
Filing ITR? Decoding TDS and TCS – who pays, who collects and key differences taxpayers must know
) are two separate provisions under the Indian tax regime, both intended to facilitate early and efficient tax collection.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Though applied during transactions, they differ in usage, liable parties, and the nature of the payments they cover.
For both individuals and businesses, understanding how TDS and TCS function is crucial for accurate income tax filing and better financial management. By ensuring that taxes are collected right at the point of income or sale, these mechanisms reduce evasion risks and help distribute tax liability throughout the year.
What is TDS?
TDS refers to the tax deducted by a person or entity at the time of making certain specified payments—such as salary, rent, interest, professional fees, or on property transactions. The party making the payment, called the 'deductor', is legally responsible for withholding tax at the applicable rate and remitting it to the government, as explained by an ET report.
The recipient, known as the 'deductee', receives the net amount after deduction and can later claim credit for the TDS while filing their tax return.
Example: Suppose you pay monthly rent of ₹90,000, which is above the ₹50,000 threshold. You're required to deduct 10 per cent TDS—₹9,000—and pay the balance ₹81,000 to your landlord. The ₹9,000 must then be deposited with the tax authorities.
What is TCS?
TCS, on the other hand, is a tax collected by the seller from the buyer when selling certain goods or services. This provision falls under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Here, the responsibility lies with the seller to collect tax on transactions and submit it to the government.
Items covered under TCS include minerals, forest produce, scrap, liquor, certain high-value vehicles, foreign remittances, and overseas travel packages.
Example: If you purchase an international travel package worth ₹14 lakh, and the threshold is ₹10 lakh, the travel agency must collect 20 per cent TCS on the ₹4 lakh excess—amounting to ₹80,000—which the buyer pays along with the package cost.
Key difference:
The core distinction lies in who is responsible for compliance.
In TDS, the payer deducts tax before making a payment.
In TCS, the seller collects tax while receiving payment.
Despite this difference, both systems aim to strengthen compliance and secure tax revenues in advance. Not deducting or collecting these taxes properly can lead to penalties and interest liabilities.
Particulars TDS TCS What is it? Tax deducted at source of income. Tax collected during sale of goods or services. Who levies it? Person or organisation making the payment. Person selling goods or services. When is it levied? At the time of making payment. At the time of sale. Levied under Section Section 192 Section 206C Due date 7th of next month. Seven days from the last day of the month.
(Based on ET report)
Why should one know the difference?
Understanding how TDS works helps individuals and professionals keep track of taxes already deducted on income streams like salaries or consultancy payments—amounts that can be claimed as credit during income tax filing. Likewise, awareness of TCS ensures that tax paid on high-value purchases or foreign transactions isn't missed when claiming tax credits.
Being familiar with both also helps prevent mismatches in Form 26AS, reduces the likelihood of receiving tax department notices, and contributes to smoother, more accurate income tax return filing.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
The worrying rise of personal, credit card and gold loans in India
Indian households are running into debt like never before. Alarmingly, household debt as a percentage of GDP has doubled in the past one decade. According to the RBI's latest Financial Stability Report released Monday, the household debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 41.9% (at current market prices) as on December 2024, as against 26% in June 2015. The good news, though, is that the debt burden has reduced from 42.9% in June 2024 to 41.9% as of December 2024. Moreover, Indian households' debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively low compared to other emerging market economies, which stood at 46.6%. But what's more concerning is the fact that households are loading up on destructive debt such as personal, credit card and gold loans, than constructive credit, which includes housing loans. On last count, non-housing retail loans—mostly used for consumption—accounted for a lion's share of 54.9% of total household debt as on March 2025 and 25.7% of disposable income as on March 2024. In other words, about Rs 55 out of every Rs 100 that banks and financial institutions are lending to individuals is going towards credit cards, consumer durable loans and all other personal loans, which have steep interest rates. Still, the share of these loans has been growing consistently over the years, and their growth has outpaced that of both housing loans and agriculture and business loans, according to RBI. Broadly, retail loans can be divided into three major categories—non-housing retail loans, housing loans and credit extended to individuals in their personal capacity, but utilised for either personal or business purposes. As on December 2024, if housing loans comprised 29% of total household debt, non-housing retail loans and agriculture and business loans accounted for the rest at 54.9% and 16.1%, respectively. Analysts also warn against the explosion of the riskiest slice of the credit market comprising sub-prime and near-prime personal loans, particularly amid rising living costs, stagnant wages and inflation. While non-housing retail loans are seeing an unprecedented increase in the recent past, the component of housing loans to overall household debt, on the other hand, has reduced from about 36%-37% in FY19 to 29% as on December 2024. Perhaps driven by the rush of non-housing retail loans, consumer segment loans grew at a CAGR of 20.4% between March 2021 and March 2025, as against 14.6% growth seen in overall bank credit. Disaggregated data shows that incremental growth has been mainly driven by existing borrowers availing additional loans, and their share has increased to more than a third of the housing loans sanctioned in March, 2025. Moreover, as RBI's latest report noted, the share of borrower accounts with loan-to-value (LTV) ratios greater than 70% is also rising, and delinquency levels are greater for lower-rated and highly leveraged borrowers. However, these have declined significantly from the levels seen during COVID-19. Sensing danger, the RBI has repeatedly flagged heightened risks in the unsecured lending segment and cautioned lenders to remain vigilant, while offering personal loans for consumption purposes. In fact, in November 2023, fearing a rise in bad loans, the central bank raised capital to risk-weighted asset ratios for both banks and NBFCs to 125%. Consequently, retail loan disbursements have slowed following the implementation of regulatory measures across lender types, product types and credit-active consumers. At an aggregate level, the per capita debt of individual borrowers has grown from Rs 3.9 lakh in March 2023 to Rs 4.8 lakh in March 2025. The rise in per capita debt has mainly been led by the higher-rated borrowers. The share of better-rated customers among total borrowers is growing, both in terms of the outstanding amount and the number of borrowers. This is important from a debt serviceability and financial stability perspective, as it indicates that household balance sheets at an aggregate level are resilient, the RBI noted. Higher debt may help boost consumption, but it could be detrimental to economic growth. As a 2017 BIS study (which used data on 54 economies over 1990-2015) revealed, household debt boosts consumption and GDP growth in the short run but mostly within one year. In the longer run, however, a one percentage point increase in the household debt-to-GDP ratio tends to lower growth by 0.1%. The negative long-run effects on consumption intensify as the household debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 60%. Households' debt burden is rising even as the growth in household savings fell with a thud to 5.3% of GDP in FY23 -- a 47-year low. However, the Ministry of Finance in the past reasoned that the decline in household savings was due to a double-digit growth in personal loans. "The household sector is not in distress, clearly. They are buying vehicles and homes on mortgages," it clarified, dismissing concerns over the rising indebtedness of households. Even as loan growth to the consumer segment slowed down, the quality of the portfolio has improved. Delinquency levels, except for credit cards, have decreased, upgrades from Special Mention Accounts (SMA)-2 accounts shot up, while slippages fell. The gross non-performing asset ratio of the banks' consumer segment loans stood at 1.4% in March, 2025. Moreover, in a sign of improving underwriting standards, the share of borrowers rated prime and above increased for both PSBs and PVBs. Likewise, the NBFC sector too remains resilient, but remains vulnerable to stress in household balance sheets with attendant consequences for asset quality. Bad loans within the retail segment stood at 3.1% compared to 1.2% for banks in March 2025. But on balance, the RBI's latest report observed that overall risks to the Indian financial system from lending to households remain contained with easing monetary policy cycle likely to reduce debt service pressures on borrowers going forward. However, the trend in household debt accumulation, especially among lower-rated borrowers, requires close monitoring, it added. Meanwhile, an update of the analysis of financial wealth of Indian households shows that it sharply in FY24. Since Q3, FY20, asset price gains contributed to around one-third of the increase in the financial assets, while the remaining was on account of an increase in financial savings. Deposits and insurance and pension funds formed nearly 70% of household financial wealth as on March 2024 even as the share of equities and investment funds has increased.


Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
Govt issues clarification on Quality Control Order for steel products
New Delhi: The Ministry of Steel clarified on Wednesday that it has issued Quality Control Orders for the enforcement of 151 BIS Standards. The last Quality Control Order was issued in August 2024, and no new Quality Control Order has been issued since then. The ministry made it clear that its order dated June 13 is merely to clarify that in the case of intermediate material for manufacturing of final products under BIS Standards, steel products will also have to follow BIS Standards prescribed for such intermediate products. The Ministry made it clear that no new Quality Control Orders have been issued, and the order on June 13 was necessary to bring parity between importers and domestic producers of steel. Presently, the import of finished steel products is not at par with Indian manufacturers of finished steel products, as Indian steel products manufacturers have to use only BIS Standard-compliant intermediate material, while no such requirement was felt by importers for the import of steel products. It will be wrong to put domestic steel products manufacturers at a comparative disadvantage vis-à-vis imported products in terms of non-BIS-compliant intermediate input products. The order will also help to ensure compliance with BIS Standards for intermediate products is required to ensure that the finished product is as per the quality requirement given by BIS Standards. If this is not done, a final product may be sub-standard. For example, a large quantity of coated steel is imported into India. Coated steel uses HR/CR Coil as base material, which is the main product in this case. If HR/CR Coil is not BIS compliant, coated steel cannot be BIS compliant, even if the coating process is itself BIS compliant, according to the statement. Besides, the order is also aimed at checking the possibility of the import of substandard steel. Because of excess capacity and declining consumption in certain countries, there is a big possibility of the dumping of substandard steel. As India is the only fast-growing large economy in the world, there is a very high possibility of cheap steel getting pushed into the Indian market unless adequate measures are put in place for the import of quality steel. It is to be noted that if intermediate inputs (which form the core of finished products like HR coil, CR coil or coated steel) are not BIS compliant and are substandard, the final product cannot be BIS compliant, the Ministry's statement said. The statement further highlighted that Integrated Steel Plants, which make intermediate products and finished products themselves, and the BIS licence has been issued to them, taking into account the whole process, will not need to have different licences for all stages, as the BIS certification process takes care of the whole manufacturing chain. The Ministry of Steel will issue clarifications in this regard after verification from BIS for such integrated steel plants. It further states that apprehension of the possibility of a price rise due to the June 13 order issued by the Ministry of Steel is unfounded. India has a steel manufacturing capacity of 200 million tonnes, which is enough to meet domestic demand. Hence, no such possibility of price increase seems to be there. The Ministry's statement also pointed out that many countries have imposed safeguard duties and measures to prevent the import of cheap steel from the international market, such imposition of sectoral tariffs, Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs), etc. Because of these safeguard measures adopted by other countries, the possibility of dumping of cheap substandard steel into India further increases. If this happens, this will have an extreme adverse impact on the domestic steel industry and especially the small steel industries in the country. This will also lead to the possibility of the loss of employment of lakhs of people. India is the only major economy where steel consumption has grown at above 12 per cent for the last three years. On the contrary, the steel consumption in other geographies is either stagnant or declining. This fast growth in steel consumption is due to the Indian government's push on infrastructure strengthening, public and private sector development in buildings and real estate and growing manufacturing of capital goods in the country. To cater to this steel demand, the country will need about 300 MT steel capacity by 2030 and 400 MT of steel capacity by 2035. This capacity creation will require a capital infusion of approximately $200 billion by 2035. If substandard cheap steel imports affect the domestic steel industry (both integrated steel producers and small steel industries), their capacity to infuse this capital will come into terrible strain, and the capacity expansion plans of the steel industry will be adversely affected, the statement added.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Foxconn's Chinese engineers called back, disrupting Apple's India expansion
Over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians have been sent back from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India, raising concerns about a potential slowdown in Apple's local manufacturing push. According to a Bloomberg report citing sources, the recall began nearly two months ago, with the majority of Chinese staff at Foxconn's southern India facilities asked to return home. Most of those who remain are Taiwanese support personnel. While Foxconn has not issued any statement on the move, it aligns with recent informal efforts by Chinese authorities to discourage the transfer of skilled labour, technology, and equipment to countries like India and Vietnam. Apple's dependence on Chinese expertise Apple CEO Tim Cook has often praised the proficiency of China's assembly workforce, attributing the company's reliance on the country to their expertise rather than just cost advantages. While the withdrawal of these staff from India is not expected to affect product quality, it could impact assembly line efficiency, a source told Bloomberg. The development comes at a crucial moment for Apple, which is working with manufacturing partners in India to scale up production of the upcoming iPhone 17. So far, Apple has not issued any comment on the development. China tightens grip on tech exports Foxconn's decision appears to align with recent efforts by Beijing to limit the movement of technology, skilled professionals, and specialised equipment out of China. These measures are seen as a response to growing interest from countries like India and Vietnam, which are working to attract global tech manufacturers amid ongoing tensions between the United States and China. Recently, China even halted the export of key rare earth metals. This shift in supply chains began during Donald Trump's first term as US president, when Apple started shifting some of its device production to India and Vietnam. The trend has continued, especially as Trump pushes forward with new tariff plans. In response, China has tightened its grip on exports of rare earth materials, technology, and labour. Foxconn's presence in India Although Foxconn still produces most iPhones in China, it has steadily expanded its operations in India, as earlier reported by Business Standard. To support this growth, the company had deployed many experienced Chinese engineers to help speed up production and train Indian workers. Chinese supervisors have played a key role in guiding Foxconn's Indian workforce. Large-scale iPhone production in India began just four years ago and now contributes around 20 per cent of global output. Apple aims to manufacture most iPhones destined for the US market in India by the end of 2026. However, Trump has criticised this move, saying Apple should make phones for American users within the US. High labour costs in the US make this idea difficult to implement. And if China restricts the movement of its skilled engineers, setting up advanced manufacturing in the US would become even less viable. India-China relations Meanwhile, India and China continue to share a strained relationship. While tensions have eased slightly over the past year, and high-level meetings have resumed, direct flights between the two countries remain suspended. India still enforces strict visa rules for Chinese nationals and maintains bans on Chinese apps like TikTok. On the other hand, China continues to block exports of fertilisers to India, even though such restrictions have been lifted for other nations.