U.S. Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged even as Trump demands cuts
The Fed's decision Wednesday (July 30, 2025) leaves its key short-term rate at about 4.3%, where it has stood after the central bank made three cuts last year. During a news conference, Chair Jerome Powell said that Mr. Trump's sweeping tariffs are starting to push up inflation and it will take time for the Fed to determine whether the uptick in prices will be a one-time effect or something more persistent.
'That is a risk to be assessed and managed,' he told reporters.
There were some signs of splits in the Fed's ranks: Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman voted to reduce borrowing costs, while 9 officials, including Mr. Powell, favoured standing pat. It is the first time in more than three decades that two of the seven Washington-based governors have dissented. One official, Governor Adriana Kugler, was absent and didn't vote.
The choice to hold off on a rate cut will almost certainly result in further conflict between the Fed and White House, as Mr. Trump has repeatedly demanded that the central bank reduce borrowing costs as part of his effort to assert control over one of the few remaining independent federal agencies.
Mr. Powell said that while tariffs are starting to push up the cost of goods — and he expects more of that to happen in the coming months — the price of services — rents, insurance, and hotel rooms — has continued to cool.
He suggested it could take some time to determine whether the impact of the tariffs will be short-lived or more persistent.
'We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how" the tariffs and prices will play out, Mr. Powell said.
Many economists and Wall Street investors have expected the Fed to cut its rate at its next meeting in September, but Mr. Powell's remarks suggest there may not be enough data before September to support a cut.
'We have made no decisions about September,' Mr. Powell said. The chair acknowledged that if the Fed cut its rate too soon, inflation could move higher, and if it cut too late, then the job market could suffer.
Major US indexes, which had been trading slightly higher on Wednesday, went negative after Mr. Powell's comments.
'The markets seem to think that Mr. Powell pushed back on a September rate cut,' said Lauren Goodwin, chief market strategist at New York Life Investments.
Mr. Trump argues that because the U.S. economy is doing well, rates should be lowered. But unlike a blue-chip company that usually pays lower rates than a troubled start-up, the Fed adjusts rates to either slow or speed growth, and would be more likely to keep them high if the economy is strong to prevent an inflationary outbreak.
Earlier Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a healthy 3% annual rate in the second quarter, though that figure followed a negative reading for the first three months of the year, when the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate. Most economists averaged the two figures to get a growth rate of about 1.2% for the first half of this year.
Some of the disagreement likely reflects jockeying to replace Mr. Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Waller in particular has been mentioned as a potential future Fed chair.
Bowman, meanwhile, last dissented in September 2024, when the Fed cut its key rate by a half-point. She said she preferred a quarter-point cut instead, and cited the fact that inflation was still above 2.5% as a reason for caution.
Waller also said earlier this month that he favoured cutting rates, but for very different reasons than Mr. Trump has cited: Waller thinks that growth and hiring are slowing, and that the Fed should reduce borrowing costs to forestall a weaker economy and a rise in unemployment.
There are other camps on the Fed's 19-member rate-setting committee (only 12 of the 19 actually vote on rate decisions). In June, seven members signalled that they supported leaving rates unchanged through the end of this year, while two suggested they preferred a single rate cut this year. The other half supported more reductions, with eight officials backing two cuts, and two — widely thought to be Waller and Bowman — supporting three reductions.
The dissents could be a preview of what might happen after Mr. Powell steps down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for the much lower interest rates the White House desires. Other Fed officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more than economic conditions would otherwise support.
Overall, the committee's quarterly forecasts in June suggested the Fed would cut twice this year. There are only three more Fed policy meetings — in September, October, and December.
When the Fed cuts its rate, it often — but not always — results in lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards.
Some economists agree with Waller's concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains occurring in health care.
'We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people appreciate,' said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income.
Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients this week if the pair were to dissent, 'it would say more about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic conditions.' The Fed's two-day meeting comes after a week of extraordinary interactions with the Trump White House, which has accused Mr. Powell of mismanaging an extensive, $2.5 billion renovation of two office buildings. Mr. Trump suggested two weeks ago that the rising cost for the project could be a 'firing offence' but has since backed off that characterisation.
Notably, Mr. Trump argues that the Fed should cut because the economy is doing very well, which is a different viewpoint than nearly all economists, who say that a healthy, growing economy doesn't need rate cuts.
'If your economy is hot, you're supposed to have higher short-term rates,' Porcelli said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The Hundred looking to feed off IPL's 'phenomenal growth' after drawing Indian investment
The investment of four IPL owners into The Hundred will enable the England and Wales Cricket Board-backed event to grow rapidly and learn immensely from the skills possessed by the top minds working for the world's biggest T20 league. Out of the eight teams in the 100-ball competition, four will be partially owned by owners of Mumbai Indians, Sunrisers Hyderabad, Lucknow Super Giants and Delhi Capitals (only GMR group involved). After a long delay, the ECB finalised the deals with the IPL and other investors on Wednesday. Reliance Group, which will own 49 percent of the London-based Oval franchise, and Trent Rockets are yet to close agreements with the ECB. "It's brilliant. You look at what the IPL has done, forget cricket, in sport in general, the growth it's achieved in 18 short years. It's nothing short of phenomenal," said Vikram Banerji, Managing Director of The Hundred, in response to a PTI query on Thursday. "So the growth and the learnings, both on the field and off the field, that they can bring into this tournament, with the balance of the other investors that we've got from America and wherever else, I'm really excited about that side of things, about the skill sets that are now coming into English cricket," he said. The deal will take effect from 2026 season and the investors will take operation control of the franchise from October 1, 2025. Asked about the reason for the delay in closing the agreement with the Reliance-backed Oval franchise and Trent Rockets, Banerji said: "Right at the start we offered all the investors the opportunity to sign and close immediately whenever the legals were all done and have some involvement in this year. "On the whole, it's been run as it was, or close formally at the end of the season, early October, when they close formally, when they take operational control of the name of the brand. So those two chose that months ago. "With Trent Rockets, it's documents were signed and all the rest of it fully there. With the Oval Invincibles, there's three things left on their venue hire stuff that they're working through. They're small things, it'll be a matter of weeks, and that'll get signed out." Banerji and the rest of the stakeholders will soon have a meeting with the new investors for the tournament operations from 2026 onwards. Barring The Hundred, all leagues including the IPL are being played in the T20 format. Is there an inclination from the IPL owners to switch to the standard T20 format from the current 100-ball a side format? "I think you have to look at what works in this country. There have been some discussions around kind of it works elsewhere, but in this country, the format has provided us with some really interesting things, especially from a broadcast perspective in terms of the reach it's provided and that ability to create a new crowd. "At the moment, it's the 100 format, and that will remain for now. But let's see where we get to in a month," said Banerji, who added the participation of active Indian players remains off the card despite the IPL investment into the competition. Sitting alongside Banerji, ECB chief executive Richard Gould, was also asked about the participation of Pakistan players in The Hundred in light of Indian investment. No Pakistan player was picked in the 2025 draft for different reasons. Gould asserted the ECB will take action if the owners are found to be discriminatory in player selection irrespective of his nationality. "We would expect players of all nations to be selected for all teams. I haven't had the need to have any discussion at this point (with new investors)." So is the latest draft just a coincidence? "I don't, I don't know. But we have not had any discussions with the owners at this point. But, we've got very clear anti-discrimination policies within cricket in England. And if those are, if those are not adhered to, our cricket regulator will take action," said Gould. Now that the deals are done, the ECB expects the change in name of at least three teams backed by IPL team owners including Reliance, RPSG and GMR. The sale of stakes have catapulted the valuation of teams to over 975 million pounds with more than 500 million pounds set to be invested in English cricket.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tariffs drive June inflation rise in US, delaying Fed rate cut hopes
US inflation increased in June as tariffs boosted prices for imported goods like household furniture and recreation products, supporting views that price pressures would pick up in the second half of the year and delay the Federal Reserve from resuming cutting interest rates until at least October. The report from the Commerce Department on Thursday showed goods prices last month posting their biggest gain since January, with also solid rises in the costs of clothing and footwear. The US central bank on Wednesday left its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25 per cent-4.50 per cent range and Fed Chair Jerome Powell's comments after the decision undercut confidence the central bank would resume policy easing in September as had been widely anticipated by financial markets and some economists. "The Fed is unlikely to welcome the inflation dynamics currently taking hold," said Olu Sonola, head of US economic research, Fitch Ratings. "Rather than converging toward target, inflation is now clearly diverging from it. This trajectory is likely to complicate current expectations for a rate cut in September or October." The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index rose 0.3 per cent last month after an upwardly revised 0.2 per cent gain in May, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the PCE price index climbing 0.3 per cent following a previously reported 0.1 per cent rise in May. Prices for furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3 per cent, the biggest gain since March 2022, after increasing 0.6 per cent in May. Recreational goods and vehicles prices shot up 0.9 per cent, the most since February 2024, after being unchanged in May. Prices for clothing and footwear rose 0.4 per cent. Outside the tariff-sensitive goods, prices for gasoline and other energy products rebounded 0.9 per cent after falling for four consecutive months. Services prices rose 0.2 per cent for a fourth straight month, restrained by cheaper airline fares and steady prices for dining out and hotel stays. In the 12 months through June, the PCE price index advanced 2.6 per cent after increasing 2.4 per cent in May. The data was included in the advance gross domestic product report for the second quarter published on Wednesday, which showed inflation cooling, though remaining above the Fed's 2 per cent target. Economists said businesses were still selling inventory accumulated before President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties came into effect. They expected a broad increase in goods prices in the second half. Procter & Gamble said this week it would raise prices on some products in the US to offset tariff costs. The Fed tracks the PCE price measures for monetary policy. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, the PCE price index increased 0.3 per cent last month after rising 0.2 per cent in May. In addition to higher goods prices, the so-called core PCE inflation was lifted by rising costs for healthcare as well as financial services and insurance. In the 12 months through June, core inflation advanced 2.8 per cent after rising by the same margin in May. Stocks on Wall Street were mixed. The dollar was steady against a basket of currencies. US Treasury yields fell. CONSUMER SPENDING STEADY The BEA also reported that consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of economic activity, rose 0.3 per cent in June after being unchanged in May. The data was also included in the advance GDP report, which showed consumer spending growing at a 1.4 per cent annualized rate last quarter after almost stalling in the first quarter. In the second quarter, economic growth rebounded at a 3.0 per cent rate, boosted by a sharp reduction in the trade deficit because of fewer imports relative to the record surge in the January-March quarter. The economy contracted at a 0.5 per cent pace in the first three months of the year. Spending is being supported by a stable labor market, with other data from the Labor Department showing initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 218,000 for the week ended July 26. But a reluctance by employers to increase headcount amid uncertainty over where tariff levels will eventually settle is making it harder for those who lose their jobs to find new opportunities, which could hamper future spending. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, was unchanged at a lofty seasonally adjusted 1.946 million during the week ending July 19, the claims report showed. The government's closely watched employment report on Friday is expected to show the unemployment rate rising to 4.2 per cent in July from 4.1 per cent in June, according to a Reuters survey of economists. Economists expect pressure from tariffs and a slowing labor market will put a brake on consumer spending in the third quarter. Slow growth is likely already in the works as inflation-adjusted consumer spending edged up 0.1 per cent in June after declining 0.2 per cent in May. Precautionary saving could also curb spending. The saving rate was unchanged at 4.5 per cent in June. Though a third report from the Labor Department showed wage growth picking up in the second quarter, inflation-adjusted annual gains moderated to 0.9 per cent from 1.1 per cent in the 12 months through March. The BEA report showed inflation cutting into income for households after accounting for taxes, which was flat in June. Signs of financial strain are also emerging among higher-income households, who have largely been driving spending. Lower- and middle-income families have been disproportionately affected by tariff-related price increases, higher borrowing costs and slowing economic activity. "While consumer spending has thus held up â€' supported by solid income gains â€' it now faces mounting headwinds from a cooling labor market and renewed inflationary pressures," said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon.


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google loses appeal over app store reforms in Epic Games case
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Alphabet's Google on Thursday failed to persuade a US appeals panel to overturn a jury verdict and federal court order requiring the technology giant to revamp its app store San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected claims from Google that the trial judge made legal errors in the antitrust case that unfairly benefited "Fortnite" maker Epic Games, which filed the lawsuit in accused Google of monopolising how consumers access apps on Android devices and pay for transactions within apps. The Cary, North Carolina-based company convinced a San Francisco jury in 2023 that Google illegally stifled District Judge James Donato in San Francisco ordered Google in October to restore competition by allowing users to download rival app stores within its Play store and by making Play's app catalog available to those competitors, among other order was on hold pending the outcome of the 9th Circuit appeal. The court's decision can be appealed to the US Supreme told the appeals court that the tech company's Play store competes with Apple's App Store, and that Donato unfairly barred Google from making that point to contest Epic's antitrust tech giant also argued that a jury should never have heard Epic's lawsuit because it sought to enjoin Google's conduct - a request normally decided by a judge - and not collect has defended the verdict and court injunction, telling the 9th Circuit judges that the Android app market has been "suffering under anti-competitive behavior for the better part of a decade."In the trial court and in the appeal, Epic disputed arguments by Google that changes to its app business ordered by the court would harm user privacy and filed a brief backing Epic, as did the US Justice Department and Federal Trade separately is battling Apple over a US judge's order requiring the iPhone maker to give developers greater freedom to steer consumers to make purchases outside its App has appealed a ruling that said it violated a prior injunction in a lawsuit that Epic filed in 2020.