
Albanian drug trafficker claims he can't be deported out of the UK because it would harm his sons' chances of becoming Premier League footballers
Elis Lila, 40, has been living in the UK since 2016 having arrived here on the back of a lorry.
Before that he lived in the Italian town of Pesaro, near Rimini, where he spent six years involved in a drug smuggling gang.
He was convicted by the Italian courts in 2012 and sentenced to 11 years for drug trafficking and facilitating prostitution Albanian drug dealer says being deported would harm sons' chances of Premier League success but returned to Albania before following his wife to Britain without serving any of his sentence.
Lila was given leave to remain in the UK for two-and-half years.
He works as a self-employed tiler and has three children, with two of his sons on the books of Watford FC, currently in the Championship.
The eldest son is said to be 'on the cusp' of receiving a football scholarship at a Premier League club, although both children have good prospects of becoming professional footballers, a court heard.
Lila has spent the past four years fighting his deportation to Italy and tried to use Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) that protects his right to a family life.
In 2021 a district judge at Westminster Magistrates' Court ordered that Lila should be extradited to Italy under five European Arrest Warrants.
Lila challenged the ruling and a second extradition hearing was heard in 2024 where a another district judge again ordered he be deported to Italy.
He was granted right to appeal the decision and a hearing in the High Court took place in March.
Mr Justice Mould's report following the appeal states that Lila has been living a stable life with his family since his arrival in the UK in 2016.
His report states: 'He was a young man in his early twenties when he committed those offences. He is now a married man of 40 years of age, supporting a close family with three children.
'He has been living a stable life with his family since his arrival in the UK. He has built a business in the UK which enables him financially to support his family
'He and his wife organise their lives so as to provide the practical day-to-day support needed to enable his eldest children to build on their footballing skills and develop their potential as future professional football players.
'There is a very real risk that, if extradited to Italy, after serving his remaining sentence the appellant will not be permitted to return to live in the UK.
'The eldest sons' prospects as potential professional footballers and the practical problems that would result from the appellant's absence was in evidence before the District Judges and formed part of the overall evaluation of proportionality. '
But in dismissing his appeal and upholding the extradition orders, Mr Justice Mould pointed out that Lila was fully aware of the extradition proceedings against him before he started a family life and moved to the UK.
He states: 'I am satisfied that the appellant was under no illusion when he came to the UK in 2016 that he faced the real risk of proceedings seeking his return to Italy to serve his outstanding prison sentences.
'He has built his life in the UK since then in that knowledge.'
Mr Justice Mould also found that Mrs Lila would be able to cope in getting her children to football traiing while her husband was in prison in Italy.
He states: 'There is likely to be real hardship and the impact on family life will be considerable.
'Nevertheless, I am satisfied that the District Judges were correct to give weight to the proven resilience and resourcefulness of Mrs Lila, and the likelihood that she would be able to cope with the loss of the appellant.
'That was a factor which lessened the severity of the impact of extradition in this case.'
The court heard Lila had a difficult childhood. He met his wife in Italy in June 2006. Their first child was born on 20 September 2009 in Italy. They lived in Bologna at that time, where Lila worked as a tiler.
On 21 September 2011, he was excluded from Italy as a result of his convictions and returned to live in Albania. On 24 October 2011 he married his wife in Albania. His wife returned to Italy, but Lila remained in Albania as he was unable to return to Italy.
In January 2012 he was granted a temporary visa to return to Italy so he could attend for his trial. He attended that trial. He then returned to Albania as his visa was only temporary. His wife remained in Italy and would visit him in Albania.
In 2013 he found out his wife had moved to the UK. She had been trafficked in Italy and came to the UK to escape. His wife claimed asylum in the UK which was granted. Lila remained in Albania, but came to the UK in 2016 where he applied for immigration status in the UK as a spouse. He was granted leave to remain for two and a half years, subject to extension.
The judge said there would be 'emotional distress' to Lila and his family should he now be extradited and some 'resulting financial hardship'.
The court heard their eldest son is a talented young football player who clearly has a good future, with this being a potential career for him and Lila organised his work based on his wife's work so that he could collect the children from school and take them to football.
A District judge at a previous hearing said however 'this is a family who would cope'.
The judge said Lila's wife came to the UK with her two children, when she was extremely vulnerable, and despite the obvious difficulties, given the trauma that she experienced in Italy, she was able to settle in the UK, with her children and bring them up.
The judge said: 'I have no doubt that this was exceptionally difficult for the Appellant's wife and children but it demonstrates the strength of character of his wife and her amazing resilience and determination as a person and as a mother.
'For these three years, when she was no doubt at her most vulnerable, his wife built a life in the UK for her and her children, with no financial help from the Appellant and when he was in Albania and therefore, emotional support would be somewhat limited.
'I accept that it will be difficult emotionally for her should he be extradited but the strength of character and resilience she has shown, will no doubt mean that she will cope.'
The judge added: 'Sadly, emotional distress is not unusual in extradition cases.'
In relation to taking the children to football, in particular the son, and school and other activities, the judge said the wife will 'find a way to make this work'.
The judge said: 'I have no doubt that the Academy will offer what support they can to the family. If she closes the business, then I still find that she will continue to ensure that their son is able to attend the Academy'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man City verdict on 100+ charges could be months away with further delays in sight
Club executives and senior football figures believe that the Manchester City case could still go until at least October before the initial outcome, as the controversy threatens to complicate another Premier League season. Some club leaders have even speculated that it might arrive in the campaign's second international break, from 4-18 October, given previous patterns regarding similar cases. An outcome was expected last season, given that the hearing concluded in early December. It has nevertheless rumbled on into the summer, and means another season faces the weight of potential upheaval and drastic change through possible points deductions. Manchester City stridently insist upon their innocence. Actual details of the process have been kept under lock and key, with only those directly involved knowing exactly how it is going, due to the sensitivity of the case. The charges involve accusations of City breaching football's financial regulations, and Freedom of Information requests revealed that the British embassy in Abu Dhabi discussed the case. Bloomberg even reported that UAE officials raised the charges in a meeting with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy in 2024, but Lammy said it was a matter for the Premier League. Insiders with knowledge of certain aspects of the investigation are nevertheless predicting a September-October outcome, with some believing it will come in one of the international breaks. The initial outcome of City's Associated Party Transaction case ended up arriving on 7 October 2024, which was at the start of that period's Fifa window. Such stances have nevertheless been subject to change, given there was previously a widespread view that the initial decisions would be published around Easter, and the end of April. The controversy - which has now been ongoing since the initial Der Spiegel "Football Leaks" in November 2018 and resulted in the Premier League announcing 100+ charges in February 2023 - is commonly seen as an "existential moment" for the league and the wider game regardless of outcome. Premier League insiders say it has also had another effect, which is in delaying proper governance. Clubs are now unwilling to push through or even suggest any major changes in the running of the competition, due to the belief that the outcome of the case could change absolutely everything. There is also a split between clubs regarding what should happen if the most severe charges are proven and City are punished. While a minority would push for outright expulsion in such an event, that is seen as unlikely since it would require a special shareholder vote and a majority of 15 clubs. Other clubs are more in favour of a potential punishment allowing everyone to get on with it, as they feel the controversy is now causing undue damage to the Premier League. That very view is nevertheless seen by other executives as a concerted "tactic" by City, since the stakeholders are more likely to become fatigued by the process the longer it goes on. Another split revolves around the idea of "a stay" in the event of a potential City punishment, and whether the club face sanctions straight away or after an appeal. One senior club executive told The Independent that there is unlikely to be any tangible change to anything for even a year after the initial outcome, due to the various stages of the process as well as possible appeals. As it is, City themselves are understood to be "confident" they will be cleared.

ITV News
38 minutes ago
- ITV News
Rise in foreign states silencing dissidents in UK going 'unchecked', MPs warn
Foreign states are becoming bolder in their attempts to silence dissidents in the UK and the government must take stronger action, parliamentarians have warned. In a report published on Wednesday, the Joint Committee on Human Rights said transnational repression had increased in recent years, with foreign states using online harassment, lawsuits and physical violence to intimidate people in the UK. MI5 investigations into threats from other states have increased 48% since 2022, the report said, while committee chairman Lord David Alton warned the rise was 'going unchecked'. He said: 'This risks undermining the UK's ability to protect the human rights of its citizens and those who have sought safety within its borders. 'We have seen prominent cases of Hong Kongers with bounties placed on their heads, Iran intimidating journalists – but evidence submitted to the inquiry suggest this may be the tip of the iceberg.' The warning comes amid rising concern about transnational repression, including reports that China has offered rewards for people turning in pro-democracy Hong Kong activists based in the UK. Last month, Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee warned that Iran had attempted to kidnap or murder at least 15 UK-based people since 2022. Meanwhile Russia has also targeted dissidents including the attempt to kill Sergei and Yulia Skripal with Novichok in 2018. While the cross-party human rights committee said China, Russia and Iran were the 'most flagrant' perpetrators of transnational repression in the UK, it highlighted evidence suggesting a string of other countries including India, Rwanda, Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain had sought to target people in Britain. MPs and peers said they had also received 'substantial' evidence of intimidation by the Eritrean government, including surveillance of anti-government activists and infiltration of community groups and churches in an effort to isolate opponents of the regime. The committee went on to criticise Interpol, saying the organisation had refused to acknowledge misuse of 'red notices' – international requests for an arrest – to harass dissidents or take any steps to address this. Almost half of the 6,550 public red notices currently in circulation have been issued at Russia's request. Lord Alton said: 'We want to see a two-pronged approach from the government. More needs to be done to give support and protection to the individuals and communities most at risk of transnational repression. 'We also want to see transnational repression prioritised in diplomatic relations and leadership at an international level to tackle the misuse and exploitation of systems of justice to silence and intimidate.' As well as pressing Interpol for action on abuse of red notices, the committee urged the government to provide more training on transnational repression for police officers in the UK and greater protection from vexatious lawsuits known as Slapps (strategic lawsuits against public participation). The committee also called for China to be placed in the highest tier of the foreign influence registration scheme that came into effect last month, saying its omission risked 'undermining the credibility and coherence' of the scheme given the extent of Chinese transnational repression. An Interpol spokesperson said: 'Every year, thousands of the world's most serious criminals are arrested thanks to Interpol's systems. "Children are saved from sexual exploitation and terrorists, cyber criminals and traffickers are brought to justice. 'Interpol knows red notices are powerful tools for law enforcement co-operation, which is why we have robust processes for ensuring that all Interpol notices and diffusions comply with our rules. 'Our constitution forbids Interpol from undertaking activities of a political, military, religious or racial character and all our databases and activities must also comply with the universal declaration for human rights.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We take the threat of transnational repression extremely seriously. "Any attempts by a foreign state to coerce, intimidate, harass, or harm individuals on UK soil are considered a threat to our national security and sovereignty, and will not be tolerated. 'The committee's review echoes many of the same findings and recommendations from the Defending Democracy Taskforce report on TNR, published in May, and we are already taking action arising from those recommendations to further strengthen our response.'


STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Teen who wanted to carry out 'Doomsday' mass shooting at school to be sentenced
An Edinburgh teenager who wanted to carry out a mass shooting at his own school is to be sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow. Felix Winter, now aged 18, repeatedly spoke about carrying out an attack at his secondary, referring to the day he would 'clear it out' as 'Doomsday'. Jurors previously heard the teenager 'idolised' the killers behind the Columbine High School massacre in Colorado in the United States in 1999, which saw 12 students and a teacher gunned down. A major police investigation began in the summer of 2023 after a photo circulated on social media showing Winter at school in full combat gear, carrying an imitation gun, which caused panic among pupils and parents. He had already been referred to a UK-wide anti-terrorism programme aimed at preventing radicalisation. He also held racist and pro-Nazi views. Winter pleaded guilty to a breach of the peace and a charge under the Terrorism Act. His offending took place between June 2022 and July 2023. Defence KC Shelach McCall told the court in March that a professor who assessed her client found a 'serious link' between his autism and his behaviour, arguing it was his condition – rather than extremism – that drove his obsession with school shootings. Ms McCall said Winter had made a 'marked improvement' since his offending. She said: 'He has expressed regret and recognises that he didn't previously appreciate how his behaviour was impacting on others. 'He accepts in the context of his plea of guilty and his remarks about school shootings in 2022, him dressing in that costume and carrying that in a school would generate alarm to those who came upon it but this was not his intent.' Winter will appear at the High Court in Glasgow on Wednesday, July 30. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country