Senate Republicans release updated text for most of their megabill
Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' is in tatters. President Donald Trump still wants it on his desk by July 4. Here's everything that will have to go right to make that happen:
GOP senators and staff now believe Saturday is the earliest voting will start on the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged Thursday that parliamentarian rulings forcing Republicans to rewrite key provisions of the bill are throwing his timeline into chaos.
A Saturday vote would assume no more major procedural issues, but that is not assured: Republicans could run into trouble with their use of current policy baseline, the accounting tactic they want to use to zero out the cost of tax-cut extensions. Other adverse recommendations from Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough could force additional redrafts of Republicans' tax plans.
Even if Republicans resolve every outstanding issue with the parliamentarian in the next 24 hours, Thune needs to firm up his whip count. The cap on state provider taxes remains among the thorniest issues, with senators threatening to block debate on the megabill until the Medicaid financing issue is resolved.
If the Senate does vote Saturday to proceed, expect Democrats to use the bulk of their 10 hours of debate time, while Republicans forfeit most of theirs. Then comes the main event — vote-a-rama — which would set up likely final passage for sometime Sunday.
That starts the timer for the House. GOP leaders there have pledged to give members 48 hours' notice of a vote — and they have already advised the earliest that voting could happen is Monday evening. Republicans will have to adopt a rule before moving to debate and final passage.
But the House's timeline depends wholly on what condition the megabill is in when it arrives from the Senate. Groups of House Republicans are already drawing red lines on matters ranging from SALT to clean-energy tax credits to public land sales. The hope is that the Senate will take care of those concerns in one final 'wraparound' amendment at the end of vote-a-rama.
If they don't, House GOP leaders are adamant that there will need to be changes — likely pushing the timeline deep into July, or perhaps beyond. For one, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Thursday the Senate's slower phase-out of clean-energy tax credits 'will need to be reversed,' or else.
'If there are major modifications that we cannot accept, then we would go back to the drawing board, fix some of that and send it back over,' Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday. 'So we should avoid that process, if possible.'
What else we're watching:
— Senate war powers vote: Senators are expected to take an initial vote at 6 p.m. on Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution that would bar the president from taking further military action in Iran without congressional approval. Kaine believes Republicans will support the measure but won't say who or how many.
— House Iran briefing: House members will receive a briefing on the Iran conflict from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Gen. Dan Caine and CIA Director John Ratcliffe in the CVC auditorium at 9 a.m. This comes as some House lawmakers are mulling two competing war powers resolutions, which Johnson could attempt to quash in advance using a rule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill sets rules on sales tax hike
GUILFORD COUNTY — State Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, is pushing a bill through the N.C. General Assembly to set guidelines on how revenue from a quarter-cent sales tax increase could be spent if the referendum is approved by Guilford County voters in the November 2026 general election. Berger, whose district includes parts of Guilford County, said Thursday that the Senate approved an amended version of House Bill 305 that addresses the referendum issue. During its meeting June 18, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners unanimously voted to yet again place the measure before county voters. Voters have rejected the quarter-cent sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. While the commissioners have said they want to use the additional revenue to support education, existing law doesn't restrict the use of funds collected for education or any particular purpose, Berger said in a statement. House Bill 305 would specify funds collected through a quarter-cent sales tax increase can only be used for classroom teacher salary supplements, fire protection equipment and services, Guilford Technical Community College and a small amount for municipalities, Berger said. A quarter-cent sales tax increase is expected to generate $25 million annually. 'Voters going to the polls in November 2026 need to know exactly what they're being asked to vote on,' Berger said. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision. I believe putting strict guardrails on the revenue collected gives taxpayers relevant information and guarantees the funds will be used as promised.' Democratic Guilford County Board of Commissioners Chairman Skip Alston said that he welcomes Berger's initiative. Having the quarter-cent sales increase revenue specified for certain uses will reassure voters and make them more likely to cast a ballot for the referendum, Alston told The High Point Enterprise. House Bill 305 now goes back to the House for a concurrence approval vote. Since the legislation is a local bill, it isn't subject to veto oversight by Democratic Gov. Josh Stein.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pam Bondi fires three Jan. 6 prosecutors, sending another chill through DOJ workforce
WASHINGTON — At least three federal prosecutors who worked on cases against Jan. 6 rioters were fired Friday by the Justice Department, according to more than half a dozen current and former officials familiar with the dismissals. A copy of one of the dismissal letters seen by NBC News was signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, notifying the recipient that they were 'removed from federal service effective immediately.' No reason for the removal was stated in the letter. One of the fired employees had been based overseas. The Justice Department declined to comment Friday night. Follow live politics coverage here. The Trump administration in late January fired probationary federal prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases and prosecutors who worked on former special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into President Donald Trump. The administration also demoted some career prosecutors who worked on the Capitol siege investigation. Probationary workers are either recent hires or have taken new positions. The firings on Friday, though, marked the first time that career prosecutors who had worked Jan. 6 cases and who were past their probationary period of federal employment had been fired. It was also the first time Bondi fired Justice Department lawyers involved in prosecuting Jan. 6 cases. Bondi was confirmed by the Senate in February, after the dismissal of probationary prosecutors. The firings come at a time when the fallout from the Jan. 6 investigation — and Trump's subsequent mass pardon of even the most violent rioters — continues to loom over employees at both the Justice Department and the FBI. Numerous current and former officials have told NBC News that the targeting of people who worked on the largest investigation in FBI history have had a chilling effect on the Justice Department workforce, and would leave career prosecutors and FBI officials hesitant to pursue cases against any Trump allies for fear of being targeted by the administration. One federal law enforcement official called Friday's firings 'horrifying' and noted that both of the prosecutors had been serving in other capacities before the 2024 election. 'To fire them, without explanation, is a slap in the face not only to them, but to all career DOJ prosecutors,' the official said. 'No one is safe from this administration's whims and impulses. And the public certainly is not served by the continued brain drain of DOJ — we are losing the best among us every day.' This article was originally published on
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
General Mills (GIS) Slashes Revenue Forecast as Trump Tariffs Squeeze Margins
Of late, General Mills (GIS) can't catch a break. Despite this week's fiscal fourth quarter 2025 earnings report featuring a beat on earnings per share (EPS), its stock dropped due to concerns over the company's strategic reinvestments and the growing impact of U.S. trade policies. Indeed, the consumer food company expects flat-to-negative organic sales and a drop in adjusted operating profit for the upcoming fiscal year. As price data shows, investors have reacted negatively to this week's earnings news, causing GIS stock to decline by almost 6%. Confident Investing Starts Here: I believe that investors have every right to feel uneasy due to a combination of internal (volume loss in its key market) and external (Trump's tariffs) threats, making me cautiously Neutral on GIS stock. General Mills' Latest Financials In its fiscal fourth quarter, General Mills reported earnings per share of $0.74, surpassing analyst expectations of $0.71, while revenue met forecasts at $4.6 billion, a 3% year-over-year decline. Despite the earnings beat, shares of General Mills have declined and are now trading near 52-week lows. This reaction reflects a broader market trend: investor attention is typically more focused on forward-looking guidance than on backward-looking results, which is reasonable given that future performance carries more weight in valuation models. In that context, General Mills' cautious outlook for fiscal year 2026 has unsettled investors. The company expects organic sales growth to remain flat, with a range of -1% to 1%. However, the more significant concern was its guidance for adjusted operating profit, which is projected to decline by 10% to 15% in constant currency from the fiscal 2025 baseline of $3.4 billion. This anticipated drop is a result of a combination of internal and external challenges. Some of these pressures were already evident in the latest quarter. As TipRanks data shows, in its largest segment—North American Retail—net sales declined by 3%, despite volume remaining flat, indicating underlying pricing or mix issues that may persist. This dynamic signals a deliberate reduction in the average price per unit and aligns with the company's strategic focus on 'returning to volume growth.' However, slashing prices doesn't always translate into higher sales volumes, particularly when underlying brand challenges remain. To address this, General Mills is ramping up its advertising investments, a strategy that will likely support the company's upcoming expansion into the fresh pet food category under its Blue Buffalo brand. Trump Tariffs Stir Trouble for General Mills Increased Selling, General, & Administrative (SG&A) costs aren't alone to blame for General Mills' profitability woes. Donald Trump's infamous tariffs continue to be a significant external operating headwind for General Mills. In fact, much of the 10% to 15% operating profit can be associated with tariffs, given that many ingredients and packaging materials are imported from China, Canada, and Mexico. General Mills' Mitigation Strategy Founded in 1928, General Mills is well-equipped to navigate challenging environments and has several strategies in place to help manage current headwinds. One key initiative is its 'Holistic Margin Management' program, which targets cost savings of 4%–5% as a percentage of cost of goods sold (COGS). This effort could yield up to $100 million in savings by fiscal year 2026, helping to offset inflationary pressures on input costs. The company is also shifting focus toward higher-margin, higher-growth categories. A notable move in this direction is the recent divestiture of its yogurt brands, including Yoplait and Go-Gurt, to Lactalis and Sodiaal for $2.1 billion—a clear example of strategic portfolio realignment. This transaction not only simplifies operations but also provides additional capital to reinvest in innovation and brand development. As a result, the coming year is expected to emphasize product innovation and brand building, although these efforts may weigh on short-term profit margins. According to TipRanks data, GIS maintains a profit margin of ~13%. From a valuation perspective, General Mills' stock appears reasonably priced, trading at a forward P/E of 12.74 —approximately 32% below the Consumer Staples sector average. For comparison, The Hershey Company (HSY) trades at a P/E of 30.27, supported by more substantial EBITDA margins of 25.84% versus General Mills' 19.91%. Is GIS Stock Worth Buying? On Wall Street, General Mills carries a Hold consensus rating based on two Buy, nine Hold, and two Sell ratings over the past three months. GIS' average price target of $56 implies an 11% upside potential over the next twelve months. Earlier this month, Morgan Stanley analyst Megan Alexander assigned a Sell rating to GIS stock with a price target of $51. The analyst expressed caution due to the company's 'decelerating scanner data trends' and a 'decline in retail takeaway.' She also expects a 'high single-digit percentage decline in earnings per share (…), driven by several headwinds, including profit dilution from the yogurt divestiture, operating profit headwinds from resetting incentive compensation, and potential cost inflation impacts.' On the other side of the aisle, Bank of America Securities analyst Peter Galbo is more bullish on General Mills, issuing a Buy rating on its stock with a price target of $63. He highlighted operational improvements, including improved gross margins, and believes the company's guidance for FY26, which calls for a decline in operating profit and EPS, is 'manageable.' General Mills Faces Tough Choices with Strong Brands In conclusion, General Mills' strategy of prioritizing volume growth over near-term profitability has drawn mixed reactions, and with good reason. The company operates in a mature, highly competitive market, faces flat growth, and has limited flexibility in terms of margins. While its planned entry into the fresh pet food category is an encouraging step toward diversification, it's still unclear when—or if—the necessary investments to build and scale that brand will yield meaningful returns. Ultimately, this situation underscores a broader reality: even a legacy player like General Mills cannot rely solely on established brands. Continued relevance in the food industry requires ongoing innovation and investment. For income-focused investors, t he stock does offer a compelling 4.49% dividend yield. However, this alone may not justify the risk, particularly given that 10-Year Treasury Notes are offering comparable yields with far less volatility. At this point, General Mills' products may be more appealing on store shelves than its shares are in a portfolio.
