logo
Why the US is burning $10m worth of birth control

Why the US is burning $10m worth of birth control

The Guardian3 days ago
There are few better metaphors for the receding status of American women than one offered up by the Trump administration at a medical waste disposal facility outside Paris this week: rather than distribute nearly $10m worth of birth control, which had been purchased by USAID and was destined to be given to women in low-income countries, primarily in Africa, the Americans decided to burn it.
The incinerated contraceptives included 900,000 birth control implants, 2m doses of injectable long-acting birth control, 2m packs of contraceptive pills and 50,000 IUDs. The medicine is just the latest in the far-reaching fallout from cuts made by the so-called 'department of government efficiency,' or Doge, a project in which Elon Musk and a group of his very young, overwhelmingly male acolytes unilaterally slashed congressionally appropriated funding to government programs they did not like. The cuts have been devastating for non-profits that work to improve women's health and safety worldwide. Sarah Shaw, an associate director at the global family planning group MSI Reproductive Choices, says that the cuts will put women at risk as they strain their health with unplanned pregnancies and seek out illegal abortions; other women who are denied access to birth control will lose out on the opportunities for education, professional development or remunerative work that can help them escape abuse, rise out of poverty, pursue their talents and ambitions and better provide for the children they already have.
When MSI attempted to buy the contraceptives, the administration would only accept full price, which the organization couldn't afford, she said. Several non-profits, including MSI, had offered to pay to ship and repackage the supplies, according to another representative. But the Trump administration refused, partially due to federal rules the prohibit the US from providing such goods to groups that perform, provide referrals for or offer education about abortions. In addition to the cost of purchasing the contraceptives, American taxpayers will now be on the hook for about $167,000 for the cost of burning them.
It's just the latest in a series of signs that the Trump administration is turning against the provision of birth control, particularly the safe, effective and woman-controlled hormonal methods that have been a cornerstone of healthcare policy for decades and which were a precondition of women's advancement in work and education over the past 60 years.
In April, the Trump administration abruptly announced that it was suspending a large swath of the domestic service grants distributed under Title X, the program meant to help low-income Americans access birth control, STD treatment and other sexual and reproductive healthcare. Of the 86 Title X grants awarded for fiscal year 2024, nearly 25% were 'temporarily withheld', mostly based on highly suspect allegations that the grant-receiving institutions – including 13 Planned Parenthood affiliates – had failed to comply with Trump executive orders banning things like DEI programs. Eight states now receive zero Title X dollars: California, Hawaii, Maine, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Tennessee and Utah. Alaska, Minnesota and Pennsylvania have also lost most of their contraception funding.
The domestic cuts – along with the exclusion of Planned Parenthood clinics from Medicaid reimbursements – mean that American women, too, are now facing dramatically greater obstacles to accessing birth control. Clinics that relied on Title X funding are now set to close: 11 Planned Parenthood clinics already have, including in Democratically controlled states like California. Planned Parenthood says that cumulatively, the cuts could lead the organization to close about 200 of its 600 clinics nationwide – a devastating cut to abortion providers in particular that will make a wide range of reproductive services inaccessible to women regardless of where they live.
But the Trump administration is not merely forcing these programs for women's health and dignity go up in flames. They are redirecting them to better suit their preferred cultural outcome: one in which women's lives, ambitions and talents are all subordinated to the task of childbearing. The New York Times reported last month that the White House is redirecting Title X funds that once went to birth control to instead fund an 'infertility training center' and programs in something called 'restorative reproductive medicine'. If Title X's original aim was to help American women control their fertility so as to build healthier families and to enable them to pursue other aims – like learning or work – in the new administration's version, the program exists mainly to encourage women to have more children. But the switch should not be seen as a genuine investment in infertility, an often devastating condition with which many Americans struggle. Because the new Title X priorities do not, by and large, direct more money to IVF. Trump promised, on the campaign trail, to make IVF free. But the procedure, which has opponents on the Christian right, is not included in the administration's new priority of 'restorative' reproductive medicine, a practice that avoids controversial fertility treatments; instead, doctors seek the 'root cause' of a woman's infertility, which may involve telling them they can conceive with proper diet and exercise.
In government, money allocation is a statement of values. With its dramatic cuts to contraceptive funding at home and abroad, the Trump administration is making its values clear. It does not value women's health; it does not value their dignity, their control over their own lives, their aspirations, their earning potential, their desire to be freed from ignorance, or poverty, or the abuse they suffer under the hands of husbands and fathers. It does not value their ability to control their own bodies, and by extension, it does not value their ability to enter the public sphere. It does not value their dreams, their gifts, their hard work or invention or aspiration to anything other than making babies. American women, like women everywhere, depend on birth control to live lives of freedom and to pursue their dreams. But because of the Trump administration, those dreams are going up in smoke.
Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Grave, growing, and underrecognized danger:' New report sheds light on plastic pollution
‘Grave, growing, and underrecognized danger:' New report sheds light on plastic pollution

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Grave, growing, and underrecognized danger:' New report sheds light on plastic pollution

The 'underrecognized' and 'grave and growing danger' of pervasive global plastic pollution is a threat to human health throughout the course of our lives, a group of international researchers warned in a report released Monday. With production on track to nearly triple by 2060, plastic pollution is responsible for disease and death and is estimated to cost the U.S. some $1.5 trillion a year in health-related economic losses, they explained, with 8,000 metric tons of plastic waste invading our lands, our water sources, and even our own hearts and brains. In the environment, such waste can provide a habitat for mosquitoes to lay eggs in, spreading deadly infections such as malaria and dengue fever. In our oceans, it can carry bacteria that sickens marine life, choking and killing animals looking for food. Furthermore, airborne emissions from the fossil fuel industry's plastic production are drivers of climate change and expose people to hazardous chemicals. Some three-quarters of plastic chemicals have never been tested for safety, the authors said, even as an estimated 57 percent of plastic waste is burned in the open, leaving low-income and at-risk populations disproportionately in harm's way. 'There is no understating the magnitude of both the climate crisis and the plastic crisis,' Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and epidemiologist at Boston College, said in a statement. 'They are both causing disease, death and disability today in tens of thousands of people, and these harms will become more severe in the years ahead as the planet continues to warm and plastic production continues to increase.' Landrigan and the report's other authors called for greater public awareness of the issue – as well as policy to prevent continued worsening of the plastic pollution crisis. Their findings were released in the British medical journal The Lancet ahead of United Nations talks in Switzerland this week, which aim to finalize the world's first plastic pollution treaty following previous failed attempts. ' Plastics are made from fossil fuels, contaminate food and water, are tied to many human illnesses, and impose steep costs for medical care and environmental damage,' Landrigan, the report's lead author, said. To track these and reduce exposures, the researchers announced they had launched an independent and global monitoring system. They said that worsening is not inevitable with action. 'We know a great deal about the range and severity of the health and environmental impacts of plastic pollution across the full life cycle of plastic,' said Landrigan. 'These impacts fall most heavily on vulnerable populations, especially infants and children. They result in huge economic costs to society. It is incumbent on us to act in response.'

Breakingviews - Trump's degraded data is worse than book-cooking
Breakingviews - Trump's degraded data is worse than book-cooking

Reuters

time24 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - Trump's degraded data is worse than book-cooking

WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump's stance on Covid-19 turned out to be a prelude for his second term. The U.S. president, who in 2020 argued that 'If we stopped testing right now, we'd have very few cases' of the coronavirus, is applying this logic to environmental, health, and - with the firing of the top Labor Department statistician — economic data. With presumably committed professional staff still in place and alternative data sources available, the main risk of isn't fake, rosy data — it's that firms, investors and policymakers will see pillars of the market crumble. The Bureau of Labor Statistics each month estimates jobs created in the prior period and updates its two previous estimates. Glum numbers on Friday prompted Trump to shoot the messenger. Following a report that 73,000 jobs were added in July, combined with a reduction of 258,000 for May and June's numbers, the president fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. His argument that the employment survey is biased, and that revisions were tilted in favor of former President Joe Biden, does not survive under scrutiny. The agency revised, opens new tab down job growth by 818,000 during 2024's presidential election—hardly positive news for an incumbent administration. While this revision was large, volatility is unsurprising amid a trade war and immigration restrictionism. This president is already dismantling other research bodies, whether at the Environmental Protection Agency, or the carbon-tracking Mauna Loa observatory, or advisory boards at the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control. Companies and whole sectors, like insurance and pharmaceuticals, rely on government data for myriad uses: carbon markets, flood insurance calculations, automaker emissions compliance, solar energy output projections, disaster planning and resilience, creditworthiness for infrastructure projects, and more. There is no explicit promise to outright cook the books. Nonetheless, any threat to the integrity of this data degrades a vast infrastructure supporting modern markets, built up over more than a century. A ham-fisted push to skew the numbers would probably be self-destructive, drawing skepticism from outside professionals. Signals like resignations of remaining career staff will be clear. And, simply put, people know whether they have a job or not. Studies from countries that have manipulated official data, like Argentina, opens new tab, show that consumers don't trust fake figures, creating black markets to exploit any spread between fantasy and reality. Even without active sabotage, outdated practices may have slid in this direction by accident: officials warned, opens new tab that the BLS needs a refresh, including by jettisoning ever-less-reliable phone surveys and favoring real-time digital sources like job postings or credit card data. Those worries now get an extra political dimension, no matter what happens. Follow Gabriel Rubin on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.

D'Tigress collect national honours, $100,000 each for wining AfroBasket
D'Tigress collect national honours, $100,000 each for wining AfroBasket

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

D'Tigress collect national honours, $100,000 each for wining AfroBasket

Nigeria president Bola Tinubu give di women national basketball team national honours and cash gift for wining di 2025 Women's Afrobasket for Ivory Coast. President Tinubu promise to give each player $100,000 and an additional $50,000 to members of di technical crew. Nigeria beat Mali 78-64 to win dia fifth straight title and seventh overall Vice President Kashim Shettima, wey represent Tinubu for di event, announce di rewards as im receiving D'Tigress for di presidential villa on Monday. Each player and official for di team go also get one flat for Federal Capital Territory (FCT). We dey update dis tori

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store