
Gatchalian seeks stricter regulation of online gambling
Gatchalian, however, said the bill which he listed as one of his 10 priority measures in the 20th Congress, would not push for the total ban of online gambling to prevent providers from going underground.
'Ang salient points nito, pagbabawalan na gumamit ng GCash sa online gambling, tataasan ang age from 18 to 21, tapos ang minimum bet is P10,000, ang top up is P5,000,' he said.
(Among its salient points are that the use of GCash for online gambling will be prohibited, the age will be increased from 18 to 21, then the minimum bet is P10,000, the top up is P5,000.)
'Naglagay rin kami ng penal provision, kapag hindi ginawa ng mga regulatory agencies ang trabaho nila, pwede silang kasuhan at matanggal sa trabaho at pwede rin silang makulong,' he added.
(We also put in place a penal provision, if regulatory agencies do not do their job, they can be sued and fired and they can also be imprisoned.)
The unnumbered bill also bans gambling sponsorships of public events and campaign donations, and mandates regulators to allocate a portion of collected regulatory fees for the establishment of gambling addiction rehabilitation centers.
Last month, Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said the government has shut down 7,000 unauthorized online gaming websites.
Also included in Gatchalian's priority bills in the 20th Congress is the Three-Year College Education Act, which aims to capacitate the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) in allowing flexibility for degree programs to be completed in not more than three academic years.
The proposed measure provides that all general education courses shall be integrated and completed at the senior high school level, and seeks to ensure students' readiness to go to college and provide them more time for internship and advanced specialization. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
12 hours ago
- GMA Network
Republicans muscle Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill through Congress
US House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain (R-MI) speaks after the US President Donald Trump's sweeping spending and tax bill passes, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., July 3, 2025. REUTERS/Umit Bektas WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump 's tax-cut legislation cleared its final hurdle in the US Congress on Thursday, as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved a massive package that would fund his domestic agenda and push millions of Americans off health insurance. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. It also cuts health and food safety net programs and zeroes out dozens of green energy incentives. It would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Despite concerns within Trump's party over the 869-page bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. The White House said Trump will sign it into law at 5 p.m. ET (2100 GMT) on Friday, the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Republicans said the legislation will lower taxes for Americans across the income spectrum and spur economic growth. "This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, cajoling and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Though roughly a dozen House Republicans threatened to vote against the bill, only two ended up doing so: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, a centrist, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a conservative who said it did not cut spending enough. Marathon weekend Republicans raced to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, working through last weekend and holding all-night debates in the House and the Senate. The bill passed the Senate on Tuesday in a 51-50 vote that saw Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote. According to the CBO, the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. Those spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop as the safety-net cuts would outweigh their tax cuts. The increased debt load created by the bill would also effectively transfer money from younger to older generations, analysts say. Ratings firm Moody's downgraded US debt in May, citing the mounting debt, and some foreign investors say the bill is making US Treasury bonds less attractive. The bill raises the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion, averting the prospect of a default in the short term. But some investors worry the debt overhang could curtail the economic stimulus in the bill and create a long-term risk of higher borrowing costs. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year, when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire. Those cuts are now made permanent, while tax breaks for parents and businesses are expanded. The bill also sets up new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime pay, seniors and auto loans, fulfilling Trump campaign promises. The final version of the bill includes more substantial tax cuts and more aggressive healthcare cuts than an initial version that passed the House in May. During deliberations in the Senate, Republicans also dropped a provision that would have banned state-level regulations on artificial intelligence, and a "retaliatory tax" on foreign investment that had spurred alarm on Wall Street. The bill is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to recapture at least one chamber of Congress. Republican leaders contend the bill's tax breaks will goose the economy before then, and many of its benefit cuts are not scheduled to kick in until after that election. Opinion polls show many Americans are concerned about the bill's cost and its effect on lower income people. — Reuters


GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
BSP may require financial institutions to limit user access to online gaming
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) is looking at requiring Philippine financial institutions to limit the gaming access of their users, in a bid to protect clients of digital platforms from risks associated with online gambling. According to the central bank, it has already circulated a draft circular for such measures, and is now reviewing feedback from stakeholders. 'The circular would seek to require BSP-supervised institutions (BSIs), primarily banks and electronic money issuers, to better protect users of their digital platforms from these risks. Protection may come in the form of various limits to gaming access,' the BSP said. 'The BSP is taking a collaborative approach to crafting the circular, to ensure that the final policy strikes a balance between protecting consumers and preserving access to digital payments for licensed businesses,' it added. To recall, the BSP in 2021 issued a directive that prohibited regulated entities from dealing with unlicensed gambling operators. It also ordered e-wallets and other BSIs to remove links to electronic sabong or e-sabong from their platforms in 2022. 'The BSP remains committed to promoting a safe, secure, and inclusive digital finance ecosystem for all Filipinos,' the BSP said. Earlier this week, Senator Sherwin Gatchalian proposed a measure imposing strict regulations for online gambling, including banning the use of an e-wallet for online gambling, increasing the minimum age from 18 to 21, and having a minimum bet of P10,000 and a top up of P5,000. Malacañang last month said the government has shut down 7,000 unauthorized gaming websites, citing concerns related to online gaming addiction. — BM, GMA Integrated News


GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
Palace: Marcos to study refiled divorce, anti-political dynasty bills
President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. will study the refiled bills in Congress, particularly the proposed measures on divorce and anti-political dynasty. During Thursday's press conference, Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro said the President has no official stance yet as regards the divorce bill, as it would be better to study this measure first. ''Sa ngayon po ay wala pa pong klarong stance ang Pangulo patungkol sa Divorce Bill... Mas maganda po talagang makita kung ano iyong nilalaman na provisions sa sinabi nating Divorce Bill dahil sa ating pagkakaalam ang karaniwan doon sa mga provisions or sa mga dahilan para i-approve ang legal separation ay sinama nila para maging dahilan na rin para mapawalang-bisa ang kasal hindi lang through legal separation,'' Castro said. (Right now, the President does not have a clear stance regarding the Divorce Bill... It would be better to see what provisions are contained in the said Divorce Bill because, as far as we know, the usual provisions or reasons for approving legal separation have been included to also be grounds for annulling a marriage, not just through legal separation.) Pressed if Marcos would support such a measure, Castro said it will depend on the bill's provisions and if the Church will also support it. ''Depende po. Muli, kapag po maganda iyong provisions at makikita rin po natin na ang bawat simbahan ay umaayon na ito ay dapat at nararapat, maaari po itong bigyan nang magandang tugon ng Pangulo,'' she said. (It depends. Again, if the provisions are good and we also see that every church agrees that this is what is necessary and appropriate, the President can give a good response to this.) On Wednesday, the Makabayan bloc lodged a measure that seeks to ban political dynasties. The proposed Anti-Political Dynasty Act seeks to prevent family members from holding or running for national and local positions simultaneously. Castro said the President will also look into this. "Siguro po mas maganda kung maibibigay niya/nila ang pinakadetalye at buong nilalaman ng bill na ito dahil mahirap po sa ngayon na mag-oo o maghindi ang Pangulo. Mas maganda pong maibigay iyong pinakadetalye dahil maaaring magandang maidulot nito sa ating bansa," she said. (Maybe it would be better if they could provide details of this bill because it is difficult for the President to say yes or no at this time. It would be better if the most detailed information could be provided because it may bring good to our country.) Castro also said Marcos would support any measure that will push for the betterment of the youth. She was asked about the bill filed by Senator Panfilo Lacson seeking to regulate the use of social media by minors. ''Kung ito po talaga ay magko-cause ng mental health issues, sususugan din po ng Pangulo iyan at makakakuha siya ng suporta basta po ito ay para sa taumbayan at lalung-lalo na para sa kabataan,'' Castro said. (If this really causes mental health issues, the President will also amend it and he will get support as long as it is for the people and especially for the youth.) Under Lacson's bill, minors shall be prohibited from accessing or using social media services, while social media platforms shall take "reasonable steps and age verification measures to prevent age-restricted users from registering, accessing, or continuing to use their social media service." —VAL, GMA Integrated News