
You Can Do Everything Right, but Your Baby Might Still Cry—Now We Know Why
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Struggling to soothe a crying baby can be debilitating, but new research suggests it might be more out of parents' control than they think.
A new Swedish twin study has found that how much an infant cries is largely determined by genetics—not parenting style, feeding choices or bedtime routines.
The findings, published in the journal JCPP Advances, offer a fresh perspective to exhausted parents wondering what they could be doing differently.
Mother holding and kissing crying baby boy.
Mother holding and kissing crying baby boy.
Ben Bloom
Researchers from Uppsala University and the Karolinska Institutet studied more than 1,000 twins across Sweden, collecting data from parents when the infants were two months old and again at five months.
By comparing identical twins (who share 100 percent of their genes) with fraternal twins (who share roughly 50 percent), the team was able to assess the relative impact of genetics and environment on infant behavior.
The researchers found that crying is largely genetically determined.
"At the age of two months, the children's genetics explain about 50 percent of how much they cry. At five months of age, genetics explain up to 70 percent," said lead author Charlotte Viktorsson, a postdoctoral fellow in psychology.
In other words, a baby's tendency to cry might have more to do with their DNA than anything a parent does—or doesn't—do.
"For parents, it may be a comfort to know that their child's crying is largely explained by genetics," Viktorsson added, and essentially, there are limits to how much parents can influence it.
The remaining percentage, researchers found, was attributed to the "unique environment"—factors specific to each child that weren't clearly captured in the questionnaires, such as subtle differences in care or external stimuli.
The study also looked at nighttime awakenings and how long babies took to fall asleep. In these areas, genetics were less influential—especially in the early months.
At two months, how quickly a baby settled to sleep was mainly influenced by environmental factors. By five months, genetics played a slightly larger role, reflecting infants' rapid development.
Interestingly, the number of times a baby woke during the night appeared to be driven almost entirely by environmental factors.
"This reflects the rapid development that occurs in infants, and may indicate that parents' efforts in getting their child to settle may have the greatest impact in the first months," Viktorsson said.
The researchers are continuing to follow the twins through age three to better understand how sleep and crying evolve in early childhood.
Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about parenting? Let us know via health@newsweek.com.
Reference
Viktorsson, C., Yahia, A., Taylor, M. J., Ronald, A., Tammimies, K., & Falck-Ytter, T. (n.d.). Genetic and environmental influences on sleep quality, ability to settle, and crying duration in 2- and 5-month-old infants: A longitudinal twin study. JCPP Advances. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70023

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Fact Check: Did an Ocean Current Reverse?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. For years, climate experts have been sounding the alarm about the worsening impacts of global warming, and a report made by a European news wire agency over the weekend heightened the concerns in an alarming manner after reporting the first-ever reversal of an ocean current that could have "catastrophic" impacts. The Claim On July 5, IntelliNews published a report titled "Southern Ocean current reverses for first time, signaling risk of climate system collapse." The report states that the Deep Western Boundary Current (DWBC), a key component to the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) that circulates water within the Atlantic Ocean, reversed direction for the first time ever, a "catastrophic" event that would accelerate global warming and disrupt global weather patterns. The alarming report cited a press release from El Institut de Ciències del Mar, a Spanish state research institute, which referenced a recent study published in the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by the University of Southampton. A stock photo of icebergs in Antarctica, where the Southern Ocean is located. A stock photo of icebergs in Antarctica, where the Southern Ocean is located. Oleksandr Matsibura/Getty The Facts What is the AMOC? The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) describes the AMOC as a "component of ocean circulation, which constantly moves water, heat, salt, carbon, and nutrients north-south within the ocean basins, and ultimately between the ocean basins and around the globe." The AMOC brings warm water north and cold water south. In a video about how the currents work, NOAA said that "as the ocean warms, the circulation may slow down, making it less effective at drawing carbon dioxide and especially heat out of the atmosphere." A reversal of the circulation would certainly be cause for concern. However, the PNAS study does not mention reversing ocean currents or the AMOC. What the study found Instead, the study discusses surface salinity of the Southern Ocean. Between the 1980s and 2015, the surface of the polar Southern Ocean was freshening, or growing less salty. The study said this coincided with an expansion of Antarctic sea ice. New satellite data referenced in the study found a "marked increase in surface salinity" across the Southern Ocean over the past decade, which has "weakened upper-ocean stratification, coinciding with a dramatic decline in Antarctic sea ice coverage." "Our study found that surface salinity in the Southern Ocean has been increasing while sea ice has declined," the PNAS study's lead author Alessandro Silvano told Newsweek. "This was unexpected, as melting sea ice is generally thought to freshen the ocean surface. The results suggest that our understanding of the Antarctic system—and how it may evolve—is incomplete." Reports of an erroneous press release It is unclear if IntelliNet is referencing the June 30 PNAS study, considering it mentions a July 2 study in the report, although it doesn't cite the source. A report from German news site said the IntelliNet article was based on an erroneous press release from El Institut de Ciències del Mar about the June 30 study that allegedly included a flawed quote from study co-author Antonio Turiel regarding ocean circulation. Turiel told Newsweek that the flawed quote was partly a result of mistranslation. "Our original press note contained some wrong sentences, partly caused by mistranslation, partly caused by a wrong use of words on my side. That's the reason of the correction," he said. Turiel added that the paper also found evidence that "isopycnals have shoaled, so effectively there is a change in the structure of Southern Ocean." This doesn't indicate a change in direction for the current, Turial said, but that "it is likely that there is a change in the configuration of the currents." A spokesperson with El Institut de Ciències del Mar told Newsweek that the press release has been updated, and Turiel's quote was corrected. However, the IntelliNews report still claims the current has been reversed. Silvano told Newsweek the story has "several issues." "We do not talk about DWBC in our recently published work. The AMOC is not collapsing this year," Silvano said. "There have been issues over the social media and press," he added. The Ruling False. The recent PNAS study does not claim the DWBC is collapsing, as reported by IntelliNews. However, the study's findings are still concerning. "If this salinity increase continues, it could enhance vertical mixing, drawing heat from deeper ocean layers to the surface and further accelerating sea ice melt," Silvano told Newsweek. "This suggests the potential for a self-sustaining feedback loop, where reduced sea ice cover perpetuates further loss. Diminished sea ice coverage can have important consequences, including ocean warming, increased iceberg formation, and threats to marine wildlife." FACT CHECK BY Newsweek


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
US Birth Rates Are Falling—But It's Not Worrying Americans
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump and Congress have offered tax credits and proposed legislation to tackle declining birth rates in the U.S., but according to polling, Americans don't consider the issue to be a "major problem." Fertility rates are projected to average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, according to the Congressional Budget Office's latest forecast released this year. This number is below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration. Despite those numbers, only three in 10 Americans say declining birth rates are a "major problem" in the United States, according to a recent survey by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Just 12 percent of those surveyed said that encouraging families to have more children should be a "high priority" for the government, researchers found after they interviewed 1,158 U.S. adults between June 5 and June 9. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. Overall, 28 percent of Americans surveyed said declining birth rates were a "major problem" while 44 percent said it was a "minor problem" and 27 percent said it was "not a problem." A newborn baby in the hospital. A newborn baby in the hospital. EyeEm'Americans Correctly See the Problem as Not Having the Support They Need' Taking a closer look at the numbers, Americans seem to be concerned about the issues that they think may be the cause of birth rate declines. Some 76 percent said the cost of child care is a major problem while 41 percent said the same about the cost of fertility treatments. The risks of pregnancy and childbirth was also placed above birth rates with 39 percent saying they are a "major problem" and 43 percent saying they are a "minor problem." "Americans correctly see the problem as not having the support they need to have the number of kids they want whether that's zero kids or five kids," said Beth Jarosz, a senior program director U.S. programs at the Population Reference Bureau. "Americans understand that birth rates themselves are not a problem," she told Newsweek. "Birth rates only become challenging—whether they're high or low—when society doesn't plan ahead." "A large number of babies without a plan means overcrowded schools, but you can plan ahead and build those schools," she continued. "The same is true for a smaller number—things like workforce training, automation, and family supportive workplace policies (like child care, consistent scheduling, and flexible leave) mean that we don't need to be afraid of low birth rates." Declining Birth Rate Is Not Just an American Issue Financial concerns are repeatedly cited as a reason for not having children. Last month, the United Nations Population Fund warned of a global birth rate crisis, after finding that one in five had not had or did not expect to have the number of children they wanted. Some 39 percent said this was because of financial limitations. But financial concerns do not appear to be the lone cause of declines with cultural shifts also playing a role in global birthrate. For example, Norway is considered a global leader in parental leave offering parents 12 months of shared paid leave for birth and an additional year each afterward. It has also made kindergarten (similar to a U.S. day care) a statutory right for all children aged 1 or older in 2008. And yet, Norway's fertility rate has dropped dramatically from 1.98 children per woman in 2009 to 1.44 children per woman in 2024, according to official figures. Newsweek spoke to several experts about Norway specifically, who all cited recent culture changes. For example, "young adults are more likely to live alone" and "young couples split up more frequently than before," Rannveig Kaldager Hart, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Centre for Fertility and Health said. Recent Pew Research Center analysis showed that fewer Americans in their 20s and 30s are planning to have fewer children than a decade ago. "Focusing on intentions rather than outcomes this study highlights the deeply complex and nuanced challenge of boosting birth rate," Theodore D. Cosco, a research fellow at the University of Oxford's Institute of Population Aging, told Newsweek. "By flagging lower intentions as an upstream issue, we recognize that both immediate and long‐term factors must be tackled well before births occur," he continued. "If there is going to be meaningful change in birth rates, upstream and downstream factors will need to be addressed in a comprehensive and accessible manner."


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Where to Watch, Full Episode List
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors The full episode list for "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3 has been announced. In this article you'll find the release timings for every single episode, so you don't miss any. And quite frankly, you really won't want to. Paramount+'s "Star Trek" origin story takes place on board the U.S.S. Enterprise years before Captain Kirk assumed command. It follows Captain Pike, Science Officer Spock, and Number One as they explore - you guessed it - strange new worlds around the galaxy. Anson Mount stars in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Anson Mount stars in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Paramount+ It also picks up the dangling plot thread from season 2's cliffhanger, in which the crew was abducted by the Gorn. As they grapple with the psychological fallout, a shadowy new villain emerges. Scroll down for more important plot details, as well as the complete "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3 release schedule. When is Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Out? The third season of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" premieres with a double episode on Thursday, July 17 on Paramount+ in the US, Canada, and the UK. Where to Watch Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3 streams exclusively on Paramount+, so you'll need a subscription to watch it if you're based the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Latin America, Australia, Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Japan. The series streams on SkyShowtime in the Nordics, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Central and Eastern Europe. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Episode List "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3 kicks off with two episodes on 17 July, 2025. Following this double drop, new episodes release weekly every Thursdays evening, running up until the season finale on Thursday, September 11. • Episode 1: 17 Jul, 2025 • Episode 2: 17 Jul, 2025 • Episode 3: 24 Jul, 2025 • Episode 4: 31 Jul, 2025 • Episode 5: 7 Aug, 2025 • Episode 6: 14 Aug, 2025 • Episode 7: 21 Aug, 2025 • Episode 8: 28 Aug, 2025 • Episode 9: 4 Sept, 2025 • Episode 10: 11 Sept, 2025 How Many Episodes are in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3? Ten. This matches both previous seasons, which each have ten episodes. Will There Be a Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 4? Yes, there will be a "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 4. But that's not all. "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" has been renewed for a fifth and final season on top. All seasons of the show will air on Paramount+. "From the very beginning, 'Strange New Worlds' set out to honor what 'Star Trek' has always stood for - boundless curiosity, hope and the belief that a better future is possible," said executive producers Akiva Goldsman, Henry Alonso Myers, and Alex Kurtzman in a joint statement. "We're deeply grateful to Paramount for the chance to complete our five-season mission, just as we envisioned it, alongside our extraordinary cast and crew. And to the passionate fans who've boldly joined us on this journey - THANK YOU. With three more spectacular seasons ahead for you to see and enjoy, this adventure is far from over." Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Synopsis Here's the official synopsis for "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3: "In Season 3, when we reconnect with the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise, still under the command of Captain Pike, they face the conclusion of Season 2's harrowing encounter with the Gorn. But new life and civilizations await, including a villain that will test our characters' grit and resolve." "An exciting twist on classic 'Star Trek,' Season 3 takes characters both new and beloved to new heights, and dives into thrilling adventures of faith, duty, romance, comedy, and mystery, with varying genres never before seen on any other 'Star Trek.'" Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Delay Almost two years have passed since the final episode of "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 2. The delay can be explained by the writers' strike. Goldsman said at the Tribeca Film Festival, "We had a writers' strike. We didn't anticipate that it was going to be quite as long. But we have faith in our audience. Thank you for waiting and thank you for liking." Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 Cast Anson Mount returns in the lead role as Captain Christopher Pike, alongside Ethan Peck as Spock, Celia Rose Gooding as Nyota Uhura, and Rebecca Romijn as Number One. Rhys Darby and Patton Oswalf also joins in a guest roles. Here's the full "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" Season 3 cast. Main Cast: • Anson Mount as Christopher Pike • Ethan Peck as Spock • Jess Bush as Christine Chapel • Christina Chong as La'An Noonien-Singh • Celia Rose Gooding as Nyota Uhura • Melissa Navia as Erica Ortegas • Babs Olusanmokun as Joseph M'Benga • Rebecca Romijn as Una Chin-Riley / Number One • Martin Quinn as Montgomery Scott Recurring: • Paul Wesley as James T. Kirk • Carol Kane as Pelia • Cillian O'Sullivan as Roger Korby • Melanie Scrofano as Marie Batel • Dan Jeannotte as George Samuel "Sam" Kirk Guests: • Rhys Darby • Patton Oswalt as Doug • Mynor Luken as Beto