
The Iran, Israel and U.S. conflict, explained
⭐️HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW⭐️
Israel attacked nuclear facilities in Iran with missiles on June 13.
Iran has retaliated with its own strikes, and people on both sides have been killed.
On June 21, the United States joined the fighting and bombed a nuclear facility in Iran.
Israel and the U.S. said they attacked because Iran is close to building nuclear weapons, which Iran denies.
A ceasefire deal reached on June 23 is shaky but appears to be holding.
Read on to find out why experts are concerned. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
For almost two weeks, Israel and Iran — two countries in the Middle East — have been at war.
It started when Israel said it fired missiles into Iran on June 13 to destroy its nuclear facilities.
These are places where a metal called uranium is enriched and turned into a concentrated energy source that could be used to create nuclear weapons, the world's most powerful bombs.
Israel said it attacked out of fear that Iran would create those weapons.
Iran denies this, saying their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, like generating power.
On June 21, the U.S. got involved by bombing three nuclear sites in Iran. Iran later fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar.
A few days later the three countries agreed to a ceasefire, which appears to be holding for now.
The conflict in the Middle East as of November 2024
What's a nuclear weapon?
You may be wondering— what exactly is a nuclear weapon? Where did they come from, who has them, and why are they such a threat?
Read this explainer on nuclear weapons — it may help you better understand the rest of this article and how we got here.
Why did Israel attack Iran?
Iran's leadership has long called for the destruction of Israel.
There's been tension between Iran and Israel for many years, and they've exchanged fire as recently as 2024, though that escalation didn't last long.
But on June 13, it once again came to a head.
Israel claimed that Iran was very close to making nuclear weapons which could be used against Israel.
Israel is widely believed to have its own nuclear weapons, but has denied this.
'In recent months, Iran has taken steps it has never taken before to weaponize this enriched uranium,' said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the initial attack.
But was their attack justified?
Some have criticized Israel for acting without enough proof.
'There was no evidence that Iran was about to attack Israel,' Mira Sucharov, professor of political science at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, told CBC Kids News.
A recent report from the International Atomic Energy Agency — which monitors nuclear programs around the globe — concluded that Iran likely does not currently have nuclear weapons.
But they also concluded Iran is likely hiding parts of its nuclear program from inspectors.
They also said Iran isn't following all of the rules that many countries around the world have agreed to that prevent the development of more nuclear weapons.
Iranian missiles are seen over Israel on June 13. At least 28 Israelis have been killed and more than a thousand wounded, according to Israel's Health Ministry.
Still, Sucharov said Israel may have broken international laws that require a country to provide clear evidence of a threat before attacking another country.
Others think it was justified regardless.
'Some think Israel's attack was ethical, that they are protecting themselves and protecting the world from a future Iranian nuclear threat,' said Sucharov.
Why did the U.S. get involved?
Some of Iran's nuclear facilities were buried deep underground, and Israel didn't have the weapons to destroy them.
But the U.S. — their close ally — has those weapons. The U.S. has expressed worry about Iran obtaining nuclear weapons for years.
'The U.S. has said for 20 years they could possibly bomb Iran, but no president has ever done so. Here, Trump saw an opportunity,' said Christian Leuprecht, a military expert and professor of political science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario.
U.S. President Donald Trump said U.S. strikes were necessary to destroy Iran's progress in building a nuclear weapon. (Image credit:)
Leuprecht said that opportunity presented itself after Israel weakened Iran over the past year through, among other factors, dismantling some of Iran's key allys.
Trump has been negotiating with Iran this year to sign a deal that would limit Iran's nuclear programs in exchange for the U.S. lifting sanctions.
Sanctions are penalties that can cost a country lots of money and have weakened Iran's economy.
But those negotiations haven't been successful.
Leuprecht said Trump may have bombed Iran's nuclear facilities to force them back to negotiations, this time with less leverage.
That said, Iran has insisted it will not give up its nuclear program.
Despite U.S. strikes hitting three Iranian nuclear sites, it's not clear how much their overall nuclear program has been set back.
What's happening now?
On Monday, Iran launched attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle Eastern countries of Qatar and Iraq.
Early Tuesday morning, Trump announced that the U.S. and Israel had reached a ceasefire deal with Iran.
Later that day however, Israel and Iran accused one another of breaking the ceasefire through missile strikes.
On Wednesday, the ceasefire appeared to be holding and Trump said that U.S. and Iranian officials would reenter talks next week.
Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
With files from The Associated Press and Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Netanyahu lands in DC for meeting with Trump at White House
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his delegation landed at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington on Monday morning, ahead of his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump. Article content Following his arrival, the Israeli leader was scheduled to meet with U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Macro Rubio for a 'preparatory meeting' ahead of a closed dinner with Trump, expected to take place around 6 p.m. Washington time, according to the schedule. Article content Article content Article content The United States is pressuring Qatar to 'deliver' on efforts to finalize a deal for the release of hostages held by the Hamas terrorist organization, according to Israel Hayom. A source familiar with the matter told the outlet that from the White House's perspective, with Israel having responded positively to the latest ceasefire proposal, it is now Qatar's responsibility to ensure Hamas agrees as well. Article content Article content The Israeli negotiating team in Doha updated Netanyahu's entourage that the atmosphere of the talks regarding the hostages is positive. A member of the prime minister's delegation rejected reports that the negotiations had stalled and said there was a good chance of reaching an agreement during Netanyahu's visit. Article content Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir told JNS on Monday that the prime minister 'wants a deal' to free the hostages. Article content Article content 'It's in the open, he doesn't accept my position,' said Ben-Gvir, speaking with JNS at a Knesset meeting of his Otzma Yehudit Party. 'I think that's a big mistake. We have a disagreement on this subject. Article content Article content 'We agreed about [the targeted killing of Hezbollah chief Hassan] Nasrallah, we agreed about Iran, we agreed on many things. On this subject, he does not agree with me,' he added. Article content Last week, Trump said that 'we're close to a deal on Gaza,' adding: 'I think there's a good chance we have a deal with Hamas during the coming week. We've gotten a lot of the hostages out, but pertaining to the remaining hostages, quite a few of them will be coming out.' Article content Looking ahead to his meeting with Netanyahu, Trump said the two leaders would discuss a range of issues, starting with what he called the 'great success' of Israel's recent military operation against Iran. 'We had an incredible success, like nobody's had in many, many years. That was a precision war strike,' Trump said, referring to the American bombing of the Fordow nuclear site. Article content 'The word 'obliteration' can now be used because the Atomic Energy Commission said you can't even get into the place. It was demolished. It was really demolished. It was a great, brilliant strike, and [we'll discuss] how to go forward,' the president asserted. Article content Religious Zionism Knesset member Simcha Rothman told JNS on Monday that there exists an opportunity, following the victory over Iran, 'to create a new reality in the Middle East—and I believe there are no people more suited to do it than President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu. Article content 'I see many people talking about friction between them ever since the day Trump was elected,' Rothman continued. 'It's more wishful thinking on their part than reality. I don't think we've ever seen an American president and an Israeli prime minister this coordinated, and I'm sure it will stay that way.' Article content Yesh Atid lawmaker Naor Shiri told JNS on Monday that the bilateral talks should 'focus on the hostages, the end of the fighting in Gaza, the day after and the continuation of the campaign against Iran. Article content

Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
EU hopes for Trump tariff deal by July deadline after ‘good exchange'
The European Union still aims to reach a trade deal with the United States by July 9 after Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. President Donald Trump had a 'good exchange', a Commission spokesperson said on Monday. It was not immediately clear, however, whether there had been a meaningful breakthrough in talks to stave off the imposition of sweeping tariff hikes on the United States' largest trading partner. The clock is ticking down on a deadline for countries around the world to conclude deals with the U.S. after Trump unleashed a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies. Trump says U.S. close to several trade deals as higher tariffs set to take effect August 1 As he keeps much of the world guessing, Trump on Sunday said the U.S. was close to finalizing several trade pacts in coming days and would notify other countries by July 9 of higher tariff rates. He said they would not take effect until August 1, a three-week reprieve. He also put members of the developing nations' BRICS group in his sights as its leaders met in Brazil, threatening an additional 10 per cent tariff on any countries aligning themselves with the 'anti-American' policies. The BRICS group comprises Brazil, Russia, India and China and South Africa along with recent joiners Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates. The EU has been torn over whether to push for a quick and light trade deal or back its own economic clout in trying to negotiate a better outcome. It had already dropped hopes for a comprehensive trade agreement before the July deadline. 'We want to reach a deal with the U.S. We want to avoid tariffs,' the spokesperson told reporters at a daily briefing. 'We want to achieve win-win outcomes, not lose-lose outcomes.' Trump threatens extra 10% tariffs on BRICS as leaders meet in Brazil Without a preliminary agreement, broad U.S. tariffs on most imports would rise from their current 10 per cent to the rates set out by Trump on April 2. In the EU's case that would be 20 per cent. Von der Leyen also held talks with the leaders of Germany, France and Italy at the weekend, Germany said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has repeatedly stressed the need for a quick deal to protect industries vulnerable to tariffs ranging from cars to pharmaceuticals. 'Time is money in the truest sense of the word,' the German spokesperson told reporters in Berlin. 'In this respect, we should give ourselves another 24 or 48 hours to come to a decision.' Russia said the BRICS group had never tried to undermine other countries. 'It is very important to note here that the uniqueness of a group like BRICS is that it is a group of countries that share common approaches and a common world view on how to cooperate, based on their own interests,' said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. 'And this cooperation within BRICS has never been and will never be directed against any third countries.'


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
U.S. envoy receives the Lebanese government's response to Hezbollah disarmament proposal
BEIRUT (AP) — A U.S. envoy said Monday he was satisfied with the Lebanese government's response to a proposal to disarm the militant Hezbollah group, adding that Washington is ready to help the small crisis-hit nation emerge from its long-running political and economic crisis. The U.S. envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, spoke to journalists after meeting President Joseph Aoun, saying he will study the government's seven-page response. Barrack said the American and Lebanese sides are committed 'to get a resolution.' 'What the government gave us was something spectacular in a very short period of time and a very complicated manner,' Barrack said during his 20-minute news conference at the presidential palace southeast of Beirut. His meetings in Lebanon came amid fears that Hezbollah's refusal to immediately disarm would renew war between Israel after a shaky ceasefire agreement went into effect in November. Last month, Barrack gave Lebanese officials a proposal that aims to disarm Hezbollah and move on with some economic reforms to try get Lebanon out of its nearly 6-year economic crisis, the worst in its modern history. The economic meltdown is rooted in decades of corruption and mismanagement by Lebanon's political class. Barrack said Lebanon should change in the same way as Syria has following the fall in December of Syrian President Bashar Assad,who was replaced by a new leadership that is moving ahead with major economic reforms. Barrack said President Donald Trump and the U.S. are ready to help Lebanon change and 'if you don't want change, it's no problem.' The rest of the region is moving at high speed,' he said. Hezbollah's weapons have been one of the principal sticking points since Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000, ending an 18-year occupation. The two sides fought a destructive war in 2006 that ended in a draw. The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began a day after the Hamas Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and intensified in September, leaving the Iran-backed group badly bruised and much of its political and military leadership dead. Since a U.S.-brokered ceasefire went into effect in November, Hezbollah has almost ended all its military presence along the border with Israel, which is insisting that the group disarms all over Lebanon. Aoun said Sunday that the number of Lebanese troops along the border with Israel will increase to 10,000, adding that only Lebanese soldiers and U.N. peacekeepers will be armed on the Lebanese side of the border. On Sunday night, hours before Barrack arrived in Beirut, Israel's air force carried out strikes on southern and eastern Lebanon, wounding nine people, according to state media. The Israeli army said the airstrikes hit Hezbollah's infrastructure, arms depots and missile launchers. Earlier Sunday, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem reiterated the militant group's refusal to lay down its weapons before Israel withdraws from all of southern Lebanon and stops its airstrikes. The Hezbollah-Israel war left over 4,000 people dead in Lebanon and caused destruction estimated at $11 billion. In Israel, 127 people, including 80 soldiers, were killed during the war. Since the November ceasefire, Israel has carried out hundreds of airstrikes on different parts of Lebanon, killing about 250 people and injuring over 600. Israel is also still holding five strategic posts inside Lebanon that it refused to withdraw from earlier this year.