Vance calls for closer US-India ties as trade talks progress
"This is very much a win-win partnership," Vance said in Jaipur on Tuesday. "The future of the 21st century is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership."
Vance highlighted trade, defense, energy and technology as areas of cooperation in his speech. He also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to continue efforts to lower trade barriers and purchase more American goods.
The remarks are the among the clearest signs to date that the Trump administration sees India as one of its main partners at a time when it is resetting its relationship with allies around the world. Vance lavished praise on Modi and pledged that the Trump administration would not treat India with "condescension," an attitude he said was shown by past U.S. leaders.
While Vance called for closer ties with India, he also said the relationship was a two-way street, calling on the Modi government to buy more American goods, particularly energy and military equipment, and talked up the potential of American F-35 warplanes to strengthen the Indian Air Force.
"Americans want further access to Indian markets," Vance said in his speech, which was hosted by the Rajasthan International Centre. "This is a great place to do business and we want to give our people more access to this country and Indians."
Vance's speech comes a day after a one-on-one meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi during which the two sides made "significant progress" toward a bilateral trade deal, according to the White House.
The vice president and his family are on a high-profile trip that underscores India's importance among countries seeking trade talks with the U.S. For Modi, the pressure is on to shield Asia's third-largest economy from disruptions in global trade by striking an early deal with the Trump administration.
In his speech, Vance also praised Modi for the hospitality shown to his wife and three children.
While urging India to cooperate more on energy with the U.S., the vice president said the world's fastest-growing major economy will be "able to build more, make more and grow more, but at much lower energy costs."
-----------
With assistance from Anup Roy and Ruchi Bhatia.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans have reached their tipping point as gratuities spiral ‘out of control' — where Dave Ramsey draws a firm line
Tipping has become ubiquitous, but many Americans are burning out. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it According to a recent survey by WalletHub, nearly nine in 10 believe tipping culture has 'gotten out of control,' and 83% think automatic service charges should be banned. Nearly 3 in 5 Americans think businesses are replacing employee salaries with customer tips. On a recent episode of The Ramsey Show, hosts Dave Ramsey and Jade Warshaw attempted to answer the question: When is it actually appropriate to leave a tip? When should you tip? Warshaw advised to always tip in restaurants. 'Where you're sitting down, you're placing an order, there's somebody attending to your table … tip between 18 to 20%," she asserted. "I feel like if you can't afford to leave a nice tip, you can't go." Ramsey agreed, saying staff are working for tips and often aren't paid well otherwise. For close-contact services like haircuts or nails, Warshaw recommends starting around 15%. But for quick barista service or grocery delivery? She says it depends on how great the service was, if she knows the person or if they went through a tough time to serve her, like delivering items in the rain. "For me, tipping falls in the bucket with generosity, so I overdo it," Ramsey admitted, even if the food wasn't that good. "Here's the thing: The kitchen might have screwed up, not the poor waitress." He typically wants to tip, and leaves $20 on his bed for the maid every day he stays at a hotel, but clarified, "The times that I walk up to the counter and someone spins an iPad at me and I leave a tip [are] precisely zero. I do not tip there, ever." Ramsey feels no guilt about this practice he calls a "manipulation at checkout … it's nickel-and-diming you to death.' All in all, the pair lean towards tipping and showing empathy for service workers and what they must deal with at the workplace — a sentiment not entirely reflected in the average American's view. Tipping fatigue Driven by inflation, menu price hikes and pressure to tip on basic transactions, tipping expectations are probably fueling exhaustion, resentment, and blown budgets among consumers. The same WalletHub survey found some telling information: almost 60% of Americans feel businesses are using tips to replace employee salaries, while close to 30% end up tipping less when prompted with a tip suggestion screen. What's more, 40% believe an instant employee rating system, which businesses can use to determine staff wages, should replace tipping. Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can People are possibly feeling confused and overwhelmed by the higher number of situations for which they're expected to tip, including in quick-serve food establishments and rideshares or taxis. In fact, one-third (33%) of U.S. adults say the frequency or amount they're expected to tip has increased in the last five years, according to a Morning Consult survey. Regardless of consumer sentiment around tipping, the service industry still depends on it, since for many people, tips are essential to their income and will remain so unless their wages increase. Tips without budget stress Want to show gratitude without breaking the bank? Consider these budget-friendly ideas: Cash-only tip jar: Keep a small bill, like $1 or $2, for cash-only gratuities at coffee shops or convenience stores. Daily tracking: Add a 'tips' category to your monthly budget, so you can splurge or skip deliberately. Service-based tipping: Only tip at sit-down restaurants, delivery orders, valet and services like nail or hair — no need at counters. Modest weekly tip budget: For frequent routine services (e.g. your daily barista) to cap your spending. Evaluate, prioritize and trade off: For example, you might prefer splurging on a nice dinner out with friends each month to your convenient, weekly quick-service lunch. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Chicago Tribune
41 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Storer H. Rowley: Six months into his presidency, Donald Trump has created a police state
Six months into Donald Trump's second term, a lawless president is solidifying his law enforcement powers to create something most Americans didn't vote for and don't want: a police state increasingly robbing residents of their rights and due process. Unaccountable, masked immigration agents, many in plainclothes, are arresting farm workers in fields, raiding Home Depots and car washes, hunting unauthorized workers 'like animals,' and grabbing immigrants in courthouses, mothers and children in their homes, high school soccer stars and kids at baseball practice. Even U.S. citizens have been rounded up by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, including children, and other children here legally seeking refuge, some of them sick, along with their parents in the country without legal permission. Many people snatched are quickly deported without due process. Some are 'disappeared' into detention facilities or shipped abroad before they can get legal representation. This hellscape of fear and chaos does not match up with Trump's campaign promise to mass-deport criminals and arrest 'the worst of the worst.' Residents here without legal authorization with no criminal records pleading their cases dutifully in court have been abducted by agents at courthouses. It is a shameful showcase for the cameras, an authoritarian regime running roughshod over constitutional rights, immigrant rights and human rights. Trump is improperly using the military on U.S. streets, defying court orders, caging detainees in deplorable gulags and dispatching ICE agents to grab anyone they can to meet arbitrary White House quotas of 3,000 a day. He makes a mockery of the rule of law by arresting Americans. Trump is escalating his war on immigrants as poll numbers on his immigration policies hit a record low. Six months in, the executive orders, court challenges, crypto corruption, firings and budget cuts seem bottomless, as well, and now he is grappling with the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. And he's just getting started. Brace yourselves. It's going to get worse before it gets better. Look for the National Guard or the Marines coming next to Chicago. Recently, the GOP-led Senate narrowly confirmed Trump's former criminal defense lawyer, Emil Bove, to a lifetime appointment on the federal appellate bench after he was accused of defying the courts. Bove denied it, but one whistleblower said he told fellow Justice Department officials to ignore court orders if necessary to make sure deportation flights took off, alleging: 'Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f––– you' and ignore any such court order.' To be clear, Republicans and Democrats both agree that illegal immigration needs to be controlled. A bipartisan effort came close to finding a longer-term solution last year until Trump killed the comprehensive reform bill to weaponize the issue against Democrats in the Nov. 5 election. The question is how to do deal with illegal immigration legally and humanely. Americans voted to get the border under control, and to be fair, Trump's administration has done that. Crossings and apprehensions have slowed to a trickle. But they didn't vote for, nor do they support, what he is doing now: lawless crackdowns leaving migrants and Americans alike living in a republic of fear, danger and violence. 'Show me your papers' used to be the catchphrase for villains in World War II movies. Now, it's the harsh reality for many legal residents. Migrants who may have crossed the border illegally but are now going through the court system to plead their cases can be swept up and disappeared before their day in court. Worse, Trump and his top White House anti-immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, deliberately appeal to white nationalists and white grievance, leaving the feeling among immigrants that they are targeted in a deportation war aimed mainly against people of color. His administration has attacked diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and ICE agents have been accused of racially profiling immigrant communities. ICE denies this, but how many white European immigrants do you see in their detention centers? We have seen this pattern before, when whole groups of people are targeted — such as Japanese Americans sent to internment camps during World War II. The inhumane immigration detention center in the Everglades is Exhibit A. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem insists her immigration agents are behaving legally and building cases correctly. She denies racial profiling: 'It's been done exactly how law enforcement has operated for many years in this country, and ICE is out there making sure we get the worst off the streets,' she said. It's not hard to do this legally. Barack Obama and Joe Biden, when they were president, fought illegal immigration within the law. In fact, Obama upset many Democrats by being the 'Deporter-in-Chief,' deporting more immigrants at a higher rate than Trump has — and he did it legally. But Trump's lawlessness and authoritarian conduct goes way beyond immigration, and it has provoked sustained nationwide protests since he took office. He has threatened a number of law firms into submission, tried to quell free speech and dissent at universities, attacked the media with frivolous lawsuits to try to bend them to his will and silence his critics in the entertainment world. But his police state tactics are causing blowback too. Americans who care about their democracy must continue to rally to defend it. Only people power and voters can stop a criminal president. Even his unprecedented weaponizing of the Department of Justice to target perceived enemies has caused revulsion among the ranks over abominations such as his attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. The unit that prosecutes those cases has lost nearly two-thirds of its staff as DOJ attorneys leave rather than further his corrupt attempts to tear down the constitutional system. Trump's approach toward immigratioin has squandered his support. Many MAGA supporters still approve of his actions, but a majority of Americans in a recent CBS poll now see his deportation program as a net negative. Moreover, more Americans now see the value of immigration way more than they did a year ago, with the share wanting immigration reduced dropping from 55% in 2024 to 30% today, according to a recent Gallup Poll — and a record-high 79% of U.S. adults now say immigration is a good thing for the country. Clearly, the police state tactics aren't working, and that's a good thing for America.
USA Today
41 minutes ago
- USA Today
The housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the way to go?
When Jonny Ballesteros and his fiancée, Jen, began house-hunting, they weren't sure what to expect. It was the first purchase for the couple, who are both 29, and in the competitive San Diego-area market where they lived, they needed some hands-on guidance. But the real estate agents they contacted were no help. They appeared to be too busy to offer the kind of service the couple wanted. They decided instead to work with a new company that offers flat-fee brokerage services for buyers. While the cost savings was helpful, Ballesteros also felt he and Jen got the support they needed: suggested homes that matched their criteria, viewing appointments, and online chats about everything from scheduling to questions about process. "We truly needed that hand-holding because it was our first property,' Ballesteros told USA TODAY. In an age when Americans do everything from writing their wills to ordering their groceries online and without a middleman, the residential real estate industry remains stubbornly entrenched in tradition. But one year after a landmark lawsuit changed the way commissions are negotiated, some upstarts think the time is finally right. "The settlements haven't actually changed the transaction much yet," said Ben Bear, co-founder and CEO of TurboHome, the company that helped the Ballesteros. "But what it has done is educated buyers that hey, high commissions don't really make sense." At the same time, Bear said, new technology makes it possible for companies "to deliver a high level of service that does have a lot of personal touch, at a lower price point." TurboHome, which has been around since 2022, is currently only available in California and Texas. Other companies offering similar services for buyers include ShopProp and Arrivva. The longstanding approach to real estate transactions in America had a commission of roughly 5% to 6% paid by the seller and divided between the agents for the buyer and the seller – a hefty surcharge that some observers believe inflated home sale prices. For the home that Johnny and Jen bought, which cost $679,000, the buyer's agent's commission traditionally could have been $20,000 or more. TurboHome's fee was less than half that – $7,500. And the seller agreed to pay it, so the couple paid nothing and was able to apply the money to their loan. How the real estate commission lawsuits changed consumer attitudes A report released in June by the left-leaning think tank Consumer Policy Center explained how the commission lawsuits have helped erode traditional arrangements. 'By focusing public attention on 5-6 percent commissions through news coverage, the changes persuaded some consumers to question traditional real estate brokerage services,' wrote Stephen Brobeck and Wendy Gilch. More recently, they added, the industry jockeying between Zillow and other listings portals and brokerages has helped focus attention on how real estate information is displayed, which may persuade homeowners to sell their properties in non-traditional ways. Douglas Miller is a long-time attorney and real estate industry gadfly who instigated the first of the commission lawsuits filed starting in 2019 against big brokerages and the National Association of Realtors, one of the largest professional lobby groups in the country. A recent analysis shows that commissions paid to real estate agents have barely budged over the past few years. The new upstarts are not "discount brokers," he said. 'They are 'fair fee brokers,' I think is a better way to put it," Miller said in an interview. "The traditional agents want to label them as, 'You are using somebody who's charging less, you're going to get what you pay for.' I would say no, what you're going to get is an overpaid agent if you use a traditional agent.' One of Miller's biggest bugaboos is that the vast majority of real estate agents do almost no deals on a regular basis. According to a 2024 analysis from Brobeck, half of all agents reported no or only one sale the previous year, while 70% did five or fewer. 'In terms of personnel, the residential real estate industry is clearly a part-time industry,' the report concluded. As Miller sees it, the lower-cost companies that focus on transactions probably have more experience than many agents do. The National Association of Realtors did not respond to a USA TODAY request for comment. When does it make sense to work with a traditional real estate agent? Lisa Gill, an analyst with Consumer Reports, thinks that there are advantages to working with traditional agents. "Real estate is still very much a relationship business," she said. "Particularly in very competitive markets, it can benefit both buyers and sellers to have a representative who's tapped into a network of agents." TurboHome's Bear agrees. There are plenty of types of transactions where a buyer or seller may want the kind of high-touch experience Gill describes. But there are also other advantages to companies like TurboHome, which doesn't require that clients be exclusive to them. That means that if another real estate agent is able to find a property, there's no penalty for walking away and choosing to be represented by that agent. Gill also notes that experienced professionals can bring wisdom and context that go beyond the checklist of transactions involved in a sale. Working without a traditional agent might be akin to 'building a house without hiring a general contractor,' she said. It's likely that many sales can be done without that expertise, but on the rare occasion that things do go wrong it may wind up costing more in time and money to fix. Still, evidence is mounting that for many Americans, the 'bare-bones' approach works perfectly well. Miller, a practicing lawyer, is also a licensed Realtor who facilitates dozens of sales every year, making him one of the Realtor Association's top producers in Minnesota, he says. He charges half the amount a traditional agent would – 1.5% of the transaction or less – on the home's sale price or list price, whichever is cheaper, to avoid the perceived conflict of interest that comes from a sale price being bid up. The 2025 Consumer Policy Center report, meanwhile, focuses on the seller experience, evaluating companies Ideal Agent, Houwzer, Trelora, Simple Showing, and 1% Lists, with a special nod for one called Clever, which had more –and more-experienced – agents on its staff. While consumers using those companies need to do a little extra research, the report says, including being absolutely sure which specific services are offered and evaluating the individual agent that will be involved in the transaction, they conclude that 'low fee brokers do represent a viable alternative for home sellers.' Read next: Should you sell your own home? Why a FSBO may look more tempting
