Minister ties herself in knots over conditions for recognition of Palestine
There has been growing backlash to the position, with the government facing criticism for using Palestinian statehood as leverage, as well as confusion over whether the release of the hostages held by Hamas will be one of the conditions for recognition.
Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Tuesday that the UK will recognise a Palestinian state by September unless Israel takes urgent steps to end the war in Gaza.
The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months.
Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said.
But, pressed on the issue, the transport secretary could not say whether the release of the hostages was a condition.
Heidi Alexander said ministers have 'always said right from day one that the hostages need to be released', adding that the UK expects 'Hamas to act in the same way as we expect Israel to act'.
'Hamas need to release the hostages, they need to disarm, and they also need to accept that they will have no future role in the governance of Gaza,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
'They are a vile terrorist organisation that has perpetrated heinous crimes and awful atrocities on the Israeli people.'
But asked directly if the release of hostages is a condition for recognition, she said: 'We will be making an assessment in September.'
She added: 'We're giving Israel eight weeks to act. If they want to be sat at the table to shape that enduring peace in the region, they must act.'
Also asked about the issue on Sky News, she added: 'This isn't about Hamas, this is actually about delivering for the Palestinian people and making sure that we can get aid in.'
It came after Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sir Keir's announcement rewards 'Hamas's monstrous terrorism'.
In a statement on the social media site X, Israel's prime minister added: 'Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails.'
Donald Trump, who met Sir Keir on Monday and discussed measures to end the starvation faced by Gazans, suggested the pair had not talked about recognising Palestinian statehood. But Mr Trump said he did not mind the PM 'taking a position' on the issue.
Other figures within the US administration have taken a harder line on recognising Palestine.
US state department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce suggested a UN conference called to discuss recognising a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution was a 'publicity stunt' and called it a 'slap in the face' to the victims of the October 7 attacks.
She also suggested that the UK announcement could risk 'rewarding Hamas'.
Sir Keir said the government's 'primary aim' was getting aid into Gaza and getting hostages released when asked why UK recognition of the state of Palestine was conditional.
He added he was 'particularly concerned that the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many, many years'.
While Sir Keir signalled the UK could back away from recognising a Palestinian state if his conditions are met, No 10 is understood to believe that such a two-state solution would also proceed from negotiations towards a sustained peace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Situation In Gaza Requires Urgent International Attention
On August 1, 2025, the United Nations reported that despite the July 27th announcement of daily military pauses in western Gaza 'to improve humanitarian responses,' Israeli forces continued attacks along food convoy routes and near Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid sites. According to the UN, between July 30 and 31 alone, 105 Palestinians were killed and at least 680 more injured along the convoy routes in the Zikim area in North Gaza, southern Khan Younis, and in the vicinity of the GHF sites in Middle Gaza and Rafah. As reported, in total, since May 27, at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food; 859 in the vicinity of the GHF sites and 514 along the routes of food convoys. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) reported that most of the killings were committed by the Israeli military: '[OHCHR] has no information that these Palestinians were directly participating in hostilities or posed any threat to Israeli security forces or other individuals. Each person killed or injured had been desperately struggling for survival, not only for themselves, but also for their families and dependents.' Intentionally directing attacks against civilians not taking direct part in hostilities and intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supplies, are war crimes. The update from the United Nations is only one of the plethora of reporting on the situation in Gaza, situation that cannot be ignored, and not without destroying the remnant of humanity of the international community. On July 29, 2025, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) platform identified that two out of three famine thresholds have been reached in Gaza: plummeting food consumption and acute malnutrition. Famine has not been declared yet. This is as the third criteria, deaths from malnutrition, cannot be demonstrated. However, as reported by the UN, there is mounting evidence that 'widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease' are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths, which is the third famine indicator. When clarifying the findings, the IPC stressed that 'one in three people is now going without food for days at a time. (…) Hospitals are also overwhelmed and have treated more than 20,000 children for acute malnutrition since April. At least 16 children under five have died from hunger-related causes since mid-July.' In May 2025, IPC issued an alert projecting catastrophic levels of food insecurity for the entire population by September. According to the platform's experts, at least half a million people are expected to be in IPC Phase 5 – catastrophe – which is marked by starvation, destitution and death. Also on July 29, 2025, several UN experts published a joint statement expressing alarm at Israel's deliberate withholding of access to safe drinking water from Palestinians in Gaza: 'Cutting off water and food is a silent but lethal bomb that kills mostly children and babies. The sight of infants dying in their mothers' arms is unbearable. (…) This catastrophe was not only predictable; it was predicted.' The UN experts further stressed that 'these intentional, widespread and systematic attacks against Palestinians are a deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of a population – another act of genocide.' The dire situation is driven by nearly two years of conflict sparked by Hamas-led terror attacks in Israel in October 2023 that left some 1,250 dead and around 250 people taken ongoing conflict resulted in thousands killed. Some 70% of Gaza's infrastructure has been destroyed. Around 90% of Gaza's population have been displaced. Safe areas have been reduced to less than 12% of the entire territory. The situation in Gaza requires urgent attention and response from the international community - to prevent further civilian suffering and death. While some steps have been taken to provide humanitarians assistance, as it stands, the steps appear to be too little and too late to address the current and ever-growing needs of the population. The international community must come together to ensure that the concerning predictions of famine and death do not materialize.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pro-Palestine protesters block three key routes in central London
Pro-Palestine protesters blocked roads at three key junctions in central London to highlight the situation in Gaza. Youth Demand activists blocked Holland Park roundabout, Euston Road outside King's Cross station and a key junction in Holborn on Saturday, calling for the government to impose a trade embargo on Israel. Protesters were seen chanting 'free the people, free the land' as they lit flares in the street in Holland Park. Meanwhile, traffic could be seen building up nearby. On the other side of central London, protesters waved flags and chanted 'shut it down for Palestine' on Euston Road. Activists also chanted 'stop bombing Gaza' as drivers waited for the road to clear. Drivers were then seen beeping their horns in frustration as protesters held flares up in Holborn, while a cyclist looped around the activist with a Palestine flag attached to the back of his bike. Youth Demand explained its activists had blocked the roads to demand 'an end to Israel's genocide in Gaza'. The group wrote on X: 'By arming Israel, our government is complicit in the bombing and starvation of millions.' Youth Demand, an offshoot of Just Stop Oil's youth wing, has been demanding that the UK government impose a full arms and trade embargo on Israel and immediately halt the development of new oil and gas projects. The group, which describes itself as leaderless but guided by a "strategy team", previously said politicians had committed a 'betrayal of our generation,' and warned of an 'unimaginable outbreak of collective power, creativity, love and defiance.' Youth Demand had vowed to 'shut down' London by swarming the capital's roads and holding demonstrations during a month-long period of action in April. The group held several protests across the month, briefly closing roads. At the end of April, two Youth Demand activists jumped the barriers at the London marathon and threw red powder paint in the air moments before the elite men's race ran over Tower Bridge.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Arab nations are getting wise to Hamas — even as others foolishly squeeze Israel
Most media ignored last week's most important Middle East development: Arab nations for the first time publicly slammed Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, massacre and demanded the terrorists surrender power, disarm, and release their hostages. OK, it's a low bar. But it's progress, and a lot more meaningful than British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's threat to recognize a Palestinian state or the other maneuvering over Gaza's food crisis. The landmark demands came in a seven-page declaration Tuesday by 17 countries, plus the European Union and the entire 22-member Arab League, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar. Advertisement British Foreign Secretary David Lammy embraces Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa after Lammy spoke at a United Nations conference on July 29, 2025. AFP via Getty Images They reflect a willingness — finally! — to publicly acknowledge that Hamas' ouster is necessary to end the war in Gaza and thus ease the suffering of its civilians. Hallelujah: We've stressed since Day 1 that the conflict can't end with Hamas in power; the group, after all, openly vows to keep attacking the Jewish state until Israel is destroyed. Advertisement Perhaps the Gaza food shortages got the Arabs' attention — even if most reports misled readers by tacitly (or even openly) blaming Jerusalem for them. Bigger picture: Nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, egged on by President Donald Trump, are now eager to normalize relations with Israel, though they want the Gaza fighting to end first. Sadly, other parts of Tuesday's statement are as misguided as ever, calling for Hamas to 'hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State.' Advertisement With Gaza then seeing 'the deployment of a temporary international stabilization mission upon invitation by the Palestinian Authority and under the aegis of the United Nations.' The Palestinian Authority? The United Nations? Neither is fit for real responsibilities: The PA is nothing but an autocratic kleptocracy that uses international-aid funds to enrich its leaders and to pay terrorists to kill Israelis; even clueless President Joe Biden insisted it would have to be 'revitalized' before it could play any role in Gaza. UN peacekeepers, meanwhile, have never managed to keep peace anywhere in the Middle East; instead, the world body's presence — e.g., via groups like the UN Relief and Works Agency — has only fueled violence in the region. Advertisement Even more brainless is Starmer's threat to recognize a Palestinian state, along with France and Canada's plans to do so next month, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a cease-fire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.' Why no threats to Hamas if it keeps preventing food from reaching ordinary Gazans? How about insisting that it hand over its remaining Israeli hostages? Look: Israel has already taken 'substantive steps' to aid Gaza's civilians, and has already agreed to numerous cease-fire plans. Hamas rejects any cease-fire unless Israel agrees to let it keep power in Gaza, even as the terrorists block the peaceful distribution of food aid. It also refuses to release the remaining hostages, knowing that if it did, it would be its last act before total annihilation. As for a 'two-state solution,' Israelis backed it (until Oct. 7, anyway); the problem is finding Palestinian leadership to agree to a deal that doesn't put Israel's future at risk. So why is Starmer threatening Israel? Advertisement Oh, and here's a reality check: The outside world can't actually summon a state into existence; citizens of a would-be nation must create it on their own. Fact is, neither Britain, France, nor any other country can truly claim to care about Gazans unless they focus solely on the heart of the problem: Hamas. That Arab nations are at last starting to admit that it is the most hopeful sign yet for peace.
