logo
Employees at nation's consumer financial watchdog say it has become toothless under Trump

Employees at nation's consumer financial watchdog say it has become toothless under Trump

Time of Indiaa day ago
Live Events
Different approaches
Reverse-engineering
Budget Cut
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The lights are on at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau across the street from the White House , and employees still get paid. But, in practice, the bureau has been mostly inoperable for nearly six months.CFPB employees say they essentially spend the workday sitting on their hands, forbidden from doing any work by directive from the White House.The bureau is supposed to be helping oversee the nation's banks and financial services companies and taking enforcement action in case of wrongdoing.Instead, the situation is Kafkaesque: the main function seems to be undoing the rulemaking and law enforcement work that was done under previous administrations, including in President Donald Trump 's first term.American consumers can no longer look to the bureau for help when it comes to their checking account, credit card, payday loan, auto loan or mortgage.Trump has neutered the watchdog, employees say, the culmination of a years-long effort by Republicans who felt the agency often went overboard in its efforts.One current employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the directive forbids staffers from speaking publicly about their jobs, said outsiders would be amazed at how little work is being done. Employees are reluctant even to talk to one another, out of fear that a conversation between two employees would be considered a violation of the directive.Another employee described the drastic shift in mission, from trying to protect consumers to doing nothing, as "quite demoralising".To gain an understanding of what is happening inside the CFPB, The Associated Press spoke with 10 current and former employees, as well as bankers and policymakers who used to interact with the bureau nearly every day but now say their emails and voicemails go into a black hole. The agency's press office doesn't respond to emails.Bureau rank-and-file employees and former CFPB officials say they expected the bureau to keep doing its work under "Trump 2.0," although likely in a more restrained fashion.In Trump's first term, his then-director, Kathy Kraninger, took a lighter approach to supervision and enforcement, but still some of the biggest financial settlements in the bureau's history took place during that time.President Joe Biden's choice to run the bureau, Rohit Chopra, took an expansive view of its authority, targeting profitable practices by banks such as overdraft and credit card late fees, as well as investigating companies over credit reporting and medical debt.He even turned a spotlight on big tech companies that have increasingly made inroads into financial services. The CFPB ordered Apple to pay USD 89 million in fines and penalties for problems related to the Apple Card.Paypal's Venmo is used by millions to split a bill, and the bureau found that payment and funds transfer apps like PayPal and Venmo should fall under the federal consumer protection laws, just like banks.Banks and the financial services industry felt Chopra acted too aggressively, particularly with a proposal to cut overdraft fees to USD 5 from the industry average of USD 27 to USD 35.The bureau estimated the move would save consumers roughly USD 5 billion a year. The proposal was overturned by Congress with Trump's backing earlier this year."We are thankful that the Trump Administration recognised the harm to consumers, the market, and the overall economy posed by the CFPB's overreaches under its prior leadership," said Lindsey Johnson, president of the Consumer Bankers Association.Under Trump 2.0, the bureau became a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency, then run by Elon Musk, who posted on X that the CFPB should "RIP" shortly after DOGE employees became embedded at the agency.Through the bureau's acting chief, Russell Vought, the White House issued a directive that CFPB employees should "not perform any work tasks".The administration then tried to lay off roughly 90 per cent of the bureau's staff, or roughly 1,500 employees. Courts have blocked those layoffs, but there is a feeling inside the bureau that the court rulings are only a temporary reprieve.Sensing blood in the water, companies that committed wrongdoing or had open investigations have lobbied the bureau and the White House for their punishments to be rescinded.Employees at the bureau say the only time their workdays get remotely busy these days is when the White House instructs them to begin rescinding one of these punishments.It often involves "reverse-engineering" reasons why the bureau, which investigated and found that these companies did harm to consumers, now no longer believes that happened.In 2024, Navy Federal Credit Union agreed to settle claims that it illegally charged overdraft fees to its members. Among the customers at the USD 180 billion financial institution are Navy service men and women and veterans.Vought cancelled the settlement last month, and Navy Federal will no longer have to pay back USD 80 million in fees.A spokesman for Navy Federal declined to comment on whether the credit union planned to return those funds to its members, as it originally said it would.In 2023, the auto financing arm of Toyota was found to be illegally bundling products onto car buyers' auto loans, refusing to cancel those products and doing harm to customers' credit scores. Toyota was ordered to refund USD 48 million to harmed customers.That settlement was rescinded in mid-May. A spokesman for Toyota declined to say whether customers would be reimbursed."Companies are lining up to get out of repaying harmed customers," said Eric Halperin, former enforcement director at the bureau, who resigned earlier this year.It's not just settlements from the Biden era. At the end of Trump's first term in 2020, the CFPB sued the Chicago-based mortgage company Townstone Financial after the company's executives made statements that were seen as discouraging Black homebuyers from applying for a loan with the company.Townstone and its executives fought vigorously with the bureau, saying that words spoken on a podcast or on social media cannot be construed as discrimination or redlining.Courts agreed with the bureau, and eventually Townstone settled in November, agreeing to pay a USD 105,000 penalty.Under Vought, the bureau said it would move to vacate the settlement and would return Townstone's fine. Courts have blocked the dismissal of that settlement, with one judge saying the CFPB wanted to commit "an act of legal harakiri that would make a samurai blush."The Associated Press sent a list of questions to the White House regarding President Trump's vision for the CFPB. The White House did not respond.While the lack of new initiatives and the scuttling of old ones frustrate employees the most, they also note that even everyday tasks like collecting consumer complaints about financial service companies have largely fallen to the wayside.The CFPB has run a consumer complaint database for nearly a decade, basically an online portal where a consumer uploads a complaint and the bureau then forwards that complaint to the subject company.A report done by the office of Sen Elizabeth Warren , the senior Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee , found that the bureau is uploading roughly 2,200 complaints a day compared to the roughly 10,500 complaints it was doing in the months before Trump took office.Warren came up with the idea for the bureau when she was a law professor at Harvard University.The bureau did take an enforcement action on Friday. The pawn shop chain FirstCash Inc agreed to pay USD 9 million in refunds and fines to settle claims that it charged excessive interest rates on loans to armed service members, in violation of the Military Lending Act.FirstCash operates more than 1,000 stores and had net income of USD 259 million in 2024.The bureau is going to be even further diminished in the coming months. The new budget law signed by Trump earlier this month cuts the CFPB's funding by roughly half, meaning the bureau will be forced into mass layoffs. Senate Democrats are looking for ways to restore that funding."The agency is still standing and its mission to protect consumers remains as important as ever," Warren said in a statement. "We will fight back using every tool at our disposal."That said, one supervision employee grimly joked that a 50 per cent budget cut to the bureau will mean little, based on how the bureau is currently operating."A 50 per cent cut of nothing is still nothing," they said.In the meantime, employees go about their mundane routine: They continue to check their email once or twice a day to see if any of their previous work has been slated for being undone.They don't talk to anyone, not even the banks they are supposed to supervise. They wait to be laid off.The only constants are the silence from bureau political appointees or the "mini funerals" that happen every Friday, when another batch of employees who have decided to leave the bureau voluntarily have their last day."I don't think I'll ever work in public service again," said one current employee, who has been looking for a new job for the past three months.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Morgan Stanley profit rises as trading gains from market volatility
Morgan Stanley profit rises as trading gains from market volatility

Business Standard

time22 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Morgan Stanley profit rises as trading gains from market volatility

Morgan Stanley's profit climbed as market volatility buoyed its trading desk, echoing second-quarter results among its Wall Street rivals. Equity markets swung sharply during the quarter after US President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs against major economies. The turbulence spurred trading as investors repositioned their portfolios and hedged risks, driving gains in Morgan Stanley's trading business. In trading, equities revenue surged 23 per cent, while jumped 9 per cent in fixed income, Morgan Stanley said on Wednesday. Institutional Securities, which houses the bank's Wall Street operations, posted revenue of $7.6 billion in the second quarter, compared with $7 billion, a year ago. "Institutional Securities saw strength and balance across businesses and geographies. Wealth continues to deliver," said CEO Ted Pick said in a statement. The investment bank posted net income of $3.5 billion, or $2.13 per share, for the three months ended June 30. That compares with $3.1 billion, or $1.82 per share, a year earlier. Rival Goldman Sachs' profit jumped in the second quarter, as turbulent markets lifted equities trading revenue. JPMorgan Chase also beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter profit on strong investment banking results a day earlier. Citigroup also reported a windfall from trading and investment banking. DEALS REBOUND Dealmaking rebounded at the end of the quarter as some companies looked past tariff uncertainty and gained confidence to carry out IPOs, mergers and acquisitions. Industry executives held up that optimism this week, anticipating that deals and stock market listings will pick up in the second half of the year. Investment banking revenue declined 5 per cent in the quarter. Advisory revenue slid to $508 million, compared with $592 million, a year ago. Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick has maintained a positive view for the year, telling investors in June that deal discussions were persistent and ramping up. It earned the fourth-highest investment banking fees among global banks in the first half of the year, according to Dealogic data. Among prominent deals in the quarter, Morgan Stanley advised Elon Musk's xAI on a $5 billion debt raise and a separate $5 billion strategic equity investment. It also advised TJC on the $5 billion sale of Silvus Technologies to Motorola. The concern about US tariff policies has also abated since Trump's initial "Liberation Day" announcement on April 2 spurred market volatility. Morgan Stanley's equity underwriting surged 42 per cent to $500 million, while fixed-income underwriting decreased 21 per cent to $532 million. It was the lead underwriter of fintech giant Chime's $864 million June IPO. The bank also led IPOs for Hinge Health, raising $437.3 million, and marketing tech firm MNTN, which raised $187.2 million, in May. Shares of the bank were last flat following the results.

Industry players optimistic as Trump hints at tariff relief for India
Industry players optimistic as Trump hints at tariff relief for India

Fibre2Fashion

time22 minutes ago

  • Fibre2Fashion

Industry players optimistic as Trump hints at tariff relief for India

Even as US-India trade talks continue with negotiations intensifying ahead of the August 1 deadline with much at stake as the clock ticks, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday stated that India is working on a trade deal along the same lines as the one he announced with Indonesia recently. 'India basically is working along that same line,' Trump maintained speaking to the reporters in Washington on Tuesday, hinting at the possibility that India could be offered similar trade terms as Indonesia. As per Donald Trump, Indonesia will face a 19 per cent tariff on imports into the US as part of new deal with Jakarta, but no tariff on exports from the US to Indonesia. President Donald Trump hinted at a potential USâ€'India trade deal similar to the recent Indonesia agreement, which imposes a 19 per cent tariff on exports to the US but grants duty-free access for US goods. Indian apparel exporters are optimistic, viewing this as a chance to boost competitiveness in the US market. Industry leaders believe the move could unlock significant trade growth. And as news of this announcement spreads through industry circles it brings into focus what such a deal could mean for India's major export sectors, especially the apparel industry, which counts the United States as its crucial garment export destination. 'President Trump hinting at a potential India–US trade deal modelled on the recent Indonesia agreement (where exports face a 19 per cent tariff), Indian exporters may finally find a more level playing field in the lucrative US apparel market,' underlined Kishan Daga, founder anchor of consulting service provider Concepts N Strategies, speaking to Fibre2Fashion , who also added that a tariff reduction to under 20 per cent could open 'more doors' for Indian exporters, particularly in athleisure and MMF-heavy segments where India is ramping up production. Such a shift would also support India's vision to become a reliable global supplier in technical textiles and functional apparel, claimed Daga even as Sabhari Girish, chief sustainability officer at Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills (Tiruppur) on his part stated: 'It is undoubtedly a very positive development if we have to pay 19 per cent tariff as is the case with Indonesia; and it also implies how hard we negotiated on tariffs to maintain our competitiveness.' Girish also noted that assuming India also have to pay 19 per cent tariff, the real challenge for the industry would be in seizing the opportunity even as he urged exporters to expand their production capacities and boost manpower in order to make the most of this situation. Meanwhile, N Thirukkumaran, chairman of Tiruppur based Ess Tee Exports India Pvt Ltd , said, ' India will definitely have a competitive advantage compared to many of its rivals. However, this will come with a caveat—the new tariff would be in addition to the existing duties Indian apparel exporters already pay on shipments to the US, which could somewhat diminish the overall benefit, even if the new tariff rate is set at 19 per cent.' He, however, remained cautiously optimistic, noting that India might negotiate hard to bring the tariff down from 19 per cent in the interim deal—a move that, if successful, could be a game-changer for the industry. It may be mentioned here that with discussions focusing on expanding market access and negotiating tariff reductions on goods estimated to constitute between $150 billion and $200 billion in bilateral trade, it is clear that both nations see the potential to unlock even greater economic value, a sentiment that is echoed in several recent media reports suggesting that India and the US aim to boost bilateral trade volumes to $500 billion by 2030, a figure that would mark a substantial leap and a transformative moment in their strategic and economic partnership. But this optimistic projection hinges on the successful completion of an equitable and mutually beneficial trade agreement. Even as the discussions with the US continue, aiming to finalise a comprehensive trade deal, all eyes are now on the so called 'mini trade deal', which is on the verge of being formalised, and is seen as a precursor or stepping stone to a more robust and all-encompassing arrangement. The origins of this mini trade deal date back to when Trump first announced his intention to impose additional tariffs on a number of countries with which the US has a trade deficit, a list that prominently included India due to its substantial export surplus vis-à-vis the US, with India exporting roughly $77 billion worth of goods to the United States annually while importing only around $42 billion, thus maintaining a trade surplus that has long been a point of contention for the Trump administration, which has repeatedly demanded more equitable terms of trade and better access for US goods and services in the Indian market. If one may recall, in February, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump had announced during Modi's two-day visit to the United States that the 'first tranche' of a larger bilateral trade agreement would be announced by fall 2025, raising hopes in both capitals that years of stalled talks, misunderstandings, and tariff disputes would finally begin to yield concrete results. However, the impetus for a more accelerated approach to the deal grew stronger after the US administration decided to impose or consider tariffs on nearly every major trading partner around the world in a bid to shrink America's longstanding trade deficit, a goal Trump has pursued with singular focus since his election as the US President. New Delhi has in the past demurred from signing any agreement that could have potentially adverse implications for its sensitive agricultural and dairy sectors, both of which are politically sensitive and socially vital for India. That said, as we now wait for formal signing and announcement of the deal, which would define the tariff India will pay on its exports to the US, the sentiment within the Indian apparel industry remains notably upbeat, in anticipation of 19 per cent tariff, which is expected give an edge to Indian apparel exporters to the crucial US market. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DR)

Donald Trump hints at finalising trade deal with India before August 1 as US prepares to enforce new tariff measures; details here
Donald Trump hints at finalising trade deal with India before August 1 as US prepares to enforce new tariff measures; details here

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Donald Trump hints at finalising trade deal with India before August 1 as US prepares to enforce new tariff measures; details here

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday indicated that a trade agreement with India could be reached soon, possibly before the United States enforces reciprocal tariffs starting August 1. The comment follows his announcement of a successful trade arrangement with Indonesia, where the US revised its earlier 32% tariff down to 19%. Trump's comments suggest that similar agreements are being considered with India and several other countries, as part of broader efforts to reshape US trade relationships in the lead-up to the tariff deadline. 'Something similar' to Indonesia deal expected with India When asked about how many more trade deals could be concluded before August 1, Trump mentioned, 'We made a terrific deal, [the Indonesian President] opened up the entire country to trade with the United States. I think something similar would happen with India and we have a couple of others.' This signals that a trade deal with India is high on the US administration's priority list, and aligns with earlier statements Trump made about being 'close to making a deal with India.' Bilateral talks with India ongoing in Washington Trump's latest comments come as a four-day bilateral trade discussion between India and the US is underway in Washington. According to reports from PTI, these discussions began on Monday and are expected to conclude by July 17. This round of negotiations is seen as part of the larger framework for establishing a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), which both countries have been exploring to ease trade tensions and expand market access. Letters sent to trade partners, tariff pressure mounts According to Bloomberg, Trump referred to letters recently issued to various trade partners, which outlined potential tariff rates. India was among 14 countries included in this wave, alongside Japan, South Korea, Myanmar, and Bangladesh. In the days following, the Trump administration announced sweeping tariffs, including 35% on Canadian goods, 50% on Brazilian imports, and a threatened 100% tariff on Russian products should a peace deal with Ukraine not be reached within 50 days. With talks ongoing in Washington, a US-India trade deal before the August 1 tariff deadline now seems increasingly possible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store