Political wrangling
The PTI is in a political crisis of its own, especially in the wake of the verdict on reserved seats. The Constitutional Bench's pronouncement that the PTI is neither a parliamentary party nor is it eligible for the seats reserved for women and minorities in national and provincial assemblies has literally decimated its locus standi. The beleaguered party, faced with the threat of floor-crossing, is mulling an oath of allegiance from its MNAs and MPA, unsure of what turn this politics of exigency is going to take. Punjab and K-P assemblies are in the eye of the storm as PTI-backed independents face overtures from rival political forces.
The 12-member judgment from the Constitutional Bench dealt a death blow to the PTI and dashed its hopes of emerging as a viable entity on the floor of the house by grabbing some 77 reserved seats. Moreover, the ruling made it obvious that those who had earlier joined the Sunni Ittehad Council could now face the defection clause under Article 63A of the Constitution, if they chose to rejoin PTI. This is where the political wrangling is underway - with some trying to saving the skin while others bent upon obliterating the party's nomenclature.
The decision of the Constitutional Bench — though well within its lawful domain, at least in letter if not in spirit — has stirred an unprecedented political crisis. Is it, by the way, constitutional for any party other than the PTI to get a share from the booty? Had the court altogether set aside distribution of the reserved seats that would have gone to the PTI, it could have at least avoided horse-trading.
The PTI too has a blame to share as its political arithmetic was wayward. Had its elected legislators joined the MWM on the floor of the house, instead of the SIC, this upheaval would not have occurred, because the former had formally participated in the general elections. It would have been wiser on the part of the PTI legislators to discipline themselves with the rank and file, avoiding a new episode of instability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Broken justice system fuels corruption and elitism: SC
Listen to article The Supreme Court has ruled that a weak and compromised criminal justice system undermines the rule of law and thus encourages corruption, authoritarianism and the rule of the powerful and privileged. "An effective and responsive criminal justice system, free from political interference and corruption, is a fundamental right of every citizen while inexpensive and expeditious justice is a commitment of the State under the Constitution. The criminal justice system will only serve its purpose when the actual stakeholders, the people of this country, will have trust and confidence in a system which is free, accessible, impartial, responsive, independent and free from corruption or any other influence. "It is, therefore, a constitutional duty of every organ of the State, the executive, judiciary and the legislature to take urgent steps so as to ensure that the criminal justice system serves the people of this country and they repose their trust and confidence in its fairness, impartiality and independence", reads a 20-page judgement authored by Justice Athar Minallah, which commuted the death sentence of an inmate imprisoned for the past 25 years into life imprisonment. A three-member bench of the apex court led by Justice Minallah heard the criminal appeal in a murder case. The judgement notes that the appellant has remained incarcerated for more than 25 years. "The appellant had escaped from judicial custody and that obviously constitutes a separate offence and, therefore, it would not be appropriate for us to make any observation lest it may prejudice the case of the parties in any matter that may be pending before a competent court/forum." The appellant was young in 1991 when the occurrence had taken place. He was accompanying his father and the motive was attributed to him and not the appellant. It cannot be ruled out that the appellant may have acted under the influence of his elders, particularly his father. He did not have any criminal record prior to the occurrence and, therefore, he was a first time offender. The court further noted the recovery of the fire arm weapon is not free from doubt and the evidence brought on record in this regard is not safe to be relied upon. In addition to these recognized mitigating factors, the appellant has served the full term prescribed for the alternate punishment of imprisonment for life without the benefit of remissions. "We are, therefore, of the opinion that on account of these mitigating and extenuating circumstances, the sentence of death on five counts was not justified. We, therefore, partly allow the appeal only to the extent of modifying the sentence of death on five counts to imprisonment for life on five counts. The sentences, except those required to be served in default of payment of compensation, shall run concurrently. The benefit under section 382b of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is extended in favour of the appellant," says the judgement. The court lamented on the abysmal condition of the criminal justice system in general and the unjustified delays in the ultimate disposal of cases in which the appellant or petitioner has challenged the sentence of death. In the case before the court, the appellant was sentenced to death by the trial court on September 3, 2008. The appeal was preferred within time. "The High Court decided the appeal on September 18, 2014, and the reference was answered in the affirmative and, thus, the sentence of death was confirmed. There is six years delay in deciding the appeal of a prisoner who has been handed down the sentence of death which cannot be justified." The necessary time for taking up the appeal and its ultimate disposal should not have been more than 12 months, stated the apex court. "The appellant had then sought leave by filing a petition before this Court and the necessary and reasonable time required for its final disposal should not have been more than twelve months." The petition, which was filed in 2014, was for the first time fixed for hearing after seven years i.e on March 22, 2021, and finally on January 29, 2025. It took more than 17 years for the appeal process to complete from the date when the death sentence was handed down. "The condemned prisoner was in a death cell and he was not responsible in any manner for this inordinate delay nor were the procedures in his control." The delay had definitely exceeded the necessary and reasonable time required for the appellate procedures to be completed. This inordinate delay brings the criminal justice system into disrepute and undermines the confidence of the people in the courts and the criminal justice system. The abysmal conditions in most of the overcrowded prisons across the country and the inhumane and degrading conditions often reported not only adds to the unimaginable agony and hardship of a condemned prisoner but becomes a form of unauthorized punishment not intended by the legislature. The court also noted that the judiciary is no doubt responsible when the process of appeal exceeds the necessary and reasonable time required for its completion, but the other branches of the State, the executive and legislature, are also equally responsible for ensuring that the conditions in the prisons are humane and that the treatment of prisoners is not cruel, inhuman and degrading. "It is an onerous task of the High Courts and this Court to ensure that the appeal process and remedies provided under the law are completed within the time which is necessary and reasonable for this purpose." The executive branch is equally responsible to ensure that treatment of the inmates of a prison is not cruel, degrading and inhumane. "The legislature is also expected to review the legislation with the object of making the criminal justice system responsive to the needs of the citizens and accountable for violations of their rights." The unauthorized punishment which an inmate of a prison is forced to endure on account of a compromised, weak and failing justice system cannot be legalized nor condoned. We have noted with concern that most of the victims of the inordinate delays in completion of the appellate process are those who are financially so weak that they cannot even afford to engage a lawyer of their choice. "It appears that the criminal justice system, from the stage of investigation to the fixation of appeals, is vulnerable to be exploited by the privileged and powerful while the victims are those who belong to politically, economically and socially marginalized and underprivileged classes." Every branch of the State having a role in the running of the criminal justice system is under an obligation to take urgent steps to remedy the wrongs. A system which fails in protecting and enforcing the rights alienates the actual stakeholders; the people of this country."
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PML-N emerges biggest beneficiary of CB ruling
Listen to article The National Assembly regained its full strength on Wednesday as the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) distributed reserved seats among the parliamentary parties in the house, in line with the decision of the Constitutional Bench (CB) of the Supreme Court last week. In a 7-3 majority ruling in the reserved seats review case, the CB on Friday overturned the Supreme Court's July 12, 2024 judgment, effectively taking away the reserved seats from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and handing them to their rival parties in the national and provincial legislatures. The CB restored the March 25, 2024, order of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), which had deprived the Sunni Ittehad Council – the party joined by PTI-backed independents after the Feb 8, 2024 elections – of reserved seats. The decision effectively meant that the PTI was no longer a parliamentary party. Therefore, the 77 reserved seats of the national and provincial assemblies were allocated among the parliamentary parties present in the respective assemblies, since they could not be kept vacant. As expected the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PKL-N) was the major beneficiary. In the light of the CB decision, the ECP distributed 19 reserved seats in the National Assembly, out of which, according to an ECP statement, 13 went to the PML-N, four for the Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians (PPPP) and two to the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI). After the allocation of the reserved seats, the ruling coalition, comprising PML-N, PPPP, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) and other parties, surged above the two-thirds majority of 224 in the 336-strong house. Acting on the court's verdict, the ECP issued an order on Wednesday, withdrawing its notifications of July 24 and 29, 2024 that had declared some independent candidates, winning on the general seats of the national and provincial assemblies as PTI lawmakers. In another order, the ECP notified the names of the returned candidates under various categories of the reserved seats with immediate effect. The National Assembly Secretariat later detailed the house composition, reflecting the actual party position after the court verdict and ECP's distribution. The data released by the Secretariat's Legislation Branch showed that the strength of the treasury benches swelled to 235 seats, with 98 of the opposition, in the house currently comprised 333 lawmakerswith one member being suspended and two reserved seats remaining vacant. The ECP also distributed the reserved seats in the provincial assemblies. In the K-P Assembly, 10 seats were given to the JUI-F, seven to the PML-N, six to the PPPP and one each to the PTI-Parliamentarians and Awami National Party (ANP). The PML-N was given 23 seats in the Punjab Assembly – two to the PPPP and one each to the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) and the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP). In the Sindh Assembly, two seats were given to the PPPP and one to the MQM-P.
Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PAC blows whistle on Rs40b Kohistan scam
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Wednesday held a detailed discussion on the alleged Rs40 billion scam in Kohistan, expressing serious concerns over financial irregularities and a lack of departmental cooperation. Chairing a meeting after a month-long break, PAC Chairman Junaid Akbar said that when the committee raises audit objections, the department concerned fails to cooperate effectively. In May, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government launched an investigation into the mega corruption scandal in Kohistan district, where an estimated Rs40 billion had allegedly been siphoned off from the provincial treasury. The account was meant for retention money by contractors for schemes of four departments including communication and works, local government, irrigation and public health engineering departments. The scandal came under intense scrutiny during a meeting of the PAC, chaired by K-P Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati. Officials from the finance department and the Accountant General's office admitted during the session that billions had been misappropriated from government funds. While an official embezzlement figure of Rs24 billion had been confirmed, the PAC members expressed dissatisfaction with the explanations provided by finance secretary and the accountant general. On Wednesday, the audit officials revealed that there had been a misuse of cheque book, with fraud committed by three individuals who have now been arrested. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) is currently investigating the matter. The auditor general disclosed that despite sending three letters to the finance department, no disciplinary action had been taken against any of their officials. The committee demanded complete details of the case and directed that all relevant records be submitted.
