logo
A Calculated Restraint: Examines Leaders' Controversial Response To The Holocaust

A Calculated Restraint: Examines Leaders' Controversial Response To The Holocaust

Globe and Mail16-06-2025
"'Churchill and Roosevelt believed that if they criticized Nazi persecution of the Jews, many Europeans and some Americans would have taken their words as evidence supporting Nazi accusations that Jews had great influence over their governments,' says Breitman. 'Both men had to gauge the impact of their words at a time when antisemitism was prevalent throughout much of the world and the fate of civilization rested on military victory'."
A Calculated Restraint: What Allied Leaders Said About the Holocaust in a new book by leading Holocaust historian Richard Breitman examines why Winston Churchill, Josef Stalin, and Franklin Roosevelt, faced with mounting evidence of Nazi mass killings of Jews, were reluctant to speak out about what later became known as the Holocaust.
When Churchill and Stalin alluded to Nazi mass killings of civilians in speeches during the second half of 1941, they said much less than they knew. Not until December 1942 did Allied governments issue a joint statement about Nazi Germany's policy of exterminating the Jews of Europe. Roosevelt deferred his own public statement specifically about Nazi killings of Jews until March 1944, when his War Refugee Board thought he could deter Hungary from collaborating in the deportation of Jews to Auschwitz. FDR's warning initially failed but had a delayed effect, serving to complement the War Refugee Board's rescue efforts in Hungary.
Through close readings of public and private statements, Richard Breitman pieces together the competing motivations that drove each leader's response to the atrocities. All three knew that their reactions would be politically sensitive, as Nazi propagandists frequently alleged that the Allies were fighting on behalf of theJews, and that Jews were the puppet-masters behind their governments. At a time of globally prevalent antisemitism, these lies held power. After the German invasion of the USSR, moreover, Stalin clearly wanted to focus on the threat to the Soviet state and its people. Nazi antisemitism did not fit into Communist ideology, and once the war in the East began, Stalin feared Nazi slaughter of the entire Soviet population.
Churchill and Roosevelt also realized that their complete silence about Nazi killings of Jews would prompt accusations of willful blindness.They usually finessed this dilemma by denouncing Nazi atrocities in general, prioritizing wartime constraints over moral considerations.
Moral critics have complained that the three Allied leaders could have done more to save Jews even while fighting the Axis and criticized Allied military decisions not to pursue the bombing of rail lines and the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau. For most of the Holocaust, none of the three was a rescuer. If they had spoken out more clearly against Nazi genocide it might have added credibility to warnings that Jews in Axis-controlled territories were already receiving. Breitman concludes, however, that ending the war was their main strategy to stop the Holocaust — for if the war in Europe had lasted longer, the Nazis would have killed hundreds of thousands more Jews. Bombing of rail lines was seen as ineffective during the war, and bombing of the gas chambers was a long-range, longshot mission that, even if accomplished, would not have halted Nazi killing of Jews through other means. The humanitarian efforts of the War Refugee Board in Hungary, resulting in the survival of about 119,000 Jews in Budapest, belie the claim that the Western allies were simply indifferent to the Holocaust in Hungary.
Timely and incisive, A Calculated Restraint sheds new light on the relationship between World War II and the Holocaust. Ultimately, the Allied leaders' responses cannot be reduced to a matter of character. What they said — and chose not to say — about the Holocaust must be understood in light of the political and military demands that drove their decision-making. A Calculated Restraint also shows how the Holocaust still influences today's extremist antisemitic movements and reactions to them. A Calculated Restraint (Harvard University Press; 352 pages; ISBN 9780674293649) is available at Amazon, Harvard University Press, Barnes and Noble and Bookshop.org.
Richard Breitman is Distinguished Professor Emeritus at American University. His many books include FDR and the Jews, co-authored with Allan J. Lichtman; The Berlin Mission: The American Who Resisted Nazi Germany from Within; Official Secrets: What the Nazis Planned, What the British and Americans Knew; and The Architect of Genocide: Himmler and the Final Solution.
Media Contact: Liz Ammirato, 914-299-3882, liz@callprinc.com, Cathy Callegari, Public Relations
Media Contact
Company Name: CATHY CALLEGARI PUBLIC RELATIONS INC
Contact Person: Liz Ammirato
Email: Send Email
Phone: 914-299-3882
Address: 159 Madison Avenue, Apt. 5J
City: New York
State: NY
Country: United States
Website: www.callprinc.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.K. and France set to implement migrant returns deal
U.K. and France set to implement migrant returns deal

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

U.K. and France set to implement migrant returns deal

Britain said it would begin implementing a deal to return migrants who arrive on small boats to France within days after a treaty on the arrangement – a key part of British plans to cut illegal migration – is ratified on Tuesday. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced the 'one in, one out' pilot scheme on migrant returns last month. Under the new deal, France has agreed to accept the return of undocumented people arriving in Britain by small boats, in exchange for Britain agreeing to accept an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with British family connections. A treaty on the scheme was signed last week but not previously announced ahead of Tuesday's ratification. Britain said the European Commission and EU member states had given the green light to the plan. Starmer, whose popularity has fallen since winning an election landslide last year, is facing pressure to stop small boat arrivals from the populist Reform U.K. party, led by Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage. Britain's interior ministry said it expected detentions to begin within days. 'This is an important step towards undermining the business model of the organized crime gangs that are behind these crossings,' British interior minister Yvette Cooper said. Under the agreement with France, government sources previously said they were looking at about 50 returns a week, or 2,600 a year, a fraction of the more than 35,000 arrivals reported last year, though the scheme could be scaled up. More than 25,000 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025, and the government has targeted people smugglers with sanctions, clamped down on social media adverts and is working with delivery firms to tackle the illegal work that is often promised to migrants.

Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left the state over Trump-backed redistricting
Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left the state over Trump-backed redistricting

CTV News

time7 hours ago

  • CTV News

Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left the state over Trump-backed redistricting

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House, Feb. 5, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says he will begin trying to remove Democratic lawmakers from office Monday if they do not return after dozens of them left the state in an attempt to block the adoption of redrawn U.S. House maps sought by President Donald Trump. Some of the lawmakers, including those who left Sunday for Illinois or New York, clapped back, accusing Abbott of using 'smoke and mirrors' to make threats that go beyond his legal authority. The revolt by Democrats in the state House and Abbott's threat ratcheted up a widening fight over congressional maps that began in Texas but expanded to include Democratic governors who have floated the possibility of rushing to redraw their own state maps in retaliation. But their options are limited. The dispute also offers another example of Trump's aggressive view of presidential power and his grip on the Republican Party nationally, while testing the longstanding balance of powers between the federal government and individual states. 'We're not going to tolerate our democracy being stolen in a modern-day stagecoach heist by bunch of law breaking cowboys,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said Monday, flanked by several of the lawmakers who fled. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us with no choice: We must do the same. You have to fight fire with fire.' At the centre of the escalating impasse is Trump's hope of adding five more GOP-leaning congressional seats in Texas before the 2026 midterm elections. That would bolster his party's chances of preserving its slim U.S. House majority. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. A vote on the proposed maps was set for Monday in the Texas House, but it cannot proceed if Democratic members deny a quorum by going to another state, which puts them beyond the reach of Texas law enforcement. After one group of Democrats landed Sunday in Chicago, they were welcomed by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, but declined to say how long they were prepared to stay away from Texas. 'We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know,' said state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader. But legislative walkouts often only delay passage of a bill, including in 2021 when many of the same Texas House Democrats left the state for 38 days to protest new voting restrictions. Once they returned, Republicans still passed that measure. Four years later, Abbott is taking a far more aggressive stance and warning Democrats that he will seek to remove them from office if they are not back when the House reconvenes Monday. He cited a nonbinding 2021 legal opinion issued by Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton that suggested a court could determine that a legislator had forfeited their office. He also suggested the lawmakers may have committed felonies by raising money to help pay for fines they could face. 'This truancy ends now,' Abbott said. House Democrats issued a four-word statement: 'Come and take it.' And some lawmakers who relocated to other states taunted the governor in response. 'He has no legal mechanism,' said Texas Rep. Jolanda Jones, one of the lawmakers who was in New York. 'Subpoenas from Texas don't work in New York, so he can't come and get us. Subpoenas in Texas don't work in Chicago. ... He's putting up smoke and mirrors.' The state of the vote Lawmakers cannot pass bills in the 150-member Texas House without at least two-thirds of them present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber, and at least 51 left the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned on Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table,' he posted on X. Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, said on X that Democrats who 'try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' Fines for not showing up A refusal by Texas lawmakers to show up is a civil violation of legislative rules. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders had the authority to 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served. Two years later, Republicans pushed through new rules that allow daily fines of US$500 for lawmakers who don't show up for work as punishment. The lack of a quorum will also delay votes on disaster assistance and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas that killed at least 136 people. Democrats had called for votes on the flooding response before taking up redistricting and have criticized Republicans for not doing so. Illinois hosts Texas lawmakers Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender who has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term, had been in quiet talks with Texas Democrats for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state. Last week, the governor hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they decided to deny a quorum to block the map, according to a person with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'This is not just rigging the system in Texas, it's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come,' Pritzker said Sunday night. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and he hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states. ___ Joey Cappelletti And Andrew Demillo, The Associated Press Associated Press writers Bill Barrow in Atlanta and Nadia Lathan in Austin contributed to this report.

ICE raids are causing a spike of pets in L.A. shelters after owners detained
ICE raids are causing a spike of pets in L.A. shelters after owners detained

CBC

time7 hours ago

  • CBC

ICE raids are causing a spike of pets in L.A. shelters after owners detained

Social Sharing Los Angeles County has a new task: taking care of dogs and cats after their owners were detained or deported in immigration raids that picked up this summer in the U.S. under the Trump administration. From June 10, the county has taken in 28 animals, 22 of whom are dogs. Eleven dogs and two cats have been placed with homes since then. In the Downey shelter, two cats come in together in a carrier and some dogs come in boxes and plastic bins. Then they are placed in cages waiting for adoption. The barking and meowing can get loud. "The animals have become sort of a victim in this situation because, to no fault of their own, they're finding themselves in the care centres," said Christopher Valles, public information officer for the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control. Increased immigration raids have been unfolding in the U.S. for months as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's anti-immigration push. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have shown up at schools, workplaces and at immigration appointments to detain tens of thousands of people, actions which have been challenged by courts and criticized by government officials. In June, Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in response to protests against the immigration raids. On Friday, a federal appeals court affirmed a lower court's decision to temporarily bar immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. The Trump administration had sought to appeal the lower court's order, but judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed with the lower court that government agents should be blocked from detaining people based solely on discriminatory reasoning such as presumed race or ethnicity, or speaking Spanish or accented English. The city of Los Angeles is also part of a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using racial policing and other unlawful tactics to meet Trump's administration's immigration quotas. In the meantime, shelters are feeling the pressure as more animals are left with nowhere to go in the wake of their owners' abrupt detainment. While the dogs and cats wait to be placed in homes, the county will give pets a health check and have them groomed if that is needed, Valles said. "The only approach that we changed on how we operate when it comes to the deportation operations in our region is how can we better assist the community, because this is something that we have never seen before," Valles said. Valles advised that families who have an animal and are concerned that they could be impacted by these increased immigration raids put a plan in place for their pets to be taken in by a close friend or family member in the event of a detainment. "During these challenging times, with the deportation operations that are going on, we are monitoring it closely, but have a plan. Create a bio for your dog, reach out to your neighbour, your family, who can be an alternative to surrendering your pet at the care centre," Valles said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store