Meta to ban political ads on Facebook, Instagram in EU over ‘unworkable' new rules
The EU has a bolstered legal armoury to rein in Big Tech, against which Meta has hit out — with the support of US President Donald Trump's administration.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of 'censorship' while this week the US State Department denounced the EU's 'Orwellian' regulation of social media.
Against this uneasy backdrop, and with EU-US trade tensions sky-high, Meta announced that political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc because of 'unworkable requirements' under new rules.
'This is a difficult decision — one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation,' it said.
'Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU,' Meta added.
The tech giant stressed that its European users would still be able to post and debate about politics.
The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018.
Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum.
The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp — which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app.
Meta said it was 'not the only company to have been forced into this position'.
Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the 'significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties'.
US 'censorship' claims
Meta and Brussels have locked horns on a series of issues — most recently over the firm's 'pay or consent' system regarding user data.
The EU slapped a €200-million (RM992-million) fine in April after concluding Meta violated rules on the use of personal data on Facebook and Instagram.
Zuckerberg has previously equated EU fines against the company to tariffs.
Facebook and Instagram also face investigations under the EU's mammoth content moderation law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA).
Meta's announcement comes as US officials ramp up their attacks on the DSA.
The State Department took aim at the DSA on Tuesday as it accused European countries of convicting thousands of people 'for the crime of criticising their own governments,' without elaborating on the allegation.
And the judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives yesterday described the EU law as a 'foreign censorship threat' that forces 'platforms to change content moderation policies that apply in the United States'.
'On paper, the DSA is bad. In practice, it is even worse,' the Republican-majority committee said in an interim report.
Staunch Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet the EU's digital chief, Henna Virkkunen, in Brussels on Monday.
Jordan will be joined by other US Congress members in a bipartisan delegation, EU digital spokesman Thomas Regnier said.
The European Commission rejected the censorship claims.
'Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in the EU. And it is at the heart of our legislation, including the DSA,' Regnier said. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Former Romanian President Iliescu, who led free market transition, dies at 95
FILE PHOTO: Former Romanian President Ion Iliescu gestures during a meeting with foreign media in Bucharest May 17, 2007. REUTERS/Mihai Barbu (ROMANIA)/File Photo (Reuters) -Romania's former President Ion Iliescu, who led its transition from communism and set it on the path to European Union and NATO membership, but faced charges of crimes against humanity for violently suppressing protests in the 1990s, died on Tuesday aged 95. Iliescu had been admitted to hospital with lung cancer roughly two months ago. The government said he would receive a state funeral. "History will judge Ion Iliescu, the main figure of the 1990s transition," said current President Nicusor Dan. Iliescu went from a rising member of Romania's Communist Party to a leader of the bloody December 1989 revolution - which toppled dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and led to his summary execution on Christmas Day - to become the first freely elected president. At the height of his popularity, Romanians were known to chant "The sun shines, Iliescu appears". But when student protests against him broke out in the capital Bucharest in June 1990, he called on coal miners, then politically influential, to put them down by force. After repeated failed attempts to investigate him, he was sent for trial at the start of this year on charges of crimes against humanity for his part in violence in which 20,000 miners entered the capital to crush peaceful anti-government protests. Four people were killed and hundreds injured. He always denied wrongdoing and was never convicted. Miners' riots throughout the 1990s hampered Romania's transition to a market economy and deterred badly needed foreign investment for years. Iliescu's critics have accused him of delaying the transitions, trying to block reform and protect the political heritage and ruling elite of the Communist system. But Iliescu was also the one who got all political parties to agree to support Romania's path to EU and NATO membership. It joined the NATO alliance in 2004 and the EU in 2007. The founder of the leftist Social Democrat Party (PSD), to this day the country's largest, Iliescu is its only leader to have won three presidential elections. No other PSD leader has managed to win since his last term ended in 2004. "Ion Iliescu must be understood in the context of his time," said Sergiu Miscoiu, a political science professor at Babes-Bolyai University. "He stirred anti-totalitarian sentiments in the 1990s, rightly so, but he was also the object of adulation by a large part of the population. "While he called miners to Bucharest and sealed the slow and uncertain transition, he also ... pushed Romania on a Euroatlantic path, such as it was understood at the time." He is survived by his wife Nina. The government has declared August 7 a day of national mourning. (Reporting by Alan Charlish and Luiza Ilie; Editing by Alex Richardson)
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
EU halts 93-bln-euro tariffs on U.S. goods despite members' dissent
BRUSSELS, Aug. 5 (Xinhua) -- The European Commission on Tuesday formally suspended planned retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports worth 93 billion euros (about 108 billion U.S. dollars), just days before they were due to take effect. The Commission's trade spokesperson, Olof Gill, said the decision was adopted under an emergency procedure and will require formal approval by a simple majority of member states within two weeks. The tariffs were scheduled to take effect on Aug. 7. "The Commission has today adopted necessary legal procedures to suspend the implementation of our European Union (EU) countermeasures," Gill told a press briefing in Brussels, adding that the regulation would be published in the EU's official journal later the same day. Ahead of this announcement, there has been mounting criticism from key member states, including France and Germany. German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil has expressed frustration at what he described as a "weak" negotiating stance by the EU during the trade talks with the United States. "I think we were too weak. We can't be satisfied with the result that was achieved," Klingbeil said, referring to the agreement reached late last month between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. President Donald Trump. Under the deal, most EU imports to the United States will face a 15-percent tariff, while the bloc has pledged to purchase more American energy products and increase investment in the U.S. market. Gill expressed surprise at Klingbeil's remarks, noting that member states had been "fully briefed" and had supported a negotiated outcome to avoid tariff escalation. The spokesperson said the suspension would remain in place for six months, during which implementation of the broader understanding would continue. If commitments are not met, Gill noted, the EU retains the right to reactivate its countermeasures. (1 euro = 1.16 dollar)
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Of Gaza genocide and EU inaction
A sizable number of countries are beginning to respond to Israel's slaughter of the Palestinians in Gaza and settler atrocities in the West Bank by taking concrete actions. But notably missing is a meaningful response from the European Union, a bloc proud of its human rights history. The deafening silence has forced 58 former ambassadors of the bloc to issue an open letter to the heads of the EU and member states, warning them that the lack of meaningful response is making it complicit in Israel's "genocide". "Silence and neutrality in the face of genocide constitute complicity. Inaction emboldens perpetrators and betrays every principle the Union and members claim to uphold." Something has stirred in this rare breed of souls and we think it is the daily genocide livestreamed to their smartphones. Rare breed given the West's habit of denying Israel's genocide. The open letter published by Al Jazeera on July 31 has been a global media story since an earlier version, signed by 34 former ambassadors, was published on July 23 by EUobserver, a news portal. The plea for the EU to do the right thing now is a developing story, as the growing number of signatories suggests. We are not surprised that so many ex-diplomats feel let down by the EU. As the 58 make it clear in the letter, "as former ambassadors of the EU, we dedicated our professional lives to upholding and promoting core European values and international law, building the reputation of the European Union and defending the rights of its peoples". Those interests and reputation, they go on to say, "are now in serious jeopardy as a consequence of EU inaction". Washington's position is clear: Israel can do no wrong, even when its military commits the crime of crimes. Its iron-clad support for the Zionist regime means it has given Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, and his extremist ministers, a free hand in committing all the genocide they want. When the United Nations Security Council members agree to a ceasefire — a rare feat indeed — Washington vetoes the resolution. Countries are condemned for criticising Israel. The International Court of Justice, the world's highest court, didn't fare any better. When it ruled that there was "a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza" and countries should stop supplying weapons to Israel, Washington dismissed the court's determination as not binding. The fate of the International Criminal Court was even worse; its officials were sanctioned for issuing arrest warrants against alleged war criminals Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, a former defence minister. But Brussels? Why the inaction, when it occasionally condemns Israel? Pretext for inaction? Some EU leaders seem to suggest a lack of consensus among the 27 member states as a reason for inaction. Even if this is true, why can't they act as individual states? The recent condemnation of Israel by 20 EU foreign ministers shows member states can, if they have the political will. The ex-diplomats have recommended a nine-point action plan, two of which are for the EU to immediately stop the supply of arms to Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood. If Brussels wants to stand on the right side of history, it must act now on the nine recommendations.
