US tariffs could deepen Germany's recession, says bank
Germany economy has contracted for the past two years and with tariffs, the country "could expect a recession for this year" too, Joachim Nagel, the head of the Deutsche Bundesbank, told the BBC World Service in an exclusive interview.
Without tariffs, the bank forecasts the German economy will stagnate but still grow, by about 0.2%, he added.
He said "there are only losers" when imposing tariffs, and supported the EU's retaliatory measures against US President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on all steel imports from overseas.
Tariffs are a central part of Trump's overall economic vision - he hopes they will boost US manufacturing and protect jobs, but critics say in the immediate term they will raise prices for US consumers.
In response to Trump's move, the EU has hit back with import taxes on a range of US products, which are set to come into force on 1 April.
Mr Nagel called Trump's tariff policy "economics from the past" and "definitely not a good idea".
A global trade war is one of the concerns from tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, he said, but added it was a "necessity" for the EU to react "because if something is working against you, you can't accept a policy like this".
However, he suggested that when the US realises that the price that needs to be paid will be "highest on the side of the Americans", it will allow further opportunity for all sides to come to a different resolution.
"I hope that in the end, good policy will succeed," he said.
How will the latest Trump tariffs affect the UK?
Trump halts plan for 50% steel and aluminium tariffs on Canada
EU hits back at Trump tariffs and warns against trade war
Germany's export economy had been one of its strengths in past decades, and its cars such as BMW, Mercedes, Volkswagens and Audis are popular in the US.
Mr Nagel refuted claims that Germany was the "sick man of Europe", saying it had a "strong economic basis" and "strong small and medium sized companies".
"But nevertheless, when you are exposed to an export-oriented model, then you are more exposed in a situation when tariffs are going up and there are so many uncertainties, so many unknowns," he added.
He said Germany could overcome such challenges "over the next couple of years".
However, German consumers are set to face higher prices.
The head of Germany's BGA federation of wholesale, foreign trade and service, Dirk Jandura, warned on Wednesday that Germans might have to dig deeper into their pockets to pay for American products, such as orange juice, bourbon and peanut butter, in supermarkets.
Commenting on recent unprecedented changes in Germany's economic policy, which were altered allow the country to borrow more to spend on defence and infrastructure, Mr Nagel said it was an "extraordinary measure" for an "extraordinary time".
"The whole world is facing tectonic changes which makes the current situation very different from those seen in the past, hence the fiscal change," he said.
He added the policy change would allow Germany some financial breathing room for recovery in the next few years, adding it provided a "stability signal to the market".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Linda McMahon's answer on Holocaust denialism should scare us
Questioner: 'Madam Secretary, does refusing to hire a Holocaust denier as a member of Harvard's history department faculty count as an 'ideological litmus test?'' Witness: ' I believe that there should be diversity of viewpoints relative to teachings and opinions on campuses.' Had I just heard that correctly? Had Education Secretary Linda McMahon really just said Holocaust denialism was just a diverse view point? I was shocked. But just recently, this exchange really happened. I sat across the dais from McMahon in the House Education and Workforce Committee room. On the desk before me was the April 11 letter sent to Harvard by the Trump administration, laying out their outrageous demands of the university in order to retain their federal funding. Contained in that letter is the phrase which has become a rallying cry for the Trump administration in their crusade against Harvard: 'viewpoint diversity.' This is the one diversity program that the administration has deemed not only important, but imperative to future of higher education. But although McMahon has been beating the drum loudly on the lack of 'diverse viewpoints' on colleges campuses, she's been vague on what that means and whether the administration has the authority to enforce viewpoint diversity on campus. In her hearing before the Senate the previous day, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) pressed the secretary on this very question. Beyond saying that college faculties need more conservative voices, she wasn't able to clearly articulate the powers that the federal government has in that realm, nor was she able to clearly define what viewpoint diversity means, nor the limits that should be recognized. So I asked. I asked if, under the demands listed in the letter, the Harvard government department would be compelled to hire faculty that believe the 2020 election was stolen. I asked if Harvard Medical School would be required to hire immunologists that adhere to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's view on vaccine efficacy. McMahon's response was to bluster about free speech and multiple viewpoints on college campuses. She obfuscated and I pressed. It was at this point I asked, 'Madam Secretary, does refusing to hire a Holocaust denier as a member of Harvard's history department faculty count as an 'ideological litmus test?'' She responded: 'I believe that there should be diversity of viewpoints relative to teachings and opinions on campuses.' There are a number of deeply disturbing aspects to that answer. I could write at length about the implications that widely discredited and — in the case of the third example, deeply offensive and dangerously ignorant — conspiracy theories should have a place in academic institutions that are at the global forefront of research. There is also much to be said about that fact that an administration which claims to be fighting against antisemitism does not immediately condemn Holocaust denial and insist that it does not have a place or a platform in higher education. But the pressing issue at stake here is that the administration cannot identify a limit to such viewpoint diversity. If a candidate for a position in the government department has a sincere political belief that the 2020 election was stolen, should they be hired in the interest of 'viewpoint diversity' although they would not meet the academic standards required for a serious candidate in political science? If they are not hired by the school, does the federal government have the power to punish the university? What does this mean for current faculty who disagree with the administration? 'Ideological vetting' is already happening to the school's prospective international students; it is not a stretch to imagine that that vetting might extend to faculty and domestic students too. Freedom of speech and freedom of dissent are among the most sacred and fundamental tenets of our democracy, enshrined in the very first amendment of the Bill of Rights. Universities are the arenas where those freedoms are exercised; places where ideas are tested and debated and critical thought is encouraged. History teaches us that government interference in and crackdown on colleges and universities is a tactic used by authoritarian governments to quash dissent. That is not to say that there aren't problems on college campuses today, and there should always be an unwavering commitment to student safety and wellbeing. But political dissent is not a crime. Dissent is a function of a healthy and vibrant democracy, and higher education is there to teach students how to think, not what to think. No matter where you fall on the political spectrum, all Americans must understand what is at stake in the administration's battle with Harvard. We should all be concerned about the federal government's attempt to force compliance from an independent institution, particularly one tasked with educating our young people and producing the world's preeminent research. If you love what makes this country great — freedom of speech, the right to dissent, the defense of civil rights — then you must know: we have a lot to lose if we do not fight for it.
Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Colorado's economy delivers mixed results in mid-2025
Colorado's latest economic data is sending mixed signals at the halfway mark of 2025. By the numbers: Metro Denver's inflation rate through June ticked up to 2.3% year-over-year, nudging past May's 2.2%, per a new report from the University of Colorado Boulder's Leeds School of Business and the Secretary of State's office. That's still below the national average of 2.7% in June, which marked the swiftest pace since February as Trump-era tariffs began taking a bigger bite out of the economy. Stunning stat: New business filings statewide surged to 51,200 in the second quarter of 2025, up 19% year-over-year — marking Colorado's strongest second quarter on record, according to Brian Lewandowski with the Leeds School of Business. The intrigue: It's unclear what's behind the spike or which sectors are seeing the most new ventures. But Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold floated a theory: a mix of entrepreneurial spirit and financial pressure. Some Coloradans may be looking to supplement income "after noticing that their money at the grocery store isn't going as far as it used to," Griswold told reporters Monday. Zoom out: Job growth across Colorado rose to 0.4% last month, the state's fourth-highest rate on record. Labor force participation held strong at 67.7% — sixth-highest nationally. Yes, but: Home prices in Colorado continued to climb last month — up 2.3% year-over-year. What they're saying: The state's economy "has remained resilient," Griswold said in a statement. "But many Coloradans struggle with the cost of living, and Trump's new law will increase the cost of energy, health care and more," the Democrat warned, referring to the president's " big, beautiful bill." What we're watching: Colorado's resilience could soon face a tougher test.
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Human Rights Watch alleges abuses at Florida immigration detention centers
Immigrants detained in federal sites in Florida have faced inhumane conditions, including substandard medical care, abuse and neglect and overcrowding, Human Rights Watch alleged in a report released Monday. The advocacy group in the 93-page report detailed the conditions migrants described at three Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the Sunshine State — Krome North Service Processing Center (Krome), Broward Transitional Center (BTC) and the Federal Detention Center (FDC) in Miami. According to the report, detainees and their allies claimed serious violations of medical standards and other breaches of ICE's own guidelines at the three Florida facilities. A Bureau of Prisons spokesman told The Hill that the agency cannot comment on specific conditions, but noted it is the BOP's mission 'to operate facilities that are safe, secure, and humane.' 'We take seriously our duty to protect the individuals entrusted in our custody, as well as maintaining the safety of our employees and the community,' the BOP said in a statement. The Hill has also requested comment from ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 'Some were detained shackled for prolonged periods on buses without food, water, or functioning toilets; there was extreme overcrowding in freezing holding cells where detainees were forced to sleep on cold concrete floors under constant fluorescent lighting; and many were denied access to basic hygiene and medical care,' HRW's researchers wrote in their report. 'The Trump administration's one-track immigration policy, singularly focused on mass deportations will continue to send more people into immigration detention facilities that do not have the capacity to hold them and will only worsen the conditions described in this report.' President Trump's administration ramped up detention and deportations this year as part of a sweeping immigration crackdown. Additionally, Congress passed a law earlier this year, dubbed the Laken Riley Act, that mandates federal detention of migrants accused of theft, burglary and other crimes. Records show that more than 56,000 migrants were held in detention facilities each day across the country this month. Florida has drawn attention for migrant detention after the opening of the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' site that Trump recently toured in the Everglades, but that facility wasn't among those reviewed in HRW's report. HRW cited interviews with 11 currently held and recently detained migrants; family members of seven detainees; and 14 immigration lawyers to document the experiences of 17 immigrants across the Krome, BTC and FDC facilities. 'If you ask for help, they isolate you,' one woman, who wasn't named in the report, told the researchers. 'If you cry, they might take you away for two weeks.' 'So, people stay silent,' she added. HRW offered several recommendations for improving detention facilities and procedures for interacting with undocumented migrants who do not pose an immediate threat to the public. HRW suggested policy changes to avoid detaining people with disabilities, ensure medical conditions are treated and allow oversight of how facilities are being run, among other efforts to improve detention efforts.
