Hungary, EU Funds, and the Rule of Law: What's at Stake?
They explore Hungary's complex relationship with EU cohesion funds, the impact of rule of law concerns on funding access, and how political shifts - like a potential government change - could reshape Hungary's future within the EU. From suspended investments to broader implications for democracy and economic growth, the discussion highlights what's at stake for both Hungary and the European Union.
Episodes
Economy
Hungary, EU Funds, and the Rule of Law: What's at Stake?
16/07/2025
Energy, Environment & Transport
Energy Efficiency First: the cases of Italy and Greece
25/06/2025
Energy, Environment & Transport
What Roswall's Clean Industrial Deal means for environmental policy
26/02/2025
Politics
Why the German election is still not over
24/02/2025
Politics
EU top diplomat Kallas on 'Russian traps' and European red lines
19/02/2025
Politics
Europe's desperate bid to shape Ukraine's Trump deal in Munich
17/02/2025
Agrifood
Why Valentine's Day will taste more bitter this year
14/02/2025
Politics
What a supermarket boycott has to do with the Romanian election
13/02/2025
Defence
What the EU can expect from NATO talks
12/02/2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Belgium under growing scrutiny over stalled EU corruption probes
Frustration is mounting over Belgium's limited resources and judicial missteps in high-profile corruption cases with ties to MEPs and officials like Ursula von der Leyen, as EU institutions and law enforcement agencies urge the country to step up its efforts. Speaking in the Belgian parliament on Thursday, Interior Minister Bernard Quintin acknowledged the gravity of the situation, telling lawmakers that just 35 officers are assigned to Belgium's central office for combating organised economic and financial crime – with half their workload now driven by investigations led by the European Public Prosecutor's Office, or EPPO. The country's anti-corruption unit is only marginally better staffed, with only 64 investigators nationwide, he added. While Quintin insisted that 'the fight against corruption and fraud is an absolute priority,' EPPO chief Laura Kövesi delivered a far more urgent warning earlier this week. In an interview with De Standaard and Le Soir, she described Belgium as a critical node for organised financial crime, but its effort to tackle this was "a joke." 'This is no longer just a Belgian problem,' she said. 'Criminal groups use Belgium as a major platform for their operations. And as host to most EU institutions, Belgium carries a special responsibility.' EPPO is currently handling 79 investigations in the country, including probes on politically sensitive cases, such as von der Leyen's Pfizergate and alleged misuse of EU funds by key players in the European Parliament. Those under scrutiny include the chamber's most powerful group, the European People's Party, the defunct far-right group Identity and Democracy, and several individual MEPs. EXCLUSIVE: EU prosecutors open probe into far-right group linked to Le Pen Media reports allege €4.3 million in EU funds was misused by the far-right Identity and Democracy group from 2019-2024. The quality and discretion of Belgian investigations are also drawing sharp criticism. European Parliament President Roberta Metsola last month pledged to revise procedures with the Belgian police for lifting parliamentary immunity, following complaints that EU lawmakers' reputations are being tarnished by flimsy allegations made public before proper review. This criticism was echoed by MEPs this week as they debated whether to lift the immunities of their peers in a closed-door meeting of the Parliament's legal affairs committee. According to three people familiar with the discussions, both the conservative, socialist, and liberal groups urged the Belgian authorities to build up their cases and share more serious evidence before presenting it to their peers. All three EU groups have MEPs targeted by the so-called Huawei gate investigation. Belgium's chequered track record on high-profile cases only adds to the unease. The 2022 Qatargate scandal – alleging a cash-for-influence network tied to foreign powers like Morocco and Qatar – is lingering amid internal legal challenges that have delayed the investigation, which remains ongoing, with no potential outcome in sight. Behind the scenes, Belgian officials have long argued the country cannot shoulder the burden of transnational corruption investigations alone. Former Prime Minister Alexander De Croo supported expanding EPPO's authority in 2024, with backing from some EU countries. The idea is now getting traction at the Parliament, as key policy talks on the overhaul of the EU's anti-fraud architecture are on track. A highly critical OECD report last year highlighted systemic failings in Belgium's justice system. Since 2016, the country has secured only three convictions for transnational corruption, involving five individuals – and no company has ever been sanctioned. Many recent cases, the report added, resulted in acquittals due to procedural delays. The report also flagged severe capacity issues: Brussels' investigative judges handle an average of 150 cases each, and just three federal prosecutors are assigned to transnational corruption cases – a workload described as unsustainable by the magistrates. Asked about ongoing issues like understaffing in the police, a spokesperson to the Belgian interior minister said: "we're going to step up the recruitment and training of our police officers. This is a priority." Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the justice minister said that "significant efforts have been made in recent years to bring this specialized service 'up to strength'," but added that such investigators were hard to recruit and retain. They also said that they were in touch with EPPO. Nicoletta Ionta contributed to reporting. (mm) UPDATE: The article has been updated to include statements from the spokespeople of the interior and justice ministries.
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany resumes deportations to Taliban-run Afghanistan
BERLIN – Germany deported a group of convicted criminals to Afghanistan on Friday, for the first time since 2024. The deportation flight, which took off from Leipzig on Friday morning, marked only the second such operation since the Taliban seized power in 2021. Due to Berlin's lack of diplomatic ties with the radical Islamist militia, Friday's flight was coordinated with the help of Qatar. It carried 81 Afghan nationals convicted of serious crimes. Chancellor Friedrich Merz defended the move, saying that all the deported Afghans were rejected asylum-seekers without a right to remain in the country "We have included plans for such an approach in our coalition treaty, and it has now been completed for the first time today," he told journalists at a press conference on Friday. The negotiations over the deportations had taken four weeks, he added. The operation also followed previous calls by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt for direct talks with the Taliban regime to facilitate regular deportations to the country. Human rights groups and UN agencies had criticised the remarks, with UN agencies saying that conditions in Afghanistan remained unsafe, pointing to ongoing human rights abuses. However, Merz said on Friday that there would never be anything more than "technical coordination" between the German government and the Taliban regime. Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU) and Dobrindt's Christian Social Union (CSU) have pushed for stricter asylum rules and expanded deportations, including to Afghanistan and Syria, after the authoritarian President, Bashar al-Assad, was replaced by a rebel-led government in December. Public pressure had mounted after violent incidents involving rejected asylum seekers in the run-up to Germany's national elections in February. The momentum for deportations to Afghanistan and Syria is also building in other European countries: Austria recently became the first EU country to resume deportations to Syria. (mm)
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
France defends €2 trillion EU budget, as Germany and others raise doubts
The sheer amount of euros that the Commission is suggesting splashing has raised doubts at a ministerial meeting in Brussels. Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Eddy Wax and Jacob Wulff Wold Euractiv Jul 18, 2025 11:34 4 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. France's Europe Minister Benjamin Haddad defended the idea of a larger EU budget, after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz poured doubts on a proposal to spend nearly €2 trillion between 2028 and 2034. 'We need a strong EU that gives itself the means to act," Haddad said in Brussels today, where ministers are having their first talks about the European Commission's new proposal. Haddad argued that threats from Russia and uncertainty about American security guarantees to Europe are reasons to support an "ambitious" budget. France and Ireland have also expressed strong disapproval with the proposed cuts to the bloc's farm subsidy scheme, which is set to drop by around 20% and be partially merged with other payment envelopes. Haddad said Paris will fight for every centime of farm subsidies. Ireland's Europe Minister Thomas Byrne told a radio program this morning: 'It's not something that we agree with. What we want is a strong and separate common agricultural policy that protects not just direct payments to farmers but also protects rural development funding as well.' 'Fake news,' Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin said of the 25–30% cut to farm subsidies. 'Direct payments will remain at current levels,' he told ministers, adding that the €300 billion earmarked for such payments is a floor, not a ceiling. The governments of Germany, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Austria have been pouring scorn on the Commission's historic proposal to increase the budget from €1.2 trillion to almost €2 trillion during the next seven-year cycle. "This proposal is very, very far removed from our Austrian position, [and] approval. In the beginning, we called for careful and smart use of Europeans' taxpayers' money, and this draft is neither careful nor smart," said Austrian Europe Minister Claudia Plakolm, who described it as "extraordinarily high." "It's an enormous amount," said Finland's European Affairs Minister Joakim Strand, adding the EU should look more closely at how it spends its funds. In a statement before the meeting, Sweden's EU Minister Jessica Rosencrantz said: "The focus is right, but the size is wrong. We need a better budget, not bigger." The disagreement also spans the Commission's proposed income sources. While France labelled new EU income sources a " sine qua non condition" in its position paper, Germany's Merz has already ruled out a new EU corporate tax as illegal. Even before von der Leyen's proposal was out Sweden called a new tobacco tax "completely unacceptable." Luxembourg's Foreign Minister Xavier Bettel said: "I know the EU: everyone would like to pay less and receive more but at a certain point that no longer works, especially if we have commitments to each other to respect." Overall, Serafin appeared unshaken by the irreconcilable views of member states, praising what he called an 'extremely constructive, informative' debate with 'a lot of pragmatism.' Serafin defended the budget size, arguing that both competitiveness and defence are more effectively financed at EU level. A larger common budget could help member states meet NATO's 5% defence spending benchmark, he added. No Catalan consensus At the same meeting, Spain is also reviving its push to get Catalan, Basque, and Galician recognised as official languages of the EU, but ran into familiar headwinds over the legal and financial implications of such a move. Fernando Sampedro, Spain's state secretary for EU affairs, said that it would amount to discrimination were countries not to accept Madrid's demands, and reiterated that Spain was happy to cover all the costs. Luxembourg's Bettel said it was difficult to agree to such a move when the EU had only just signed off on new sanctions against Russia and still can't find a unified position on Israel's continued war in Gaza. 'Momentum is really not the right one if we're not able to agree on anything else," he said. Nick Alipour contributed to reporting. (mm) UPDATE: The article has been updated with Serafin's comments.
