LBC host James O'Brien issues on-air apology after reading out antisemitic message about Jewish children - sparking raft of complaints to Ofcom
James O'Brien sparked fury for reading the antisemitic comments without challenging them while discussing the conflict in Gaza during yesterday's programme.
The 53-year-old host was allegedly sent the message from someone called Chris in Oxford who said his wife had been taught at a 'Shabbat school' in Hertfordshire. The listener claimed she was also told 'one Jewish life is worth thousands of Arab lives'.
Mr O'Brien read out the message before a shortened version was shared by LBC on social media, then deleted after a furious backlash from Jewish organisations.
The Campaign Against Antisemitism said it was a 'modern blood libel on national radio', and communications regulator Ofcom has received a number of complaints.
When reading out the message yesterday, Mr O'Brien said: 'I'm fascinated by objectivity, which is why I'm going to read out this from Chris, because you do find yourself wondering how people can be looking at the same world you're looking at and arriving at such completely different conclusions.
'The polling we looked at in Ha'aretz, displaying support not just for ethnic cleansing, but also for genocide, on levels that many of us would find terrifying.
'And of course it's not confined, as Chris writes from Oxford – "I'm loving the show" – thank you, Chris – "and the high quality of callers today, but I do think it's worth saying that these warped views are not just an Israeli problem.
'"My wife was brought up Jewish and at Shabbat school in a leafy Hertfordshire town she was taught that one Jewish life is worth thousands of Arab lives, and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed.
'"Whilst young children are being taught such hatred and dehumanisation, undoubtedly on both sides" – as Chris points out – "then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty, and it does indeed start young.
'"There is a danger perhaps that we only ever hear one side of the dehumanisation and propaganda processes."'
A shortened version of this was then shared by LBC in a social media video post, with the caption: '"At Shabbat school, my wife was taught that one Jewish life is worth a thousand Arab lives". Listener Chris outlines to James O'Brien the "danger" of "propaganda processes" spreading.'
What did James O'Brien say on LBC?
Original broadcast yesterday
'I'm fascinated by objectivity, which is why I'm going to read out this from Chris, because you do find yourself wondering how people can be looking at the same world you're looking at and arriving at such completely different conclusions.
'The polling we looked at in Ha'aretz, displaying support not just for ethnic cleansing, but also for genocide, on levels that many of us would find terrifying.
'And of course it's not confined, as Chris writes from Oxford – "I'm loving the show" – thank you, Chris – "and the high quality of callers today, but I do think it's worth saying that these warped views are not just an Israeli problem.
'"My wife was brought up Jewish and at Shabbat school in a leafy Hertfordshire town she was taught that one Jewish life is worth thousands of Arab lives, and that Arabs are cockroaches to be crushed.
'"Whilst young children are being taught such hatred and dehumanisation, undoubtedly on both sides" – as Chris points out – "then they will always be able to justify death and cruelty, and it does indeed start young."
'"There is a danger perhaps that we only ever hear one side of the dehumanisation and propaganda processes."'
Apology today
'This is very important. At this time yesterday on the show, I read out a message from a listener called Chris who said that his wife had been brought up in the Jewish faith and had attended what he described as a "Shabbat school".
'He went on to make further claims about what he said she had been taught in that school.
'As with all the texts and messages that I read out on the programme, I did so in good faith, but the message has understandably upset a lot of people, and I regret taking those unsubstantiated claims at face value, and I'm genuinely sorry for that.
'It is very important that I get that out there, and thank you for your attention.'
This post has since been deleted by LBC.
But the comments sparked fury, with the Jewish Leadership Council describing the unchallenged read-out as 'irresponsible and dangerous journalism'.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said it was 'urgently seeking a meeting with senior executives' at LBC, and called on the station to take Mr O'Brien off air.
And the Jewish News pointed out that 'while there is certainly a concept of 'Sunday school', or 'cheder', for Jewish children, there is no such thing as 'Shabbat school'.'
The broadcast has also allegedly been reported to the Metropolitan Police - with one complaint claiming the programme spread 'lies about Jews', according to The Telegraph.
Ofcom confirmed to MailOnline that it had received complaints about the content, which were now being assessed.
While Mr O'Brien presented his show as normal today, he addressed the controversy at 11.48am, which was the same time he read out the message yesterday.
He said: 'This is very important. At this time yesterday on the show, I read out a message from a listener called Chris who said that his wife had been brought up in the Jewish faith and had attended what he described as a 'Shabbat school'.
'He went on to make further claims about what he said she had been taught in that school.
'As with all the texts and messages that I read out on the programme, I did so in good faith, but the message has understandably upset a lot of people, and I regret taking those unsubstantiated claims at face value, and I'm genuinely sorry for that.
'It is very important that I get that out there, and thank you for your attention.'
A Campaign Against Antisemitism spokesman told MailOnline today: 'This was a modern blood libel on national radio, amplified by a host who likely wouldn't think twice about cutting off the statement were it promoting such grotesque falsehoods about another minority. No such generosity for the Jews.
'The suggestion that one "side" of this conflict is the genocidal monsters of Hamas who slaughtered 1,200 people and took some 250 hostage, and the other "side" is the Jewish community in Hertfordshire, is not only a baseless fiction and totally repugnant but to broadcast it is unbelievably reckless.
'It is practically an invitation to disaffected people to target Jews in the UK – why not, if they are a 'side' in this conflict?
'It is deplorable the depths that some talk show hosts will sink to inflame their listeners and drive up ratings. The consequences are borne by British Jews. We are formally complaining to Ofcom.
'While we welcome LBC's deletion of the post and Mr O'Brien's apology, perhaps he might take a break from moralising to the nation and reflect on why a listener like that understood that his was exactly the right show to promote this bile, and why Mr O'Brien himself was only too ready to treat the claims as entirely plausible and convenient to his narrative.
'What does that say about his own prejudices and views on certain topics to which British Jews are particularly sensitive?'
After yesterday's broadcast, a Jewish Leadership Council spokesperson said: 'For James O'Brien to uncritically read out this outrageous claim as the truth is irresponsible and dangerous journalism.
'At a time of heightened antisemitism when synagogues and Jewish schools require increased security, the threat created by such unsubstantiated claims is real. LBC must urgently investigate and explain how this was allowed to be read out by their presenter.'
Andrew Gilbert, vice president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, added: 'We are urgently seeking a meeting with senior executives following the completely unacceptable and highly offensive comments made by James O'Brien on his LBC show today.
'Broadcasting such a transparent falsehood and demonising the British Jewish community – at a time when antisemitism in this country is at terrifyingly high levels – must have clear consequences. LBC should apologise and take Mr O'Brien off the air.'
An Ofcom spokeswoman told MailOnline today: 'We are assessing the complaints against our rules, but are yet to decide whether or not to investigate.'
MailOnline has contacted LBC and the Metropolitan Police for comment.
Israel is continuing its campaign in the Gaza Strip against Hamas after the October 6 attacks saw around 1,200 Israelis killed during a militant incursion into the country.
More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed since, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry. Around two thirds are women and children, according to previous casualty analysis by the UN.
The UK was among 28 countries to sign a letter calling on Israel to end the war in Gaza 'now' amid a growing humanitarian crisis in the region, which has been all but completely decimated by Israeli strikes.
Sir Keir Starmer was among the world leaders to express concern at the suffering endured by civilians in Gaza, which the statement noted had reached 'new depths'.
The Israeli model of delivering aid, the letter said, was 'dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity'.
More than 1,000 people seeking aid have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to get food, the UN's Human Rights Office said yesterday. Its claims could not be immediately verified.
A spokesperson for Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the statement was 'disconnected from reality' while President Isaac Herzog maintained the state was operating 'according to international law' on a visit to Gaza on Wednesday.
Mediators in Qatar are hosting talks between Israel and Hamas on a 60-day ceasefire that could see hostages released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners.
Israel is demanding the dismantling of Hamas itself, while the militant terror group wants guarantees on a lasting truce, a withdrawal from Gaza and the free flow of aid.
James O'Brien's previous 'antisemitism' controversy
LBC host James O'Brien has previously found himself in hot water after sharing a video that was criticised by some as antisemitic.
Last year, he circulated a video of a Muslim man in a balaclava apparently preparing to throw a brick at a church - who then pulls off the balaclava and says he won't conform to far-right stereotypes of Muslims.
However, the activist goes on to claim that far-right groups have 'Zionist backers' - referencing those who believe in the idea of a Jewish state.
He made the universally recognised symbol for 'money' by rubbing his fingers together as he said the term - seemingly referencing antisemitic tropes that Jewish people have huge sums of money and seek to control the world.
Mr O'Brien later admitted that he had not watched the clip to the end and subsequently apologised.
'I referenced this clip on the show today while watching it live in the studio. I didn't watch it to the end. Obviously, the reference to 'Zionist backers' is obnoxious & anti-semitic. My apologies,' he wrote on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is this tough US-EU trade deal a triumph for Brexit Britain? Only in leavers' most delusional fantasies
Those who misled the country over Brexit are usually quieter these days. They do not hang their heads in shame, but change the subject whenever they can. They deflect with their new war-cry that Britain must also leave the European convention on human rights. As the effects of their wicked Brexit folly worsen by the month, they rarely get a chance to whoop: 'We were right!' So their glee was unrestrained when the great US global bully gave Britain a less hard beating with a 10% tariff on its goods, compared with the EU, which was walloped with 15%. Their joy overflowed when the business and trade secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, conceded: 'I'm absolutely clear, this is a benefit of being out of the European Union, having our independent trade policy, absolutely no doubt about that.' But what else can a trade secretary, speaking through gritted teeth, actually say? In his attempts to attract foreign investment, he can hardly tell the truth about the damage done by leaving the EU. These advocates of Brexit should gloat while they can. When the French prime minister called the EU's deal with Donald Trump a 'soumission' (submission), Kwasi Kwarteng seized on the word in a piece for the Telegraph, writing: 'For the French, with their memories of capitulation to the Nazis in 1940, the word is even more associated with abject humiliation than it is in English.' Yes, that's the same Kwarteng who hurled the British economy over a cliff only three years ago. 'This trade deal is the EU's greatest humiliation since Britain voted to leave', read the headline on his column. But he would never confess that the difference between a 10% and 15% tariff with the US is minimal, since we trade twice as much with the EU as the US. It barely equates to the regular variation in exchange rates: in other words, it's 'a rounding error', the Centre for European Reform's trade expert, John Springford, told me, when compared with the hammer blow Britain gave itself with Brexit. The UK-India trade deal signed with the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, last week was greeted with another Brexiter whoop from the Conservative peer Daniel Hannan. Also writing in the Telegraph, he said: 'My party, and Brexiteers more widely, should be taking credit for having done what all the clever Europhiles have spent six years telling us was impossible. Instead of moaning, we should welcome Starmer's belated understanding that world's biggest and fastest-growing markets are outside the EU.' But the Tory leader took another view: 'Keir Starmer called this 'historic.' It's not historic, we've just been shafted!' Kemi Badenoch said, dismissing the India agreement as a bad deal that would increase immigration. I don't know whether clever men like Kwarteng and Hannan are blinded by Brexit monomania or paralysed by the awful knowledge of the damage they have inflicted on their country, unable to confess an act of treachery and delusion hardly matched in British history. But as ever, facts are too inconvenient for them to deal with. Yes, the India deal is the biggest and most substantial trade deal since leaving the EU. Yes, it's a deal that would have been impossible to do from inside the union. But how big is it? It will add 0.13% to our economy. That's better than the Australia agreement, worth just 0.08%, the New Zealand deal, worth 0.03%, or the proposed US agreement, worth 0.16%, according to Department for Business and Trade analysis. But our fragile economy needs all the help it can get, so hurrah for Brexit and our new trade deals! But the gloaters ignore the context: our great Brexit losses. Here's the Office for Budget Responsibility's assessment: 'Our forecasts have assumed that the volume of UK imports and exports will both be 15% lower than if we had remained in the EU.' That 15% loss in trade 'will lead to a 4% reduction in the potential productivity of the UK economy'. In other words, as Jonty Bloom of the New World calculates, we need 50 India trade deals to make up for Brexit, because Britain does more than 40% of its trade with the EU – more if you include the European Economic Area and Switzerland. India has just 2% of our trade. Brexiters bleat that Labour is sneaking us into the EU by the back door, with deals on Horizon, the EU's research and innovation funding programme; soon, hopefully, Erasmus; and maybe a youth experience scheme. We hope for agricultural products and energy deals. But even these, say the trade experts, are still small potatoes. Major attempts to rescue Britain's 4% loss in productivity since 2020 hit the concrete walls of Boris Johnson's monumentally bad trade and cooperation agreement. Brexit zealots protest against agreements to keep a dynamic alignment with EU standards that would make trade easier. But it doesn't apply to our internal environmental standards: outside EU rules, we have let our water quality fall behind the EU. More than 85% of bathing waters in the EU are rated excellent compared with just 64% in the UK, with the gap rising every year, reports the European Movement. Public opinion has shifted rapidly: we are now a 'Bregretful' country, where only 31% still think it was right to leave and 61% say Brexit has been more of a failure than a success. Who do they blame? The Conservatives and Boris Johnson are top of the list, with 88% and 84% respectively holding them responsible. More than two-thirds (67%) blame Nigel Farage. A majority of Britons (56%) want to rejoin the EU as the grim reaper carries off old Brexiters, replacing them with young, pro-European voters. Don't expect bolder moves from the Labour government in its current frame of mind. Though defence and security draw us towards ever closer union, public opinion is not to be trusted. If people were confronted now with actual re-entry terms – paying in, free movement, joining the euro, no special deals – their answers might change. The mood might also be different if the far right continues its gains in EU countries, dividing the union's values. What might it take to throw off the economic, political and psychological darkness of Brexit? A clever – or Cleverly? – new Tory leader daring to break with the past, confessing the error of Brexit and taking us back into the EU, once and for all. It may take another generation to recover. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Economic confidence falls to record low as tax rises loom
Confidence in the British economy among business leaders has tumbled to its lowest level since the Brexit vote, as bosses fear the impact of tax rises and President Trump's trade war. An index that tracked optimism in the economy produced by the Institute of Directors, a lobby group, slid to -72 in July from -53 in June, the worst reading since the research started exactly nine years ago. Tax and the cost of employment were the main issues raised regarding the government by a survey of 894 finance directors, as they predicted wages and costs would rise and revenue and exports would fall. The figures add to pressure on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, to demonstrate the government's ability to reverse the economy's declining growth and avoid months of debilitating speculation of further tax rises after a £25 billion increase in employers' national insurance contributions (NICs).
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Our society accepts others, but that is now at risk': Kemi Badenoch fears that divisions will lead to South-African style apartheid
Britain's acceptance of others is at risk of being eroded by people on 'both extremes', Kemi Badenoch has warned. The Conservative leader said those who 'pretend' the UK is an awful place for ethnic minorities, and those who promote ethno-nationalism, are damaging society. She said both groups 'need to be dealt with' so children do not grow up in a segregated society akin to apartheid South Africa. Speaking to the Rosebud with Gyles Brandreth podcast, Mrs Badenoch also said she did not experience 'meaningful' prejudice after moving from Nigeria to the UK permanently. Born in Wimbledon, south London, to her Nigerian parents, mother a professor and father a doctor, she was raised in Lagos before coming back as a teen. Asked if she was made conscious of her 'blackness' after coming to Britain, she said: 'Never. And I think that this is one of the things that probably made me an outlier. 'I knew I was going to a place where I would look different from everybody and I didn't think that was odd. 'What I found actually quite interesting was that people didn't treat me differently. It's why I am so quick to defend the UK whenever there are accusations of racism. 'I did not experience prejudice in any meaningful form. That doesn't mean prejudice doesn't exist or that it doesn't happen. Many people do [experience it], but I didn't, not seriously. 'I had a couple of instances at school which now I look back and I think "Well, that might have been prejudice" but even then, when I talk about the soft bigotry of lower expectations, teachers saying "You don't need to go to all these fancy universities, just to this poly or this former poly". 'Some of it was just coming from what they thought was a good place, they thought they were being helpful or they were well-meaning. 'I don't think they were trying to disadvantage me. So I didn't feel that way.' But Mrs Badenoch, who moved permanently to the UK when she was 16 in 1996 because of economic turmoil in Nigeria, warned that things could get worse. The mother-of-three said it would be a 'dereliction of duty' to leave a worse world to her children. She added: 'I have mixed race children. Making sure we keep a socially cohesive society, one where the colour of your skin doesn't matter any more than the colour of your eyes or your hair, is quite important. I think we've done such a brilliant job in the UK and that's in danger of turning because of people on both extremes. 'Those who want to pretend this is the most awful place in the world to live if you're an ethnic minority, they've created a lot of damage, but now we're also seeing a rise in ethno-nationalism, of people who are trying to pretend that those of us who are different skin colours are not meant to be here. I don't want [my children] to grow up in a society that is like South Africa was, where people were segregated or where the colour of their skin is something to be noted.' The Tory leader also revealed she still bears the marks of a tough upbringing in Nigeria. 'I think my worst experience would have been being sent away from home, having to live in what was quite a brutal boarding school. 'I had to fetch water from a borehole. My soft baby hands were calloused. I think they are still calloused actually 35 years later from doing that.'
