Conor McGregor whiskey brand dispute to proceed next week
Artem Lobov, a former sparring partner of Mr McGregor, is suing the MMA fighter for what Mr Lobov says was an oral agreement in 2017 that he would get a 5 per cent share in creating the brand which he says he came up with the idea for.
The Proper Number Twelve Irish whiskey brand was sold in 2021 to Proximo Spirits for a reported sum of up to $600 million (€530 million) and Mr McGregor was reported to have received $130 million from the sale.
Proximo cut ties with Mr McGregor and the brand following last year's separate High Court action in which a civil jury found he should pay almost €250,000 for raping a woman, Nikita Hand, in a Dublin hotel in December 2018. That decision is being appealed.
READ MORE
Mr McGregor denies Mr Lobov's claims that there was any agreement for him to have a share in the brand.
On Thursday, the case came before Mr Justice David Nolan for mention to see if it was ready to proceed next Tuesday. Eight days have been set aside for the hearing.
After hearing that there had been a delay by the Lobov side in lodging pre-hearing legal submissions to the court – which resulted in the defendant not being able to reply to them – the judge said he was concerned the case was not ready to go ahead next week.
Liam Bell BL, instructed by Dermot McNamara & Co Solicitors for Mr Lobov, said his side would have its submissions in by close of business on Thursday. He said the delay was due to his lawyers having to get further instructions for the case.
Shelley Horan BL, instructed by Michael Staines & Co Solicitors for Mr McGregor, said the Lobov side submissions were due to be in at the end of February but had not arrived. However, she agreed with Mr Bell that the defendant's submissions could be put in at the end of the case as this was a matter that would be determined on the basis of evidence to the court.
Mr Justice Nolan said however that whatever judge hears the case, he or she will need to have the legal submissions of both sides beforehand.
Ms Horan said the Lobov side had been 'in dereliction' and her side had been chasing them for their submissions. However, this was a 'net issue' case in which the plaintiff seeks specific performance of an oral agreement which is denied, she said.
Her side did not think the judge who hears the case would be prejudiced by not having the submissions, she said. This was an unfortunate situation not of the defendant's making but they were anxious to get on with the case, she said.
The judge said he did not think the case was ready to go ahead but it was with 'great reluctance' that he would allow it to proceed next week. He also said the delay in having submissions in on time would have to be dealt with when the judge who hears the case is dealing with who pays the costs.
Mr Lobov, who was born in Russia and lives in Mulhuddart, Dublin, claims he came up with the idea that Mr McGregor lend his name to a new whiskey brand.
He also says he did all the research and negotiations to get Cork-based distillery firms to agree to produce the whiskey before the project was taken over by Mr McGregor's manager and chief executive of Paradigm Sports Management, Audi Attar, along with American entrepreneur Ken Austin.
He claims he was effectively 'muscled out' and that Mr McGregor acknowledged his involvement when he made Mr Lobov an offer of US$1 million which he refused.
Mr McGregor strongly denies the claims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Water bonuses are hard to swallow
Sir, – I noted three headlines in The Irish Times on July 2nd which surprised me. They are as follows:- (1) 500,000 people across State use 'at risk' drinking water, (2) Water system a major block on growth, Ifac says, (3) Total bonuses at Uisce Éireann top €13 million. READ MORE I'm mystified why employees at Uisce Éireann should receive bonuses for doing what they are employed to do. – Yours, etc, LESLEY KERRIGAN, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
FAI board holds unscheduled board meeting after standoff with Oireachtas sport committee
The board of the Football Association of Ireland (FAI) has held an unscheduled board meeting after a standoff emerged with the Oireachtas sport committee. The organisation was due to appear before the committee next Wednesday, but after its regular meeting last week, members of the committee were told the FAI was seeking to delay the meeting. It is understood the FAI wrote to the committee outlining that it wanted to postpone the meeting until Garda investigations into allegations of inappropriate relationships with players against former coaches, and unwanted sexual advances. The allegations were first made public last summer by RTÉ Investigates and the Sunday Independent. Gardaí later confirmed that they are investigating at least one complaint regarding the matter and were in contact with several more potential victims. READ MORE RTÉ has previously reported that the former coaches have denied any wrongdoing. [ FAI stands down three former women's football coaches after allegations of inappropriate behaviour Opens in new window ] Political sources said this week that the committee had decided to respond to the FAI saying it wanted the meeting to go ahead, arguing that the questioning could be constructed in such a way as to avoid encroaching on areas that might be subject to any ongoing investigation. It is unclear what the outcome or decision of the board meeting held on Friday night was, if any. A source with knowledge of discussions denied that there was a split in the board over the matter. It is believed some senior figures at the FAI are deeply sceptical about the merits of attending the committee. A request for comment to the FAI met no immediate response on Friday evening. At the time of the joint RTÉ/Sunday Independent investigation, the FAI said it was treating the allegations with the utmost priority and seriousness. Speaking under Dáil privilege last month, Fianna Fáil TD for Cork North Central Pádraig O'Sullivan said the organisation knew of the allegations in 2023, 'despite the FAI stating publicly that it only learned of these allegations in early 2024″. Mr O'Sullivan said he had seen correspondence dating to May 4th, 2023, which laid this out 'in black and white'. [ Gardaí investigating historical allegations made against women's soccer coach Opens in new window ] Responding, Minister of State for sport Charlie McConalogue said it was the view of his department and of Sport Ireland that the FAI had engaged appropriately with the allegations, and that once it received a formal complaint in January 2024 it acted swiftly and contacted An Garda Síochána and Tusla in accordance with mandatory reporting requirements and its own safeguarding and child welfare regulations. Mr McConalogue said the allegations made by women involved in football in the 1990s were 'truly shocking' and he commended the bravery of those who had come forward to tell their stories.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on plans for the GPO: a terrible idea is born
The GPO occupies a space in Irish life that transcends bricks and mortar. More than a functioning post office or architectural anchor of O'Connell Street, it is the most resonant physical symbol of the struggle for Irish independence. It is no surprise, then, that the Government's vague and ill-defined outline for its redevelopment, framed in response to the Dublin City Taskforce report, has drawn such emotional and at times overheated criticism. Sinn Féin and Aontú have accused the Government of plotting to turn the GPO into 'a shopping centre'. While this charge is more rhetorical than realistic – the proposals include 're-imagined retail components' in the existing shops on Henry Street and the GPO Arcade – it reflects an understandable fear that the site's dignity might be compromised in the name of commercial convenience. The idea of a Starbucks beneath the watchful gaze of Cúchulainn rightly causes discomfort, however improbable it may be. Still, the reaction should not obscure the need for careful scrutiny of what is being proposed. Among the Government's stated intentions are to retain a post office function, enhance the public realm, integrate retail elements and introduce 'significant cultural uses'. Thus far, so good. But it also includes a plan to install a 'high-quality office element on the upper floors to meet ongoing and additional Government requirements'. This is where the proposal veers off course. READ MORE At a time when central Dublin is not short of modern office space – much of it lying vacant – it is difficult to comprehend why the State would invest in converting a historic and architecturally sensitive complex from the 1920s into more civil service workspace. Such a move appears not only unnecessary but tone-deaf to the symbolic role of the building and the opportunity it presents. The north inner city, and O'Connell Street in particular, have suffered decades of neglect and decline. The GPO, if imaginatively and respectfully revitalised, could be a cornerstone in the area's cultural and civic renewal. That opportunity must not be squandered. A successful redevelopment should put heritage and public engagement at its core. It must help residents and visitors alike understand the GPO's extraordinary role in Ireland's history, something the current museum on the premises only begins to do. It should also include new public cultural venues: not just one, but several, ensuring that this central, national site is animated with meaning and public value. As Labour's Marie Sherlock and An Post CEO David McRedmond (who chaired the original taskforce and knows the building as well as anyone) have rightly pointed out, there are better options for additional office space elsewhere. The GPO deserves more than functional repurposing. It deserves vision, respect and ambition.
