Tesla is finally here. Will India be able to power it?
Tesla's India website already lists the Model Y for Indian customers, promising supercharge in 15 minutes - up to 238 kilometres for its rear wheel drive, and up to 267 kilometres for its long-range rear wheel drive. Though it mentions that the said is dependent on factors such as Supercharger type, vehicle configuration, state of charge, battery temperature, speed, weather and elevation change, among others. It also outlines the early Supercharger network under development, including planned locations in Mumbai (BKC, Navi Mumbai, Thane), Gurugram, Delhi Aerocity, and Noida.
'For markets like India where CCS2 (Combined Charging System / IEC 62196-3) dominates, Tesla has developed connector adapters or dual-compatible systems to ensure that even their NACS-based (North American Charging Standard) models can charge from existing infrastructure for the LR RWD model. This strategic flexibility highlights a broader industry shift towards interoperability and charging standard unification, ensuring greater accessibility and convenience for EV users across India,' shares Arun Handa, CTO, Servotech Renewable Power System. This is highly relevant given that Tesla has confirmed the launch of two models in India Model Y RWD, which supports CCS2 charging, and Model Y LR RWD, which uses Tesla's proprietary North American Charging Standard (NACS).
Charging Infrastructure Challenge
For the Model Y RWD, Tesla can fully leverage India's existing network of CCS2-based fast chargers, available across highways, cities, and commercial zones. This alignment ensures minimal infrastructure investment and a faster market rollout. However, the Model Y LR RWD with NACS presents a unique challenge, as India currently lacks any NACS-based infrastructure. 'To support this, Tesla would either need to develop proprietary superchargers or offer reliable CCS2-to-NACS adapters. This would require additional investment and could affect scalability in the short-term,' says Handa. Currently, Tesla is offering connectors for the LR RWD models to charge from the existing EV charging infrastructure in India and Tesla's wall mount chargers for quicker at home charging.
'The CCS2 charger type is already available in India and used by brands such as Tata Motors, JSW MG Motor, Mahindra & Mahindra, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi,' says
Kwan Wongwetsawat
, Senior Analyst – Global Powertrain, Automotive at GlobalData.
For now, aligning with India's CCS2 standard enables Tesla to accelerate market entry, reduce deployment costs, and ensure a smoother user experience for Indian EV buyers while they build a charging infrastructure for the NACS supported vehicles.
Currently, CCS2 standard chargers are commonly used for four-wheelers and hybrid EVs in India, and are capable of fast DC charging up to 360 kW. It's an extension of the IEC 62196 Type 2 connector, with additional DC pins for high-power delivery.
'The CCS2 charger type is already available in India and used by brands such as Tata Motors, MG Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi,' says Kwan Wongwetsawat, Senior Analyst – Global Powertrain, Automotive at GlobalData.
Fast Charging Gap
'Over 90 per cent of India's public fast charging network uses CCS2, ensuring compatibility with Tesla's global vehicle architecture. However, a large portion of the current installed base consists of DC chargers in the 30–60 kW range, which offer limited charging speed for a Tesla-sized battery. That said, CPOs (Charging Point Operators) in India are actively expanding into higher-power chargers (120–240 kW), particularly on highways and urban hubs. Tesla will likely address ultra-fast charging needs by installing its own hyper-chargers at high-traffic or premium locations, and partnering with major Indian CPOs to co-develop ultra-fast charging points that can serve its vehicles,' says Anshuman Divyanshu, CEO – EV, Exicom.
'Post initial traction and market validation (in 18–24 months), Tesla may evaluate deeper investment, including a dedicated Supercharger network, depending on demand, policy clarity, and competitive dynamics,' he adds.
Tesla's adoption of CCS2 in Europe and ASEAN aligns well with India's direction. 'Tesla typically establishes its own charging stations, known as Tesla Superchargers, when entering new markets, often restricted to Tesla vehicles only,' notes Wongwetsawat. 'Tesla's CCS2 is identical to that used in Europe, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore. In contrast, Tesla's proprietary NACS is limited to the US, Canada, and Japan.'
According to
Krishna K Jasti
, CEO & CPO of EVRE, 'The Indian EV space is significantly adaptive. Tesla's entry will positively impact the scalability of the overall industry. With CCS connectors already embedded in India's infrastructure, we are equipped to cater to Tesla cars.'
While Tesla can integrate into India's public CCS2 charging network for basic compatibility, optimal performance, especially for vehicles such as Model Y and others such as X and S -demand Tesla's own Supercharger infrastructure. These high-speed chargers, often rated at 250 kW, need significant upgrades in grid connectivity, high-voltage equipment, and real estate partnerships. 'It is a capex-heavy rollout,' explains Velayutham S, Founder and CEO, Tamirabot. He adds that Tesla might eventually advocate for NACS inclusion in India's Bharat EV standards to align future incentives.
Smart Charging Integration
'The advantage of Tesla Superchargers lies not just in their charging speeds of up to 250 kW for Model 3 and Y (around 170 kW for LFP batteries), but also in their software integration. These chargers integrate with Tesla's built-in navigation system. When navigation is set to a Tesla Supercharger, the vehicle's battery is warmed up just before arrival, which can facilitate faster charging,' explains Wongwetsawat.
'We can envision that initially; Tesla's infrastructure will be exclusively available to Tesla users. This could provide an advantage to Tesla owners over others, as they would have access to both Tesla chargers and other public charging stations. Consequently, this could help accelerate Tesla sales,' shares Wongwetsawat.
In addition to Superchargers, Tesla also offers AC chargers known as Tesla Destination Chargers, which are typically located in public parking areas. 'These Destination Chargers can provide charging speeds of up to 22 kW,' he adds. But all this rests on the question of India's grid readiness.
'India's grid capacity for public EV chargers currently supports 30–60 kW DC chargers. This limits Tesla's ability to fully utilise its fast-charging potential unless there's a grid upgrade,' says Velayutham S. He estimates that a single 250 kW Supercharger stall draws 0.25 MW continuously, with a typical six-stall station consuming up to 1.5 MW, equivalent to the peak power needs of nearly 1,000 Indian homes. This will necessitate dedicated transformers or sub-station taps.
'Tesla will have to partner with majors in power, infrastructure, and energy space such as Jio BP, Tata Power, Adani, and HPCLs to roll out its Supercharger network, starting with pilots in metros and on high-traffic corridors like Delhi–Mumbai and Bengaluru–Chennai,' he adds.
Indicating that Tesla's Supercharging technology is primarily designed for high-speed DC charging, Handa says, 'Indian households are more than capable to charge the EV with the output they're equipped with. For home charging, Tesla is offering more compatible charging solutions. The model LR RWD, will support a 7.7 kW wall mounted charger, priced around ₹40,000, which is essentially an AC Level 2 charger capable of charging the EV in 12 hours offering a range of 350-400 KMs, ideal for overnight charging.' Additionally, Tesla is offering its 15A charger for home charging which would fully charge the EV in about 72 hours.
Public Charging Crucial
The bottom line is, Tesla Superchargers are best suited for commercial hubs and highway networks, while home charging in India will be limited to slower AC chargers unless significant infrastructure upgrades are made. This makes the expansion of public fast-charging stations even more critical for Tesla's success in India. However, charging is still possible with the existing power output offered by the Indian households.
Ultimately, while Tesla's arrival will supercharge India's EV ecosystem, it will also test the strength, and flexibility of its power infrastructure. Whether India can rise to meet this challenge could determine how fast the electric revolution truly accelerates.
Power Draw for Single Tesla Charge (Typical Scenario)
Tesla ModelBattery Size (kWh)Charging Time (from 10–80%)Charging Power Required (kW)Electricity Draw (Units)Model 3/Y~60–75 kWh25–30 min (150 kW DC)120–150 kW (DC fast charging)~45–55 unitsModel S/X~100 kWh30–40 min (250 kW DC)150–250 kW~70–80 unitsUsing AC (Home Charger)Same batteries8–10 hours (7.2 kW)3.3–11 kW (AC)Same energy, slower rate
Source: Tamirabot
Tesla EV Power Grid Impact – City-Wise Estimation (Top Metro Cities)
(Assumption: 1000 Tesla vehicles charged daily at ~75 kWh each.)
CityAvg Grid Capacity (MW)*Tesla Charging Demand (Assuming 1000 Cars/Day)% Load from EVsNotesDelhi NCR~6,000 MW75 MWh/day (avg 75 kWh per Tesla)~1.25%Manageable; grid strong, but EV charger clustering neededMumbai~3,500 MW75 MWh/day~2.1%Urban constraints may limit ultra-fast charger sitesBengaluru~2,800 MW75 MWh/day~2.7%Solar + EV infra growing; manageableChennai~2,500 MW75 MWh/day~3.0%Strong industrial grid, but heat impacts grid resilienceHyderabad~2,000 MW75 MWh/day~3.75%Needs local DISCOM readinessAhmedabad~1,800 MW75 MWh/day~4.2%Higher relative impact; good solar integration potentialPune~1,500 MW75 MWh/day~5.0%Higher impact, especially with residential growth
Source: Tamirabot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The Hundred looking to feed off IPL's 'phenomenal growth' after drawing Indian investment
The investment of four IPL owners into The Hundred will enable the England and Wales Cricket Board-backed event to grow rapidly and learn immensely from the skills possessed by the top minds working for the world's biggest T20 league. Out of the eight teams in the 100-ball competition, four will be partially owned by owners of Mumbai Indians, Sunrisers Hyderabad, Lucknow Super Giants and Delhi Capitals (only GMR group involved). After a long delay, the ECB finalised the deals with the IPL and other investors on Wednesday. Reliance Group, which will own 49 percent of the London-based Oval franchise, and Trent Rockets are yet to close agreements with the ECB. "It's brilliant. You look at what the IPL has done, forget cricket, in sport in general, the growth it's achieved in 18 short years. It's nothing short of phenomenal," said Vikram Banerji, Managing Director of The Hundred, in response to a PTI query on Thursday. "So the growth and the learnings, both on the field and off the field, that they can bring into this tournament, with the balance of the other investors that we've got from America and wherever else, I'm really excited about that side of things, about the skill sets that are now coming into English cricket," he said. The deal will take effect from 2026 season and the investors will take operation control of the franchise from October 1, 2025. Asked about the reason for the delay in closing the agreement with the Reliance-backed Oval franchise and Trent Rockets, Banerji said: "Right at the start we offered all the investors the opportunity to sign and close immediately whenever the legals were all done and have some involvement in this year. "On the whole, it's been run as it was, or close formally at the end of the season, early October, when they close formally, when they take operational control of the name of the brand. So those two chose that months ago. "With Trent Rockets, it's documents were signed and all the rest of it fully there. With the Oval Invincibles, there's three things left on their venue hire stuff that they're working through. They're small things, it'll be a matter of weeks, and that'll get signed out." Banerji and the rest of the stakeholders will soon have a meeting with the new investors for the tournament operations from 2026 onwards. Barring The Hundred, all leagues including the IPL are being played in the T20 format. Is there an inclination from the IPL owners to switch to the standard T20 format from the current 100-ball a side format? "I think you have to look at what works in this country. There have been some discussions around kind of it works elsewhere, but in this country, the format has provided us with some really interesting things, especially from a broadcast perspective in terms of the reach it's provided and that ability to create a new crowd. "At the moment, it's the 100 format, and that will remain for now. But let's see where we get to in a month," said Banerji, who added the participation of active Indian players remains off the card despite the IPL investment into the competition. Sitting alongside Banerji, ECB chief executive Richard Gould, was also asked about the participation of Pakistan players in The Hundred in light of Indian investment. No Pakistan player was picked in the 2025 draft for different reasons. Gould asserted the ECB will take action if the owners are found to be discriminatory in player selection irrespective of his nationality. "We would expect players of all nations to be selected for all teams. I haven't had the need to have any discussion at this point (with new investors)." So is the latest draft just a coincidence? "I don't, I don't know. But we have not had any discussions with the owners at this point. But, we've got very clear anti-discrimination policies within cricket in England. And if those are, if those are not adhered to, our cricket regulator will take action," said Gould. Now that the deals are done, the ECB expects the change in name of at least three teams backed by IPL team owners including Reliance, RPSG and GMR. The sale of stakes have catapulted the valuation of teams to over 975 million pounds with more than 500 million pounds set to be invested in English cricket.
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Nithin Kamath slams flawed comparison between India and US in candid post, says ‘Gambling runs deep in American culture'. Netizens applaud
Agencies Zerodha's Nithin Kamath sparked debate by contrasting India's options trading with the US, cautioning against superficial comparisons. He emphasized that India's market is less leveraged and still developing, unlike the US, which he characterized as having a deep-rooted gambling culture. In a bold and unfiltered post that's making waves across financial circles, Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath has challenged what he calls a 'misguided narrative' comparing India's options trading volumes to those of the United States. And he isn't mincing words. Kamath took to social media this week, highlighting stark contrasts in market maturity, investor behavior, and cultural ethos—concluding with a punchline that's hard to ignore: 'Gambling runs deep in American culture.' The remarks, which appear in a now widely circulated LinkedIn post, reflect growing concerns over surface-level interpretations of trading data, especially as India's retail participation in stock markets continues to surge. At the heart of Kamath's argument is the assertion that Indian markets are not dangerously overleveraged, as some analysts and commentators suggest. He notes that most comparisons rely on the sheer number of options contracts traded, without factoring in premiums or actual capital value. 'If anything, India is significantly less leveraged than the US, even taking into account the fact that our markets are 15–20 years behind theirs,' Kamath wrote in his post. To drive home the scale of difference, Kamath pointed out that the margin funding market in the US recently crossed $1 trillion. In India? It's still under $10 billion—just 1% of that. Likewise, while shorting is a trillion-dollar mechanism in the US, India's stock lending and borrowing market remains in its infancy. — Nithin0dha (@Nithin0dha) Kamath's most eyebrow-raising observation, however, came from outside the trading world—sort of. Referring to a bizarre $210 million wager on whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would wear a suit to the NATO summit, Kamath underlined how deeply embedded gambling is in the American psyche. 'From the stock market to sports, casinos, events, lotteries, prediction markets, and crypto, you can bet on anything,' he said. 'Calling the US a gambling society wouldn't be unfair.' Kamath's comments have ignited a spirited conversation online, with many users rallying behind his take. One user wrote, 'We actually cannot compare Indian markets with the US… the biggest companies in the US are still growing fast, but fractional investing will change the Indian market.' Another comment struck an optimistic tone: 'In the US, approximately 62% of the population has stock market investments, whereas in India, it's only 6%. India could be a sleeping giant waiting to awaken.' Other users praised Kamath for drawing attention to the importance of measuring real leverage over superficial contract counts. 'Comparing contract numbers without looking at actual value is like counting cars without checking if they're Ferraris or Fiat Puntos,' one quipped. Kamath's broader point is that while India's markets are evolving rapidly, they are still in a formative phase—and that's no reason to ring alarm bells. He argued that overzealous comparisons with mature markets like the US not only lack nuance but risk misleading retail investors and policymakers alike. 'We're still building basic infrastructure,' another netizen commented. 'Our regulators are right to be cautious given how new retail participation is. Better slow growth than 2008 crashes.' Whether one agrees or disagrees with Kamath's framing, one thing is clear: the story of India's financial markets cannot—and should not—be told through the lens of another nation's gambling habits.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google loses appeal over app store reforms in Epic Games case
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Alphabet's Google on Thursday failed to persuade a US appeals panel to overturn a jury verdict and federal court order requiring the technology giant to revamp its app store San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected claims from Google that the trial judge made legal errors in the antitrust case that unfairly benefited "Fortnite" maker Epic Games, which filed the lawsuit in accused Google of monopolising how consumers access apps on Android devices and pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company convinced a San Francisco jury in 2023 that Google illegally stifled District Judge James Donato in San Francisco ordered Google in October to restore competition by allowing users to download rival app stores within its Play store and by making Play's app catalog available to those competitors, among other order was on hold pending the outcome of the 9th Circuit appeal. The court's decision can be appealed to the US Supreme told the appeals court that the tech company's Play store competes with Apple's App Store, and that Donato unfairly barred Google from making that point to contest Epic's antitrust tech giant also argued that a jury should never have heard Epic's lawsuit because it sought to enjoin Google's conduct - a request normally decided by a judge - and not collect has defended the verdict and court injunction, telling the 9th Circuit judges that the Android app market has been "suffering under anti-competitive behavior for the better part of a decade."In the trial court and in the appeal, Epic disputed arguments by Google that changes to its app business ordered by the court would harm user privacy and filed a brief backing Epic, as did the US Justice Department and Federal Trade separately is battling Apple over a US judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to give developers greater freedom to steer consumers to make purchases outside its App has appealed a ruling that said it violated a prior injunction in a lawsuit that Epic filed in 2020.
