logo
Analysis: Trump made historic gains with minority voters in 2024. They are already pulling back in 2025

Analysis: Trump made historic gains with minority voters in 2024. They are already pulling back in 2025

CNN11-05-2025
Several of the key voter groups that provided President Donald Trump's most important electoral gains in November are recoiling from him as his term moves past the 100-day mark. But it remains unclear how much Democrats can benefit from these growing doubts.
In 2024, Trump improved his performance among some big voting blocs that have historically favored Democrats, including Latinos, younger men, non-White voters without a college degree, and, to some extent, Black men. Trump's advances generated exuberant predictions from an array of right-leaning analysts that he had achieved a lasting realignment and cemented the GOP's hold on voters of all races without a college degree.
But the flurry of polls 100 days into Trump's second term suggests that cement has not hardened as much as some allies anticipated. Across multiple surveys, Trump's overall job approval rating has fallen below his 2024 vote share with these key groups, and they are consistently giving him even lower marks for his handling of the economy, particularly inflation.
'The collapse that he's experiencing — I think that's the right word to phrase it — is broad-based and it's deep,' said Mike Madrid, an expert on Latino voters and a longtime Republican consultant who has become a leading Trump critic in the party.
Few strategists in either party believe the cooling toward Trump means Democrats have erased their long-term problems with these voter groups, which have generally drifted toward the GOP since the end of Barack Obama's presidency. But the rapid erosion of Trump's standing with them does suggest that their movement toward him in 2024 was driven less by a durable rightward shift on cultural issues than by immediate discontent with their economic situation. And that means that rather than solidifying as part of the GOP coalition, many of these voters likely will remain up for grabs if Trump can't improve their finances any more than President Joe Biden did.
'What we don't see is an across-the-board realignment all up and down behind Trump's agenda,' said Robert P. Jones, president and founder of the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute, or PRRI, which recently completed a large-scale survey of Americans' attitudes on cultural issues.
Whether measured by Election Day surveys or precinct-level results, Trump's improvement among voter groups that had not traditionally supported the GOP was arguably the biggest factor in his return to the White House.
Both the exit polls conducted by Edison Research for a consortium of media organizations including CNN and the AP VoteCast survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago found that Trump's vote among White people was virtually identical from 2020 to 2024 and improved just modestly among voters older than 30.
But all data sources agreed that Trump made significant gains among groups that had been pillars of what was once called the 'Obama coalition' and what I termed in 2008 'the coalition of the ascendant.'
The exit polls and VoteCast studies, for instance, both found that Trump in 2024 won around 45% of voters younger than 30, up from 36% in 2020. Both showed he gained much more among young men than among young women.
Likewise, both sources showed Trump crossing 40% support among Latinos, a modern high for the GOP, up from about one-third in 2020. The VoteCast study also found Trump doubling his vote among Black men to about 1 in 4. (The exit poll did not find meaningful improvement for him with them.)
The most attention after the election focused on Trump's improvement among minority voters without a four-year college degree. The exit polls and AP VoteCast agreed that Trump carried almost exactly one-third of them, a big improvement over the roughly one-fourth of their votes he carried in 2020.
Since Trump's first term, a growing number of center-right analysts in both parties have argued that Democrats were alienating working-class non-White voters by emphasizing culturally liberal and 'woke' positions on issues such as transgender rights or the use of 'Latinx' to describe Latinos. Many of these voices took Trump's 2024 gains as proof that non-White voters without a college degree were now realigning away from Democrats toward the GOP, primarily around cultural issues, just as non-college-educated White voters did during the 1960s and 1970s.
'The Democrats really are no longer the party of the common man and woman,' Ruy Teixeira, a longtime Democratic analyst who has become a leading critic of the party, wrote immediately after the election. 'This election has made this problem manifest in the starkest possible terms, as the Democratic coalition shattered into pieces.'
Republican pollster Patrick Ruffini, author of 'Party of the People,' a book that perceptively analyzes the GOP's growing strength among working-class minorities, summarized the results even more succinctly: 'No word for it but … realignment,' he wrote on social media few weeks after the vote.
Just over 100 days into Trump's second term, the picture, at the least, looks much more fluid.
The swarm of national polls marking Trump's 100 days shows his job approval rating among young people, Latinos and Black Americans falling below — often well below — his 2024 vote shares. His ratings on the economy with those groups are even weaker. And while Trump still receives decent grades from Hispanic and young people for his handling of the border, ratings of his overall approach to immigration have consistently fallen into negative territory with them as well.
Trump's position has equally eroded among the group whose shift toward him last year attracted the most attention: the large number of minority Americans without a four-year college degree. His approval rating among those blue-collar racial minorities stands at just 29% in the latest CNN/SRSS poll, according to results provided by the CNN polling unit. (The latest New York Times/Siena, Pew Research Center and Washington Post/ABC/Ipsos surveys produced nearly identical results among that group.)
Just 27% of non-college-educated people of color approved of Trump's economic performance in the CNN survey, and two-thirds of them thought he was 'going too far' in his deportation agenda. Nearly 3 in 4 of them in the Washington Post survey said Trump does not respect the rule of law, and just 1 in 6 in the New York Times/Siena poll agreed with his assertion that he should be allowed to send US citizens to a prison in El Salvador.
Coming so soon in 2025, this broad dissatisfaction is casting a retrospective shadow over what happened in 2024. Madrid says the recoil from Trump, particularly among Latinos, makes clear that the movement toward him in 2024 was based mostly on economic factors rather than affinity for his cultural and racial views. 'This is just another brick in the wall of the argument that this (Latino voter) is an economic voter,' Madrid said.
Jones similarly thinks the quick distancing from Trump strengthens the argument that his 2024 gains among minority and younger voters were driven more by the economy than by a cultural realignment. In PRRI's recent national survey, Hispanic, Black and Gen Z adults were all much less likely than Trump's core constituency of White voters without a four-year college degree to agree with foundational MAGA beliefs, such as that Whites and Christians are the real victims of discrimination or that 'immigrants are invading our country and replacing our cultural and ethnic background.'
'There's a real danger that Trump is overreaching on the cultural issues,' Jones said.
Republican former Rep. Carlos Curbelo likewise believes Trump may be pushing his Latino supporters too far with the sweep of his deportation agenda, especially while they remain stressed about the economy. 'Democrats were wrong to believe that Hispanic voters would never prioritize border security and the deportation of the undocumented,' Curbelo wrote in an email. '(But) the current Administration is wrong if they think Hispanic voters will perform like MAGA base voters on immigration enforcement matters.'
Ray Serrano, national director of research and policy at LULAC, a Hispanic advocacy organization, sees Trump's decline in terms that are even more absolute. 'If there was a flirtation with possibly moving to the Trump side, to the Republican side, it's moving away now,' Serrano said during a recent conference call that Latino advocacy groups held to release a national survey from a bipartisan polling team about Trump's first 100 days. The disappointed response to Trump's return, he argued, could signal 'the rise and immediate fall of the Trump Latino Democrat.'
It may be as premature, though, to dismiss Trump's inroads among these traditionally Democratic groups as it was to declare them proof of a durable realignment. All the 100-days surveys provide evidence that many of these voters, though disappointed in Trump's first days, have not shut the door on him.
Republican pollster Daron Shaw, for instance, said the survey conducted for Latino advocacy groups by a bipartisan polling team found that both Trump's job approval and support for some of his most controversial initiatives, such as deporting people without hearings or ending diversity initiatives, remained much stronger among men younger than 40 than any other group of Latinos.
And, as Jones pointed out, some of Trump's conservative cultural views continue to resonate with minority voters, especially men. Big majorities of Latino men and women and Black men, for instance, agreed in the PRRI poll that transgender people should be required to use the bathroom of their gender at birth; a substantial minority of each group also agreed with the conservative perspective that society is better off when men and women accept traditional gender roles.
Even on the economy, the polls show some room for Trump, with many of his new voters saying it is too soon to render a verdict on his impact. The latest CNN poll was typical: Half of minority adults without college degrees said Trump has done nothing to address the nation's problems, compared with only about 1 in 5 who said his agenda was already helping. But slightly more than another 1 in 4 of them said his agenda could generate benefits in time. That suggests he could recover among blue-collar non-White voters if they see progress on their biggest concerns, principally inflation.
John Della Volpe, who directs the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics' youth poll, agreed that Trump's attraction for younger voters has been frayed, not severed. 'A lot of the newer Trump voters could say they disapprove of him, and they are unsure of his policies, but they are telling me they are giving him some time,' said Della Volpe, who also advised a super PAC in 2024 that tried to rally young voters for Vice President Kamala Harris.
Della Volpe says younger voters' uncertainty about Trump hasn't erased their doubts about Democrats. Though the Harvard survey has recorded sharp declines in support for Trump's economic management just since January, Della Volpe said, 'it doesn't mean Democrats at this stage are a viable alternative.'
Madrid likewise thinks it would be a mistake for Democrats to assume the discontent with Trump has solved their own problems with Latinos and other blue-collar minority voters. He correctly notes that Democrats' performance among Latinos rebounded in the 2018 midterm elections relative to 2016, only to resume their decline in the 2020 presidential election and continue downward in 2024.
The party could likewise run better among Latinos in 2026 than in 2024, Madrid says, solely because the less frequent, often younger, Latino voters most drawn to Trump tend not to turn out as much in midterm elections. But unless Democrats develop a more convincing economic message, he says, those less-reliable voters could easily prefer the GOP again when they return in larger numbers in 2028. 'The lesson that Democrats failed to learn in 2018 could come back and haunt them in this election cycle: Winning just by being against something does not cement or build the coalition,' Madrid said.
Trump so far has clearly failed to consolidate, much less extend, the beachhead he established last year with younger and non-White voters. His sweeping tariffs, by raising their daily costs, seem likely to weaken his position with them.
But in the battle for these voters' long-term allegiance, Democrats would be dangerously complacent to conclude the tide has already turned. Young people and blue-collar minorities, especially the men in each group, now look less like reliable voters for either party than a volatile swing constituency that could tip future presidential contests based on which side they believe can best deliver for their bottom line.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gastonia resident and RNC Chair Michael Whatley expected to launch bid for Tillis' seat
Gastonia resident and RNC Chair Michael Whatley expected to launch bid for Tillis' seat

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gastonia resident and RNC Chair Michael Whatley expected to launch bid for Tillis' seat

Michael Whatley, a Gastonia resident and the chair of the Republican National Party, is expected to seek the seat held by U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, who announced he would not seek re-election voting against advancing President Donald Trump's " big, beautiful bill," Republicans' massive domestic policy legislation. Whatley, one of the driving forces in the GOP today, would likely face former Gov. Roy Cooper in the race. The Democrat, whose final term as governor was bookended by the COVID-19 pandemic and Tropical Storm Helene, is expected to soon launch a campaign, according to reporting from Axios. Whatley began his climb in the GOP more than 2 decades ago. He served as chair of the Gaston County Republican Party from 1999-2001. In 2019 he was to picked to lead the North Carolina Republican Party, and in 2024 he became chair of the Republican National Committee. He has served as a senior official in the George W. Bush administration, and as chief of staff for former Sen. Elizabeth Dole. Politico reported this week that Whatley has the backing of Trump, whose daughter-in-law Lara Trump had also been rumored to be considering a bid. In a July 24 social media post, Lara Trump confirmed she would not be seeking the Senate seat. 'I am deeply grateful for the encouragement and support I have received from the people of my home state whom I love so much,' she wrote. Whatley did not respond to a July 24 request for comment from the Asheville Citizen Times. A White House spokesperson also did not respond to a request for comment on the president's reported endorsement. On the Democratic side, Axios first reported Cooper's intentions July 23. When reached by the Citizen Times, Morgan Jackson, a longtime political adviser to Cooper, declined to confirm Axios' reporting, but said the former governor 'would be making his intentions known in the coming days.' Cooper, who served two terms as North Carolina's governor, is a likely frontrunner to win his party's primary. Former Congressman Wiley Nickel is also vying for the seat, currently held by Tillis, who annnounced in June that he would not seek a third term in office. A matchup between Cooper and Whatley will likely be a high-stakes, expensive election that could determine whether Republicans can maintain control of the Senate. The race could prove to be 'as close to a toss-up as exists in American politics,' Chris Cooper, a professor of political science and public affairs at Western Carolina University, told the Citizen Times on July 24. Cooper, who is not related to the former governor, said both are 'heavyweight candidates with access to deep pockets and networks.' But neither Roy Cooper, nor Whatley, have outsized personalities that have often dominated politics in recent years. 'I think people who are expecting a barn-burner campaign driven by candidate narratives may be surprised,' Cooper said. Sarah Honosky contributed reporting. Jacob Biba is the Helene recovery reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@ This article originally appeared on The Gaston Gazette: Gastonia resident and RNC chair Michael Whatley may campaign for Tillis' seat

5 Warren Buffett Tips Celebrities Use To Build Lasting Wealth
5 Warren Buffett Tips Celebrities Use To Build Lasting Wealth

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

5 Warren Buffett Tips Celebrities Use To Build Lasting Wealth

If you're aiming to grow your wealth to extraordinary levels, it's wise to take a page from Warren Buffett's playbook. As one of the richest individuals in the world and a legendary investor, Buffett has mastered the art of smart financial decision-making. And his numbers speak for themselves. Buffett is currently estimated to have a net worth of about $141.5 billion — an amount you don't accumulate by accident. Read Next: Learn More: Because of this, it's no surprise that celebrities and high-net-worth individuals often turn to Buffett's insights to build and preserve their fortunes. From A-list actors and elite athletes to influential CEOs, many listen closely when the Oracle of Omaha shares his wisdom. His advice spans far beyond stock picks, touching on everything from nurturing relationships and honoring commitments to investing in companies you truly believe in. If you are looking to make better financial choices and pad your bank account as much as the rich and famous have, it's time to tune in to Buffett's timeless principles. Strong Relationships Build Wealth Bill Gates and Warren Buffett don't just share a spot on the list of the world's wealthiest individuals, but they also share a decades-long friendship. One of the most meaningful lessons Gates says he's learned from the legendary investor is the value of relationships. 'Warren Buffett talked about how, in the end, it's how your friends truly think of you and how strong those friendships are that really matters,' Gates once shared. This isn't the first time that the co-founder of Microsoft, with an estimated net worth of $116.8 billion, has spoken warmly about Buffett's relationship advice. Reflecting on their history, Gates has said, 'I've learned many things from Warren over the last 25 years, but maybe the most important is what friendship is all about.' For both Gates and Buffett, building wealth doesn't have to come at the expense of meaningful connections. Consider This: 'A Brand Is a Promise' A-list actress and Grammy-winning singer Jennifer Lopez revealed that her fragrance, Promise, was directly inspired by advice from Warren Buffett. The name stems from one of Buffett's most well-known branding philosophies: 'A brand is a promise.' Lopez embraced that idea wholeheartedly, building a powerful personal brand that has helped her amass an estimated net worth of $400 million. Buffett has shared this concept of 'keeping promises' at several Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meetings, emphasizing the importance of trust and consistency in business. Lopez said the message deeply resonated with her. 'He said a brand is a promise. And I just feel like everything that I put out into the world has to be a promise,' she explained. 'We have to have promises with ourselves. It's really the foundation that keeps us going. It really made me think about life in a bigger way.' Invest for the Long Term World-renowned alpine skier Mikaela Shiffrin is among the many high-profile individuals who closely follow Warren Buffett's investment philosophy. Known for prioritizing long-term value over short-term market trends, Buffett consistently advises investors to put their money into businesses they genuinely believe in. In the 2022 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Buffett emphasized this approach: 'Our goal in both forms of ownership is to make meaningful investments in businesses with both long-lasting favorable economic characteristics and trustworthy managers. 'Please note particularly that we own publicly traded stocks based on our expectations about their long-term business performance, not because we view them as vehicles for adroit purchases and sales. That point is crucial: Charlie [Munger] and I are not stock pickers; we are business pickers.' Buffett's strategy highlights the importance of patience, trust and belief in a company's fundamentals, principles that resonate with Shiffrin and many others seeking financial growth. Protect Your Customers and Protect Your Brand During an interview with Barron's Editor-at-Large Andy Serwer, American Express CEO Stephen Squeri shared a critical piece of advice he received from Warren Buffett. 'Warren is our largest investor, and I talk to him quite a bit,' Squeri said. 'And during the pandemic… his advice to me [was] to 'protect two things. Protect your customers and protect your brand.'' It was this advice that shaped how Squeri led the company during a time of economic uncertainty. While many companies were scaling back, Buffett's words encouraged American Express to lean in. 'It would have been pretty easy to pull back even more,' explained Squeri, 'but we invested [in] more value propositions for our customers. We invested in our colleagues. And we invested in our brand.' The results speak for themselves. American Express emerged stronger, with profits continuing to soar. Final Take To GO: Apply Buffett's Principles To Build Lasting Wealth You may not have the fortune of a celebrity, A-list athlete or legendary investor, but that doesn't mean you can't start building your own. By following timeless advice from experts like Buffett — focusing on long-term investments, strong relationships and brand integrity — you can lay the foundation for lasting financial success. It may take time, but with discipline and the right mindset, your wealth-building journey can begin today. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on 5 Warren Buffett Tips Celebrities Use To Build Lasting Wealth Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

This Future Retiree Plans To Downsize His $1M Home To Cover Health Insurance — Is It A Smart Move?
This Future Retiree Plans To Downsize His $1M Home To Cover Health Insurance — Is It A Smart Move?

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Future Retiree Plans To Downsize His $1M Home To Cover Health Insurance — Is It A Smart Move?

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. As retirement approaches, one of the biggest unknowns many Americans face is how to pay for health insurance before Medicare kicks in at age 65. One future retiree recently shared his strategy online: sell his $1 million home, downsize to a smaller, less expensive property, and use the equity to bridge the gap until he qualifies for Medicare. It's a move some have considered — but is it a good idea? Trading Square Footage for Subsidies Posting to the r/retirement subreddit, the 60-year-old homeowner explained that he and his wife plan to retire in a few years. Their house is paid off and valued at around $1 million. With grown children and 3,000 square feet of space, they feel ready to downsize. The plan is to sell the current home and buy a $300,000 to $400,000 replacement. Don't Miss: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. The equity from the sale would be used for living expenses, with a specific goal: keeping their Modified Adjusted Gross Income low enough to qualify for Affordable Care Act subsidies. This would help offset the cost of health insurance until they become eligible for Medicare at 65. Several Reddit users responded with encouragement — and caution. The Cost of Healthcare Before Medicare Healthcare expenses can be a major burden for early retirees. According to the Milliman 2024 Retiree Health Cost Index, someone retiring at 60 instead of 65 can expect to spend 56% to 89% more on healthcare over their lifetime, depending on the plan they choose. The earlier you retire, the more years you must cover before Medicare, often at a higher out-of-pocket cost. Some Reddit users suggested exploring the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, or COBRA. This program allows individuals to continue their employer's health insurance for up to 18 months. One retiree said it cost them $750 a month — cheaper than ACA options at the time. But for someone retiring at 60, COBRA wouldn't cover the full five-year gap. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — Risks of Relying on Home Equity Selling a home to unlock cash might offer flexibility — but it comes with trade-offs. Once the home is sold, that equity is no longer growing, and there's no guarantee the market will stay favorable if the retiree needs to sell quickly. Another consideration: capital gains tax. The Reddit poster said they bought the home for $490,000. If they sell it for $1 million, they'll be close to the $500,000 capital gains exemption for married couples. But with selling costs and home improvements factored in, they may still owe tax if the gain exceeds the limit. Reddit users also warned about downsizing regret. Some retirees have moved, only to later wish they had stayed in place — and found it difficult or expensive to reverse at the Bigger Picture While downsizing could reduce living costs, relying too heavily on that equity could be risky. With only 1–2 years of living expenses in a Roth IRA, the couple's ability to weather changes — like a drop in home values or rising insurance premiums — may be limited. That's why several commenters emphasized the importance of professional advice. As one noted, income, savings, and expenses are all different — and managing them requires careful planning. By exploring multiple options, testing assumptions, and working with a financial planner, future retirees like this one can build a plan that works — without putting their long-term stability at risk. Read Next: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . Image: Shutterstock This article This Future Retiree Plans To Downsize His $1M Home To Cover Health Insurance — Is It A Smart Move? originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store