
The Charges Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia Collapsed in Court. Next Should Come Consequences
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
People interested in law and order in the United States are looking the wrong way. It's not the Supreme Court ending nationwide injunctions last week that should disturb us. It's the implosion of the Department of Justice's case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
The loss of nationwide injunctions will be followed by a tidal wave of class actions that will ultimately take the place of the individual suits, yet have the same national impact that the Court has just outlawed. Don't worry. The Supreme Court hasn't set the sky to falling.
A protester holds a photo of Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia as demonstrators gather to protest against the deportation of immigrants to El Salvador outside the Permanent Mission of El Salvador to the United Nations...
A protester holds a photo of Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia as demonstrators gather to protest against the deportation of immigrants to El Salvador outside the Permanent Mission of El Salvador to the United Nations on April 24, 2025, in New York City. More
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
But the Abrego Garcia struggle is over the soul of American justice. Under pressure, the Justice Department obeyed a court order to return him from El Salvador. But then the DOJ leadership doubled down on dumbness. It filed an indictment against Abrego Garcia with Attorney General Pam Bondi promising to prove he was a key figure in an alien smuggling ring. Justice Department lawyers asserted that Abrego Garcia was an MS-13 gang member who transported guns, and sexually abused migrant women.
Last week the case fell apart. The Justice Department used all the evidence it had to try to keep Abrego Garcia in prison pending a trial. A federal magistrate judge in Tennessee listened and then wrote a detailed and damning decision—ordering him released pending trial.
It turns out that the only support for the government claim that Abrego Garcia was a key figure in a gang-related adult and child smuggling ring comes from three people who are close relatives of one another and are facing deportation.
Two of them are expecting to stop their deportations in exchange for testifying, and their ringleader—a five-times deported and twice-convicted felon who admits smuggling aliens—has already been sprung from jail by the Justice Department and had his deportation stopped.
Despite their incentives to help Bondi, these three contradicted each other about Abrego Garcia's supposed membership in the MS-13 gang. One just said Abrego Garcia was "familial" with gang members. Another said, without taking an oath, that she "believed" Abrego Garcia was a gang member. The final witness suggested the opposite, noting that "there were no signs or markings, including tattoos, indicating that Abrego is an MS-13 member."
These cooperating but clumsy cons also preposterously reported that Abrego Garcia's smuggling involved driving 2,900 miles three or four times per week—over 120 hours at the wheel weekly—a figure almost physically impossible.
The government didn't even have the courage to bring its sole supporters to court where Abrego Garcia's lawyers might have cross-examined them. An ICE agent read their statements instead. No wonder the Tennessee magistrate judge, backed up by her supervising judge, ordered Abrego Garcia released.
Foolishly, the DOJ leadership then proved that it wasn't done ruining its reputation. After a ruling finding no credible evidence that Abrego Garcia smuggled anyone and which noted he had been charged with "smuggling" not "trafficking" a DOJ spokesperson declared that Abrego Garcia "has been charged with horrific crimes, including trafficking children, and will not walk free in our country again."
DOJ now insists that, if released, Abrego Garcia won't be arrested and deported immediately. Wisely, Abrego Garcia decided to stay in jail.
The DOJ exit strategy? Ultimately, it will drop the frivolous charges. They will then try to deport Abrego Garcia to somewhere like Somalia.
But that shouldn't be the end of the story. The DOJ lawyers who want to follow the law must win out against those willing to violate it. They know the department once enjoyed the highest reputation. It stood up to Richard Nixon, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden alike, but now its struggling. To rescue it, the courts must punish Pam Bondi and those who have maliciously prosecuted Abrego Garcia.
Bondi ordered the prosecution. Two lawyers signed the indictment papers filed in court. After the charges are dismissed, the Tennessee judge should summon all three of them to court to show cause why they shouldn't be disciplined under ethical rules forbidding frivolous filings.
Commenting on the charges against Abrego Garcia when she announced them, Bondi trumpeted about this train wreck, "This is what American justice looks like." Here's hoping she's wrong and that judges prove it to her.
Thomas G. Moukawsher is a former Connecticut complex litigation judge and a former co-chair of the American Bar Association Committee on Employee Benefits. He is the author of the book, The Common Flaw: Needless Complexity in the Courts and 50 Ways to Reduce It.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 21, 2025
The rundown: The issue of animal testing is something most Americans agree on: it needs to change and gradually be stopped. Since President Donald Trump began his second term, his administration has been making moves to transform and reduce animal testing in country. Find out what steps are being taken. Why it matters: In April, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that its animal testing requirement will be "reduced, refined, or potentially replaced" with a range of approaches, including artificial intelligence-based models, known as New Approach Methodologies or NAMs data. The Trump administration's efforts to tackle the issue of animal testing appear to be a step in the right direction, according to experts who spoke with Newsweek. Read more in-depth coverage: Over 300 Animals Removed From US Safari After Decade of Red Flags TL/DR: Millions of animals each year are killed in U.S. laboratories as part of medical training and chemical, food, drug and cosmetic testing. What happens now? A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) official told Newsweek: "The agency is paving the way for faster, safer, and more cost-effective treatments for American patients.' Deeper reading How Animal Testing in US Could Be Transformed Under Trump


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 23, 2025
The rundown: Iranian lawmakers have said blocking the strategic Strait of Hormuz could be one retaliatory response to U.S. and Israeli attacks, and have given symbolic approval to the decision. Find out how it will impact the global oil trade. Why it matters: If the Iranian government blocks passage through the Strait, Asian markets are expected to be most hit, but American markets will be too, with energy prices likely to rise. Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January following the U.S. strikes. Located between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, connecting to the wider Indian Ocean, the chokepoint on one of the world's busiest maritime routes is vital to global energy security and it handles roughly 20 percent of global oil trade. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China on Sunday to press Iran against closing the Strait following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Read more in-depth coverage: Oil Prices Jump, Stocks Fall After US Strikes Iran Nuclear Sites TL/DR: Since 2019, Iran has repeatedly used the Strait of Hormuz to apply pressure. What happens now? Iran has signaled that there will be a response to U.S. strikes, but has not said exactly what yet and whether that would include targeting shipping in the Strait or Hormuz. Deeper reading How Iran Could Close the Strait of Hormuz


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 19, 2025
The rundown: President Donald Trump has inched closer to ordering military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, approving operational attack plans while stopping short of authorizing an attack, The Wall Street Journal reported. Why it matters: Multiple sources said Trump remains undecided about launching strikes, amid doubts over whether American Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs could destroy Iran's deeply buried and heavily fortified Fordow nuclear plant near the city of Qom. Trump privately approved military plans for action against Iran but has so far withheld execution, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday. People familiar with the deliberations said the president was holding off to see whether Iran would halt its nuclear ambitions. Meanwhile, Israel and Iran exchanged air and missile strikes, intensifying already-severe regional tensions. Read more in-depth coverage: Iran Starts Firing Heavier Missiles in Israel Attacks TL/DR: The prospect of U.S. military action against Iran's nuclear infrastructure carries far-reaching consequences for American security interests, global energy markets, and the volatile Middle East region. What happens now? Trump is expected to continue consultations with security and defense officials in the coming days, weighing the risks of direct military involvement against Iran. Deeper reading Donald Trump Moves Closer to Bombing Iran