UN Mandela Prize 2025: Makhzen's Nomination, A Moral and Political Farce
They called for the nomination to be withdrawn to preserve the credibility of the UN international institution.
In an article titled 'Morocco's Nomination for the Mandela Prize… When the Executioner Demands the Victim's Medal,' Moroccan blogger and human rights activist Mohamed Kandil said, 'Morocco's nomination for this prize is yet another farce added to the archive of official impudence of the Makhzen regime.'
He added, 'When Morocco nominates itself for the Nelson Mandela Prize, it's as if the Makhzen is asking the world to believe that mass graves, secret prisons, and torture chambers are merely transient human rights violations.'
He emphasised in this context that 'the National Council for Human Rights in Morocco, whose president, Amina Bouayach, was nominated for this prize, has become nothing more than a human rights polishing arm for the repressive apparatus. How can it now be presented to the world as the face of human rights in Morocco after all that it has done to the Rif movement, journalists, and political prisoners?' He emphasized that 'the Makhzen regime does not represent the people or the victims, but rather is merely a security institution adept at public relations at international forums.'
He explained in this context that 'Amina Bouayach is neither an activist nor an independent woman, but rather a mere intelligence agent, recruited within the official propaganda network, called upon when necessary to endorse the crimes of the Makhzen state, distort the reports of international organizations, and cover up the various forms of torture in the country.'
He asked sarcastically, 'Who's the Mandela that Morocco wants to emulate? Is he Mandela, who spent 27 years in prison for defending dignity and freedom? Or the Mandela of the Makhzen, who imprisons activists on 27 fabricated charges in a 27-minute sham trial?'
The Moroccan human rights activist believes that Morocco's nomination for this prize is a 'moral and political scandal,' adding, 'Awarding Morocco this prize is an official whitewash of a dark record and a slap in the face of every prisoner of conscience, every mother who lost her son under torture, and every Moroccan who was displaced or persecuted for daring to say no to injustice, tyranny, and corruption.'
For his part, Moroccan writer and journalist Ali Lahrouchi wrote in an article that 'Morocco's nomination for this prize is an insult to United Nations institutions, as the Nelson Mandela Prize is a global recognition of human commitment to principles, values, and ethics, the prioritization of the public interest over personal interest, transcending vengeful thinking, and remaining patient and steadfast in adhering to principles…'
Ali Lahrouchi asserted that Morocco 'is still living in the Middle Ages,' asking, 'What has changed in Morocco for Amina Bouayach to be nominated for the prize of Nelson Mandela, the courageous fighter?'
In this regard, he emphasized that 'everyone who criticized, opposed, or commented on the backward practices in Morocco was subjected to assassination, kidnapping, torture, arrest, marginalization, and retaliation through the use and subjugation of all relevant institutions, starting with the intelligence, security, gendarmerie, judiciary, and prisons, to silence all voices opposing or criticizing the dictatorial policies pursued in Morocco.'
Hence, he confirmed, 'Morocco's history is replete with all forms of human rights violations and abuses, and its mere nominating it for this prize is an insult to the freedom fighter Nelson Mandela.' He warns that Morocco's victory 'will be the last nail in the coffin of the United Nations and its institutions, which will never receive any respect.'
In turn, human rights activist and former prisoner Saida el-Alami wondered, 'Morocco is submitting its nomination for the Nelson Mandela Human Rights Prize? What rights exactly, when Moroccan citizens enjoy no political, civil, or economic rights?'
In her remarks, el-Alami addressed the suffering of the Moroccan people due to the Makhzen's policies in various sectors and their lack of the most basic rights that guarantee a decent life. She highlighted the worsening deterioration of human rights in the Kingdom, in light of the judiciary's use of retaliation against opponents, fabricating charges against human rights activists, and violating the rights of detainees in police stations and prison cells.
The Moroccan human rights activist concluded her remarks by saying, 'I don't understand the basis on which Morocco was nominated for this prize. If Nelson Mandela were alive, he would have cancelled this award as long as the enemies of humanity continue to nominate it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
15 hours ago
- El Chorouk
'Harraga'… The Moroccan Makhzen's Weapon for Blackmail in the Sahrawi Issue
The Moroccan Makhzen regime continues to use irregular migration as a weapon for political blackmail, directing thousands of migrants towards Spain whenever it wants to exert pressure to extract concessions, especially in the issue of Western Sahara, in complete disregard for international laws and a clear disdain for international norms and conventions. In this context, Sahrawi writer and political analyst, Taleb Ali Salem, said in an interview with the Spanish newspaper 'La Gaceta' that Morocco does not deal with migration as a social phenomenon that requires treatment, but rather employs it as a hybrid weapon in its political battles, replacing the logic of regional cooperation with a policy of threat and intimidation. He added that 'the Moroccan regime uses the migration card to create crises when it fails to extract concessions through official channels,' pointing out that these practices confirm that this regime 'does not hesitate to traffic in human beings as bargaining tools' and that what is happening 'is not a momentary event, but part of an integrated strategy adopted by the Makhzen for decades, based on transforming human suffering into a diplomatic pressure card.' For his part, Sahrawi human rights activist, Baba Ali Hasana, said in an article that the Moroccan regime exploits migrants, especially minors, as tools for political blackmail without any regard for their humanitarian situation or basic rights, adding that what happened in May 2021 constitutes a 'stark example' of this exploitation, where Morocco pushed more than 9,000 migrants, including about 1,500 minors, to cross the border into the city of Ceuta within 24 hours, in a move that 'was not spontaneous, but politically calculated.' He explained that the Moroccan authorities did not only open the borders, but later refused to take back the children, despite the efforts made by Spanish child welfare institutions, which placed the host country under a great legal and humanitarian burden, pointing out that the minors were held in temporary centers, some in unsuitable conditions, due to the sudden number and the pressure of the crisis, while Morocco remained silent, refusing to bear its responsibilities. Baba Ali Hasana stressed that this incident is not an exception, but rather falls within a systematic policy in which Rabat uses migrants as a pressure card, whenever it wants to create a crisis or convey political messages, adding: 'The Moroccan regime does not deal with migration as a humanitarian or social challenge, but as a tool within the negotiation and blackmail agenda, indifferent to the consequences of that on the lives of thousands of people.' In this context, Spanish researcher, Javier Ruiz, commented that Morocco manages a 'black market for migration,' pointing out that the Moroccan regime does not hesitate to create crises and employ vulnerable groups as pressure tools, disregarding international laws and international conventions, in a systematic behavior that reflects the nature of a power that sees human beings as a means to achieve its political interests, even if the price is trafficking in human dignity and the security of the entire region. According to testimonies from migrants and organizations such as 'Border Forensics,' 'Iridia,' and the 'Moroccan Association for Human Rights,' the Melilla massacre on June 24, 2022, was not a spontaneous result, but a planned operation in which the Moroccan Makhzen participated with prior coordination.
El Chorouk
3 days ago
- El Chorouk
French Hold Macron Responsible for Losing in Algeria
President Abdelmadjid Tebboune's visit to Italy last weekend received particular attention from political and media circles in France, given its proximity to an unprecedented political and diplomatic crisis between Algeria and Paris. Leading specialists and political analysts considered it a resounding failure of French diplomacy. The French discussed President Tebboune's visit to Rome from the perspective of Rome being Paris's main competitor in the struggle for influence in the former French colony. They focused on the economic and geopolitical gains the Italians have achieved from their rapprochement with Algeria, as well as the losses incurred by France due to the mismanagement of the crisis with it, which began, as is well known, last summer following France's biased position toward the Moroccan regime on the Western Sahara issue. The launch was based on the outcomes of President Tebboune's visit to Rome, the second of its kind in about three years. This visit, as is well known, culminated in the signing of numerous partnership agreements in various sectors, including industry, energy, agriculture, energy transition, and security. The distinguished reception President Tebboune received from officials in the capital of Roman civilisation was, in itself was a powerful message to the French side. Images and videos of President Tebboune walking alongside Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni were broadcast on the far-right CNews channel on Thursday, July 24, 2025. A journalist commented with regret on these scenes and protocols, saying, 'It's extremely humiliating to be French. It's unbearable,' according to Louis de Raguenel. The same political analyst added, 'It's a state visit, with all the usual protocols, not a secret visit.' He continued, 'If Giorgia Meloni is doing this, she's doing so because she feels empowered by the Italian people. She's not afraid of us at all.' He pointed out that Meloni is defending her country's supreme interests, as demonstrated by the outcomes of this visit, which generate economic benefits for the Italians at a time when the French should be defending their strategic interests, rather than continuing to display moral fanaticism and defend interests that do not belong to France. This was a reference to Macron's decision to side with the Moroccan regime in the Western Sahara issue. The visit also had a significant impact on the French, as it came just days after the European Union announced its intention to resort to arbitration in the case of the partnership agreement between Algeria and Brussels. This measure was intended to demonstrate European solidarity against Algeria, even though France was behind this sudden move, which came at a time when the two parties had begun negotiations to resolve differences and review the agreement under its provisions. The shock was also present for Bernard Cohen-Hadad, head of the Marcel Etienne think tank, who, on the same channel, discussed the excellent level of relations between Algeria and Rome, as well as the return of warmth to ties with Spain, which, he said, runs counter to French interests. He held the French side responsible for what was happening, due to the decision taken by Macron last summer regarding the Western Sahara issue. The spokesman described what happened to France after President Tebboune visited Rome as a 'slap in the face' delivered by Giorgia Meloni. Bernard Cohen-Haddad said, 'It doesn't make you happy to be French when you see this slap. It's a slap in the face for French diplomacy.' The French fear that Italy will become a pivotal player in relations between Algeria and the European Union, due to its diplomatic acumen in not siding with the Moroccan regime in the Western Sahara issue. This issue has cost some European countries, such as France and Spain, many of their interests and privileges in a country the size of Algeria, due to inaccurate calculations, as Bernard Cohen-Hadad has stated.
Khabar Agency
4 days ago
- Khabar Agency
Mysterious Flights at Sana'a Airport… Has Arms Smuggling Begun by Air Under UN Sponsorship ?
Unusual air traffic at Sana'a International Airport on Wednesday sparked a wave of questions and controversy after activists and observers reported the arrival and departure of six foreign aircraft within daylight hours. The Houthi militia government remained tight-lipped, with no transparency regarding the nature of these flights or their cargo. According to activist Abdulqader Al-Kharraz, field monitoring revealed that the flights included four planes designated for transporting humanitarian organization staff, as well as a medical evacuation aircraft. Notably, the list also featured two Boeing 727 cargo planes, estimated to have carried around 40.2 tons of shipments daily—equivalent to over 1,200 tons monthly of uninspected materials. Interestingly, these flights were not listed in the UN Humanitarian Air Service (UNHAS) schedule, which recorded only one flight that day. This has heightened concerns about a parallel air channel operating outside international oversight. These developments have led activists on social media to raise serious questions: Is arms smuggling to the Houthis now being conducted by air under UN cover, with Iranian-Omani-Qatari sponsorship? This comes after the Yemeni Coast Guard, affiliated with the Joint Forces on the West Coast, tightened maritime surveillance and intercepted the largest arms shipment destined for the militia in recent weeks—forcing the group to seek alternative routes. The unusual air activity coincided with a formal protest from Houthi Foreign Minister Jamal Amer, who demanded that the UN halt the international inspection mechanism in Djibouti, following increased crackdowns on maritime smuggling operations. Observers warn that these flights could open the door to smuggling weapons and military experts under the guise of "humanitarian missions," which would enhance the militia's combat capabilities, escalate the conflict, and undermine the credibility of humanitarian work in Yemen. Critics have also slammed the internationally recognized Yemeni government for its silence on these suspicious movements, calling it a grave failure in its oversight and diplomatic role within international forums. This inaction, they argue, has allowed the militia to freely bolster its military capabilities under a humanitarian pretext.
