logo
Donald Trump's dream for a greater Gaza

Donald Trump's dream for a greater Gaza

The Hill21-02-2025
Twenty years ago, I sat with Gen. Omar Suleiman in the headquarters of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service in Cairo. We discussed a trilateral land swap between Egypt, Israel and the Palestinians. The logic behind the plan was the same as that of President Trump's recent comments. Only now, the urgency for its implementation is clear to the world.
The rulers and borders between Egypt, Gaza and Israel have changed many times over the last hundred years. From the Ottomans to the British, from the Egyptians to the Israelis, from the Palestinian Authority to Hamas, this small strip of land has never known quiet — and it will never allow others quiet until its inhabitants have a vision of peace and prosperity. Trump has provided just that.
Today, Gaza is a terrorist's dream. There are hundreds of kilometres of underground tunnels in which they can hide themselves and hostages. Meanwhile, the Gazan population is left exposed and vulnerable above ground.
How does Trump's vision change this? This is not about sending the Gazan population into Egypt, but rather about adjusting the borders of Egypt, Gaza and Israel to benefit all sides.
The Gaza strip would be expanded down to El Arish in northern Sinai, doubling its land mass to 800 sq. km. Egypt would see a land crossing from Sinai to Jordan, while Israel would annex its main population centres and areas of critical security in Judea and Samaria.
The Egyptians would leverage a resource of which they have excess for a resource they are lacking. Ninety-eight percent of Egypt's huge 120 million population currently lives on 3 percent of Egypt's land, along the Nile delta. But they have thousands of kilometers of coastal land. What they lack is access to foreign capital. Thanks to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they lack wheat to feed themselves, and Houthi terrorism is now reducing their income from the Suez Canal, approximately 2 percent of Egyptian GDP.
Furthermore, too many Egyptian pilgrims drown in boats crossing to Saudi Arabia to make the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca. A land crossing from Sinai to Jordan would save lives and realize that little known clause in the Israeli-Egyptian peace agreement that is yet to be implemented.
There are precedents for this. In 1965, Saudi Arabia and Jordan exchanged land from Aqaba to Iraq to align interests. More recently, in 2017, Egypt transferred the ownership of two islands, Tiran and Sanafir, to Saudi Arabia in return for billions of dollars. This is a model for what can and must be done with Gaza.
For the Palestinians, expanding the Gaza strip down to El Arish will give them new homes, extra fishing rights and a deep sea port. They will connect into the Indian Middle Eastern Economic Corridor, benefiting from trade, tourism, oil and gas. Most importantly, they will be focussing on their future rather than dreaming of a disappeared past.
This is not ethnic cleansing, as some have said. This would be moving the population a hundred miles down the road to a better future.
Gaza cannot be rebuilt under current conditions. For two decades Hamas has invested billions of Qatari, American and European money in building terror tunnels underground rather than housing and offices above ground. As someone who works in the construction industry, I know how difficult it is to build above the underground in London or the metro in New York. You cannot insert the deep piles required for tall buildings. Greater Gaza will enable this future.
For Israel, this will facilitate the international recognition of Israeli sovereignty in Ariel, Gush Etzion and major Jewish population areas as well as the Jordan Valley. The latter is critical to prevent the infiltration of terrorists across the Jordan river. A multinational landswap will enable full normalisation in the Middle East and expediate the implementation of the Indian Middle Eastern Economic Corridor.
For the U.S., this will increase regional stability but offers something more. Currently, America's main military base is in Qatar. Trump could replicate or move this base to Gaza, gaining a stronghold in the Eastern Mediterranean, similar to that of the UK army in Cyprus. Since America is the main military ally of both Egypt and Israel, and will ultimately be the guarantor of Palestinian security, this will be welcomed by all.
Finally, the wider Middle East, Europe and the world will benefit from a bit of quiet in this area. Long-term stability and investment will replace decades of terror and despair. The U.S. has shown its trump card. Let's see how the others respond.
Terry Newman is an entrepreneur, investor and geopolitical strategist who has lived in both Egypt and Israel. He has previously served as a chief of staff to Lord Janner in the UK House of Lords.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister ties herself in knots over conditions for recognition of Palestine
Minister ties herself in knots over conditions for recognition of Palestine

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Minister ties herself in knots over conditions for recognition of Palestine

The transport secretary tied herself in knots when she was faced with questions over the conditions for the recognition of Palestine, following pushback to the government's announcement. There has been growing backlash to the position, with the government facing criticism for using Palestinian statehood as leverage, as well as confusion over whether the release of the hostages held by Hamas will be one of the conditions for recognition. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Tuesday that the UK will recognise a Palestinian state by September unless Israel takes urgent steps to end the war in Gaza. The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said. But, pressed on the issue, the transport secretary could not say whether the release of the hostages was a condition. Heidi Alexander said ministers have 'always said right from day one that the hostages need to be released', adding that the UK expects 'Hamas to act in the same way as we expect Israel to act'. 'Hamas need to release the hostages, they need to disarm, and they also need to accept that they will have no future role in the governance of Gaza,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'They are a vile terrorist organisation that has perpetrated heinous crimes and awful atrocities on the Israeli people.' But asked directly if the release of hostages is a condition for recognition, she said: 'We will be making an assessment in September.' She added: 'We're giving Israel eight weeks to act. If they want to be sat at the table to shape that enduring peace in the region, they must act.' Also asked about the issue on Sky News, she added: 'This isn't about Hamas, this is actually about delivering for the Palestinian people and making sure that we can get aid in.' It came after Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sir Keir's announcement rewards 'Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. In a statement on the social media site X, Israel's prime minister added: 'Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails.' Donald Trump, who met Sir Keir on Monday and discussed measures to end the starvation faced by Gazans, suggested the pair had not talked about recognising Palestinian statehood. But Mr Trump said he did not mind the PM 'taking a position' on the issue. Other figures within the US administration have taken a harder line on recognising Palestine. US state department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce suggested a UN conference called to discuss recognising a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution was a 'publicity stunt' and called it a 'slap in the face' to the victims of the October 7 attacks. She also suggested that the UK announcement could risk 'rewarding Hamas'. Sir Keir said the government's 'primary aim' was getting aid into Gaza and getting hostages released when asked why UK recognition of the state of Palestine was conditional. He added he was 'particularly concerned that the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many, many years'. While Sir Keir signalled the UK could back away from recognising a Palestinian state if his conditions are met, No 10 is understood to believe that such a two-state solution would also proceed from negotiations towards a sustained peace.

Chicago comedians deny Stephen Colbert cancellation will lead to fewer Trump jokes
Chicago comedians deny Stephen Colbert cancellation will lead to fewer Trump jokes

New York Post

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Chicago comedians deny Stephen Colbert cancellation will lead to fewer Trump jokes

Chicago comedians argued on Tuesday that the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' will lead to more jokes about President Donald Trump, not fewer, in contrast with liberal critics' concerns. After CBS announced the left-leaning comedian's show being canceled weeks earlier, several people ranging from commentators to lawmakers called out the move as authoritarian, suggesting CBS bent the knee to Trump after recently settling a lawsuit. Though some believed that this could lead to either more censorship or political capitulation, comedians from the windy city, where Colbert had trained in comedy, largely believed the opposite. 'That would go for whoever is the president,' late night host Mark Bazer told the Chicago Sun-Times. 'That's the gig. My guess is there's very few comedians or late-night talk show hosts who are going to bend the knee.' Bazer added that Colbert can now 'take the gloves off' regarding his jokes against Trump without the pressure of maintaining his show. 'We've all seen late-night talk shows over the years. It's a tradition to make fun of whoever's in power, like, that's what the job entails,' Bazer said. Local comic James Dugan, who frequently performs for the Chicago improv show Whirled News Tonight, told the Chicago Sun-Times that his team largely pulls jokes from the headlines, which have heavily featured Trump recently. 3 CBS cancelled 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.' CBS via Getty Images 3 Colbert has not shied away from making jokes about President Trump after CBS announced the end of his show. AP In fact, he described concerns about an oversaturation of Trump jokes. 'A lot of times with our show in particular, we get four or five newspapers and spread them out,' Dugan said. 'And there is a little bit of a sense of like, should we take out the Trump stuff? Because people are kind of sick of hearing about it.' However, some comedians are still worried about what Colbert's cancellation could mean for comedy on a larger scale. 'The fact that a sitting public official is doing so much private litigation, and that it results in this type of thing — it's dangerous,' stand-up comic Eunji Kim told the Chicago Sun-Times. 3 The show's cancellation was due to financial reasons, according to CBS and Paramount. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Despite the timing of the announcement, CBS and its parent company, Paramount, have said that the cancellation was a financial decision, not a political one. Insider sources have also said that the decision was made days before Paramount's settlement with Trump. Colbert himself has not shied away from attacking Trump in the weeks after his show's cancellation. Last week, he told Trump to 'go f–k yourself' after the latter celebrated the end of 'The Late Show.'

Could Tariffs Actually Accelerate The Move To A Circular Economy?
Could Tariffs Actually Accelerate The Move To A Circular Economy?

Forbes

time3 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Could Tariffs Actually Accelerate The Move To A Circular Economy?

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 02: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a ... More 'Make America Wealthy Again' trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 2, 2025 in Washington, DC. Touting the event as 'Liberation Day', Trump is expected to announce additional tariffs targeting goods imported to the U.S. (Photo by) A lot has been said about President Trump's tariff policy, particularly from an economic perspective, but could they also hasten the move to a more circular economy, particulary in the U.S? The circular economy is a popular concept in sustainability circles, and is defined by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation as one where products and materials are kept in circulation through processes like maintenance, reuse, refurbishment, remanufacture, recycling, and composting. The concept also tackles climate change and other global challenges, like biodiversity loss, waste, and pollution, by breaking the links between economic activity from the consumption of finite resources. David Linich, sustainability principal at PwC U.S, said he believes tariffs could accelerate the business case for circularity, in an interview. Despite concerns over rising costs, he said circular business models could make strategic sense – not just to avoid tariff exposure, but to spark innovation, reduce operating costs and drive long-term growth. He said there are several key reasons why tariffs could fuel circularity, including how tariffs will increase input costs for businesses, in an interview. Linich added consumers are also increasingly expect more sustainable products and packing, and advances in artificial intelligence and robotics will mean improved sorting and reuse from waste streams. 'Any contamination of the recycling stream reduces the value of it, but if you can sort out the impurities, then you are left with a higher value stream, which you can reuse in a number of different applications,' he told me. Linich said a number of states in the U.S now have various extended producer responsibility laws, which are helping to fund new waste infrastructure. And he said a number of businesses are now setting targets around how much of the content of their products contains reused or recycled materials. He added many of raw materials in electric waste, like cobalt and copper are expensive and increasingly harder to source. 'More and more companies are recognizing these are becoming scarce commodities, and there is a lot of value in the waste stream today to harvest that material and to reuse it,' said Linich. He said PwC's Second Annual State of Decarbonization report shows 37% of companies are increasing their ambitions around sustainability, while only 16% are dialing them back in some way. 'The business value of climate action is becoming clearer to most organizations. As a proof point, we see between a 6% and 25% revenue uplift from products that are marketed with sustainability attributes compared to those which are not.' Vishal Agrawal, business of sustainability initiative academic director at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business, said there are several key issues when considering the move towards a circular economy, in an interview. In terms of recycling, Agrawal added the introduction of tariffs could foster more recycling infrastructure, particularly in Western countries, but any potential benefits would require an 'incredible amount' of investment and take a long time to pay off. But he added the impacts on reuse, which is another cornerstone of the circular economy, could be more interesting, particularly in some sectors where tariffs could have a big impact, like domestic appliances and electronics, because it could mean consumers holding onto products for longer. 'But, no matter how much new things cost, people will still want the latest style, so perhaps there will be more potential for the prolonged use of certain products. 'The best thing you could do in terms of sustainability is incentivize customers to keep these products longer, because most of the environmental impact,' he added. Another cornerstone of the circular economy is design and Agrawal said if the tariffs continue to be in place, firms could respond by using less materials, being more efficient when they design the product, or designing it to be more longer lasting. 'The push towards the circular economy requires a lot of change in consumer behavior, as well as huge investments in infrastructure, collection, recycling, reuse, and like any other investments, people might wait to see how all of this pans out,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store