Warren Buffett doesn't believe in the '10,000-hour rule'—what he suggests you do instead to gain mastery
'I don't believe in that book that talked about spending 10,000 hours at something,' he said at Berkshire Hathaway's 2025 shareholder meeting. 'I could spend 10,000 hours at tap dancing and you'd throw up if you watched me,' he added.
That appears to be a reference to Malcolm Gladwell's 2008 book 'Outliers' which helped popularize the idea that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to master a talent or subject. CNBC Make It has reached out to Gladwell for comment.
In 'Outliers,' Gladwell called 10,000 hours the 'magic number' in terms of the time needed to spend practicing a skill to become an expert. That could go for playing the violin, writing fiction or virtually any other field.
The so-called '10,000-hour rule' has been oversimplified, however, Gladwell subsequently pointed out. 'Practice isn't a SUFFICIENT condition for success,' he said in 2014. 'I could play chess for 100 years and I'll never be a grandmaster. The point is simply that natural ability requires a huge investment of time in order to be made manifest.'
At the shareholder meeting, Buffett underlined the importance of identifying what skills you already have and what you love doing, and then find people who can teach you to improve. Ideally that means spending time with instructors or mentors, though it may be just as valuable to read what experts in your field have written on the subject. Read More BUSINESS LIVE: Natwest profits hit £1.8bn; Deutsche to buy Numis
'If I spent 10 hours reading Ben Graham, I would be damn smart when I got through,' Buffett said, referring to one of his most impactful mentors. 'Find your own path and you will find the people in schooling that want to talk to you.' 'Look around at what really fascinates you'
It may seem financially wise to pursue a career or trade that you're not too interested in because it pays well. But you may be more likely to succeed by pursuing the thing that you're good at and excited about.
'If my ambition had been to become a ventriloquist or whatever it might have been, it wouldn't have worked,' Buffett said at the shareholder meeting. 'I just spent hours and hours and hours on investing.'
Lucky for him, the topic he was interested in happened to be a lucrative career path. But he was able to master investing in part because his teachers and mentors were impressed with his curiosity and excited to work with him.
'People that teach, in general, love having a young student who's actually really interested in the subject, and they'll spend extra time with you,' he said. Reflecting on his time at Columbia University, Buffett said his professors treated him 'like a son.'
'I was interested in what they were saying and they found it kind of entertaining that I was so interested, so I would look around at what really fascinates you. I wouldn't try and be somebody else,' he added.
Career experts often agree that your interests and natural skills should guide your career decisions more than the potential starting salary. When you choose a college major, for example, it's better to pursue a field of study you're genuinely interested in, not just something you think will help you get paid well. Read More Gambling stocks hit by fears of UK Budget tax grab
Doing so can help you be more successful in school — and it may still pay off down the line.
'Your interests may match with a job that can ultimately pay you a really good salary right out of the gate,' Kafui Kouakou, assistant vice president of career development and experiential learning at Quinnipiac University previously told CNBC Make It. 'Some others you may have to start a little bit slow, start to make some money and then over time, it continues to increase and grow from there.'
Want a new career that's higher-paying, more flexible or fulfilling? Take CNBC's new online course How to Change Careers and Be Happier at Work . Expert instructors will teach you strategies to network successfully, revamp your resume and confidently transition into your dream career. Start today and use coupon code EARLYBIRD for an introductory discount of 30% off $67 (+taxes and fees) through May 13, 2025.
Plus, sign up for CNBC Make It's newsletter to get tips and tricks for success at work, with money and in life.
READ SOURCE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Janus Henderson Group's (NYSE:JHG) 22% CAGR outpaced the company's earnings growth over the same five-year period
When you buy a stock there is always a possibility that it could drop 100%. But on a lighter note, a good company can see its share price rise well over 100%. Long term Janus Henderson Group plc (NYSE:JHG) shareholders would be well aware of this, since the stock is up 106% in five years. On top of that, the share price is up 30% in about a quarter. But this move may well have been assisted by the reasonably buoyant market (up 16% in 90 days). On the back of a solid 7-day performance, let's check what role the company's fundamentals have played in driving long term shareholder returns. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. During five years of share price growth, Janus Henderson Group achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 42% per year. The EPS growth is more impressive than the yearly share price gain of 16% over the same period. Therefore, it seems the market has become relatively pessimistic about the company. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Janus Henderson Group's earnings, revenue and cash flow. What About Dividends? As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Janus Henderson Group the TSR over the last 5 years was 166%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that Janus Henderson Group shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 23% over one year. Of course, that includes the dividend. That's better than the annualised return of 22% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. Most investors take the time to check the data on insider transactions. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
CNBC
15 hours ago
- CNBC
The real reason a 4-day workweek makes people happier in their jobs—it's not just more free time
It's not exactly surprising that workers support moving to a four-day workweek. In the last five years, hundreds of companies have piloted a four-day, 32-hour workweek with no pay cuts to some 8,700 workers around the world. People experienced less burnout, stress and anxiety, and better mental and physical health. Employees rated their work-life balance higher, and even business profits grew. There are two major factors for the boost in workers' happiness, says Juliet Schor, an author, economist, sociologist and lead researcher of the 4 Day Week experiments. One, of course, is that people have more time for their families, friends, sleep, hobbies, health and communities, Schor writes in her latest book, "Four Days a Week." The second factor, however, is that workers are happier even while they're on the clock. Simply put: The four-day week makes people feel much more effective at work, and that makes them happier in general. Trial participants self-reported that they were more productive than ever after moving to a shortened week. When faced with the task of getting their usual amount of work done in less time, workers and teams found ways to cut out busywork, streamline processes and determine what work was actually most important, Schor writes. Some said they felt more stress trying to cram everything in, though those situations were the exception, Schor writes. Beyond maintaining productivity, "people just feel so much better," Schor tells CNBC Make It. "They feel on top of their work and their life, and they're not stressed out. They feel recovered when they come to work on Monday morning. They feel more eager to do work. They feel like they can get it done." When workers feel like they're good at their job, they feel good overall, and that spills into their personal lives. "That productivity bump they get, of feeling so good about their work quality, that has a big positive impact on their overall well-being, which we never expected," Schor says. The four-day workweek could also make people feel better about their jobs because it signals a new contract between themselves and their employer. The typical five-day, 40-hour workweek has been the national standard by law since the 1940s. When companies introduce a shorter workweek without a pay cut, the flexibility can be seen as an exclusive benefit or reward. It signals that management is willing to give up some control over how people structure their time, Schor says, especially if part of the goal is to explicitly improve employee well-being. The move can additionally strengthen teams when colleagues band together to work smarter in less time. The four-day week "makes everyone super motivated to implement [process] changes, which aren't easy," said Jon Leland, who previously helped Kickstarter through a four-day workweek pilot. "It makes the stakes really high, because you're not only gaining these efficiency gains just for yourself, but you're doing it for everyone else around you," Leland told Schor in her book. "This accountability to co-workers is an important part of why people are willing to make the extra effort to find efficiencies, forgo goofing off, and do the hard work," Schor writes. "They develop more team spirit."
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Warns Inflation Turns Business Into ‘The Upside-Down World of Alice in Wonderland' But Weeds Out ‘Bad Businesses'
Warren Buffett, chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) (BRK.A), is known for his clear-eyed assessments of economic forces and their impact on business fundamentals. In his 1981 shareholder letter, Buffett addressed the distorting effects of inflation on corporate behavior, writing: '...inflation takes us through the looking glass into the upside-down world of Alice in Wonderland. When prices continuously rise, the 'bad' business must retain every nickel that it can. Not because it is attractive as a repository for equity capital, but precisely because it is so unattractive, the low-return business must follow a high retention policy. If it wishes to continue operating in the future as it has in the past — and most entities, including businesses, do — it simply has no choice.' More News from Barchart China, Chips, and Chaos: Where Smart Investors Are Putting Their Money Now Alphabet Had a 'Standout Quarter.' Should You Buy GOOG Stock Here? The Saturday Spread: Leveraging Practical Math to Extract Alpha in Hidden Places Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. This observation came at a time when the U.S. economy was grappling with high inflation and rising interest rates, conditions that posed unique challenges for both investors and managers. Buffett's metaphor of an 'upside-down world' captures the counterintuitive reality that, in inflationary periods, even companies with poor returns are forced to reinvest heavily just to maintain their existing operations. Unlike high-quality businesses that can generate surplus cash and reward shareholders, low-return enterprises must retain capital simply to keep pace with rising costs of inventory, receivables, and fixed assets. Buffett's authority on this subject is grounded in decades of experience navigating different economic cycles. Since taking control of Berkshire Hathaway in the 1960s, he has consistently emphasized the importance of investing in businesses with durable competitive advantages and strong pricing power — traits that allow companies to pass rising costs on to customers and maintain profitability in inflationary environments. By contrast, businesses with weak economics are forced into a perpetual cycle of capital retention, leaving little room for dividends, growth, or debt reduction. This insight has enduring relevance for investors and corporate leaders. Even as inflationary pressures ebb and flow over time, the underlying principle remains: capital allocation decisions should be based on the ability of a business to generate real returns above the rate of inflation. Buffett's warning also serves as a caution against being misled by headline earnings or reported profits during inflationary periods. What matters most is not the nominal growth in revenues or assets, but the true economic value created for shareholders after accounting for the 'silent tax' of inflation. Buffett's 1981 letter to investors continues to be studied for its timeless lessons on business quality, capital allocation, and the dangers of inflation. His ability to distill complex macroeconomic realities into practical guidance has made his annual letters essential reading for investors seeking to build resilient, value-driven portfolios in any market environment. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
