logo
Not so fast, sir ... One Capitol Hill bureaucrat stands in the way of Trump's ‘Big Beautiful' Fourth of July

Not so fast, sir ... One Capitol Hill bureaucrat stands in the way of Trump's ‘Big Beautiful' Fourth of July

Yahooa day ago

Senate Republicans' plan to pass President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' by their self-imposed July 4 holiday deadline is facing a major setback.
Last week, the Senate Finance Committee released the tax and healthcare parts of the bill, which included a provision that would limit provider taxes. States levy taxes on health care providers like hospitals and nursing homes to raise the money to receive federal matching dollars for Medicaid.
Immediately, hospitals denounced it, saying it could decimate rural hospitals, which led to Republican Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine to criticize the provision.
To get this massive bill over the finish line, Republicans plan to sidestep the 60-vote threshold known as the filibuster through the process of budget reconciliation, wherein they can pass a bill with a simple majority as long as it relates to taxes and spending.
But on Thursday, the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, said the Republicans' plan to cap a tax that states use to raise money for Medicaid did not pass the narrow rules of budget reconciliation, known as the 'Byrd rule,' which determines what can be included in a reconciliation bill.
The parliamentarian serves as the nonpartisan rules arbiter in the Senate. Going back to the 1974 Budget Control Act, the parliamentarian determines which parts of a reconciliation bill comply 'the Byrd Rule.' Named for late Senate majority leader Robert Byrd, the rule determines whether legislative text directly relates to the budget, does not involve Social Security, produces a change in outlays or revenues, increase the deficit beyond the years described in the bill, or is 'merely incidental' to spending, which is to say the policy changes would outway any budgetary effects.
Trump said on Friday that the July 4th deadline is 'It's important,' but added 'We can go longer.' Republicans might not have a choice.
'We have no idea what's going to happen here,' Hawley told The Independent afterwards. 'I mean we've got to work on some kind of a fix. Hopefully their fix will involve protecting rural hospitals.'
Hawley said that he spoke to Trump about the legislation when the president flew back from the NATO summit in the Hague earlier this week.
'He likes the house framework, because he helped negotiate it,' Hawley said. 'Yeah, that's a pretty good framework, and I said, 'Yeah, I agree with that.' So, we'll see'
In addition, the parliamentarian ruled against a provision to reduce the federal share of Medicaid expansion coverage under the Affordable Care Act from 90 percent to 80 percent for states that provide health care to undocumented immigrants, another to restrict Medicaid dollars to states that provide health care to certain immigrants who are not citizens and a provision that would have banned Medicaid from covering gender-affirming care for transgender people.
'There was a technical issue with it, and we think we got a technical fix, but that has that's not been done yet,' Sen. John Hoeven of North Dakota told The Independent.
Trump has called for the Senate to pass the bill that the House of Representatives passed last month by a narrow margin by July 4th. He has specifically said that the Senate should not go on vacation until the bill passes.
'I'm not planning to leave until this is done,' Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio told The Independent.
But the setback with the parliamentarian means Republicans will need to rewrite the text of the bill for Medicaid to make it comply with the Byrd Rule.
The bill poses a limited opportunity to pass most of Trump's domestic policy agenda, including extending the 2017 tax cuts he signed his first term and increasing spending for the military, immigration enforcement and oil exploration.
Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee, said the parliamentarian's rulings symbolized how Republicans had run roughshod over the process.
'It's designed to be only for deficit reduction,' he told The Independent. 'They're using it to increase debt massively.'
In response, some Republicans called for the firing of the MacDonough, whom has been in the office since 2012.
'I don't think anyone should stay here that long and have power where she doesn't answer to anybody,' Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas told The Independent. 'I think that her rulings have very much would look like politically, that she's leading to the left, and I think we should have a term limit.'
MacDonough came into her position when Democrats controlled the Senate. But she also irritated Democrats in the past, such as when she did not allow them to include a $15 minimum wage increase in the American Rescue Plan signed by President Joe Biden in 2021.
But Collins, a swing vote, disagreed with the idea of firing the parliamentarian.
'She is doing her job, they are doing their jobs, and people should remember that what comes around goes around when it comes to the parliamentarian,' Collins told The Independent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed
Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed

CNBC

time17 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed

A federal judge on Friday dealt another blow to President Donald Trump's efforts to throw out a defamation lawsuit against him filed by plaintiffs formerly known as the Central Park Five. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone said that Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP law, designed to protect defendants from lawsuits targeting protected speech, does not apply in federal court, rejecting Trump's motion to dismiss the case. "The only issue before the Court is whether Plaintiffs' claims for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") can survive given Pennsylvania's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, otherwise known as its Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Statute," Beetlestone wrote in a 13-page filing. "Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP Statute (a state law) does not apply here, in federal court," she wrote in the filing, adding: "Accordingly, Defendant's Motion shall be denied." Five men who as teenagers were wrongfully convicted in the so-called Central Park Five jogger rape case sued Trump in October, accusing the then-Republican presidential nominee of defaming them. They cited a number of statements Trump made during his Sept. 10 presidential debate against former Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing him of falsely stating that the men killed somebody and pled guilty to the crime. "These statements are demonstrably false," they wrote in their filing against Trump. The five men — Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray and Korey Wise — spent years in prison for the rape and assault of a white female jogger, a crime they were later exonerated of and did not commit. Trump has tried to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against him, but has not been successful. Judge Beetlestone in April also threw out Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him in a different filing.

‘60 Minutes' Kamala Harris interview at center of Trump lawsuit runs afoul of Cronkite-era CBS guidelines
‘60 Minutes' Kamala Harris interview at center of Trump lawsuit runs afoul of Cronkite-era CBS guidelines

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

‘60 Minutes' Kamala Harris interview at center of Trump lawsuit runs afoul of Cronkite-era CBS guidelines

The infamous '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris that sparked President Donald Trump's $20 billion 'election interference' lawsuit conflicted with Walter Cronkite-era CBS News guidelines. Cronkite, who was the face of 'CBS Evening News' from 1962 to 1981, was the premier anchorman of America's golden age of network news. In 1976, at the height of Cronkite's reign as 'the most trusted man in America,' CBS News president Richard Salant penned a 76-page document outlining CBS News standards. Advertisement Page 58 is focused on editing and suggests the '60 Minutes' interview at the center of Trump's lawsuit against CBS News would have been frowned upon during the Cronkite era. 'The objective of the editing process is to produce a clear and succinct statement which reflects fairly, honestly and without distortion what was seen and heard by our reporters, cameras and microphones,' Salant wrote in the 1976 document, which has come to the attention of the Trump legal team. Trump's lawsuit alleges CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with '60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker, who asked her why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't 'listening' to the Biden administration. Harris was criticized for the 'word salad' answer that aired in a preview clip of the interview on 'Face the Nation.' 3 60 Minutes election special, Bill Whitaker asks Vice President Kamala Harris how she'll fund her economic plan and how she'd get it through Congress. 60 Minutes / CBS Advertisement However, when the same question aired during a primetime special on the network, she gave a different, more concise response. Critics at the time accused CBS News of editing her answer to shield the Democratic nominee from further backlash leading up to Election Day. The raw transcript and footage released earlier this year by the FCC showed that both sets of Harris' comments came from the same lengthy response, but CBS News had aired only the first half of her response in the 'Face the Nation' preview clip and aired the second half during the primetime special. 3 Trump's lawsuit alleges CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with '60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker. 60 Minutes / CBS CBS News, which has denied any wrongdoing and stands by the broadcast and its reporting, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital when asked if the Cronkite-era standards have changed. Advertisement 'If more than one excerpt from a speech or statement is included in a documentary broadcast, the order of their inclusion in the broadcast will be the same as the order of their inclusion in the speech or statement, unless the broadcast specifically indicates otherwise,' Salant wrote in the 1976 CBS News Standards guide. When Cronkite died in 2009 at age 92, his Associated Press obituary said the famed anchor 'valued accuracy, objectivity and understated compassion' and 'always aimed to be fair and professional in his judgments' regardless of personal views on a topic. 3 Photograph of Walter Cronkite in the year 1950, doing the 6 o'clock news at WTOP-TV in Washington, D.C., taken from the book 'A Reporter's Life'. 12.18.96 Two polls pronounced Cronkite the 'most trusted man in America': a 1972 'trust index' survey in which he finished No. 1, about 15 points higher than leading politicians, and a 1974 survey in which people chose him as the most trusted television newscaster, according to the AP. Advertisement Salant, who was running CBS News when '60 Minutes' was launched, was lauded by The New York Times when he died in 1993. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 'He was credited with raising professional standards and expanding news programming at CBS,' the Times wrote. CBS News, along with parent company Paramount, are currently in mediation with hopes of settling with Trump. The mediator recently proposed the network end the president's $20 billion lawsuit with a $20 million settlement, according to the Wall Street Journal. Last month, Trump rejected Paramount's $15 million settlement offer as he sought at least a $25 million payout as well as an apology. According to the Wall Street Journal, Paramount 'isn't prepared' to give one.

The Trend Of High Returns At Mainfreight (NZSE:MFT) Has Us Very Interested
The Trend Of High Returns At Mainfreight (NZSE:MFT) Has Us Very Interested

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Trend Of High Returns At Mainfreight (NZSE:MFT) Has Us Very Interested

If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an eye out for. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. Put simply, these types of businesses are compounding machines, meaning they are continually reinvesting their earnings at ever-higher rates of return. And in light of that, the trends we're seeing at Mainfreight's (NZSE:MFT) look very promising so lets take a look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Mainfreight: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.25 = NZ$799m ÷ (NZ$4.1b - NZ$852m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). Therefore, Mainfreight has an ROCE of 25%. That's a fantastic return and not only that, it outpaces the average of 11% earned by companies in a similar industry. Check out our latest analysis for Mainfreight Above you can see how the current ROCE for Mainfreight compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Mainfreight for free. The trends we've noticed at Mainfreight are quite reassuring. Over the last five years, returns on capital employed have risen substantially to 25%. Basically the business is earning more per dollar of capital invested and in addition to that, 84% more capital is being employed now too. The increasing returns on a growing amount of capital is common amongst multi-baggers and that's why we're impressed. To sum it up, Mainfreight has proven it can reinvest in the business and generate higher returns on that capital employed, which is terrific. And investors seem to expect more of this going forward, since the stock has rewarded shareholders with a 88% return over the last five years. So given the stock has proven it has promising trends, it's worth researching the company further to see if these trends are likely to persist. On a separate note, we've found 1 warning sign for Mainfreight you'll probably want to know about. If you'd like to see other companies earning high returns, check out our free list of companies earning high returns with solid balance sheets here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store