RAF CEO intends to appeal against suspension ruling in court battle

IOL News

2 days ago

Collins Letsoalo, suspended RAF CEO will appeal the judgment not lifting his suspension
Image: File
Suspended Road Accident Fund (RAF) chief executive Collins Letsoalo has hit back at the judge who refused to lift his suspension, citing nearly 40 points in which he claimed the judge had erred in his judgment.
Letsoalo has applied for leave to appeal against last month's judgment in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria.
In a scathing judgment, Judge Nasious Moshoanathe said Letsoalo's application was deemed vexatious. He found Letsoalo's suspension effected by the RAF Board earlier this month to be lawful, rational, and reasonable.
While the judge had some harsh words regarding Letsoalo's earlier urgent application, the suspended CEO will again have to face the judge in court, as Judge Moshoanathe will have to decide on whether to grant him leave to appeal or not.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
In slapping Letsoalo with the legal costs, the judge last month said: 'The present litigation is aimed at protecting pecuniary interests as opposed to protecting a constitutional right. This court takes the view that the present application is frivolous and vexatious. Mr Letsoalo, for very selfish reasons, it seems, disavowed adequate and substantial remedies available to him in terms of the LRA (Labour Relations Act).'
In his leave to appeal application, Letsoalo remarked that the judge was biased from the start, and Letsoalo had the reasonable apprehension that the judge was assisting the respondents, being the RAF and its board.
He said most of the issues the court had decided upon in its judgment were raised by the court itself and not by the respondents.
In his notice for leave to appeal, Letsoalo made an issue of the fact that the court did not find that there was no resolution by the RAF Board to appoint the firm of attorneys which had represented them in court. His counsel during legal arguments in the main application said the matter should have proceeded on an unopposed basis.
In one of his many points where he felt the court had erred in turning down his application, Letsoalo said the judge chose to ignore his entire version as to why his suspension was unreasonable and irrational.
He also objected to the judge slapping him with the legal costs and for not accepting the argument made by his counsel that this was a constitutional matter, thus he should not face the financial consequences of losing the legal battle.