Trump plan to cut programs that get poor kids into college makes no sense
Clearly, the Trump administration's effort to eliminate Upward Bound, Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate and other programs known by the acronym of TRIO, to trim 15% from federal education spending to allow for generous tax cuts to billionaires is not only short-sighted but also dumb.
How can they justify erasing programs that help get poor students into college, where they will move up the economic ladder and bring their families along with them?
They can't.
But Russell T. Vought, executive director of the president's Office of Management and Budget, gave it a try.
Opinion
'TRIO and GEAR UP are a relic of the past when financial incentives were needed to motivate Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) to engage with low-income students and increase access,' Vought said in a May 2 letter to Sen. Susan Collins in which he outlined President Donald Trump's recommendations on discretionary spending for 2026.
'Today, the pendulum has swung and access to college is not the obstacle it was for students of limited means,' said Vought, who added that institutions of higher education should fund those programs rather than engaging in woke ideology with federal taxpayer subsidies.'
There are seven TRIO programs, each designed to identify and provide services for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds. They range from Veterans Upward Bound to Educational Opportunity Centers to Educational Talent Search.
I wish some of them had been in place when I was graduating from Delano High School, where I never had a counselor point me toward college or explain how to fill out college applications.
Christopher Navas, an 18-year-old student at Riverdale High, is more fortunate. The Fresno State-bound Navas, who plans to major in mechanical engineering, is the second-youngest of seven children of a farm irrigation manager and a merchandiser.
'I'm so grateful that I took the risk to join ETS (Fresno State Educational Talent Search) because this simple program that was supposed to motivate students to pursue a higher education impacted my life significantly,' said Navas at Wednesday's ceremony honoring 23 TRIO graduates at his school.
Navas said he was ambivalent about college until a summer program in his sophomore year introduced him to college majors and helped him establish relationships with college staff. A trip to Disneyland remains a highlight.
Once in the program, Navas became more active in school, joining the baseball team and clubs and getting 'out of his comfort zone.'
Olga Núñez, director of the Educational Talent Search at Fresno State, said 94% of the 680 high school students with 62% of all California students.
The program gets $370,000 of federal funds for a staff of two counselors, an administrative assistant and Núñez. When money is available, student assistants are hired.
The return on investment is impressive: 91% graduate with the requirements to get into college (vs. a 45.3% state average); and 91% graduate from high school (vs. 52.7% average at Riverdale High, 48.5% at Mendota High).
'They need to want to go to college,' said Núñez, who stressed her team can't promote students to go to Fresno State. 'Maybe they don't know where, or what major, but we want to increase high school graduation rates and college enrollment rates.'
This TRIO program is critical because sometimes working-class parents with no college experience don't know how to prepare their children for college. Any help parents can get is sorely needed.
According to the Sacramento-based Public Policy Institute of California, high school students from the San Joaquín Valley are less likely to attend and graduate from college than their counterparts in the rest of the state. Only 26% of ninth graders in the region are on a path to earn a bachelor's degree (vs. 35% statewide), and only 57% of high school graduates attend public or nonprofit colleges (vs. 65% statewide).
Núñez was among those notified earlier this month about the Trump administration's desire to cut funding. TRIO programs are required to submit annual progress reports to remain eligible for 5-year grants. Núñez is preparing to submit another grant for the cycle starting in the 2026-27 school year.
A May 7 webinar organized by the Council for Opportunity in Education ran out of space after organizers were flooded by more than 5,000 requests. A follow-up session is scheduled for May 22 for TRIO educators.
Organizers want to remain nonpartisan because the TRIO program has gotten support from both Republicans and Democrats. Of more than 200 representatives who have signed a letter of support for TRIO for the 2026 fiscal year, only 63 are Democrats.
The Fresno State TRIO programs are among 3,500 at more than 1,000 colleges and universities in the country. They help 870,000 students through individualized counseling, advising and other services.
The letter explains why TRIO works: 'Since their inception in 1964, TRIO programs have produced over 6 million college graduates. Research demonstrates that college graduates have lower rates of unemployment, pay more in federal taxes, and earn a million dollars more throughout their working lives than non-college graduates.'
What is so difficult to understand that eliminating TRIO funding is bad for the country? It seems like Trump and his advisors need some education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Out of sight, out of mind: Without federal support, brain injury survivors will be left behind
Unlike a broken bone, a brain injury is often invisible. We can't see the cognitive struggles, the lost memories or the chronic pain. But for millions of Americans with brain injury, the impact is lifelong and profound. Every day is an exercise in rebuilding your life, your relationships and future. Federal programs have made the journey of life with brain injury a bit more manageable. But now, that support is under serious threat. Budget proposals and the Office of Management and Budget's leaked passback document outline catastrophic cuts to health programs across the board. Among them: the elimination of nearly every federal initiative supporting people with brain injuries. Decades of investment in prevention and treatment could vanish with the stroke of a pen. These programs aren't wasteful spending. They are an important investment for people living with brain injury — now and in the future. These proposed cuts would dismantle the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HEADS UP program, which trains coaches, parents and athletes to recognize concussions before they cause permanent damage. They would collapse the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems, the nation's gold standard for providing care and advancing recovery for survivors with moderate to severe brain injuries. We would also lose the National Concussion Surveillance System and end the collection of critical data showing where injuries are happening and how many lives are at risk. Funding cuts for these programs put all of us at risk. Funding cuts mean a teenage football player sustains a preventable second concussion because his school had no access to proper return-to-play guidelines. A veteran with a blast injury loses access to a rehabilitation specialist trained to address cognitive impairments. Families already stretched thin by caregiving responsibilities lose the tiny but crucial grants that kept their loved ones living independently at home. Brain injury does not just happen to 'other people.' More than 64 million Americans have sustained at least one traumatic brain injury (TBI) in their lifetime and millions have suffered from non-traumatic brain injuries like stroke, aneurysm or a lack of oxygen. Federal investment in brain injury research and care is modest. In 2024, TBI research funding was an estimated $194 million, which is just $3.03 per person living with a TBI — barely the cost of a cup of coffee. That figure pales in comparison to the estimated $76.5 billion annual cost of TBI in the United States for emergency care, hospitalization, lost productivity, disability and social services. Cutting these programs isn't fiscal responsibility. It's public health malpractice. Eliminating programs like HEADS UP, the National Concussion Surveillance System and the Core State Injury Prevention Program will roll back decades of progress. These cuts will create a world where more people are suffering from the effects of brain injury, and we will have a lessened ability to identify and help those in need. It is not realistic to assume that states will be able to pick up the cost of these programs, so many will likely go away with no backup plan for continuity. This should not be a political issue. For decades, programs that support brain injury prevention, research and treatment have received bipartisan support because the need for them is undeniable. Brain injuries don't discriminate by party, race, income or geography. Brain injury can strike suddenly — a slip on the ice, a collision on the field, a car crash, a roadside bomb in combat — and alter lives forever. Brain injury should be thought of as a chronic health condition. Many survivors struggle with persistent effects such as memory loss, depression, behavioral changes and physical disabilities, which can quietly erode their ability to work, study or maintain relationships. Worse, brain injury dramatically increases the risk of developing devastating conditions later in life, including Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and stroke. Without continued research, education and community-based supports, many survivors will simply fall through the cracks. Eliminating federal brain injury programs would worsen these public health crises while stripping hope from those who need it most. The Brain Injury Association of America calls on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to reverse course. We urge Congress to reject these devastating cuts to brain injury programs. Investing in brain injury services and research saves lives, saves money and upholds America's promise to care for its most vulnerable citizens. America made that promise decades ago, when it began building the vital network of programs that exist today. That promise must not be broken now. Not when so many lives and futures depend on it. Rick Willis is president and CEO of the Brain Injury Association of America.
CNN
3 days ago
- CNN
Reverting records, a written apology and policy changes: How UPenn reached a deal with the White House over trans athletes and $175 million in federal funding
Donald Trump LGBTQ issues People in sports Education policy FacebookTweetLink President Donald Trump's alma mater recognized early on it could be under threat. A week after the University of Pennsylvania alumnus' inauguration, the university president composed a message to the school community: 'Like you, I am closely monitoring recent developments from Washington that directly affect higher education.' 'Together we will protect and preserve what defines us as Penn,' then-interim President J. Larry Jameson wrote. A week later, the university was under investigation by the federal government. What followed was a high-stakes, months-long back-and-forth between one of the country's most prestigious universities and the Department of Education. But the battle over $175 million in frozen federal funding that centered around women's sports at UPenn, and one transgender swimmer in particular, would unfold much differently — for now — from the ongoing funding fight its sister Ivy League institution, Harvard University, has been waging with the Trump administration. The deal reached this week between UPenn and the DOE, which restored the federal funding to the university, drew substantial praise from the Trump administration and conservatives. It also drew accusations of surrender and capitulation from some faculty, local politicians, and more. In the end, UPenn's president maintained the university remained committed to 'fostering a community that is welcoming, inclusive and open to all students, faculty and staff.' But Jameson acknowledged the deal with the administration was made because 'if unresolved, (the investigation) could have had significant and lasting implications for the University of Pennsylvania.' The conflict began in earnest in early February, when President Trump signed an executive action titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports.' 'You've been waiting a long time for this,' said Trump, flanked by dozens of young girls and female athletes at a ceremonial signing at the White House. 'So have I.' The following day, the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights announced an investigation into three entities, including the University of Pennsylvania, for violating Title IX by 'denying women an equal opportunity to participate in sports.' Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination at any academic institution that receives federal funding. The DOE specifically cited Lia Thomas, a transgender woman and UPenn swimmer, as the basis for the investigation into the university. In 2022, Thomas won the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) championship for Penn competing in the women's 500-yard freestyle. Since then, Thomas has become a symbol for those — including Trump — hoping to prevent transgender women from competing in women's sports. After the president's executive action, the NCAA announced a new policy limiting 'competition in women's sports to student-athletes assigned female at birth only.' UPenn said it complied with the new rules of the NCAA—and maintained it hadn't violated Title IX when Thomas competed three years ago, saying it was just following NCAA guidance at the time. But the university said it was blindsided when it learned 'through various news outlets' that the Trump administration had frozen $175 million of federal funding to the school anyway. Jameson said the funding cut impacted research, 'preventing hospital-acquired infections, drug screening against deadly viruses, quantum computing, protections against chemical warfare, and student loan programs.' 'We expect to continue to engage with (the DOE Office of Civil Rights), vigorously defending our position,' he wrote to the Penn community on March 25. By the end of April, the DOE's investigation concluded Penn had violated Title IX. But also that month, according to The Daily Pennsylvanian, Penn came to the negotiating table. The demands by the DOE's Office of Civil Rights to become Title IX compliant were relatively straightforward. UPenn had to issue a statement that it would comply with Title IX in its athletic programs, restore records and titles to the women who competed against Thomas and any other transgender women, and write apologies to those women who competed against Thomas. As UPenn's leadership released public statements on a new front with the Trump administration — visas for foreign students being threatened — internally, the university was working with the administration to comply with the Title IX investigation. 'UPenn came back to the table and asked us what they can do to make it right,' said Education Secretary Linda McMahon in remarks published Tuesday evening. 'We said, 'You have to completely rewrite your institutional policy.' They signed on the dotted line,' said McMahon. 'We said, 'You have to take these steps with records and reporting so this never happens again.' They signed on the dotted line.' 'We said, 'You owe (former UPenn swimmer Paula Scanlan), (former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines), and the other female athletes you've wronged a formal written apology. On Penn letterhead. In 10 business days.' 'Even that provision made it into the agreement,' said McMahon. In a statement to the community, UPenn confirmed it agreed to these terms, reiterating that it believes it has always followed Title IX regulations under NCAA guidelines. On its athletics website, Thomas' swimming records set for UPenn are now a footnote in Penn Women's Swimming. CNN has reached out to Thomas for comment. On Wednesday morning, a White House official confirmed to CNN it had restored the $175 million in frozen funding. By Wednesday afternoon, the agreement had been trumpeted as a major victory for President Trump. 'About dang time,' wrote former UPenn swimmer Paula Scanlan on X, adding in another post, 'I got what I voted for!' 'A long overdue step in the right direction,' wrote Republican Pennsylvania Sen. Dave McCormick. 'Fantastic news,' posted Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. But criticism spilled out as well. 'By following a path of political expediency at the expense of trans athletes, Penn makes all trans students, faculty, staff, and community members less safe, exposing them to renewed and emboldened harassment and discriminatory treatment,' wrote the UPenn chapter of the American Association of University Professors. 'This move is not about equity,' wrote Pennsylvania State Representative Rick Krajewski and Philadelphia City Councilmembers Jamie Gauthier and Rue Landau in a joint statement calling the deal a 'surrender.' 'It is about appeasing the Trump administration.' McMahon applauded UPenn's decision to comply, adding Tuesday, 'We advise every institution that is currently violating women's rights under Title IX to follow suit — not just in college sports, but in K-12 and every other institution covered by Title IX.' CNN's Betsy Klein and Amanda Musa contributed to this report.
Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
Illinois' population is aging 'faster' than the rest of the country, editorial warns
Illinois' population of young people is dwindling, an editorial from the Chicago Tribune warned. "A dwindling youth population means shrinking potential — not just economically, but in civic energy, creativity and community life. That's bad news for a state that depends on young people to power its workforce and its future," the editorial stated. he Tribune's editorial board described the conditions of an aging population in Illinois, adding that the Prairie State is "aging faster than the rest of the country." The board urged Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, D., to take action on the issue, citing that the state "desperately" needs to "retain and attract young people." Pritzker signed legislation making college more accessible and affordable. The move came after Pritzker cited the Illinois Board of Higher Education's research showing that nearly half of the state's high school graduates were fleeing to colleges outside the state and not returning. "There is a 70% likelihood that when they get to whatever that university is outside of Illinois, they're not coming back," Pritzker said at a news conference in March. "That's a real problem, so we want to keep our best and brightest in the state." Other factors are driving the state's aging population. Illinois' retiree population is growing. Currently, the median age is 39.4, five years older than in 2000, according to the editorial. That is "rising steadily," the board added. However, the state was younger than the rest of the country, on average, 25 years ago. The number of "prime-age working adults" declined in Illinois by 1% from 2020 to 2024, while the rest of the country increased by 2%. The board detailed the cause of the declining population of young people is due to population loss, "outmigration," and low birth-rates. "Illinois faces a demographic double bind. Not only are fewer women of childbearing age remaining in the state because of persistent outmigration, but those who stay are having fewer children than their counterparts elsewhere. Our birth rate already lags behind most states — particularly those in the South and West — and the gap is growing," the Tribune wrote. "The long-term implications for our workforce, tax base and economic vitality are hard to ignore."
