logo
M&S' food sales growth slows after cyberattack, says NielsenIQ

M&S' food sales growth slows after cyberattack, says NielsenIQ

Time of India3 days ago

HighlightsBritish retailer Marks & Spencer's food business experienced a slowdown in sales growth to 9.1 percent during the 12 weeks ending June 14, primarily due to disruptions caused by a cyberattack in April. The market share of Marks & Spencer increased by 10 basis points year-on-year to 3.7 percent, although it decreased from the previous month's figure of 3.8 percent. Following the cyberattack, Marks & Spencer estimated a loss of approximately 300 million pounds ($409 million) in operating profit due to reduced food availability and increased waste and logistics costs.
British retailer Marks & Spencer's food business saw sales growth slow to 9.1 per cent over the 12 weeks to June 14 year-on-year, reflecting the disruption that followed a cyberattack in April, industry data showed on Wednesday.
Researcher NielsenIQ said M&S' food sales growth slowed from 10.8 per cent in last month's report and 14.7 per cent in the one before that.
Though M&S' market share ticked up 10 basis points on the year to 3.7 per cent , it was down from the 3.8 per cent reading in last month's report.
As part of its management of the cyberattack, M&S stopped taking online clothing orders and also took other systems offline. That reduced food availability and also resulted in higher waste and logistics costs.
Last month, M&S said the attack would cost it about 300 million pounds ($409 million) in lost operating profit.
The group resumed taking online orders for clothing lines on June 10 after a 46-day suspension following the attack.
Most of NielsenIQ's data broadly echoed the findings of rival researcher Kantar's report on Tuesday, with robust performances from market leader Tesco, number two player Sainsbury's and online supermarket Ocado.
However, M&S is not fully included in Kantar's market share data set.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global disruptions to help Indian higher education sector to grow, attract foreign students: QS CEO
Global disruptions to help Indian higher education sector to grow, attract foreign students: QS CEO

The Hindu

time6 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Global disruptions to help Indian higher education sector to grow, attract foreign students: QS CEO

As the Union Education Ministry claimed major improvement in the country's higher education sector citing that Indian institutions have achieved their best-ever performance in the World University Rankings 2026, conducted by British company Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), the chief executive officer (CEO) of QS, Jessica Turner, has told The Hindu in an online interview that India can benefit from the shift in the traditional model of students going abroad to the United States, United Kingdom, Canada or Australia due to various factors such as geopolitical instability, economic pressures, Artificial Intelligence and visa restrictions. She welcomed the decision to allow foreign universities to set up campuses in India and said it will invite students worldwide to India. Excerpts from the interview: How do you assess the performance of Indian higher education institutions in the latest QS ranking? This year, India performed exceptionally in the QS Rankings — eight new institutions entered, the highest from any country. Over the last decade, India's representation grew by 390%, overtaking Germany to become the fourth most represented country (after the US, UK, and China). We've seen a holistic rise in India's higher education landscape, with more institutions participating globally. About 48% of Indian institutions improved in ranking, while only 24% declined — a strong performance compared to other countries with large numbers of ranked institutions. Key drivers include improved employer reputation, employment outcomes, and increased research — especially among IITs. The focus on employability and research aligns with India's economic growth. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has been instrumental in driving internationalization and raising quality. Based on the points earned in the ranking in different criteria, which are the areas where the Indian institutions can improve performance in future? Rankings are relative and a dynamic exercise. A fall doesn't mean decline — it may indicate slower progress compared to peers. In areas like international student and faculty ratios, Indian institutions lag. For instance, 78% declined in the international student metric. The faculty-student ratio is also a challenge due to rapid enrolment growth. The 50% Gross Enrolment Ratio target stretches resources, making it hard to match global faculty availability. Citations per faculty is a lagging metric. The improvements seen now reflect research-oriented reforms made over the last 5–10 years — not just in IITs but also in technical institutions under AICTE. These reforms created a more research-intensive environment, and that's finally being reflected in our rankings. Question: Mostly, engineering and technology institutions from India have come up in the rankings. What does this indicate? India's top-ranking institutions are primarily in engineering and technology. These excel in 'Employer Reputation' and 'Citations per Faculty', suggesting strong graduate employability and impactful research. Eight Indian institutions now rank in the global top 100 for research impact—seven are IITs. This demonstrates where international partners are increasingly seeking collaboration. Question: India has now allowed foreign universities to open their campuses in India. How do you see this policy change? And will the global disruptions bring major changes in the higher education sector globally? Internationalisation efforts like joint degree programmes, exchange initiatives, and collaborative research will improve long-term outcomes. These efforts, supported by NEP reforms, are expected to attract more international students and researchers to India. India is also in a strong position to fill global research gaps — particularly as funding declines in countries like the US. Indian institutions offer high-quality, cost-effective research collaboration opportunities. The traditional model — students going abroad to the US, UK, Canada, or Australia — is shifting. Geopolitical instability, economic pressures, AI, and visa restrictions are prompting more hybrid models. Students may now complete parts of their degree at home and travel less. This shift supports joint, online, and blended programs. We also expect regional hubs (e.g., UAE, Singapore, Malaysia) to attract more students due to affordability and English-language programs. These destinations provide high-quality education at lower costs. India can benefit from this shift. It can position itself as a destination for international students, especially from Africa and Central Asia. The NEP lays a strong legislative foundation, and now the focus must be on removing operational barriers (e.g., visa issues) to fully enable internationalisation.

Five risk factors US stock investors may monitor closely for the second half of the year
Five risk factors US stock investors may monitor closely for the second half of the year

Mint

time7 hours ago

  • Mint

Five risk factors US stock investors may monitor closely for the second half of the year

Some of the world's biggest money managers are wary of chasing the stock rally further in the second half of 2025, bracing for more volatility. Markets are wrapping up a wild six months that saw the S&P 500 plunge 19% from peak to trough, before it recouped those losses. The index closed at a record high on Friday after the ceasefire between Israel and Iran revived the risk-on rally. The recent bounce is not enough for many institutional investors, who cite a litany of risks confronting equities. The fast-approaching deadline for tariff deals, a mixed outlook for earnings and questions around America's debt and leadership of the Federal Reserve loomed large in interviews with investment firms. They're also mindful of US-China tensions, potentially eased somewhat by the countries' just-announced trade framework. 'We are more cautious than constructive,' said Joe Gilbert, a portfolio manager at Integrity Asset Management LLC. 'The outlook for the second half of the year is always framed by the starting point, and that starting point from the perspective of valuation and earnings growth is not that attractive.' Gilbert's view is typical of the downbeat sentiment among institutional investors from Singapore to London and New York as June draws to a close. It's also reflected in equity positioning by global asset managers, which remains well below historical levels. Here's more about five key risk factors that stock investors said they are watching closely for the rest of the year: An immediate threat to the equity rally lies in the July 9 deadline set by President Donald Trump to reach trade pacts with major US partners. The stakes are high as exporters without a deal will be hit with much higher tariffs than the current 10% level applied to most countries. The UK is an outlier, having secured an agreement on paper. The European Union and the US believe they can clinch some form of trade agreement in time, Bloomberg News reported Friday, while talks with India, Japan and many others continue. Bloomberg News has also reported that the US is nearing agreements with Mexico and Vietnam. Still, investors got a reminder of the risks of sudden turbulence in this area of international relations when Trump on Friday said he would terminate trade talks with Canada in response to a 3% digital services tax. Investors generally agree that a tariff shock for markets on the scale of 'Liberation Day' in early April is unlikely. There are also hopes that the deadline could be pushed out. Still, Anthi Tsouvali, a strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management, said that while 'markets are not complacent anymore, there are risks until a firm deal is announced.' Tsouvali said she has a neutral stance on equities. 'There's going to be a lot of uncertainty, a lot of volatility,' she said. 'We are not taking active risk.' Corporate resilience has been a key support for the sharp rebound in US stocks since April. Analysts on average expect earnings for S&P 500 companies to rise 7.1% this year before an acceleration in 2026, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. That will be put to the test within a few weeks as second-quarter results roll in. The last earnings season saw companies across the world pull forecasts for the year, citing cost increases and weak consumer sentiment. A June survey by the Business Roundtable showed C-suite executives were more pessimistic than three months earlier, with fewer expecting to ramp up hiring or capital spending. That said, Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package — facing a key Senate vote in the week to come — could provide a boost to companies struggling with tariff hikes and costs to rejig their supply chains. 'Within this more challenging environment, you've got to think that those growth expectations have got to come down,' said Louise Dudley, a portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. For the broader market, 'perhaps the most that we can expect is a sideways move from here,' she said. An end to hostilities between Israel and Iran has pulled oil prices lower, easing a worry for equity investors about how this would feed through to inflation and complicate the Fed's path to interest-rate cuts. Still, the boost to sentiment is fragile as uncertainty swirls around the future of Iran's nuclear program. 'Despite this temporary relief, we continue to see geopolitical risk as structurally elevated,' said Francisco Simón, European head of strategy at Santander Asset Management. The firm retains an underweight stance on equities, favoring a 'cautious and selective approach,' he said. The fraught relationship between the US and China also keeps investors on edge. They will be scouring for details of a trade framework the two sides said this week that they have reached. Among key points are whether the agreement will free up access to Chinese rare earths for American companies and remove obstacles for Chinese tech companies in obtaining cutting-edge US chip technologies. The US lost its last top credit rating in May amid deepening investor concerns over its ballooning debt. Meanwhile, Trump's tax-and-spending bill is expected to add trillions to federal debt over coming years. 'We know that the problem is not going away,' said Neil Robson, head of global equities at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. He noted that a market meltdown sending bond yields surging and equity valuations plunging remains a low probability event. 'But we got to be aware,' he said. For Nicolas Wylenzek, a macro strategist at Wellington Management, the handling of the Fed Chair's succession is also an important issue for investors. Trump said Wednesday that he has three or four people in mind to follow Jerome Powell when his term expires next year. A risk mentioned by some investors is that the US experiences its own version of the UK's 2022 'Liz Truss moment.' That was 'partly triggered by uncontrolled spending, in combination with some questioning of the independence of the Bank of England,' Wylenzek said. 'Could we see something similar?' he said. 'There's a risk that markets suddenly start to get worried that the next chairman of the Fed is not as independent as they maybe have been in the past.' With stocks trading at 22 times earnings in the next 12 months, the S&P 500's valuation is well above its 10-year average of 18.6 times. Firms like Wellington and AllianceBernstein are among those expecting the multiple to remain elevated due to future rate cuts and the resilience of big tech companies. But others see the lofty price tag as an obstacle to buying more stocks. 'US equity valuations, particularly in market-capitalization-weighted strategies such as the S&P 500 Index, may have further to adjust if US economic conditions deteriorate,' said David Chao, a global market strategist at Invesco Asset Management. 'Markets outside of the US mostly trade at lower multiples, and we think the gap with the US will continue to narrow.'

H&M profit beats expectations as brand reboot starts to bear fruit
H&M profit beats expectations as brand reboot starts to bear fruit

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

H&M profit beats expectations as brand reboot starts to bear fruit

Swedish fashion retailer H&M reported slightly stronger second-quarter profit on Thursday, an encouraging sign as CEO Daniel Erver tries to attract more shoppers with trendier clothes. H&M shares were up 4% by 1000 GMT as investors focused on the profit rather than second-quarter sales, which fell slightly more than predicted. Erver has said his focus is on profitability rather than solely sales growth. The world's second-largest listed fashion retailer also said it expected sales in June, measured in local currencies, to rise 3%, an improvement after a 6% fall in the same period a year ago. "Our collections are more current, they are more on trend, more fashionable, and the customer reception has been strong throughout this quarter," Erver said in a press conference. Erver said gingham and check patterned dresses, blouses and skirts have been especially popular this season, with the trend continuing into the autumn. Accessories sales have picked up, with social media also driving a craze for mini-accessories on bags, sneakers, and cellphones, he said. In the U.S., where H&M has around 500 stores, Erver said consumer sentiment has dropped significantly due to the "turbulent" tariffs situation since President Donald Trump hiked duties on imports, and competitors have started raising prices as a result. H&M, which sources its products primarily from China and Bangladesh, is focused on keeping prices competitive, Erver said, as consumers are particularly price-sensitive given uncertainty around the economy in the U.S. and globally. H&M's sales were 56.7 billion Swedish crowns ($5.99 billion) in the March to May quarter, down from 59.6 billion a year ago. Analysts polled by LSEG had forecast revenue of 57.0 billion crowns. Zara owner Inditex earlier this month also reported disappointing sales, in a sign consumers are pulling back from spending on clothes as U.S. tariffs create risks for global economic growth. H&M's second-quarter operating profit was 5.91 billion crowns, beating analysts' forecast of 5.88 billion, and the operating profit margin was 10.4%, down from 11.9% a year ago but still better than analysts had feared. "The slightly better than expected margin delivery sends a positive signal to the market," said Alphavalue analyst Jie Zhang. "The brand upgrading strategy has started to pay off." H&M said its higher-priced brand COS had done especially well and shoppers are opting for more medium- and high-priced items across the board, helping to boost profitability. But Erver flagged more discounting in the June to August quarter as he said summer markdowns across the market were highly competitive. Even as it reduces store numbers globally, H&M is also searching for growth in new markets with a growing middle class, with plans to open its first stores in Brazil in the second half, as well as in El Salvador and Venezuela, and to launch in Paraguay next year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store