logo
As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll

As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll

National Post06-06-2025
Against a backdrop of fresh talk of Alberta separation and the constant spectre of Quebec's sovereignty movement, a new national opinion poll found that most Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do.
Article content
A large majority of respondents nationally said any secession by one province would require negotiation with all provinces and must be supported by a clear majority of voters in the province, and most said separation cannot be a unilateral decision, and it should require approval by the federal House of Commons.
Article content
Article content
Article content
A national opinion survey, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia, was designed to probe Canadians attitudes about the process for separation, rather than their views on separation itself, and what should follow a successful provincial leave referendum.
Article content
Article content
'The bottom line is that Canadians across the country envision the process as much more complex than a simple majority vote on a referendum question,' said Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies.
Article content
Public discussion about Alberta separating from Canada drew more mainstream attention in May, after the federal election returned the Liberal Party to government and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith tabled provincial legislation to make it easier for Albertans to trigger a referendum on the province leaving the rest of Canada. Smith said she would hold such a referendum if a citizen petition called for it.
Article content
Article content
Separatists in Quebec hope the renewed discourse on separation will boost their long-standing desire for independent statehood, which twice went to provincial referendum which failed to support sovereignty, in 1980 and 1995. The Parti Québécois plans another provincial sovereignty referendum in the years ahead.
Article content
That creates plenty of secessionist talk and debate, but it has been 30 years since Canada has seen an actual separation referendum.
Article content
'Many Canadians of voting age and, of course, most immigrants didn't experience the last referendum 30 years ago, but there is a growing consensus that the rest of the country would want a say in the process and secession would not be simple,' said Jedwab.
Article content
The poll asked 1,537 people across Canada a series of questions on the mechanism of a possible separation.
Article content
Article content
A majority of Canadians said any referendum question regarding provincial separation from Canada must be unambiguous, with 59 per cent of respondents agreeing with that, with only 11 per cent disagreeing, and 30 per cent saying they don't know or declined to answer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EDITORIAL: Federal contracting is a complete mess
EDITORIAL: Federal contracting is a complete mess

Toronto Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

EDITORIAL: Federal contracting is a complete mess

Alexander Jeglic, Procurement Ombud, poses for a photo in downtown Ottawa. Photo by Tony Caldwell / Postmedia The federal government spends $37 billion annually buying goods and services from outside contractors, and according to two financial watchdogs of government spending, the system for doing so is broken. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The latest criticism comes from federal procurement ombudsman Alexander Jeglic. In a report released last week, he said the procurement system has been broken for decades, lacks consistent rules for awarding contracts, has no coherent, government-wide way to identify poor contractors and lacks transparency. That comes on the heels of a report by federal auditor general Karen Hogan, who said fiascoes such as awarding a $60-million government contract to develop the ArriveCAN app that was supposed to cost $80,000 are widespread, across the government. In addition to wasting taxpayers' money, a broken federal contracting system invites fraud where contractors are paid for work they didn't do. It also exposes the system to political corruption, where those awarding the contracts are pressured to do so because of patronage, where politicians award contracts not on the basis of who is best to do the job, but as a reward to contractors favourable to the government, regardless of their ability. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Jeglic proposed five ways to address the problem. • Appointing a chief procurement officer to preside over the contracting process across the federal government. • Creating a government-wide registry identifying consistently poor contractors. • Developing one, universally applicable set of procurement rules across the government. • Using artificial intelligence to streamline the procurement process by eliminating redundant or straightforward tasks. • Creating a transparent database, keeping track of what the government is buying and how and where it buys it. By contrast, Hogan recommended no new rules for contracting, saying there are plenty of rules, but the problem is that those in government awarding these contracts often fail to follow them. We'd add vigorous criminal prosecution where fraud is identified and demoting and firing civil servants who consistently fail to follow contracting rules. If the template for awarding $37 billion annually to federal contractors for providing services to the government is broken, then the system will continue to be wasteful and inefficient, no matter how much money is being poured into it. In a time of skyrocketing federal deficits and repeated fiascoes in government spending, nothing will change unless these problems are addressed. Toronto & GTA Columnists Relationships MLB Toronto & GTA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store