Netanyahu criminal trial: Mozes' defense wraps up, cross-examination set to begin next week
The defense questioning phase of the direct examination in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's criminal trial wrapped on Wednesday, paving the way for the prosecution's cross-examination next week, which could be a massive turning point in the prime minister's image and legacy.
On his 35th day of testimony at the Tel Aviv District Court on Wednesday, Netanyahu was questioned by Sharon Kleinman, the representative for Yediot Aharonot owner Arnon 'Noni' Mozes, the fourth figure charged in the indictment, along with Shaul and Iris Elovich.
In the background of the trial was the marking of the 600th day since October 7, as 58 hostages are still being held in captivity by Hamas in Gaza.
The relationship between Mozes and Netanyahu is the heart of Case 2000, one of the three levied against the prime minister.
Allegedly, Mozes offered Netanyahu a bribe by proposing positive coverage of him and his family in the prominent daily and negative coverage of political opponents in exchange for the advancement of legislation that would force restrictions on Yediot's rival daily tabloid, Israel Hayom.
The charges are based on recordings of conversations between the two, recorded by Netanyahu staffer-turned-state's-witness Ari Harow. Netanyahu was charged with fraud and breach of trust, while Mozes was charged with attempted bribery.
Addressing the proposed legislation, which failed to pass into law, Netanyahu said he couldn't recall exactly when he first became aware of it. He also said he had nothing to do with the public relations campaigns against the Israel Hayom bill.
Kleinman presented a strategic planning document relating to the law, which has Netanyahu's handwriting on it.
In one area, it reads, 'Sheldon [Adelson, the late owner of Israel Hayom] – to the cover.' He then presented copies of the printed paper and its supplements in the coming days, which indeed had Adelson on the cover.
Netanyahu insisted he had no recollection of discussing these details with Adelson in phone calls he had with him around that time. But he said that he wasn't shy about his attempts to halt the legislation.
When it passed its first reading in the Knesset in 2014, Netanyahu said, 'I used a word then that was truly appropriate at the time, 'Shame!'' This was a loose reference to the rally cry issued today by protesters against the prime minister and the government.
Kleinman noted, citing police interrogation transcripts, that Netanyahu told interrogators that he had expressed as much to Adelson himself. 'I am in favor of freedom of the press. I don't control what goes into a paper,' Netanyahu said.
Kleinman pointed to a 'hostile' headline in Yediot as an example of what is claimed to have been negative coverage that Netanyahu allegedly sought to change and which relates to the attempted bribery charge.
When Netanyahu insisted that the coverage was pointedly negative, Kleinman responded that the articles paint a different reality, one in which the coverage is professional: critical, yet portraying both the right- and left-wing angles. This, supposedly, is the bedrock of the drive behind the openness to a discussion with Mozes on the matter of shifting the coverage.
'Just because I didn't sue a news company for libel doesn't mean that I don't think the publications were fake! Channels 11, 12, and 13 lie all the time. A public figure does not have the time to chase after all these lies,' Netanyahu charged.
Kleinman responded that the claim in this case, though, is that Netanyahu was allegedly concerned by a specific series of articles that were published, not a 'wide ocean of lies.'
In one instance, Netanyahu addressed the judges, 'You wouldn't sit back if such lies were written about you, would you?' Lead Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman responded, 'Mr. Netanyahu, leave us out of this.'
What this does for Mozes' defense is twofold: first, it calls into question Netanyahu's reliability as a witness.
Second, it positions Yediot as a serious publication, one that covered news of the prime minister from both the Right and the Left but did so professionally, meaning that any conversations Mozes had with Netanyahu about coverage were within that framework, and so there was no attempted bribery.
After receiving four sealed envelopes in the courtroom at around 12 p.m., Netanyahu asked for a break. This was right around the time of the confirmed Israeli strikes on Yemen's Sanaa International Airport, carried out in response to several Houthi ballistic missile attacks fired at Israel over the last week.
Separately, a decision recently enforced by the court's guard does not allow questions directed at the prime minister while he is in the room and before the judges enter. This is common practice in any criminal trial. After a break on Wednesday, all journalists were forbidden from reentry until the hearing began anew.
This came following a volley of questions directed toward the prime minister earlier that morning. Only a few journalists shouted questions, but all were forbidden from entry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
UK to Recognize Palestine If Israel Doesn't End Gaza War
00:00 Well, last week we were talking about President Macron and France and making a similar announcement, but perhaps a little bit more explicit, saying that they will actually move to recognize a Palestinian statehood come September at the U.N. General Assembly. A lot of pressure has been building on the U.K. prime minister to do the same. He sort of did, but with a few caveats. What maybe. Walk us through what what he announced yesterday. Yeah, he didn't go quite as far as Emmanuel Macron did last week when he made that announcement of plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly, which is usually the third week in September. But Keir Starmer making it clear that he he is acknowledging the political pressure he's under from his own party to do more, to put pressure on Israel to to stop the conflict in Gaza. Starmer saying he will go ahead and recognise a Palestinian state if Israel doesn't wind down operations there, get itself set on a pathway toward peace that ends with a two state solution. So it's it looks like he's basically walking up to the line Macron put out there. This would if the two countries go forward and do this in September, they would be the first two of the G7 nations to officially recognize a Palestinian state. And it would it does add some pressure to Benjamin Netanyahu and his government to to get more aid flowing into into Gaza and to try to wrap up that conflict there as soon as they can. Yeah, well, you know, you bring up the flow of humanitarian aid and the passage of food into the Gaza enclave, but there are many within the Israeli coalition who are not happy to see Israel ease some of those curbs over the course of the weekend that members on the far right pushing back against the decision. So how likely is it that these big announcements coming from the likes of President Macron, from UK prime minister, a lot of push from international aid agencies as well? How likely is that to actually impact Netanyahu and his next moves? Well, we have seen periods since this conflict started with Hamas following Hamas's attacks on Israel in October 2023. We have seen periods where Israel has come under a lot of pressure internationally to either change its tactics, to pause the fighting, to do make other changes in its strategy. And it by and large, has has ignored much of that and and just kind of proceeded with its plan. The Netanyahu government continues to say their goal is to eliminate the political and military power of Hamas. It has not done that so far. And so it continues its operation. So I don't know that this is this is going to be enough to really persuade Netanyahu's government to do things differently, although they are, as you mentioned, working to get more aid in. We'll have to see whether that has the impact that the outside groups and foreign governments are looking for.
Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
Jon Stewart argues Netanyahu would have to 'bomb himself' for endangering Jewish people
Jon Stewart blasted Israel's current policy towards Gaza on "The Daily Show" Monday, calling its actions "self-evidently inhumane and horrific." With "Jewish Currents" editor-at-large Peter Beinart, Stewart reflected on how he is condemned by other Jewish people as a "bad Jew" for speaking out about the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Stewart said Jewish people often think of themselves as the underdog, but, "What happens when David becomes Goliath?" He derided pro-Israeli commentators for denying the conflict is a genocide, arguing it is "purposeful starvation." "I feel like a crazy person. I feel like I'm watching something that is so self-evidently inhumane and horrific," he added. Stewart argued that the ongoing conflict is not only a moral hazard, but hazardous to the existence of Israel itself. "And to be told that I have to shut up because I risk the Jewish state by speaking out? I would say the opposite," he said. "I think they're putting the likelihood of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this type of action." "I think they're the ones that are being anti - if you want to define - [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, with that definition of antisemitism, would probably have to bomb himself," he added. Beinart, for his part, claimed that Palestinians "behaved like Gandhi" by participating in "overwhelmingly non-violent" marches in Gaza seven years ago, alleging that the U.S. supports Israel shutting down peaceful protests. "When they do non-violent boycotts, we criminalize the boycotts. When they go to the International Criminal Court, we sanction the International Criminal Court," he added, referencing the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement and President Donald Trump's sanctions against the ICC for issuing an arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Beinart appeared to insinuate Hamas' October 7 terror attacks were understandable in light of all this. "We essentially send the message to Palestinians that non-violent protests, that ethical protest resistance, doesn't work. And that makes it easier for Hamas to commit the crimes that they did on October 7," he said.
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Inside the emergence of Congress' unlikely Israel critics
Israel is coming under an unprecedented barrage of criticism from some of Congress' most stridently pro-Israel Democrats and even some Republicans over the growing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Why it matters: Lawmakers told Axios the deteriorating situation in Gaza and the U.S. public's growing apathy toward Israel have made it increasingly untenable to be unflinchingly pro-Israel. "The public shifted quite a while ago. If the people lead, eventually, the leaders will follow," Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), a pro-Palestinian progressive, told Axios. "We may be at that second stage. Pictures of starving kids getting shot seem to wake some people up." Driving the news: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), in a Tuesday night post on X, became the first Republican in Congress to refer to the war in Gaza as a "genocide." Though she has a history of inflammatory remarks about Jews and the Holocaust, Greene has been staunchly pro-Israel for most of her time in Congress. She even tried to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attacks for Tlaib's criticism of Israel. But she has more recently sided with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) as an opponent of hawkish foreign policy in the Middle East, lambasting American and Israeli strikes on Iran last month as needlessly provocative. Zoom out: President Trump's break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over starvation in Gaza is creating space for a GOP realignment on Israel. For years, "America first" nationalists have been skeptical of U.S. foreign aid, but Trump and others carved out an exception for Israel. That consensus has eroded at a stunning rate over the last week. "Everyone, regardless of politics, should support President [Trump] in his desire to immediately supply food to starving children and women in Gaza," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), a Trump ally, said in a post on X. Similarly, Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) posted: "Standing with Israel means eliminating every barbaric Hamas terrorist. It also means rejecting the killing and starvation of children in Gaza. We must allow aid to enter Gaza." Zoom in: Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) has come under fire from pro-Israel allies over his support for Democratic New York mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani and for what they say is growing criticism of Israel and Netanyahu. Torres, who has been one of the most reflexively pro-Israel Democrats in Congress since the Oct. 7 attacks, accused Netanyahu of aligning with the Republican Party in an interview with journalist Chuck Todd. He also said in a Tuesday post on X: "The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is morally unacceptable, and all parties, including the US and Israel, have a moral obligation to do their part in alleviating the hunger and hardship that have taken hold in Gaza." Several of Torres' current and former colleagues expressed shock at his latest comments, but the congressman's office pushed back on the idea that he has shifted his position, pointing to past instances of him blasting Netanyahu and members of his government. What they're saying: Even some pro-Israel House Democrats, while maintaining they have always called for humanitarian assistance to Gaza, acknowledged there has been growing urgency in recent days. "Many of us, if not all of us, have been consistent on humanitarian aid," said one, speaking on the condition of anonymity. But the lawmaker conceded that "the situation has gotten worse" and that American voters' approval of Israel has been slipping. "I think what's changed is the crisis has just gotten worse, and it does require Israel to do even more," said Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio), though he added the UN, Qatar and Hamas must do more as well. The bottom line: "The reality of the images from Gaza are impossible to ignore," said former Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.), who fought to restrict U.S. arms shipments to Israel after the Oct. 7 attacks.
