Major US volcano predicted to erupt TOMORROW
The Axial Seamount is a mile-wide underwater volcano that sits 300 miles off the coast of Oregon and more than 4,900 feet below the surface of the Pacific Ocean.
Researchers with the National Science Foundation's Ocean Observatories Initiative say there has been massive uptick in the number of earthquakes under the seamount, caused by magma pushing to the surface.
According to William Wilcock, a professor and marine geophysicist at the University of Washington the seafloor has inflated to the level that it reached before the 2015 eruption.
The swelling means that dangerously hot magma is building up beneath the surface.
'At the moment, there are a couple hundred earthquakes a day, but that's still a lot less than we saw before the previous eruption,' Wilcock explained.
'I would say it was going to erupt sometime later (this year) or early 2026, but it could be tomorrow, because it's completely unpredictable,' the marine geophysicist added.
The Axial Seamount last erupted in 2015, triggering roughly 8,000 earthquakes, producing 400-foot-thick lava flows and causing the bottom of the ocean to sink nearly eight feet.
The Axial Seamount is a mile-wide underwater volcano that sits 300 miles off the coast of Oregon and more than 4,900 feet below the surface of the Pacific Ocean. One of Axial Seamounts many hydrothermal vents, which are part of a complex, sprawling network
Scientists monitoring this volcano have detected a key sign that it is about to erupt: inflation of the seafloor. Pictured is the opening of the volcano
The region has seen a sharp rise in the number of earthquakes in just the last month, with a major spike in activity recorded on April 13.
Since May 6, the number of daily earthquakes under the seamount has been steadily rising.
If Axial Seamount does blow within the next few days, it won't pose any threat human communities along the West Coast, experts say.
It's too deep and too far from shore for people to even notice when it erupts, and it has no impact on seismic activity on land.
However, the number of underwater quakes is expected to skyrocket during this event, rising from several hundred per day right now to 10,000 earthquakes within a 24-hour period as magma flows out of the seafloor volcano, according to Interesting Engineering.
Mike Poland, a scientist at the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, expressed excitement about the eruption, highlighting Axial Seamount as one of the world's best-monitored submarine volcanoes.
'This particular volcano is probably the best-monitored submarine volcano in the world,' he told Cowboy State Daily. 'It's fascinating and doesn't really pose a hazard.'
Seismic activity at the Axial Seamount has been growing exponentially, with hundreds of daily earthquakes now being reported – signaling a pending eruption
Situated along the Juan de Fuca Ridge, a chain of undersea volcanoes extending between Oregon and Alaska, Axial Seamount is a young shield volcano – a broader volcano with a low profile.
'When Axial Seamount erupts, it'll look a lot like a Hawaiian lava flow eruption,' Poland said.
'It's not an explosive eruption, but calm effusions of lava flowing out of the caldera and across the seafloor.'
Scientists warned last year that Axial Seamount was going to erupt by the end of 2025.
'Because it's had these three eruptions in the last 30 years, that's why we call it the most active volcano in the Pacific Northwest, because most of the ones on land aren't active that frequently, and they spend a lot of their time slumbering, whereas Axial has a pretty active magma supply,' Chadwick told local CBS affiliate KOIN 6 News.
'So, if it's not erupting, it's inflating and getting ready for the next one. And so that's why we're kind of monitoring what's happening to it all the time.'
Eruptions from Axial Seamount were recorded in 1998, 2011, and 2015, and the volcano has undoubtedly erupted numerous times prior to those events, according to Poland.
In November 2024, Oregon State University geophysicist William Chadwick started investigating the volcano when he noticed its surface had swelled to nearly the same height it reached before its last eruption 10 years ago.
The swelling that occurred prior to the 2015 eruption allowed Chadwick and his colleagues to predict that event.
This massive underwater volcano sits 300 miles off the coast of Oregon and more than 4,900 feet below the surface of the Pacific Ocean
This time, their observations told them that Axial Seamount would erupt before the end of 2025.
'Based on the current trends, and the assumption that Axial will be primed to erupt when it reaches the 2015 inflation threshold, our current eruption forecast window is between now (July 2024) and the end of 2025,' the researchers reported.
They also found that seismic activity at Axial Seamount had increased, with hundreds of earthquakes generated around the volcano per day and earthquake swarms greater than 500 per day.
Frequent, small earthquakes like these can signal that magma locked beneath the ocean floor is creeping closer to the surface.
The team shared their findings at the annual American Geophysical Union conference in December 2024.
Wilcock noted that the first sign that an eruption from this volcano is imminent would be a sharp increase in the number of earthquakes around it – which the area is now experiencing.
'That period lasts about an hour, and then the magma reaches the surface,' Wilcock said in a statement last month.
After that, 'the seismic activity dies down pretty quickly over the next few days, but the eruption will continue slowly for about a month,' he added.
This impending eruption will be a major research opportunity for Wilcock and other scientists, who plan to use a suite of high-tech instruments to monitor the eruption from start to finish.
The University of Washington's College of the Environment hosts one of the largest underwater observatories in the world, comprised of networks of sensors along the seafloor and throughout the ocean waters.
In November 2024, Oregon State University geophysicist William Chadwick started investigating the volcano when he noticed its surface had swelled to nearly the same height it reached before its last eruption 10 years ago
The volcano is located off the coast of Oregon. Pictured is a quaint town in the state
When Axial Seamount finally erupts, Wilcock and his colleagues will use this array to gather data and images of the event as it unfolds.
Even though Axial is not a dangerous undersea volcano, the forecasting capabilities scientists have gained from studying it could help them predict eruptions from those that are.
For example, in January 2022, an extremely powerful eruption of the Hunga underwater volcano in the Tonga archipelago in the southern Pacific Ocean triggered a tsunami that caused an estimated $90 billion in damages.
This massive wave impacted California, Hawaii, and parts of Canada, Chile, Fiji, Japan, New Zealand, Mexico and Peru.
The West Coast won't have to worry about Axial causing an event like that. But its eruption will provide an opportunity for scientists to learn more about how these powerful geological structures work – and now it could come at any time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Humans used to have straighter teeth—what changed?
Braces, rubber bands, even jaw surgery—millions endure them in pursuit of a straighter smile. But were misaligned smiles always this common? Research suggests that might not be the case. While malocclusions—crowded or misaligned teeth—have been found among our hunter-gatherer ancestors, they appear to be more prevalent in modern populations. So what changed? Experts say the answer isn't simple but point to one possible culprit: our diets. As we traded raw, tough foods for softer, more processed ones, the burden of chewing decreased, allowing our jaws to shrink over time. Now, researchers are exploring how evolutionary biology, diet, and modern lifestyles may have reshaped our faces—and our smiles. Ancient human skulls were strikingly different from our own. Early hunter-gatherers had large, powerful jaws built for the demanding work of chewing tough meats, fibrous vegetables, seeds, and nuts. But around 12,000 years ago, things began to change. As humans around the world traded hunting for farming, their diets changed too, incorporating more grains and cultivated produce into their diet. These foods were softer, more processed, and required far less chewing.' We did not have ice cream or white bread back in the day,' says Sue Herring, professor emeritus in orthodontics at the University of Washington. 'When you get your food straight from the environment, it's probably a little [grittier] than stuff which has been cooked and processed.' (Neanderthal teeth reveal intimate details of daily life.) With softer diets came less mechanical strain on the jaw. Over generations, our mandibles began to shrink— a trend visible in the fossil record. That shrinkage is, at least in part, adaptive and the result of millennia of evolution, says Myra Laird, assistant professor of basic and translational sciences at the University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine. 'If you don't need a huge mandible, it's energetically costly to build that extra bone.' But not all changes in jaw size and shape are evolutionary. Bone is highly responsive to physical stress—even within a single lifetime—and builds up around muscle attachment sites. In other words, less muscle usage results in less robust bones, Laird says, citing studies of craniofacial growth in non-human animals like hyraxes. 'If you switch to a liquid diet, you will not use your muscles as much and see some shape changes in your face.' (Here's how ultra-processed food harms the body and brain.) That's exactly what researchers believe happened to humans as they adopted agriculture. 'Post-agricultural populations had a marked reduction in the size of the chewing muscles,' Laird says. 'What this suggests is that the origins of agriculture brought about less work for the feeding system'—and, ultimately, much less roomy mouths. So, what happens when you try to fit the same number of teeth into a smaller jaw space? Over-crowding and crookedness. 'The way your teeth come through is almost like a zipper,' says Julie Lawrence, assistant professor of biological anthropology at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. 'Your jaw moves forward and then it makes space for them to come through.' If there isn't enough room for the teeth to erupt, they might become impacted or crowded together. The third molars, or wisdom teeth, are particularly at risk for noneruption in undersized jaws. Research suggests that the mismatch between the size of the mandible and dentition may be to blame for increasingly crooked teeth among post-industrial humans. 'That loss of space is really what precipitates the malocclusions, dental crowding,' says Laird. 'The rate of malocclusion goes way, way up [in modern humans], and that is ubiquitous across all populations.' (Why we add fluoride to water—and how it became so controversial.) But experts caution that the story isn't so simple. Although the frequency of malocclusions seems to have increased among modern humans, dental impaction and crowding have been observed in early hominid skulls. The fossil record is limited and likely not fully representative, Lawrence says. 'Better teeth tend to be better preserved,' she says, adding that anthropological data doesn't take into account confounding factors like missing teeth. While 'there does seem to be a pattern' of increased malocclusions among post-industrialization humans, Lawrence adds, not all changes in teeth alignment can be attributed to diet. Extreme under- or overbite, for example, is the result of population genetics and 'doesn't have to do with industrialization.' Many other factors can cause crooked teeth, including environmental conditions or developmental anomalies. And some populations are more genetically predisposed to malocclusions. Ultimately, the prevalence of crooked teeth may also be due in small part to aesthetic bias. 'Our modern society is a lot more sensitive to cosmetic problems,' Herring says. 'I think we're a lot more aware of malocclusions now than anybody was in the past.'
Fast Company
6 hours ago
- Fast Company
Why 1995 was the year the internet grew up
The internet wasn't born whole—it came together from parts. Most know of ARPANET, the internet's most famous precursor, but it was always limited strictly to government use. It was NSFNET that brought many networks together, and the internet that we use today is almost NSFNET itself. Almost, but not quite: in 1995, the government that had raised the internet from its infancy gave it a firm shove out the door. Call it a graduation, or a coming of age. I think of it as the internet getting its first real job. In the early 1980s, the National Science Foundation sought to establish the United States as a leader in scientific computing. The plan required a fleet of supercomputers that researchers could readily use, a difficult feat when the computers routinely cost more than the buildings that housed them. Business computing had solved similar problems with time-sharing and remote terminals, and ARPANET had demonstrated that terminals could be connected to computers across the country using a packet-switching network. The Computer Science Network, or CSNET, was the NSF's first foray into wide area networking. It connected universities that didn't have defense contracts and, as a result, had been left out of ARPANET. With dozens of sites, CSNET was much smaller than ARPANET but proved that a group of universities could share computing resources. When the NSF funded five cutting-edge supercomputing centers in 1985, it planned to make them available to users over a similar network. The problem was that big computers invited big data: CSNET just wasn't fast enough for interactive work with large data sets, and it was falling further behind as traffic doubled about every two weeks. After a sluggish 56 Kbps pilot effort (about a thousand times slower than today's common broadband connections), the NSF contracted the University of Michigan to develop an all-new replacement based on MERIT—a Michigan inter-university network that had already started to expand its high-speed digital telephone and geostationary satellite links into other states. In 1987, the MERIT team brought on IBM and upstart long-distance carrier MCI, freshly invigorated by the antitrust breakup of their principal competitor and truly feeling their oats. They worked at a breakneck pace. In under a year, NSFNET connected the supercomputing centers and a half dozen regional networks at blistering T1 speeds: 1.5 Mbps—an almost 28-fold increase. Just after 8 p.m. on June 30, 1988, Hans-Werner Braun, the project's co-principal investigator, sent an email to the NSFNET mailing list to announce these new high-capacity links—among the fastest long-distance computer connections ever deployed—with typical scientific understatement: 'The NSFnet Backbone has reached a state where we would like to more officially let operational traffic on.' Braun's email 'received little notice at the time,' the NSF wrote in a 2008 announcement. But 'those simple words announced the birth of the modern Internet.' NSFNET was a runaway success. Besides its massive capacity, the network maintained an open door for interconnection. Overseas academic computer networks established peer connections with NSFNET, and in 1989 the federal government opened two Federal Internet Exchanges that routed traffic between NSFNET, ARPANET, and other government networks. The superior speed of NSFNET meant that these exchanges served mostly to bring NSFNET to federal users, and ARPANET's fate was sealed. The military network, birthplace of many internet technologies, was deemed obsolete and decommissioned the next year. At the turn of the 1990s, NSFNET had become the Internet: the unified backbone by which regional and institutional networks came together. NSFNET never stopped growing. It was a remarkable problem: at every stage, NSFNET traffic grew faster than anticipated. During 1989 alone, traffic increased by five times. The state of the art T1 links were overwhelmed, demanding a 1991 upgrade to 45 Mbps T3 connections. To manage the rapidly expanding infrastructure, the original NSFNET partners formed Advanced Network and Services (ANS). ANS was an independent nonprofit that could be called the first backbone ISP, the service provider that service providers themselves connected to. The popularity of this new communications system was not limited to government and academia. Private industry took note as well. During the 1980s, 'online services' had sprouted: companies like CompuServe, PlayNet, and AOL that are often considered early ISPs but were, in fact, something else. Online services, for both businesses and consumers, were walled gardens. They descended from time-sharing systems that connected users to a single computer, providing only a 'curated' experience of software provided by the online service itself. The internet, in the tradition of ARPANET and especially NSFNET, was very different. It was a collection of truly independent networks, autonomous systems, with the freedom to communicate across geographical and organizational boundaries. It could feel like chaos, but it also fostered innovation. The internet offered possibilities that the online services never could. Douglas Van Houweling, director of the MERIT office, called NSFNET's university origin 'the only community that understands that great things can happen when no one's in charge.' At first, it was contractors who took their business to the internet. ARPANET had always been strictly for government business, but still, companies with the privilege of ARPANET connections found it hard not to use them for other work. Despite prohibitions, ARPANET users exchanged personal messages, coordinated visits, and even distributed the first spam. NSFNET's much wider scope, welcoming anyone with a nexus to research or education, naturally invited users to push the limits further. Besides, the commercial internet was starting to form. CERN engineer Tim Berners-Lee had invented HTML and, along with it, the World Wide Web. In 1993, NCSA—one of the same NSF supercomputing centers that NSFNET was built to connect—released Mosaic, the first popular web browser. Early private ISPs, companies like PSINet and Cerfnet, started out as regional academic networks (New York and California's). There was obvious business interest, and for cash-strapped academic networks paying customers were hard to turn down. NSFNET went into business on its own, with ANS establishing its own for-profit commercial subsidiary called ANS CO+RE. The term 'internet backbone' still finds use today, but in a less literal sense. NSFNET truly was the spine of the early 1990s internet, the only interconnection between otherwise disparate networks. It facilitated the internet's growth, but it also became a gatekeeper: NSF funding came with the condition that it be used for research and education. NSFNET had always kept a somewhat liberal attitude towards its users' online activities, but the growth of outright for-profit networks made the conflict between academia and commerce impossible to ignore. Several commercial ISPs established their own exchange, an option for business traffic to bypass NSFNET, but it couldn't provide the level of connectivity that NSFNET did. Besides, ANS itself opposed fragmentation of the internet and refused to support direct interconnection between other ISPs. In 1992, a series of NSFNET policy changes and an act of Congress opened the door to business traffic on a more formal basis, but the damage was done. A divide had formed between the internet as an academic venture and the internet as a business, a divide that was only deepened by mistrust between upstart internet businesses and incumbent providers ANS, IBM, and MCI. The network was not the only place that cracks formed. Dating back to ARPANET, a database called the Domain Name System maintained a mapping between numeric addresses and more human-friendly names. While DNS was somewhat distributed, it required a central organization to maintain the top level of the hierarchy. There had been different databases for different networks, but consolidation onto NSFNET required unifying the name system as well. By 1993, all of the former name registries had contracted the work to a single company called Network Solutions. At first, Network Solutions benefited from the same federal largesse as NSFNET. Registry services were funded by government contracts and free to users. Requests came faster and faster, though, and the database grew larger and larger. In 1995, Network Solutions joined the ranks of the defense industrial complex with an acquisition by SAIC. Along with the new owner came new terms: SAIC negotiated an amendment to the NSF contracts that, for the first time, introduced a fee to register a domain name. Claiming a name on the internet would run $100 per two years. By then, commercial ISPs had proliferated. Despite policy changes, NSFNET remained less enthusiastic about commercial users than academic ones. Besides, traffic hadn't stopped growing, and improved routing technologies meant the network could scale across multiple routes. The internet became competitive. MCI, benefiting from their experience operating NSFNET links, had built its own backbone network. Sprint, never far behind MCI, had one too. ANS reorganized their assets, placing much of their backbone infrastructure under their commercial operations. Government support of the increasingly profit-driven internet seemed unwise and, ultimately, unnecessary. In April of 1995, the internet changed: NSF shut down the NSFNET backbone. The government funded, academically motivated core of the internet was replaced by a haphazard but thriving interconnection of commercial ventures. ANS, now somewhat lost for purpose, stepped out into the new world of internet industry and sold its infrastructure to AOL. Network Solutions became embroiled in a monopoly controversy that saw DNS reorganized into a system of competitive private registrars. Modems became standard equipment on newly popular personal computers, and millions of Americans dialed into a commercial ISP. We built communities, businesses, and the shape of the 21st century over infrastructure that had been, just years before, a collection of universities with an NSF grant. The internet, born in the 1960s, spent its young adult years in the university. It learned a lot: the policies, the protocols, the basic shape of the internet, all solidified under the tutelage of research institutions and the NSF. And then, the internet graduated. It went out, got a job, and found its own way. Just where that way leads, we're still finding out. The super-early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, July 25, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make incredible breakthrough that could transform future water heaters: 'Cost-effective solution'
As part of the ongoing transition from dirty energy and its financial and environmental burdens, researchers from the National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra and National Institute of Solar Energy designed a solar geyser system that uses sand to store heat and heat water. Since sand maintains an excellent capacity for heat storage, the team achieved promising results, as exemplified by the change in the sand's temperature: over 200 degrees Fahrenheit in a single day, per Interesting Engineering. By converting electricity from solar panels into thermal energy via a nichrome wire heating rod, they established the blueprint of their fine sand-based solar geyser, by which they could channel heat into sand for storage and later into water. The primary goal, however, was driving down the energy costs of water heating. Published in the journal Energy Sources, the study reported an approximately 25-year lifespan for the design and an energy cost of about $0.0233 per kilowatt-hour, making the FSG a successful jumping-off point. "The FSG system offers a sustainable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective solution for water heating by storing thermal energy in fine sand, overcoming the intermittency of solar radiation," researcher Dinesh Kumar Saini explained. Conventional water heaters run on fuel, typically natural gas, the combustion of which releases carbon pollution that contributes to the overheating of the planet. Even electric water heaters aren't necessarily the most eco-friendly, though they can be, depending on whether the electricity is generated by fuel-based power plants or a cleaner power alternative. Fortunately, finding other ways to heat water may be just what is needed to put a dent in the carbon pollution problem. While there is a plethora of Earth-heating emission sources, ranging from industrial to residential settings, every little swap makes a difference, helping offset the creeping reverberations of the changing climate, such as supercharged weather events and food shortages. The FSG's reliance on solar panels rather than any fuel-based energy source makes it refreshingly pollution-free and showcases an inventive way to maximize the unsung potential of solar power, the ultimate cost-effective clean energy solution. Though this solar geyser technology is still in the works — currently more of a draft than a final model — you can still take advantage of solar innovations by installing solar panels for your home, using EnergySage to bring your installation costs down by up to $10,000 and your long-term energy costs near zero. If you're looking for a more gradual solar investment, LightReach promotes clean energy accessibility by leasing solar panels at no cost upfront. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
