Megabill reading wraps up after nearly 16 hours
By refusing to waive chamber rules allowing for reading, Senate Democrats hoped to create an opportunity to highlight some of the most unpopular issues in the legislation. Now, under Senate rules, there will be 20 hours of the debate evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans.
Democrats are expected to use their full 10 hours, while Republicans are expected to take only a couple hours. That would mean the vote-a-rama — a marathon series of amendment votes — will begin sometime early Monday morning, though senators could agree by unanimous consent to delay it.
The GOP megabill is by no means finalized. Party leaders continue to negotiate to tweak the bill in ways that will win 51 votes in the Senate while also garnering enough votes to pass in the House later this week without further modifications. Republicans also continue to deal with the chamber's parliamentarian, who continues to review whether parts of the bill comply with the budget rules the GOP is using to pass the bill along party lines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billions in grants for summer school, English instruction delayed during Trump administration review
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for afterschool and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable afterschool care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English. Programs that rely on the funding were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. A national organization for afterschool programs called the department's action a 'stunning betrayal.' 'Withholding these funds will cause lasting harm to students and families, and to our education system, our future workforce, and our economy,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance. The six grant programs under review includes one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for afterschool and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. California's education agency said it was notified Monday that it wouldn't be receiving money from those programs. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year," Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, said in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology.' The administration had signaled its desire to cut much of the money in an April letter to Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. In that letter, Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said cutting money for teaching kids to speak English would help "end overreach from Washington and restore the rightful role of State oversight in education.' 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Collin Binkley And Bianca Vázquez Toness, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Calls Lara Trump His 'First Choice' for NC Senate Seat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump said his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, would be his "first choice" to replace North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis as U.S. Senator. Asked who he'd like to see replace Tillis, the president said in part, "Somebody that would really be great is Lara [Trump], she grew up there. But they live in Florida, and they have a very good life, and they're great people." He continued, "That would always be my first choice, but she doesn't live there now, but she's there all the time, and she really knows North Carolina well. And I won it three times." The wife of Eric Trump and host of Fox News' My View with Lara Trump, joined Fox Across America with guest host Emily Compagno on Monday and teased that she is "considering" a run for U.S. Senate. Trump on Tillis's replacement: "Somebody that would really be great is Lara. She grew up there. But they live in Florida. They have a very good life." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 1, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Defeat of a 10-year ban on state AI laws is a blow to tech industry
'The Senate came together tonight to say that we can't just run over good state consumer protection laws,' Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said in a statement. 'States can fight robocalls, deepfakes and provide safe autonomous vehicle laws.' Advertisement There are no federal laws regulating AI but states have enacted dozens of laws that strengthen consumer privacy, ban AI-generated child sexual abuse material and outlaw deepfake videos of political candidates. All but a handful of states have some laws regulating artificial intelligence in place. It is an area of deep interest: All 50 have introduced bills in the past year tied to the issue. The Senate's provision, introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, sparked intense criticism by state attorneys general, child safety groups and consumer advocates who warned the amendment would give AI companies a clear runway to develop unproven and potentially dangerous technologies. The proposed ban on state AI laws stemmed from a proposal championed by Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. On May 22, the House's approved version of the bill included the 'Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative,' a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws. Advertisement Silicon Valley venture capital powerhouse Andreessen Horowitz and AI startups OpenAI and Anduril, a defense tech company, lobbied fiercely in favor of the amendment. They said it was too difficult for startups to comply with dozens of different state AI laws. The Trump administration also threw its support behind the proposal. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the moratorium a critical policy to advance American leadership in AI. 'If we're serious about winning the AI race, we must prioritize investment and innovation,' Lutnick posted on social media Monday. On Sunday, it appeared more likely the AI amendment might go through after Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., reached a compromise with Cruz on a shorter moratorium of five years. But the compromise included language that many legal experts said could neuter existing state laws. Blackburn withdrew her amendment written with Cruz late Monday and introduced a motion to strike his original amendment. 'The Senate did the right thing today for kids, for families and for our future by voting to strip out the dangerous 10-year ban on state AI laws, which had no business being in a budget bill in the first place,' Jim Steyer, CEO of the child safety group, Common Sense Media, said in a statement. This article originally appeared in .
