Prime Minister Chris Luxon faces questions on building product investment, immigration numbers
He will join Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking at 7.30am.
It comes after Luxon said the Government would be increasing the number of building products available in New Zealand, including plasterboard, cladding systems, external doors and windows.
He made the announcement at the weekend with Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk, who said thousands of overseas building products had been given the green light for construction.
'[This ends] costly monopolies on a small number of products that are currently used in New Zealand,' Penk said.
'It is 50% more expensive to build a standalone home in New Zealand than in Australia. That is frankly outrageous.'
Luxon is also expected to face heat this week from NZ First leader Winston Peters, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, over his concerns about the number of migrants entering New Zealand.
Peters said he is observing an 'alarming development' overseas where 'careless immigration policies' are 'transforming cities' and 'changing centuries of development and social life'.
He referred to his party as 'nationalist' while his coalition partners are 'globalists', and believes Kiwis are increasingly worried about immigration issues.
'We intend to turn that problem into a success story, so people do understand that, when you're coming here, there are some fundamental things you need to sign up to,' he said. 'If you don't want to sign up to it, don't come.'
Meanwhile, Luxon's new hotline to curb overzealous road cone use has come under scrutiny, with a chief executive of a traffic management company saying he is very doubtful it will work.
Traffic management planning company Parallaxx helps train WorkSafe staff for the hotline, but chief executive Dave Tilton is sceptical of the concept, partly due to the number of people a report needs to go through before action is taken.
'We absolutely have oversupply [of road cones] beyond the minimum without question ... but I'm very doubtful that this particular thread [the hotline] is going to bear fruit in fixing it.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Government's cost of living speech 'more spin than a front load washing machine'
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The Labour Party says a cost of living "sermon" by National Party Ministers reeks of desperation and spin. The government is on the defensive over its efforts to mitigate the cost of living, even as it announces fresh measures to save voters cash. On Monday, the coalition promised to legislate a ban on surcharges for contactless card payments from no later than May 2026. The Commerce Commission estimates New Zealanders are paying up to $150 million in surcharges each year - including $45 to $65 million in what it considers excessive charges. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said it was a worthwhile policy but the "most important" thing the coalition could do was to "double down" on its long term economic plan. The government spent the first 10 minutes of yesterday's post-Cabinet media briefing outlining actions it had already taken in this plan: tax relief in last year's budget, cutting government spending and scrapping plans to increase petrol taxes to name a few. Finance Minister Nicola Willis stressed these steps did not mean everything was fixed but said the coalition had managed to get the country "back on course" since getting into office. "We know many people are still doing it tough and the economy is recovering from a protracted downturn. However, we know that the fundamental changes we are making will deliver," she said. "Economies are like oil tankers. You can't turn them around on a dime, but New Zealand is back on course." [h ] 'Out of touch' - Hipkins The latest Ipsos Issues Monitor survey saw Labour overtake National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living . This was despite the Labour Party releasing no substantial new policy since the election. Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Opposition leader Chris Hipkins was quick to criticise the government's briefing, saying no amount of spin could convince the public they were better off. "According to the sermon that we just heard from Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon, New Zealanders just don't understand the genius of their plan. "Things are supposedly getting better, according to them. I think it shows just how out of touch they are with the reality facing the vast majority of New Zealanders." Hipkins said there were now 18,000 fewer people working in construction, more people heading over to Australia and higher unemployment rates compared to the last election day. "No amount of spin from them is going to change the reality that things are getting worse for New Zealanders under their leadership. "I think we should start calling them Fisher and Paykel, because they've got more spin than a front load washing machine." Hipkins took aim at the government's move to hike director fees for the 22 Crown-owned entities; in some cases by up to 80 percent. "Increasing the pay of some of the best paid New Zealanders at a time when the majority of Kiwi families are struggling just to make ends meet shows just how out of touch they are." Luxon said public sector director fees had gotten "completely out of whack" compared to private sector fees and the government needed to be able to attract good people into public roles. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
13 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
MP ‘ill-informed' on seesaw
A National MP has been accused of getting his facts wrong after slamming council spending on a central Dunedin seesaw. In a social media post published on Thursday, Tauranga MP Sam Uffindell criticised the Dunedin City Council for wasting ratepayer money on "stupid vanity projects". He claimed the council had spent $600,000 on a seesaw as part of an inner city playground built during upgrades to George St. "The message to local government is clear: get your costs under control — Kiwis are doing it tough." "I mean, how stupid do you have to be," he asked. Reaction from social media commenters was mixed — some were supportive while others pointed out the overall playground feature had cost less than $600,000 in total. The council said the play space cost $586,000 and also featured "talk tubes", benches and shading and soft-fall surfaces. Invoices showed the three seesaws in the playground — a 7m-long, 12m-long and inclusive seesaw — together cost $244,700. The council had received a $250,000 donation from lead contractor Isaac Construction to go towards the cost of the playground. Cr Christine Garey said Mr Uffindell was "ill-informed" — "but that's not a surprise". Children and families loved the playground feature of George St, she said. "This decision was made long before the cost of living crisis that was caused by his government. "Did he talk about the huge cost of government regulation imposed by central government on local government? I doubt it." Cr Andrew Whiley said he and Mr Uffindell attended the same event when the MP was in Dunedin earlier this month where the topic of the seesaws came up. "I quickly said, 'well, actually, councillors never signed off on the seesaws'," Cr Whiley said. "I made it quite clear to him that actually councillors had not seen or had the ability to review that prior to it being installed and being signed off by council staff." Councillors had seen and noted a plan for the play space at an extraordinary planning and environment committee in April 2022, but it did not include the seesaws, Cr Whiley said. "I never basically understood [how] the playground went from what was in our papers to being what it was finished." Council central city plan project director Glen Hazelton said councillors voted to note the report in 2022, "including the details on the play space". The council was "disappointed" by Mr Uffindell's comments. "The total cost of the entire play space on George St was $586,000," he said. "At less than 1% of the total budget for George St, we believe the investment in a more people-friendly space is good value for money." "A number of new retail tenants coming to George St have noted the improvements that make the area more people-friendly, including the play space, as the reason for relocating," Dr Hazelton said.
Newsroom
15 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Where to draw the line on terror
The Government is eyeing an overhaul of the country's terrorism legislation, which is necessary, it says, to keep New Zealanders safe in a rapidly evolving world and keep pace with modern threats. However, critics are warning the move could come at a steep price, specifically a loss of civil liberties. The proposed changes, still in the closed-door consultation phase with a handpicked selection of groups and experts, would give police and intelligence agencies broader powers to intervene earlier, redefine what constitutes a 'terrorist act' and expand preventative detention powers, all in the name of public safety. Today, The Detail speaks with Newsroom national affairs editor Sam Sachdeva and University of Waikato terrorism and firearms expert Alexander Gillespie about the potential changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act and how the Government will balance risk without resorting to overreach. 'What this is really about is are our current terror laws fit for purpose, and where do we draw the line between dealing with the very real threat that is posed by terrorist groups and terrorists, while still preserving the fundamental political freedoms and rights and liberties that all New Zealanders hold dear,' Sachdeva tells The Detail. He says critics, worried that those freedoms and rights are now at risk, are fired up. 'Look, they are. We have seen the Council for Civil Liberties, [and] the Free Speech Union has now come out as well, expressing some concern about this. 'So, it's early stages, but it seems like it's something that could quite easily animate or light a fire under a lot of these rights groups who are concerned.' The terror law, enacted in 2002 following the September 11 terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. Minor changes were made after the March 15 terror attack in 2019 and the New Lynn Countdown Supermarket attack in 2021. Sachdeva says among the new potential changes are making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities – including showing insignia – and modernising definitions for terms like 'material support' to capture new online forms of support. Extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present, is also being considered. The Government says there will be safeguards and judicial oversight. The proposed changes are expected to go before Parliament later this year. Professor of International Law Al Gillespie, speaking to The Detail from Vienna, where he is working on gun reforms, says the threat of a terror attack has long lingered in New Zealand, and while the likelihood of another attack will never be zero, the risk can be lowered. 'Part of reducing that risk is making sure the law is as good as it can be. That the balance between civil liberties and risk is correct. And that we have proportionate penalties for those who are willing to advocate the use of violence against civilians to change policy. 'I support looking at it … I think it's foreseeable that the tensions in our society are going to be around for the foreseeable future. And to make sure they are fit for purpose, because when I look back at recent times, our laws weren't fit for purpose, and now we need to be thinking, 'What more can we do?'' While the debate on security versus liberty and protection versus principle will undoubtedly continue, one thing is certain – in the fight against terror, New Zealand is searching for a line, but it will not be easy to draw. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
