EU unveils long-delayed 2040 climate target with contested flexibilities
After months of tough negotiations with EU member states, Brussels announced it would stick to the objective announced last year of cutting emissions by 90% by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. The proposal comes as much of Europe roasts in an early summer heatwave, which scientists say are becoming more intense, frequent and widespread due to human-induced climate change.
The 2040 target – which needs the sign off from the EU's member states and parliament – is a key milestone toward the bloc's goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. Brussels says the EU has cut climate-warming emissions by 37% relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces mounting pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate skepticism in many European countries.
EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra acknowledged the "sensitive" debate, saying Brussels was keeping an "ambitious" goal while being "pragmatic and flexible on how to achieve it." To sway resistant capitals, the European Commission proposes that from 2036, the bloc's 27 countries can count carbon credits purchased to finance projects outside Europe, for up to 3% of their emission cuts.
Climate groups are fiercely opposed to such a measure. Backed by scientific studies and the commission's own science advisers, they say factoring in international credits – for things like tree-planting or renewable-energy projects – risks undermining the EU's own efforts to shift away from fossil fuels.
'Don't strain ourselves'
EU environment ministers will discuss the objective at a meeting in mid-July, ahead of an expected vote to approve the measures on September 18. It will only become law after EU lawmakers also sign off on the target. The commission's hope is that the 2040 objective will be approved before the UN climate conference (COP30) in November in the northern Brazilian city of Belem. But that gives little time for negotiations with skeptical nations, with whom Hoekstra has already spent months trying to build a compromise.
For some countries, including the Czech Republic, the 90% target is unrealistic. Meanwhile, others including Italy and Hungary worry about the burden of decarbonizing heavy industry at a time when Europe is working to strengthen its industry in the face of fierce competition from the United States and China. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has suggested a target of 80 or 85%, while France has expressed doubts over how the EU will reach its objective. French President Emmanuel Macron wants guarantees for the decarbonization of industry and support for nuclear energy, the largest source of power in France.
But the commission can count on the support of other countries including Spain and Denmark, which took over the rotating EU presidency this week. And the three-percent "flexibility" – which mirrors demands made in the new German government's coalition agreement – should help keep the economic powerhouse on board.
When it comes to Europe's international commitments, Macron has also stressed that the bloc is only bound to present a midway target for 2035 at COP30 in Belem, and not the 2040 objective. "Let's not strain ourselves," Macron told reporters last week. "If we have [a 2040 target] for Belem, great, but if it takes longer, let's take the time," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
IMEC: Can the ambitious trade corridor from India to Europe succeed?
The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is one of the most ambitious modern connectivity initiatives. It aims to create a modern transport and trade corridor linking India to Europe through the Middle East, leveraging ports, rail networks, highways and digital infrastructure. The project aspires to reshape global trade maps, offer alternatives beyond the Suez Canal, and enhance Europe's energy and supply security. For Greece, IMEC represents an opportunity to upgrade its role as a key gateway to Europe. Greek ports, particularly Piraeus and Thessaloniki, have the potential to become key centres for transferring goods and distributing them further into Europe. At the same time, Greece can act as an energy hub, contributing to the diversification of energy sources and supply routes. However, IMEC also faces significant challenges: geopolitical tensions, competition from other trade routes and countries, the need for large infrastructure investment and policy coordination. These challenges were discussed in detail at the event titled 'IMEC from potential to partnership,' held by the Balkans & Black Sea Forum "Executive Roundtable 2025," with the participation of ambassadors from the involved countries, analysts, experts, and industry stakeholders. The main conclusions are: The IMEC Corridor needs clear guidance and funding. The project started as an Indian initiative, which was then embraced by the EU and Saudi Arabia. However, unlike other similar initiatives, India has not set up a specific implementing body for the project, nor has it committed funds. Most speakers agreed that the projects will need to be funded through India-EU partnerships, and that the contribution of Saudi Arabia and the US will be crucial. The US is generally positive about the project but sees it as part of a larger strategic framework related to the implementation of the Abraham Accords. As the speakers pointed out, it is unlikely that India, mainly due to a different mindset, will commit funds and establish a mechanism for the implementation of the IMEC, as China did for the 'Belt and Road' Initiative. The Indian government emphasises that countries themselves must adopt the project and develop national plans for its implementation. The corridor will require coordination in the development and operation of the necessary infrastructure. The project is easier for the ports, but for the railway, there are many challenges. For example, there is a need to secure investment funding, build the necessary railway lines (some of which cross regions with significant geopolitical instability), establish a customs union, and set up a dedicated sales office. As one of the speakers said: "Every corridor is only as strong as its weakest point." For Greece, the big challenge is the port of Piraeus. Greece is trying to emerge as the main gateway of the Corridor to Europe (competing with Italy and France). However, the fact that the port of Piraeus is managed by a Chinese company raises questions about how willing and able it will be to serve as the final point of the IMEC. Alternatively, as some speakers noted, the port of Thessaloniki could play this role. The second major challenge relates to the railway network, which is underdeveloped both within Greece and in its connections with neighbouring countries. As was emphasised, without a strong and interconnected railway network, the potential to fully utilise the IMEC is significantly limited. The military conflicts in the Middle East are 'freezing' plans for the Corridor's development. Although tensions have eased in the past 24 hours, the broader Middle East region remains an area of high tension and conflict, which raises questions as to whether and how the necessary infrastructure will be shielded. As for Cyprus, whose participation in the project was confirmed during the recent visit of Noreda Modi to Nicosia, it was noted that Cyprus could become a regional hub for managing administrative and operational issues, building on its experience in this field and its membership of the EU. And what will be the role of the Palestinians in this project? "The Palestinians should be part of the project," noted the speakers, for example with rail links to Jordan through the West Bank. However, such a prospect requires permanent peace in the region.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Strike by French air traffic controllers disrupts summer travel
The DGAC civil aviation authority has asked airlines to cancel some of their flights to ensure there are enough controllers on duty. The strike affected air traffic across Western Europe. Ryanair, Europe's largest airline, said on Thursday it was forced to cancel 170 flights, affecting 30,000 passengers. "Once again, European families are being held hostage by French air traffic controllers," said Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary. The Airlines for Europe association, which includes Ryanair, Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, British Airways and EasyJet, described the action as "intolerable". According to sources familiar with the matter, 270 air traffic controllers out of a total workforce of around 1,400 went on strike. UNSA-ICNA, the second biggest labour group in the sector, launched the action to demand better working conditions and more staff. It was joined by the third largest union, USAC-CGT. Shortly after 10 am on Thursday, flights were experiencing significant delays, including an average of 1.5 hours for arrivals and 1 hour for departures in Nice, France's third-largest airport. A quarter of flights departing from or arriving at Paris Charles de Gaulle and Paris Orly have also been cancelled. Airports in the south were particularly hit. In addition to Nice, 30 percent of flights have been cancelled in cities including Lyon, Marseille, and Montpellier. On the eve of the school holidays on Friday, the situation is expected to become even more tense at Paris airports and Beauvais, where the DGAC has ordered a 40-percent reduction in the number of flights. On Thursday morning, the Eurocontrol monitoring agency warned airlines of "significant" delays in the airspace managed by the air traffic control centres in Marseille, Brest and Reims. Sources said that business aviation, particularly in Nice and Le Bourget near Paris, has also been significantly affected. France's transport minister called the unions' demands unacceptable. "The demands made by minority unions are unacceptable, as is the decision to hold this strike at the start of the holiday season," Philippe Tabarot said on Wednesday. © 2025 AFP


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Europe's top CEOs call for Commission to slow down on AI Act
CEOs from more than 40 European companies including ASML, Philips, Siemens and Mistral, are asking for a 'two-year clock-stop' on the AI Act before key obligations enter into force this August. In a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, made public on Thursday, they say this would allow 'both for reasonable implementation by companies, and for further simplification of the new rules.' The AI Act – rules that regulate artificial intelligence systems according to the risk they pose to society – entered into force in August 2024, but will fully apply in 2027. The companies call for a pause on obligations on high-risk AI systems, due to take effect as of August 2026, and to obligations for general-purpose AI models (GPAI), due to enter into force as of August 2025. 'This postponement, coupled with a commitment to prioritise regulatory quality over speed, would send innovators and investors around the world a strong signal that Europe is serious about its simplification and competitiveness agenda,' the letter says. The call comes as the Code of Practice on GPAI, a voluntary set of rules aiming to help providers of AI models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, comply with the EU's AI Act, is yet to be released. The rules enter into force on 2 August, and the Commission has said it will publish the guidelines before that date. However, Euronews reported earlier this week that several companies including Google have been asking for a grace period to be able to comply with the code. Thomas Regnier, the Commission spokesperson on digital, told Euronews that what is being discussed in the context of the AI Board is "the timing to implement the Code of Practice, with the end of 2025 being considered." "This would be well ahead of the AI Act's enforcement deadlines - 2026 for new models and 2027 for existing models," he added. The process has been criticised since Commission-appointed experts started drafting the rules in September 2024. Tech giants as well as publishers and rights-holders are concerned that the rules violate the EU's Copyright laws, and restrict innovation.