Effort to restrict Maine police from carrying out federal immigration enforcement splits lawmakers
A narrow majority of the Judiciary Committee recommended on Monday that the Legislature pass a bill to restrict local authorities from carrying out federal immigration enforcement.
LD 1971 would place restrictions on enforcement activities absent formal agreements with federal authorities, and the version advanced was amended to clarify what would and would not be permitted under the bill as a means to address pushback from police groups.
The vote was 7-6, with Passamaquoddy Tribal Rep. Aaron Dana absent. Those opposed — the Republicans on the committee and Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer — raised objections, both to the bill's substance as well as the decision to take the vote on Monday.
The vote came amid growing scrutiny of local law enforcement collaboration with federal immigration authorities and followed days of protests over the Trump administration's workplace raids in Los Angeles with residents and activists facing off with local and federal officers.
Rep. Rachel Henderson (R-Rumford), who voted against the measure, said the bill would 'effectively turn Maine into a 'sanctuary state,'' and argued, 'we're actively seeing on a national level how that's playing out currently in California.'
President Donald Trump has since deployed the National Guard to the protests, the first time a president has activated a state's National Guard since 1965 without a request from a governor — something Gov. Janet Mills and other Democratic governors condemned in a joint statement. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is now suing Trump over the deployment.
Others on the committee asked for more time to consider the bill.
Sen. David Haggan (R-Penobscot) requested another work session, but committee co-chair Sen. Anne Carney (D-Cumberland) said that the committee is already working past deadline.
Rep. Jennifer Poirier (R-Skowhegan) also tried to push for more time by requesting the bill be carried over into next year, which is what the committee decided to do last week with a related proposal.
The committee carried over LD 1259, which would explicitly prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from entering into contracts with federal immigration enforcement authorities.
Participation in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 287(g) program has grown across the country after President Donald Trump revived it to bolster ICE's capacity by deputizing local police officers to detain immigrants, an authority otherwise generally reserved to federal authorities. The program was discontinued in 2012 due to the discovery of discriminatory practices such as racial profiling. Wells Police Department is the only Maine agency that has opted to join. However, Wells paused its agreement to see if the Legislature votes to ban such contracts.
The committee also voted down a competing plan, LD 1656, which would prevent local agencies from adopting any policies that restrict them from assisting in the enforcement of federal immigration law.
Rep. Elizabeth Caruso (R-Caratunk) requested more time to hear from law enforcement on the latest changes to the bill.
A few additional tweaks were made since last week when Auburn Police Chief Jason Moen, who is president of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, said an earlier amendment assuaged his concerns 'to some extent.' The overarching concern from law enforcement has been about the bill hindering federal task forces that are not primarily for immigration enforcement but sometimes touch on some immigration issues, such as drug enforcement partnerships.
Michael Kebede, policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine, said the version that passed on Monday was crafted to explicitly address those concerns but that law enforcement did not have a hand in drafting the amendment.
'I just don't feel like this is doing our due diligence,' Caruso said.
But Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn) said, 'Respectfully, I couldn't disagree more.' Regarding the latest changes, he said, 'We've protected the one thing we've heard from the chiefs of police that is a problem.'
The amended version clarifies that the legislation doesn't prohibit state or local law enforcement from conducting investigative and enforcement duties as part of a joint law enforcement task force,as long as its primary purpose is not immigration enforcement.
Further, it removed provisions that would have prohibited state and local law enforcement agencies from providing office space for immigration authorities and prohibited state employees from inquiring about a person's immigration status unless necessary to determine service eligibility or ordered by law.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Plans to Give up to 12 Days for Putin to Agree to Ukraine Deal
While in Scotland, President Trump said he is 'disappointed' in Russian President Vladimir Putin for not yet reaching a deal to end the war in Ukraine.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gives Starmer the green light to recognise a Palestinian state
Donald Trump has given Keir Starmer the green light to go ahead and recognise the state of Palestine. It came as the prime minister met with the US president at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland for crucial talks on the Middle East crisis, trade and Ukraine. Speaking to journalists ahead of their meeting in Scotland, the US president took a very different tone to his secretary of state Marco Rubio who last Friday condemned French president Emmanuel Macron for going ahead in recognising Palestine. President Trump and Sir Keir appeared to be on the same page in wanting to end the hunger in the besieged territory, with the UK set to lead a new peace process with American support. On the political issue vexing Sir Keir Starmer over recognising Palestine as a state, Mr Trump said: 'I'm not going to take a position. I don't mind him [Sir Keir] taking a position. I'm looking to getting people fed right now. That's the number one position, because you have a lot of starving people.' He also made it very clear that he does not agree with Benjamin Netanyahu, after the Israeli PM claimed 'nobody is starving in Gaza'. He said: 'Based on television I would say [on agreeing with Netanyahu] 'not particularly', because those children look pretty hungry to me.' He also was not enthused about Israel's tactics saying that nobody was coming out of the crisis well. 'It's a real mess,' he added. But the US president warned that Hamas will not release its final 20 hostages and that was now the sticking point. The issue of recognising Palestine has moved up Sir Keir's agenda in the last week with the issue set to dominate a cabinet meeting this week with ministers deeply divided over what to do. But with a threat on his left flank from Jeremy Corbyn's new party and its support from so-called 'Gaza independents' and more than 250 MPs from nine political parties signing a letter calling for recognition, the prime minister is under pressure to act. Sir Keir made a point of thanking President Trump over his efforts in the Middle East. The prime minister appears to be putting together a plan for peace there following his talks over the weekend with Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz in the E3 group of leaders. The prime minister told journalists: 'It's an absolute catastrophe [in Gaza]. Nobody wants to see that. And I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screen. So we've got to get to that ceasefire. Turning to Mr Trump, he added: 'Thank you, Mr President, for leading on that, and also to just get more and more aid in. And again, America has done a lot on this.' The two were also set to discuss the war in Ukraine, with President Trump again emphasising that he is losing patience with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He said: 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kiev and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that. I'm very disappointed.'
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says he's shortening the 50-day deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine
EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday he intends to shorten the 50-day deadline he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a deal that ends the three-year war in Ukraine, after Russia continued to bombard Ukrainian cities. Russia fired an overnight barrage of more than 300 drones, four cruise missiles and three ballistic missiles, the Ukrainian air force said. Trump said two weeks ago he would implement 'severe tariffs' on Russia unless a peace deal is reached by early September, as he expressed exasperation with Putin over the bombardment of Ukrainian cities amid the Republican president's attempts to stop the fighting. Trump said he would now give Putin 10 to 12 days from Monday, meaning he wants peace efforts to make progress by Aug. 7-9. The plan includes possible sanctions and secondary tariffs targeting Russia's trading partners. The formal announcement would come later Monday or on Tuesday, he said. 'No reason in waiting,' Trump said of the shorter timeline. 'We just don't see any progress being made.' Putin has 'got to make a deal. Too many people are dying,' Trump said during a visit to Scotland. There was no immediate response from Russia. Trump repeated his criticism of Putin for talking about ending the war but continuing to bombard Ukrainian civilians. 'And I say, that's not the way to do it,' Trump said. He added, 'I'm disappointed in President Putin.' Asked at a news conference about a potential meeting with the Russian leader, Trump said: 'I'm not so interested in talking anymore.' Still, he voiced some reluctance about imposing penalties on the Kremlin, saying that he loves the Russian people. 'I don't want to do that to Russia,' he said, but he noted how many Russians, along with Ukrainians, are dying in the war. Ukraine has urged Western countries to take a tougher line with Putin. Andrii Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office, thanked Trump for shortening the deadline. 'Putin understands only strength — and that has been conveyed clearly and loudly,' Yermak said on Telegram, adding that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shared the sentiment. Latest attacks in Ukraine A Russian drone blew out the windows of a 25-story residential building in the Darnytskyi district of Kyiv, the head of the city's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, wrote on Telegram. Eight people were injured, including a 4-year-old girl, he said. The attack also started a fire in Kropyvnytskyi, in central Ukraine, local officials said, but no injuries were reported. The main target of the Russian attack was Starokostiantyniv, in the Khmelnytskyi region of western Ukraine, the air force said. Regional authorities reported no damage or casualties. Western Ukraine is on the other side of the country from the front line, and the Ukrainian military is believed to have significant airfields as well as arsenals and depots there. The Russian Defense Ministry said its forces carried out an overnight strike with long-range, air-launched weapons, hitting a Ukrainian air base along with an ammunition depot containing stockpiles of missiles and components for drone production.
