'Fagin's Law' offences by adults to groom children into criminality 'difficult to prove', review finds
A post-enactment report from the Department of Justice into the Criminal Justice (Engagement of Children in Criminal Activity) Act 2024 said that a 'small number of offences' under the act have been brought before the court since it was enacted.
'Given the short timeframe since the enactment of the Act, very little data is presently available that is relevant to the performance of the Act's individual provisions,' the review said.
The long-awaited laws criminalising adults who entice or force a child to engage in any form of criminality came into force last summer. Convictions in the higher courts can lead to a sentence of up to five years in jail under 'Fagin's Law'.
It came after successive national drug strategies recommended the measure, given the issues around grooming of children as young as eight to engage in couriering and dealing drugs.
Then-Minister for Justice Helen McEntee said the law would be an 'effective tool in tackling organised crime'.
To analyse its performance so far, the Department of Justice asked for feedback from the Director of Public Prosecutions, the gardaí, the Courts Service and the Greentown Programme, which works in local areas aiming to disrupt the influence of criminal networks on children.
In the case of the DPP, it said it does not collect formal data on offences under the act, while the gardaí said that less than 10 charges/summonses have been issued under the act.
The Greentown Programme's management committee meanwhile, said the law has increased awareness around grooming and criminal behaviour.
'This increased awareness has acted as a deterrent for persons considering engaging a child for the purposes of committing a crime and for potential child victims who were previously unaware of the grooming process,' it said.
However, it added the offences are difficult to prove and that garda interventions are more focused on more straightforward offences and those with higher penalties such as those to do with drug-dealing and organised crime.
Read More
Criminals target young people with offers of drugs in exchange for sex
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
'Fagin's Law' offences by adults to groom children into criminality 'difficult to prove', review finds
New offences to prevent children being groomed into criminality are 'difficult to prove' and there is uncertainty over the law's 'operational effectiveness', a review has found. A post-enactment report from the Department of Justice into the Criminal Justice (Engagement of Children in Criminal Activity) Act 2024 said that a 'small number of offences' under the act have been brought before the court since it was enacted. 'Given the short timeframe since the enactment of the Act, very little data is presently available that is relevant to the performance of the Act's individual provisions,' the review said. The long-awaited laws criminalising adults who entice or force a child to engage in any form of criminality came into force last summer. Convictions in the higher courts can lead to a sentence of up to five years in jail under 'Fagin's Law'. It came after successive national drug strategies recommended the measure, given the issues around grooming of children as young as eight to engage in couriering and dealing drugs. Then-Minister for Justice Helen McEntee said the law would be an 'effective tool in tackling organised crime'. To analyse its performance so far, the Department of Justice asked for feedback from the Director of Public Prosecutions, the gardaí, the Courts Service and the Greentown Programme, which works in local areas aiming to disrupt the influence of criminal networks on children. In the case of the DPP, it said it does not collect formal data on offences under the act, while the gardaí said that less than 10 charges/summonses have been issued under the act. The Greentown Programme's management committee meanwhile, said the law has increased awareness around grooming and criminal behaviour. 'This increased awareness has acted as a deterrent for persons considering engaging a child for the purposes of committing a crime and for potential child victims who were previously unaware of the grooming process,' it said. However, it added the offences are difficult to prove and that garda interventions are more focused on more straightforward offences and those with higher penalties such as those to do with drug-dealing and organised crime. Read More Criminals target young people with offers of drugs in exchange for sex
Sunday World
a day ago
- Sunday World
Man (50s) arrested by gardai investigating murder of Josephine Ray in Tipperary last year
A man has been arrested by gardai investigating the murder of Josephine Ray in Tipperary last year. The man, in his 50s, is being held in relation to the death of the great grandmother (89) whose body was discovered at her home at St Joseph's Park, Nenagh, on the afternoon of Sunday, August 4. Gardaí had been called to the property where Ms Ray lived on a number of occasions over the last number of months to deal with what sources said were 'a number of different alleged complaints'. She was discovered with severe bruising to her face and blood was found close to her body. It is understood that a pillow that was seized as part of the probe would be subject to a full forensic examination. Tributes later appeared online to the victim who was described as 'a vulnerable lady' including by her grandson, Daniel Ray O'Brien who discovered her body on Sunday afternoon after neighbours raised the alarm. "My poor poor poor granny, I loved you so much. God please let there be justice. The system failed her too many times please don't let it happen during her death too,' he posted on Facebook. A man and woman in their 50s who had been quizzed by gardai at the time were later released without charge with a file to be prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions. A Garda spokesperson said this morning: 'Gardaí in Nenagh continue to investigate all the circumstances surrounding the death of a woman, whose body was discovered at a residence at St Joseph's Park, Nenagh, County Tipperary, on the afternoon of Sunday, August 4, 2024. 'A male in his 50s was arrested today, Thursday 3rd July 2025 in relation to this investigation. 'He is currently being detained under the provisions of Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1984.' Gardai added that investigations are 'ongoing'
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Diddy trial: The five charges Sean Combs faced - and why he was only found guilty of two of them
THE JURY IN the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial convicted him of two counts, but cleared him of some of the more serious allegations. Combs has been behind bars since his arrest in September. His lawyers argued that the acquittal on the most serious counts changed the legal landscape enough that he should get bail. Combs, 55, was still convicted on two lesser counts related to prostitution, and could serve time. But he and his lawyers hailed the day as a win. Prosecutors said they would seek a prison term. Here's what we know about the charges, and the potential sentence. What were the charges against Sean 'Diddy' Combs? Combs faced five federal charges related to sex trafficking, prostitution, and alleged organised criminal activity. Count 1: Racketeering Conspiracy – Not Guilty Maximum sentence: Life in prison. Prosecutors accused Combs of running a criminal enterprise with the help of staff and associates to carry out crimes including sex trafficking, kidnapping, forced labour, bribery, and obstruction of justice since at least 2008. This enterprise allegedly facilitated so-called 'freak-offs' – drug-fuelled sex parties involving escorts and coerced participation. Police found baby oil and drugs during a raid on Combs' LA home, said to be connected to these events. The charge fell under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to prosecute mafia networks. To convict, prosecutors needed to prove Combs conspired with others to commit at least two related crimes over a decade. Defence lawyers cast doubt on whether his employees were knowingly involved, and the jury ultimately found Combs not guilty. A court sketch of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Count 2: Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud or Coercion – Not Guilty Maximum sentence: Life Combs was accused of coercing ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a former artist on his label, into sex acts during 'freak-offs,' which were allegedly filmed and used for blackmail. Ventura testified she feared Combs and felt pressured to participate in these encounters. However, the jury acquitted him on this charge. Count 3: Transport for Purposes of Prostitution – Guilty Maximum sentence: 10 years Combs was convicted of transporting Ventura and male escorts across state and international lines between 2009 and 2018 to participate in 'freak-offs.' Escorts were recruited through the service Cowboys 4 Angels and paid thousands, contingent on Combs' satisfaction with their performance. Count 4: Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud or Coercion – Not Guilty Maximum sentence: Life Advertisement A second trafficking charge involved another ex-girlfriend, known as 'Jane.' Prosecutors said Combs lured her with promises of luxury and then coerced her into sex acts by controlling her financially. Jane said she felt obligated to comply, but the jury again found Combs not guilty. Count 5: Transport for Purposes of Prostitution – Guilty Maximum sentence: 10 years Combs was convicted of transporting 'Jane' and male escorts across state lines between 2021 and 2024 for participation in filmed sex parties. Why was he acquitted of racketeering, the most serious offence? Combs was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy due to the prosecution's inability to prove that he ran a coordinated criminal enterprise as defined under the RICO Act. Although prosecutors alleged that Combs led a network of employees and associates who helped facilitate crimes such as sex trafficking, bribery, forced labour, and obstruction of justice, the jury ultimately found that the evidence didn't meet the legal threshold. To convict under RICO, the government needed to show that Combs committed at least two related crimes as part of a structured, long-term conspiracy involving at least one other person. The prosecution argued that 'freak-offs' – sex parties involving escorts and allegedly coerced participants – were organised by Combs' inner circle. They also pointed to items found in his home, such as drugs and large quantities of baby oil, as supporting evidence. However, key testimony undermined the conspiracy claim. Cassie Ventura, the prosecution's star witness, said she didn't believe Combs' employees were present at the events in question. Without direct evidence that others knowingly took part in the alleged enterprise, the jury was left with doubt. Cassie Ventura and Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Combs' defence capitalised on this, arguing that no witnesses testified to participating in or even being aware of any organised criminal activity. His lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, dismissed the charge as built on assumption rather than hard proof. Legal experts noted that racketeering charges are notoriously difficult to prove, often requiring clearer evidence of shared intent and coordination than what was presented in this case. As a result, the jury found Combs not guilty on Count 1. So how much prison time is Diddy facing? Both guilty charges have maximum sentences of 10 years – meaning Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison. It is up to the judge whether sentences will run concurrently or consecutively. Prosecuter Maurene Comey said that the US government would seek the maximum sentence of 20 years. A court sketch of US Attorney Maurene Comey. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo After the convictions were announced today, defence lawyers requested that Diddy be released on bail, suggesting a $1 million bond. Before Combs is sentenced, prosecutors and defense lawyers will file written arguments advocating for the sentence they believe Combs deserves. What happens next? A US District judge will determine Combs' full sentence at a later date, which has not yet been confirmed. After sentencing, Combs is expected to appeal. His legal team will have to convince the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which can take years. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
