Trump lawyer says no immediate deportations under birthright citizenship order, as judges to decide on challenges, World News
During separate hearings in lawsuits challenging Trump's order, US District Judges Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, and Joseph LaPlante in Concord, New Hampshire, set expedited schedules to decide whether the order can be blocked again on grounds that the US Supreme Court's ruling on Friday curbing the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide does not preclude injunctions in class action lawsuits.
Both judges asked US Department of Justice lawyer Brad Rosenberg, who represented the government in both cases, for assurances that the Trump administration would not move to deport children who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident at least until the executive order takes effect.
Rosenberg said it would not, which Boardman and LaPlante respectively asked him to confirm in writing by Tuesday and Wednesday.
In the Maryland case, immigrant rights advocates revised their lawsuit just a few hours after the 6-3 conservative majority US Supreme Court on Friday ruled in their case and two others challenging Trump's executive order. The New Hampshire lawsuit, a proposed class action, was filed on Friday.
The Supreme Court ruling did not address the merits or legality of Trump's birthright citizenship order, but instead curbed the ability of judges to issue "universal" injunctions to block the Republican president's policies nationwide.
But while the Supreme Court restricted the ability of judges to issue injunctions that cover anyone other than the parties appearing before them, Justice Amy Coney Barrett's opinion held out the possibility that opponents of a federal policy could still obtain the same type of relief if they instead pursued cases as class actions.
William Powell, a lawyer for immigration rights groups and pregnant non-citizen mothers pursuing the case, told Boardman at a hearing on Monday that an immediate ruling was necessary to address the fears and concerns migrants now face as a result of the Supreme Court's decision.
"They want to see how fast we can get class relief because they are afraid about their children and their babies and what their status might be," Powell said.
Trump's executive order, which he issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder.
In Friday's ruling, the high court narrowed the scope of the three injunctions issued by federal judges in three states, including Boardman, that prevented enforcement of his directive nationwide while litigation challenging the policy played out.
Those judges had blocked the policy after siding with Democratic-led states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violated the citizenship clause of the US Constitution's 14th Amendment, which has long been understood to recognise that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen.
Immigrant rights advocates in the hours after the Supreme Court ruled swiftly launched two separate bids in Maryland and New Hampshire to have judges grant class-wide relief on behalf of any children nationally who would be deemed ineligible for birthright citizenship under Trump's order.
The Supreme Court specified the core part of Trump's executive order cannot take effect until 30 days after Friday's ruling. Boardman on Monday pressed Rosenberg on what it could do before then.
"Just to get to the heart of it, I want to know if the government thinks that it can start removing children from the United States who are subject to the terms of the executive order," Boardman said at the end of the hearing.
Boardman scheduled further briefing in the case to continue through July 9, with a ruling to follow. LaPlante scheduled a hearing for July 10.
Rosenberg said the Trump administration objected to the plaintiffs' attempt to obtain the same relief through a class action. He stood by the administration's view of the constitutionality of Trump's order.
"It is the position of the United States government that birthright citizenship is not guaranteed by the Constitution," he said
[[nid:719410]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US judge blocks Trump from ending Temporary Protected Status for Haitians
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A woman holds a placard as Haitian immigrants and supporters rally to reject DHS Decision to terminate TPS for Haitians, at the Manhattan borough in New York, U.S., November 21, 2017. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo NEW YORK - A federal judge on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration's bid to end temporary deportation protections and work permits for approximately 521,000 Haitian immigrants before the program's scheduled expiration date. The Department of Homeland Security had in February rescinded Democratic President Joe Biden's extension through February 3, 2026 of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians. It called for the program to end on August 3, and last week pushed back that date to September 2. U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn, however, said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem did not follow instructions and a timeline mandated by Congress to reconsider the TPS designation for Haitians. "Secretary Noem does not have statutory or inherent authority to partially vacate a country's TPS designation," making her actions "unlawful," Cogan wrote. "Plaintiffs are likely to (and, indeed, do) succeed on the merits." Cogan also said Haitians' interests in being able to live and work in the United States "far outweigh" potential harm to the U.S. government, which remains free to enforce immigration laws and terminate TPS status as prescribed by Congress. Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Cogan was appointed to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan Singapore A second chance to excel: 3,800 private candidates taking O- and A-level exams in 2025 Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train Opinion US strikes on Iran: The impact ripples on, from Baghdad to Beijing Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Business Key features and risks of investment products to be on one page under MAS proposals The case had been filed on March 14 by nine Haitian TPS holders who said Noem did not do a required review of current conditions in Haiti before ending TPS early. Lawyers for the plaintiffs had no immediate comment. TRUMP CRACKDOWN Republican President Donald Trump has made a crackdown on legal and illegal immigration a central plank of his second White House term. Federal courts blocked Trump from ending most TPS enrollment during his first term. Noem shares Trump's hardline stance, and moved to end TPS for about 350,000 Venezuelans as well as thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon. On May 19, the U.S. Supreme Court let TPS end for the Venezuelans, signaling that other terminations could be allowed. Noem has authority to grant TPS for six to eight months to people from countries experiencing natural disasters, armed conflict or other extraordinary events. The nine Haitian plaintiffs also claimed the suspension of their TPS status was motivated in part by racial animus, violating their constitutional right to equal protection. Trump falsely said in a September 2024 debate with Democratic candidate Kamala Harris that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were eating pets, sparking fear of retaliation toward Haitians. More than 1 million people, over half of them children, are displaced within Haiti, where gang violence remains prevalent despite a United Nations-backed security mission that began last year. REUTERS
Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran made preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz, US sources say
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox WASHINGTON - The Iranian military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf last month, a move that intensified concerns in Washington that Tehran was gearing up to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israel's strikes on sites across Iran, according to two U.S. officials. The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by U.S. intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial missile attack against Iran on June 13, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. The loading of the mines - which have not been deployed in the strait - suggests that Tehran may have been serious about closing one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, a move that would have escalated an already-spiraling conflict and severely hobbled global commerce. About one-fifth of global oil and gas shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz and a blockage would likely have spiked world energy prices. Global benchmark oil prices have instead fallen more than 10% since the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, driven in part by relief that the conflict did not trigger significant disruptions in the oil trade. On June 22, shortly after the U.S. bombed three of Iran's key nuclear sites in a bid to cripple Tehran's nuclear program, Iran's parliament reportedly backed a measure to block the strait. That decision was not binding, and it was up to Iran's Supreme National Security Council to make a final decision on the closure, Iran's Press TV said at the time. Iran has over the years threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on that threat. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan Singapore A second chance to excel: 3,800 private candidates taking O- and A-level exams in 2025 Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train Opinion US strikes on Iran: The impact ripples on, from Baghdad to Beijing Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Business Key features and risks of investment products to be on one page under MAS proposals Reuters was not able to determine precisely when during the Israel-Iran air war Tehran loaded the mines, which - if deployed - would have effectively stopped ships from moving through the key thoroughfare. It is also unclear if the mines have since been unloaded. The sources did not disclose how the United States determined that the mines had been put on the Iranian vessels, but such intelligence is typically gathered through satellite imagery, clandestine human sources or a combination of both methods. Asked for comment about Iran's preparations, a White House official said: "Thanks to the President's brilliant execution of Operation Midnight Hammer, successful campaign against the Houthis, and maximum pressure campaign, the Strait of Hormuz remains open, freedom of navigation has been restored, and Iran has been significantly weakened." The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Iranian mission at the United Nations also did not respond to requests for comment. KEY THOROUGHFARE The two officials said the U.S. government has not ruled out the possibility that loading the mines was a ruse. The Iranians could have prepared the mines to convince Washington that Tehran was serious about closing the strait, but without intending to do so, the officials said. Iran's military could have also simply been making necessary preparations in the event that Iran's leaders gave the order. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. It is 21 miles (34 km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 2 miles wide in either direction. OPEC members Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. Qatar, among the world's biggest liquefied natural gas exporters, sends almost all of its LNG through the strait. Iran also exports most of its crude through the passage, which in theory limits Tehran's appetite to shut the strait. But Tehran has nonetheless dedicated significant resources to making sure it can do so if it deems necessary. As of 2019, Iran maintained more than 5,000 naval mines, which could be rapidly deployed with the help of small, high-speed boats, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency estimated at the time. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, is charged with protecting commerce in the region. The U.S. Navy has typically kept four mine countermeasure vessels, or MCM vessels, in Bahrain, though those ships are being replaced by another type of vessel called a littoral combat ship, or LCS, which also has anti-mine capabilities. All anti-mine ships had been temporarily removed from Bahrain in the days leading up to the U.S. strikes on Iran in anticipation of a potential retaliatory attack on Fifth Fleet headquarters. Ultimately, Iran's immediate retaliation was limited to a missile attack on a U.S. military base in nearby Qatar. U.S. officials, however, have not ruled out further retaliatory measures by Iran. REUTERS
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Trump said he believed India was ready to lower barriers for US companies. WASHINGTON - The United States could reach a trade deal with India that would help American companies compete in the South Asian country and leave it facing far lower tariffs, President Donald Trump said on July 1, while casting doubt on a possible deal with Japan. Mr Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he believed India was ready to lower barriers for US companies, which could pave the way for an agreement staving off the 26 per cent rate he announced on April 2, before pausing it until July 9. 'Right now, India doesn't accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, if they do that, we're going to have a deal for less, much less tariffs,' he said. Earlier, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News that the US and India are nearing a deal that would lower tariffs on American imports to the South Asian country and help India avoid levies from rising sharply next week. 'We are very close with India,' Mr Bessent told Fox News in response to a question about progress on trade negotiations. Indian officials extended a visit to Washington last week through June 30 to try to reach agreement on a trade deal with the Trump administration and address lingering concerns on both sides, Indian government sources told Reuters. A White House official familiar with the talks said the Trump administration plans to prioritise securing trade deals with countries including India ahead of Japan in the days leading up to the July 9 deadline. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Seniors can claim $800 SG60 vouchers from July 1; adults to get $600 in vouchers from July 22 Singapore NSman, 30, dies in hospital after collapsing outside Maju Camp Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Singapore Trial opens for 3 women who allegedly organised procession outside Istana Business Do not overcommit to a single solution in a multi-polar world, says ex-foreign minister George Yeo Singapore 1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore India is one of more than a dozen countries actively negotiating with the Trump administration to try to avoid a steep spike in tariff rates on July 9, when a 90-day tariff pause ends. India could see its new 'reciprocal' tariff rate rise to 27 per cent from the current 10 per cent. The US-India talks have hit roadblocks over disagreements on import duties for auto components, steel, and farm goods, ahead of Mr Trump's deadline to impose reciprocal tariffs. 'We are in the middle – hopefully more than the middle – of a very intricate trade negotiation,' Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told an event in New York on June 30. 'Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion. I cannot guarantee it, because there's another party to that discussion,' said Mr Jaishankar, who is in the US for a meeting of the China-focused Quad grouping. He added that there 'will have to be give and take' and the two sides will have to find middle ground. Trump suggests higher tariff for Japan Mr Bessent told Fox News that different countries have different agendas for trade deals, including Japan, which Mr Trump complained about on June 30 and again on July 1. Mr Trump said he was not thinking of extending the July 9 deadline and would simply send letters notifying countries of the tariff rate they would face. 'We've dealt with Japan. I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it,' Mr Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to Washington from a trip to Florida. Mr Trump suggested he could impose a tariff of 30 per cent or 35 per cent on imports from Japan - well above the 24 per cent tariff rate he announced on April 2 and then paused until July 9. He said Japan was refusing to accept US-grown rice, a demand made by Washington that he described as 'an easy one', while selling millions of cars in the United States. 'So what I'm going to do, is I'll write them a letter saying we thank you very much, and we know you can't do the kind of things that we need, and therefore you pay a 30 per cent, 35 per cent or whatever the numbers that we determine,' he said. So far, only Britain has negotiated a limited trade deal with the Trump administration, accepting a 10 per cent US tariff on many goods, including autos, in exchange for special access for aircraft engines and British beef. REUTERS
