial policy, said that opening markets to American goods is encouraging, but now depends on how the private sector responds. 'We'll just need to see if business investment in the U.S. follows, and we see expansion in manufacturing and expansion in other areas that's going to drive exports. Certainly that could be an engine of economic growth, but I think to date, we're actually seeing businesses pulling back because of the uncertainty,' Gorman said. The uncertainty is exacerbated by the last-minute changes from the administration— Trump announced on Thursday that Mexico's tariffs would be punted by 90-days— and on the lack of details about each trade deal. Trump also declared on Wednesday, after months of administration officials claiming a deal was imminent, that he would impose a 25 percent tariff on India and slap on a penalty for buying military equipment and energy from Russia amid the war in Ukraine.

Bipartisan pair of senators seek billions in new Ukraine aid
Bipartisan pair of senators seek billions in new Ukraine aid

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bipartisan pair of senators seek billions in new Ukraine aid

A bipartisan pair of senators introduced legislation Thursday calling for tens of billions of dollars in aid for Ukraine to be spent over the next two years, as Russian President Vladimir Putin rebuffs calls from President Trump to halt the war. The bill was introduced by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a member of the Appropriations Committee, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a member of the Appropriations Committee. The top line figure for the bill comes in at over $50 billion, according to Shaheen's office. The Shaheen-Murkowski bill comes as the Senate Appropriations Committee advanced on Thursday a defense funding bill with $1 billion in military assistance related to Ukraine. Still, the bill's passage faces long odds in the Republican-controlled Congress, where GOP leaders in the House and Senate have deferred to Trump over which legislation makes it to the floor. The administration has slashed foreign aid so far, and administration officials and some GOP lawmakers regularly rally against sending U.S. military and assistance abroad. While Congress approved $60 billion in Ukraine funding in April 2024, 18 senators voted against it, including Vice President Vance, then the Republican senator from Ohio. And Senate Majority Leader John Thune has held back putting on the floor a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill — with a veto-proof majority of co-sponsors — at the request of Trump, who wants to decide when to impose sanctions on Russia if Moscow fails to negotiate an end to the war. Trump has set an Aug. 8 deadline. But Shaheen and Murkowski are framing their legislation as giving Trump additional tools to force Putin to the negotiating table — by scaling up Ukraine's military capabilities to withstand Russian attacks. The legislation also sets up guardrails to protect against executive action limiting assistance to Ukraine. The language responds to Trump's decision in March to pause intelligence sharing to Ukraine for one week after a public spat with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, and a decision by the Pentagon earlier this month to pause certain weapons transfers to Ukraine pending a review. Shaheen and Murkowski's legislation provides billions of dollars in direct military assistance to Ukraine, but much of the funding is intended for investing in military production in the U.S., and also seeks novel ways of raising funds to pay for support for Kyiv. This includes using interest earned from frozen Russian assets in the U.S. to fund assistance for Kyiv, sending to Ukraine 'seized,' 'illicit' weapons from non-state actors or using the sale of those weapons to fund military equipment for Ukraine, and prioritizing American military production for purchases by U.S.-allies to then be sent to Ukraine. The bill also codifies Trump's so-called minerals deal with Ukraine, called the Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, which was established in May. U.S. military assistance to Ukraine is expected to be counted as a U.S. contribution into the fund. Direct funding for military assistance for Ukraine includes $30 billion lasting until 2027 and provides $3 billion in Foreign Military Financing for Ukraine over the next two fiscal years. The bill increases the Presidential Drawdown Authority from $100 million to $6 billion each year, allowing the U.S. to pull directly from Pentagon weapons stockpiles to send to Ukraine, with the money to pay for backfilling those stocks. The bill also provides $600 million for the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement to support Ukrainian law enforcement and anti-corruption programming. It provides $50 million for war crimes prosecutions. Shaheen and Murkowski also include $1 billion for a trilateral drone initiative — for research, development and production of drones with Ukraine and Taiwan — to learn lessons from Ukraine's fight against Russia. The bill also creates a task force 'to process lessons learned from Ukraine's fight, including modern warfighting doctrine' and how to counter U.S. vulnerabilities to drone attacks. 'This bipartisan bill is a win for America,' Shaheen said in a statement. 'It supports our defense industrial base, American manufacturers and workers — all while ensuring the U.S. military learns from Ukraine's battlefield innovations. Make no mistake: unprovoked violence against U.S. partners by would-be aggressors in the Kremlin and Beijing will be met by unshakable resolve from the U.S. and our allies.' 'I'm pleased to work with Senator Shaheen in introducing the Supporting Ukraine Act of 2025, which reaffirms our commitment to both Ukraine's sovereignty and America's national interests,' Murkowski said in a statement. 'By providing critical funding for military and humanitarian assistance, this legislation ensures Ukraine can continue to resist Russia's illegal and brutal war.' She added, 'We are also incorporating the use of seized Russian assets to hold aggressors accountable, while strengthening America's military preparedness by applying valuable battlefield insights from Ukraine's fight and sharing these lessons with critical partners like Taiwan. It's time to reaffirm our leadership on the world stage and show that our support for our allies is unwavering.'

White House conducts de-Muskification at GSA
White House conducts de-Muskification at GSA

Politico

time25 minutes ago

  • Politico

White House conducts de-Muskification at GSA

In recent days, the White House has detailed to GSA nine employees — who are seen as more Trump institutionalists than the unconventional tech bros Musk favored — from the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management, according to internal agency records and a third person familiar with the matter. It is a clear attempt by the White House to water down the influence of DOGE staffers from Musk's orbit, including Ehikian, Josh Gruenbaum and Thomas Shedd at agencies like GSA, where their control was significant. 'All parties involved after the President's appointment of Mike Rigas as Acting Administrator are working collaboratively to ensure GSA continues delivering the best value in real estate, acquisition, and technology services to the government and the American people,' GSA spokesperson Marianne Copenhaver said, acknowledging that Rigas' appointment marked a shift for the agency. Last month, former DOGE operation lead Steve Davis attempted to retain influence over employees at GSA by leading a DOGE meeting on the sixth floor of the building — despite no longer being an employee there. Gruenbaum remains highly involved at GSA, the second person familiar with the internal dynamics of the agency told West Wing Playbook. He comes to the GSA office regularly and just closed a deal with more expected to come, the person said. (GSA and Docusign today announced a deal on price reductions for government tools.) But most of the people who were recently detailed over from OMB and OPM to GSA have worked with Rigas before and have ties to Trump's first administration — not to Musk's world. 'The direction of the DOGE team makes a lot of sense. But what the DOGE team lacks is that staying power,' a GSA official told West Wing Playbook. 'We want to make sure that these aren't just short-term, mid-term goals, that these goals have a lifespan beyond what a DOGE life cycle may end up being.' Stephen Billy, a senior advisor at OMB, also served under Russ Vought in OMB during the tail end of Trump's first term. Billy is also listed as a contributor to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's blueprint to the president's second-term agenda. The former director of intergovernmental affairs for three years in Trump's first term, Doug Hoelscher, was also detailed from OPM to GSA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store