BBC chiefs 'should face charges' over Glastonbury... Outrage led by Keir Starmer grows after broadcast of vile 'death to Israeli soldiers' chants
BBC bosses should be prosecuted for broadcasting a vile anti-Semitic outburst at the Glastonbury festival, the Tory party said tonight.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the corporation 'appears to have broken the law' by transmitting a punk duo's calls for the deaths of Israeli soldiers.
Top lawyer Lord Carlile said the BBC may have committed a criminal offence, while Sir Keir Starmer said the broadcaster had serious questions to answer.
The growing backlash comes after the BBC live-streamed Bob Vylan's performance uninterrupted on its iPlayer site. It could now face an investigation into whether it has breached public-order laws.
Such are the implications of the chants that the US State Department is also reportedly gearing up to revoke the band's visas ahead of a forthcoming tour.
During Saturday's performance by the London-based pro-Palestinian duo, vocalist Bobby Vylan shouted 'Death, death to the IDF', the Israeli Defence Forces.
He followed the chant, which was repeated by the audience, with 'From the river to the sea, Palestine... will be free' – regarded by many Jews as a call for Israel 's elimination.
Broadcasting material calling for the death of an individual or group is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. It carries a maximum sentence of seven years in prison.
Detectives from Avon and Somerset Police, the force responsible for the policing of Glastonbury, are reviewing footage of the performance.
It is understood that BBC director-general Sir Tim Davie would have to bear ultimate responsibility if the Crown Prosecution Service decided to take the matter further.
Mr Philp said: 'It looks clear that Bob Vylan were inciting violence and hatred.
'They should be arrested and prosecuted – just like some of those who did the same during the riots last summer.
'By broadcasting the duo's vile hatred, the BBC appears to have also broken the law. I call on the police to urgently investigate and prosecute the BBC as well for broadcasting this.
'Our national broadcaster should not be transmitting hateful material designed to incite violence and conflict.'
DailyWire this evening said the US State Department were looking to revoke the band's visas.
A senior official reportedly told them: 'As a reminder, under the Trump Administration, the U.S. government will not issue visas to any foreigner who supports terrorists.'
The punk duo have a twenty-city tour through the States lined up later in the year.
Bob Vylan were performing as a warm-up act for controversial Northern Irish rappers Kneecap – one of whose members is facing a terror charge for allegedly displaying a flag in support of the banned organisation Hezbollah.
Sir Keir said there was no excuse for Vylan's 'appalling' hate speech.
'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence,' he added.
'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.'
Lord Carlile said people were free to make anti-Israel comments but when those comments spilled over into death threats, or something that sounded like death threats, the BBC had a responsibility not to broadcast unlawful material.
The KC, who served as the Government's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation for ten years, added: 'I would be interested to know whether the BBC took legal advice and, if so, what that legal advice was. I'm very troubled they may have broadcast unlawful material under section 22 of the Public Order Act.'
Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said: 'Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for anti-Semitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.'
Bob Vylan, who formed eight years ago in London, refuse to reveal their real names because of what they call the 'surveillance state'
But lawyer Mark Lewis, who specialises in libel cases, said the apology had come too late. He added: 'It is a bit rich that they try to lock the stable doors after the horse has bolted. Glastonbury was warned what was likely to happen and now it is likely there will be legal consequences.'
Former Tory culture secretary Nadine Dorries said the BBC had 'serious questions to answer', adding: 'It is quite right that lawyers are asking whether the broadcasting of the chants made on the stage at Glastonbury have crossed the line into a criminal offence. Police should seek swift advice and take action immediately.'
Dame Priti Patel, former home secretary and current Shadow Foreign Secretary, added: '[The BBC] no longer hold the respectability to claim the mantle of our national broadcaster.'
Former Labour minister Lord Austin said: 'This weekend Glastonbury was turned into a sickening hate rally, and chants for death were beamed into millions of homes by the BBC.
'Tim Davie must now launch an urgent investigation and fire those found to be responsible. He must understand this is a very dark day for the corporation that calls its very purpose and future into question.'
Former director of BBC television Danny Cohen told The Daily Telegraph: 'The police should investigate, as should the BBC's board, led by chairman Samir Shah. How much longer can they tolerate the failings of BBC leadership on anti-Semitism and bias?'
A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'The BBC has surpassed even itself in endangering British Jews by airing this violent chanting.
'We are formally complaining to the BBC over its outrageous decision not only to broadcast Bob Vylan's calls for death and destruction, but also to place that segment on iPlayer along with Kneecap's performance, which the BBC knew in advance that it should not air.
Bob Vylan is the UK's self-proclaimed 'most violent boy band' whose singer attended his first pro-Palestine protest at the age of 15 and whose music fuses punk, grime and hip hop
'Our national broadcaster must apologise for its dissemination of this extremist vitriol, and those responsible must be removed from their positions.
'That includes Tim Davie... who has had more than enough chances to stop this abuse of licence fee payers' money to platform bigots and extremists.'
Toby Young, president of the Free Speech Union, raised the case of childminder Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for tweets she made about deporting asylum seekers and burning down hotels housing them after the Southport killings of three girls at a dance studio. She is currently serving a 31-month sentence.
He added: 'She caveated what she said by adding 'for all I care', whereas he [Vylan] clearly does care and wants every member of the IDF, which includes virtually the entire population of Israel, to be killed, so the case for prosecuting him is stronger. But to be clear, neither should be prosecuted.'
Bob Vylan's performance was later removed from iPlayer.
A BBC spokesman said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive.
'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.'
Avon and Somerset Police were approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sophisticated Booking.com scam targeting holidaymakers could leave you £1,000s out of pocket – 3 urgent warning signs
HOLIDAYMAKERS are being warned about a scam that has already cost victims £370,000. Fraudsters are hacking hotel accounts on the platform and sending fake messages or emails that look legitimate. 2 This often happens when hotel staff accidentally click on a malicious link in an email, giving criminals access to the hotel's account on the platform. Once inside, scammers send messages to customers claiming payment details need to be verified or that a card has been declined. They then trick holidaymakers into entering their banking details via fraudulent links. Action Fraud has received over 500 reports of the scam between June 2023 and September 2024, with victims collectively losing £370,000 – or £700 per person. Customers have shared their close calls with the scam on X (formerly Twitter). One showed a message directly through their app which read: "Dear [XXX], we need you confirmation. "Your reservation and the details you entered are still pending. If you don't verify and complete everything within the next six hours, your booking will be automatically cancelled - no exceptions." The customers is then directed to click on a rogue link in the message chain to "confirm and finalize" their trip - even though it's already paid for. Consumer rights expert Martyn James said: "If you get a message from a hotel or host through or an email asking for your card details, ignore it. "Only go through your portal on the website to confirm payment details. Major warning over emergency social welfare scam texts as thousands could be targeted "Do not send money via links and never pay with bank transfers or PayPal 's 'friends and family' option." said its security hasn't been hacked, but scammers may have accessed the IT systems of some hotels listed on its site. A spokesperson added: "Unfortunately, there is an increasing number of online scams targeting many businesses operating in the e-commerce space. "With the rise of AI, cybercriminals are able to create increasingly sophisticated scams." If you get a message on asking for payment, contact your hotel, airline, or service provider directly to make sure it's real. Meanwhile, another scam targeting holidaymakers uses fake websites to trick people into downloading harmful files that give criminals control of their devices. HP Wolf Security says scammers send emails with links to these fake sites. When visitors click "accept" on the cookie pop-up, the malicious file is downloaded. Hotel booking scam cost me £800 By Laura Purkess CYBER scammers are impersonating hotels to steal holidaymakers' cash. Crooks swiped more than £15million from travellers through a range of rackets over the year to April, Action Fraud revealed. Recently, grifters have been messaging customers who have reserved hotels via travel website The website said its own security had not been breached, but confirmed that a number of the venues it lists have had their IT systems compromised by con artists. This can happen if a member of the hotel's staff mistakenly clicks on a link in an email sent by criminals, who can then log into the hotel's account on the booking site and message customers directly. Student Viktoria Tkach was duped into paying nearly £800 in one such scam. The 21 year-old, of Greenwich in South East London, had booked a trip to Sharm El Sheik, Egypt, with mum Natalie, 50, in February. A week before departure, Viktoria got a message, apparently from the hotel, saying she must pay £791 towards her stay or the reservation would be cancelled. She said: 'Because the message appeared in my account and looked so official, I felt like I had to follow orders.' It wasn't until Viktoria and her mum got to the hotel that she realised she had been scammed as the receptionist told her the full £937 for their 11-night break still had to be paid. She felt she had no choice but to fork out a second time. Viktoria fought for five months to get her money back, but the hotel and her bank all refused. It was only when Sun Money stepped in that agreed to a refund. A website spokesperson said: 'While there has not been a security breach on we are aware some of our accommodation partners were targeted by phishing messages, which compromised their internal systems. 'We take safety and security very seriously and were sorry to hear about Viktoria's experience. This is not the level of service we strive to provide.' It has now refunded Viktoria's money with an extra goodwill payment. Sun Money journalist Mel Hunter was targeted by a similar scam when she booked a holiday in Faro, Portugal, this month. 'The fact the message appeared in my account made it so convincing,' she revealed. 'Thankfully I smelled a rat, but the hotel told me other guests had lost money.' said it is supporting its hotel partners with training and guidance. How to report scams If you think you have been a victim of a scam, you should report it as soon as possible. There is no guarantee you'll get your money back, but banks will often compensate you if you can show you did not know the money would leave your account. You can forward scam emails to report@ If you notice a website that doesn't look quite right, you can also report it to the National Cyber Security Centre by visiting You should also contact your provider and report it to Action Fraud, which will give you a crime reference number. You can do this online by visiting or by calling 0300 123 2040. If you're in Scotland, report a scam through Advice Direct Scotland online by visiting You can also report scams to Police Scotland on 101. If you need further help, contact Citizens Advice Scams Action by visiting or calling 0808 223 1133. Action Fraud's advice on holiday fraud THINIKNG about booking a holiday this year? Follow our top tips to avoid falling victim to holiday fraud DO YOUR RESEARCH: Before committing and booking your dream holiday, make sure that you do a thorough online search to ensure the company is credible. PAY SAFELY: If you have a credit card, use it when shopping online. Most major credit card providers protect online purchases. LOOK FOR LOGOS: Check if a travel company is an ABTA, the Travel Association, member or an ATOL holder. Look for the ABTA logo on the company's website. If you have any doubts, you can verify their membership of ABTA online on their website. If you're booking a flight as part of a package holiday and want to find out more information about ATOL protection, visit the ATOL website. STAY SAFE ONLINE: Use three random words to create a strong email password that's different from all your other passwords. If two-step verification is available, always enable it. WATCH FOR SUSPICIOUS MESSAGES: Be cautious of unexpected emails or messages offering unrealistic holiday deals. If you receive a suspicious email, report it by forwarding it to: report@ PROTECT PERSONAL INFORMATION: Only fill in the mandatory details on a website when making a purchase. If possible, don't create an account for the online store when making your payment. BOOK WITH CONFIDENCE: Be sceptical of unrealistic holiday deals. If they sound too good to be true, they probably are. Exercise caution and research before making a purchase.
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kendall to set out welfare changes as modelling suggests 150,000 may be pushed into poverty
Update: Date: 15:09 BST Title: Who has said what? Content: While we're taking a look over that written statement, and waiting for things to get moving in the Commons, here's what some of the key players have said about the proposed welfare changes : After the concessions were announced, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the government was aiming to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate" benefits system. Labour rebels argued the original plans were rushed and would push vulnerable disabled people into poverty. Despite the government's partial U-turn, dozens are believed to still have misgivings about the changes and could defy the government in tomorrow's vote. The Liberal Democrats are planning to vote against the bill and have called for the government to bring forward its programme to help people into work more quickly. The Conservatives said ministers had wasted an opportunity to reform welfare and have called for cuts to mental health benefits for all but the worst cases. Update: Date: 15:02 BST Title: Government shares statement ahead of Commons address Content: A written ministerial statement, external from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has just been published, ahead of her address in the Commons later this afternoon. We're reading through it now and will bring you the key lines imminently. Update: Date: 14:54 BST Title: What concessions has the government made? Content: The original bill set out changes to who could qualify for certain disability and sickness benefits. This includes restricting eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), and freezing the health-related element of universal credit (UC). Now Pip claimants will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health-related element of UC. Instead, planned cuts will only hit new claimants. The government also reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of UC. The payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients. Update: Date: 14:37 BST Title: A simple guide to the planned changes to Pip and universal credit Content: Personal independence payment (Pip) is paid to 3.7 million people who have a long-term physical or mental health condition in England and Wales - up from 2.1m in 2019. There are two elements - a daily living component and a mobility component. Claimants may be eligible for one or both. The government now plans to tighten daily living assessments for future claimants - this will not affect those already receiving Pip, and the mobility element is not affected. It also announced changes to universal credit (UC), a payment made to people to help with their living costs. More than three million recipients of UC have no requirement to find work due to their health, a number that has risen sharply. If you have limited capacity to work because of a disability or long term condition, the UC payment you receive more than doubles, because of an extra top-up. Under the government's proposals, claimants will not be eligible to get this incapacity top-up until they are aged 22 or over. And new claimants will also see the value of this top-up fall. Update: Date: 14:32 BST Title: How we got here, in 99 words Content: Back in March, the government announced significant benefits changes, aimed at cutting welfare spending. But they proved unpopular with a large group within Labour, and faced criticism from opposition parties. As the first parliamentary hurdle drew nearer, so grew MPs' disquiet. Then last Thursday, after 126 Labour MPs threatened to vote down the proposals, the government confirmed major concessions, including: Today, the work and pensions secretary will share more details in the Commons, ahead of a vote on Tuesday. Update: Date: 14:29 BST Title: Government to outline welfare concessions ahead of key vote Content: Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall will later this afternoon set out to Parliament the details of concessions the government has made to proposed welfare changes. Last week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced into a U-turn over his planned benefits changes, after more than 120 Labour MPs threatened to vote down his plans. The deal with rebel MPs suggests the welfare reforms will only save £2bn a year, rather than the £5bn they were expected to save by 2030. Ministers are hoping the concessions will help limit the rebellion ahead of a key vote on the bill tomorrow - but dozens of Labour MPs are believed to still have misgivings, and could defy the government in Tuesday's vote. Stick with us as we follow Kendall's statement live - due at around 15:30 BST.
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
North Yorkshire's first fixed speed camera installed
The first fixed-location speed camera in North Yorkshire has been installed and is ready to go-live on is located on the A64 in Sherburn, between Malton and Scarborough, as part of a three-month now, North Yorkshire Police has used mobile speed camera vans to patrol the county's road network, but these can only operate during daylight hours."We have real challenges around serious collisions and sadly, people killed on our roads. Speed is a high contributing factor to that," said Supt Mick Roffe, the force's head of specialist operations. "My message to those people who speed in this county routinely is: 'We will be here to catch you when you do speed and this technology will help us do that all times of day and night, and you're not going to always know where it is.'" Sherburn was chosen for the trial based on collision statistics and data from mobile speed camera Supt Roffe said the technology could be moved to different places to stop drivers learning the location of the camera."Do not speed wherever you are in the county, because this kit may be round the corner from you," he said. 'Speeding mindset' Gillian Taylor, who co-ordinates the Average and Fixed Speed Cameras for North Yorkshire campaign group, welcomed the announcement."To get this far is incredible and it feels great that we are actually being listened to and the authorities are taking this seriously," she Ms Taylor, who lives in Cowling, raised concerns about the "halo effect", where drivers slow down for a camera, then speed back up."It's great that it's being trialled, but I wonder how success is going to be measured when I look at our neighbouring counties that are rolling out average speed cameras to rural villages like we live in," she said. Ms Taylor said the historic lack of fixed or average speed cameras in North Yorkshire had resulted in a "speeding mindset" in the county."It's actually embarrassing that our neighbouring counties are taking proactive steps around average speed cameras and North Yorkshire wasn't doing it, but they're at least trialling one, and that's great." York and North Yorkshire's elected Labour mayor David Skaith said speeding along the stretch of the A64 was an "incredible problem"."Time and time again, people tell us that their roads don't feel safe so having cameras like this is going to help create safer communities, safer streets," he said. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
