logo
OAN's Pentagon reporter learns the limits of expressing her own opinion

OAN's Pentagon reporter learns the limits of expressing her own opinion

Washington Post03-06-2025
Assigned to cover the Pentagon for the conservative outlet One America News Network, Gabrielle Cuccia didn't pretend to be an unbiased reporter. She describes herself as 'a MAGA girl' who is unapologetically defiant in her support of President Donald Trump.
Yet days after publicly criticizing a Trump appointee, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth , Cuccia found herself out of a job.
In taking to Substack last week to express a personal opinion about a figure she covers, Cuccia did something that would be frowned upon in many legacy newsrooms. The message that she was sent, however, is most likely to resound in places where opinion is fine — but only a certain variety.
Cuccia's lengthy Substack post , 'The Secretary of Defense-ive,' was posted three days after Hegseth issued new rules that banned reporters from accessing large areas of the Pentagon without being watched by his minders.
She criticized him for limiting freedom of movement in the name of national security.
'The Pentagon wants to paint a picture that journalists are freely roaming classified spaces, sneaking into (secure areas), and leaking top-secret information,' she wrote. 'And that is simply not true. There are security cameras everywhere, protocols in place and quite frankly, it would be painfully obvious if a reporter was in a space they didn't belong.'
Cuccia said the real leaks from the Pentagon have come from Hegseth's own team and other senior officials. Hegseth, a former Fox News personality, was embarrassed in March when The Atlantic magazine's editor-in-chief was mistakenly included in a Signal chat in which the defense secretary discussed upcoming military strikes.
She criticized Hegseth for not yet holding a media briefing at the Pentagon.
'The Commander-in-Chief welcomes the hard questions ... and yes, even the dumb ones,' she wrote. 'Why won't the Secretary of Defense do the same?'
Three days after her Memorial Day Substack post, Cuccia said her Pentagon access badge was revoked. 'By Friday,' she said, 'I was out of a job.'
The Defense Department did not pull Cuccia's credentials, according to a Defense official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel issues. Cuccia said OAN told her the Substack piece had been 'put on their radar,' but she wouldn't say by who. She wouldn't speak further about what her employer told her, and OAN president Charles Herring told The Associated Press that it does not discuss personnel issues.
'When a reporter asks inconvenient questions about government overreach, the response should be accountability — not silence, and certainly not separation,' Cuccia said.
Traditionally, the legacy media does not want its journalists expressing opinions about people they cover, since it calls into doubt their ability to report without bias. But exceptions are often made in cases where media access is at issue, said Tom Rosenstiel, a journalism professor at the University of Maryland.
The New York Times, for example, institutionally called upon Joe Biden to meet more often with journalists when he was president. The Pentagon Press Association said Hegseth's restrictions were a direct assault on the freedom of the press.
One America News Network makes no secret of its allegiance to Trump. When Matt Gaetz's nomination as Trump's attorney general fell apart following the election, OAN quickly signed him up as a contributor. OAN faced lawsuits — and negotiated settlements — for its promotion of Trump's false theories that he did not lose the 2020 election.
When Hegseth earlier this year evicted several news organizations from their Pentagon workspaces and gave more room to friendly outlets, Cuccia was assigned space formerly held by NBC News. Before Hegseth aide Sean Parnell's only media briefing, Cuccia said Hegseth's team reached out to her in advance to find out what questions she wanted to ask, something that would never be done for most media outlets.
If OAN is responsible for removing Cuccia, it's a 'take no quarter position,' Rosenstiel said. 'There is no room, if you're on the team, to say anything that is negative.'
He said he'd be interested to see if any representatives from pro-Trump media outlets defend her. 'Are they silent, or do they rally to her in any way?' he asked. Trump, in the past, has frequently criticized Fox News Channel for saying anything on the air that he deemed negative.
Part of Cuccia's Substack post sounded almost prescient about what might happen to her, when she reminisced about the energy of the early Make America Great Again movement. Questioning government then, she noted, was a point of pride.
'Somewhere along the way, we as a collective decided — if anyone ever questioned a policy or person within the MAGA movement — that they weren't MAGA enough,' she wrote. 'That they were deep state, that they couldn't be trusted, that they didn't love America as much as we do and that ... to put it bluntly, they sucked.'
___
AP correspondent Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting
"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"What The F**ck": People Are Losing Their Minds Over This Really, Really Bizarre AI Interview With A Dead Teenager From The Parkland Shooting

Former CNN host Jim Acosta faced backlash on Monday after sharing what he called a 'one-of-a-kind interview' with an AI version of Parkland school shooting victim Joaquin Oliver, a bot created by his parents to honor their son on what would have been his 25th birthday. The interview — shared to Acosta's SubStack page — depicts Oliver, one of 17 who died in the 2018 massacre, remarking on the cause of death and stressing why it's 'important' to talk about gun violence in schools. The AI — when asked for its 'solution' to gun violence — emphasized a need for a mix of stronger gun-control laws, mental health support and community engagement. Related: The bot of Oliver proceeded to speak in a noticeably higher tone before discussing the late teen's interests in the Miami Heat and Star Wars. Acosta — who declared that the technology left him 'speechless' — called the conversation 'so insightful,' telling the late teen's father, Manuel Oliver, that it felt like the first time he really got to know his son. 'I felt like I was communicating with him, which is just so remarkable,' Acosta said. 'People say, 'Well, AI, you know, it could be bad, it could cause all these destructive things.' This is an example of how it might actually do some good, it might help some people who have suffered tremendous losses like your family have a way to hold on to who this person was, which I think is a beautiful thing.' @JimAcosta Related: Manuel Oliver and his wife, Patricia Oliver — co-founders of the gun-control advocacy group Change the Ref — have been involved in other projects that demand action against gun violence, including a school shooting video game, a play and a site that uses AI to recreate victims' voices for calls to Congress. Manuel Oliver — in a video shared to X, formerly Twitter — acknowledged that the AI was his and his wife's idea, adding that Acosta shouldn't be blamed for 'what he was able to do' in the 'interview.' 'If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem,' he said. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago. So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.' Related: While Acosta restricted those who could reply to his posts on X, it wasn't the same case on his BlueSky account, where a number of critics were stunned by the AI move. 'Hey Jim. Quick question. What the fuck is wrong with you,' replied one user. And, naturally, users on X had a lot to say regardless. Check out what users said on Bluesky and X below. Related: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:

Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof
Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump looks for ‘more ways to spend my money' on White House roof

Ever the developer-in-chief, President Donald Trump made a surprise appearance on the White House roof above the briefing room in an apparent effort to inspect future construction. The press, which had been pushed significantly down the driveway, attempted to figure out what was going on. "Mr. President, what are you doing up there?" MORE: Trump is building a new $200 million ballroom at the White House "Just taking a little walk," he shouted back. "What are you building?" "It goes with the ballroom, which is on the other side," he said. Pressed again by reporters, Trump said "Something beautiful," while pantomiming with his hands. Trump said it was "Just more ways to spend my money," adding "Just more ways to spend my money for the country." "Anything I do is financed by me," he stressed. Asked if he was considering an addition or a second story, Trump wouldn't say. The president was accompanied by a small group of aides and Secret Service. The group included architect Jim McCrery, who has been commissioned to add Trump's ballroom to the White House. The two men appeared engaged in intense conversation as they surveyed the grounds with lots of animated pointing. Trump then went out of camera range for several minutes, presumably to look out toward the South Lawn. When he returned, reporters again tried to get more information. "What are you trying to build?" one reporter shouted. "Missiles," Trump responded, presumably joking. "Nuclear missiles," he repeated while making the gesture of a rocket launching. Trump then ignored a question on Gaza and walked back inside.

Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty
Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Linamar's Hasenfratz urges Canada to hold the line on CUSMA amid rising tariff uncertainty

Linamar executive chair Linda Hasenfratz is urging Ottawa to defend the CUSMA trade pact, warning that any move to impose tariffs on auto parts could severely disrupt the industry's deeply integrated North American supply chain. Automakers have been hit hard by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war due to tariffs on exported vehicles and metals, which have negatively impacted their bottom lines. Yet, within the automotive industry, the vast majority of products crossing the border, particularly parts, are CUSMA-compliant and operating under zero duties. Still, there's a risk that could change. Hasenfratz, board chair of the Association of Equipment Manufacturers, is urging the federal government to work hard to maintain the CUSMA agreement, warning that dismantling it would have a devastating impact on the economy. 'While its spirit and substance have been undermined by the Trump administration, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement has thus far been key to Canada's perceived safety net,' said CIBC Capital Markets economist Avery Shenfeld. Canada's advantage from the CUSMA carve-out is only as strong as the agreement itself, which will lapse in 2026 unless all parties agree to renew it, he says. 'The cloud of uncertainty will hang over capital spending plans in a broad range of Canadian export sectors,' Shenfeld added, noting that Canada could lose its special exemption at any time. 'I still believe that if they put tariffs on parts, it would bring the industry to its knees because it's such an integrated supply chain of parts going back-and-forth the border multiple times,' Hasenfratz said. Trying to apply a tariff on each of those crossings would be enormously expensive, she says. After decades of free trade, trying to 'unscramble the eggs,' as many people have said, would be difficult, costly, and wouldn't create value, she adds. 'Let's address the concerns that exist and make sure that people are feeling comfortable with the trade agreement we have in any areas that are felt to be lacking,' Hasenfratz said. If CUSMA stays intact, Linamar stands to benefit as its customers look to onshore products currently sourced from Asia and Europe. With new international trade deals in place, clients are comparing tariff costs, and that's prompting many to consider localizing their supply chains. 'I see this as a real opportunity for us to potentially get some new business and we're quoting on such opportunities.' Hasenfratz is optimistic that Canada's automotive sector will remain a pillar of the economy. Suppliers, she notes, play an essential role and are poised for growth. She also believes Canada will continue to be a home for vehicle assembly due to its productivity, talent pool, and green, low-cost energy. These fundamentals are how one should decide where to manufacture, Hasenfratz says. 'Don't make long-term decisions on short-term tactics. Make long-term decisions on long-term fundamentals, and that's something Canada has in spades.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store