
MoD admits British Army weapons systems are causing brain damage in soldiers
Words by ITV News Assistant Producer Robbie Boyd
Thousands of serving troops may be suffering from brain damage after being exposed to harmful blast waves from the British Army's weaponry, an ITV News investigation has revealed.
In a landmark admission, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed that weapons systems used by the army are causing brain damage in soldiers.
Speaking to ITV News Science Correspondent Martin Stew, the MoD's lead on Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), acknowledged that repeated exposure to blasts generated by some army weapons can injure the brain and lead to life‑long health conditions.
Lt Col James Mitchell said during earlier campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, the perception was that large munitions and impact blasts were the primary cause of TBI and concussion among British soldiers.
However, that is no longer the case, with TBI and concussion being blamed on the impact on soldiers from their own weapons systems.
'Over especially the last five to ten years, we're starting to appreciate the role of what we call low level blasts,' he explained.
He said these low level blasts were predominantly being caused by 'the exposure of our service personnel to blast over-pressure from their own weapons systems'.
Lt Col Mitchell added that while exact figures are not known, 'thousands' of serving personnel have been exposed to harmful blasts, with figures potentially even higher for veterans affected.
Lt Col James Mitchell, the MoD's lead on Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), acknowledged thousands of troops may be suffering from brain damage after being exposed to harmful blasts
Most at risk are those who have been repeatedly exposed to heavy weapons, including mortars, some shoulder-launched anti-tank weapons, 50-calibre rifles and machine guns, or explosive charges.
Explosions create a wave of 'overpressure', a spike in the surrounding air pressure above normal atmospheric levels caused by a blast wave.
It can create a force so strong that it penetrates the skull, and the energy transferred to the brain causes microscopic damage to blood vessels and neurons.
Repeated exposure can overwhelm the brain's ability to heal itself, causing serious long-term neurological damage.
Symptoms of blast-related TBI overlap with those of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), making it difficult to diagnose.
They may include: severe headaches, visual disturbances, sensitivity to noise and light, memory loss and a sense of personality change. / Credit: ITV News
Now, scientists around the UK are hoping to explore the potential causes of TBI, with financial support from the MoD.
The University of Birmingham is playing a key role in the mild TBI study in partnership with the MoD, which aims to estimate what kind of brain damage veterans have.
Professor Lisa Hill is a neuroscientist at the University of Birmingham.
She explained that when the brain is damaged, it releases biomarkers, biological clues that can help scientists understand what and where the damage is happening.
'If somebody gets injured, it changes the structure and function of the brain, but it also releases chemicals that you wouldn't normally see,' she said.
'So if we can measure things in blood or in their saliva, that can tell us how potentially bad their injury has been and what symptoms they might go on to get.'
But policy changes might need to be made in order to reduce or prevent injuries in the first place.
Professor Karen Mullinger, an expert in neuro-imaging at Nottingham University, is working to identify patterns of damage with sophisticated brain scanning technology called OPM MEG.
Hugh Keir, a sniper with the Parachute Regiment who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, now runs the H-Hour podcast which is popular with veterans in the UK and abroad. Hugh Keir / Credit: H-Hour podcast/Hugh Keir
He volunteered to undergo a trial scan to see if his years of exposure to blast have left a mark.
The results showed normal brain activity overall, but there were some signs that may indicate damage.
To be certain, Prof Mullinger and her team need to scan many more veterans and controls to build up a database of what 'normal' looks like.
In time, it is hoped there will be enough data to allow for definitive diagnoses.
Professor Mullinger also plans to study soldiers in real time, to see which activities are highest risk.
'We can scan these soldiers before they go and do a training exercise and then immediately after, then we get a baseline which is specific to them,' she said.
'If the 'wire paths' have been damaged by blasts or whatever else it might be, then the function is going to change.'
The information collected from these trials could shape policy, such as modifying the most damaging weapons or reducing blast exposure in training exercises.
If you've been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, help is available The charity Samaritans operates a 24/7 helpline (116 123) for anyone who needs somebody to talk to. Further resources can also be found on its website.
Concussion Legacy Foundation supports British current and former serving members and their families
The Concussion Legacy Foundation also provides a personalised helpline for those struggling with the outcomes of brain injury.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
MoD admits Britain's troops could have brain damage caused by their own weapons
Senior British officers and scientists admit British troops may suffer 'brain damage' caused by low impact blasts from their own weapons while fighting on the frontline Thousands of UK troops could have brain damage caused by their own weapons, defence chiefs have confirmed. Blast waves repeatedly caused by explosions from weapons could have led to life-long health issues, it has been revealed. The Ministry of Defence's lead officer on Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Lt Col James Mitchell admitted exposure to weapons blasts could cause the injuries. He told ITV News that in Iraq and Afghanistan, TBI and concussion was caused by larger explosions and blasts. But in fact low level blasts may cause health problems. Lt Col Mitchell told ITV News: "Over especially the last five to ten years, we're starting to appreciate the role of what we call low level blasts.' He said low level blasts were predominantly being caused by "the exposure of our service personnel to blast over-pressure from their own weapons systems." Lt Col Mitchell said 'thousands' of personnel may have been exposed to harmful blasts. Most at risk are troops exposed to heavy weapons like mortars, shoulder-launched anti-tank weapons, 50-calibre rifles and machine guns, or explosive charges. Explosions create a wave of 'overpressure', a spike in the surrounding air pressure above normal atmospheric levels caused by a blast wave. The force is so strong it enters the skull and can cause microscopic damage to blood vessels and neurons. Repeated exposure means the brain may not heal itself, causing serious long-term neurological damage. Symptoms of blast-related TBI overlap with those of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), making it difficult to diagnose. They are severe headaches, sight problems, sensitivity to noise and light, memory loss and a sense of personality change. Scientists are probing the causes of TBI, with financial support from the MoD. The University of Birmingham is playing a key role in the mild TBI study in partnership with the MoD, which aims to estimate what kind of brain damage veterans have. Professor Lisa Hill, a neuroscientist at Birmingham University said: 'If somebody gets injured, it changes the structure and function of the brain, but it also releases chemicals that you wouldn't normally see,' she said. 'So if we can measure things in blood or in their saliva, that can tell us how potentially bad their injury has been and what symptoms they might go on to get.' Hugh Keir, a Para Regiment sniper who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, now runs the H-Hour podcast which is popular with veterans in the UK and abroad. He volunteered to undergo a trial scan to see if his years of exposure to blast have left a mark. The results showed normal brain activity overall, but there were some signs that may indicate damage. Professor Mullinger also plans to study soldiers in real time, to see which activities are highest risk. 'We can scan these soldiers before they go and do a training exercise and then immediately after, then we get a baseline which is specific to them,' she said. 'If the 'wire paths' have been damaged by blasts or whatever else it might be, then the function is going to change.' The information collected from these trials could shape policy, such as modifying the most damaging weapons or reducing blast exposure in training exercises. British troops throughout the Afghan and Iraq wars were repeatedly exposed to firefights, explosions from bombs and mortars, especially being fired by their own side. Thousands have suffered hearing loss from the blasts but the new research suggests lower-grade blasts may have caused long-term issues. Sources said the research into the issue is ongoing and may result in protective gear used by soldiers may be investigated and further improved in a bid to protect against the blast waves. An estimated 300,000 armed forces personnel suffering with hearing loss caused by the relentless noise of military life. Hearing loss and tinnitus is much more common in the military population than the general public. In fact, by the age of 75, service personnel are 3.5 times more likely to experience hearing difficulties than the general public. The UK Armed Forces has a number of compensation schemes for serving and former serving personnel who have been injured as a result of their service in the armed forces. If the injury was caused prior to April 6 2005 and the person is no longer serving this would be the War Pension Scheme (WPS). The Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) was established for soldiers injured after 2005 who are still in active service. However the criteria to claim for both schemes is arduous and in-depth.

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Humza Yousaf's family-in-law 'starving in Gaza'
The former first minister shared a video on social media on Tuesday, where the pair said the stories they were hearing from El-Nakla's side of the family in Gaza were "sickening" and "gut-wrenching". They added that while governments "might stay silent" and refuse to act, "we won't". READ MORE: British Jewish body calls for broadcaster James O'Brien to be 'taken off air' It comes as more than 100 aid organisations warned of 'mass starvation' in Gaza with more than two million people facing shortages of food and other essentials after 21 months of brutal bombardment by Israel. The UN said on Tuesday that Israeli forces had killed more than 1000 Palestinians trying to get food aid since the US-and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operations in late May – in effect side-lining the existing UN-led system. In the video, El-Nakla says: "My cousin Sally, her husband and four children are starving. My aunt Hanan, her children and grandchildren, including a seven-month-old baby, are being starved." Nadia's cousin Sally, and her four children are being starved by Israel. Millions in Gaza are being deliberately starved while Israel withholds food mere kilometres away. Words are not enough. Governments must act and force Israel to open the borders and allow aid to flow in. — Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) July 23, 2025 Yousaf adds: "Sally is one of millions in Gaza. Her husband goes out all day searching for food, often to come home with nothing – and when I say home, I mean a tent in almost 40 degree heat." El-Nakla then says: "Yesterday my family's town, Deir Al Balah, was hit hard and starving people were being forced to run while being shot and bombed." "In Gaza, doctors are becoming too weak to treat patients, journalists too weak to report the silent killer of forced starvation," Yousaf adds. El-Nakla goes on: "This is a deliberate starvation of the Palestinian people. Food and water are mere kilometres away. READ MORE: Labour panned for foreign aid cuts as women and children to be hit hardest "This form of warfare is sickening and the stories and images from my family and millions of others in Gaza are absolutely gut-wrenching. "Can you imagine not being able to feed your children, yet knowing the food you so desperately need is only a few miles away?" Yousaf continues: "Fathers like me, parents like us, children like ours, being starved, displaced, bombed, all while the world watches. "Governments might stay silent. They may refuse to act, but we won't." El-Nakla concludes: "Sally's life matters. Palestinian lives matter. And I am begging those who have the power to open the borders to do so now and let the people of Gaza live." Pressure is continuing to ramp up on the UK Government to take action over Israel's starvation of [[Gaza]] – including from voices which have, until now, remained largely silent. The National reported earlier on Wednesday on a harrowing front page by the right-wing Daily Express, which featured an image of a starving one-year old child in Gaza accompanied by the headline 'for pity's sake stop this now'. A sub-heading detailed how the child Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq was 'clinging on to life' and how his suffering 'shames us all'.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
One politician could benefit most from the doctor's strike: Wes Streeting
Is it possible that the junior doctors have bitten off more than they can chew? That, in abandoning the care of their patients for five days, they risk losing the support and sympathy of the very people whose support they need? That is the dilemma that resident (formerly known as 'junior') doctors face this week after talks between their trade union, the British Medical Association (BMA), and the Government broke down without agreement. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, gives the impression of someone who has had three Weetabix for breakfast, describing the doctors' insistence that strike action would go ahead from Friday as showing 'a complete disdain for patients and the wider recovery of the NHS'. This is strong stuff, particularly from a Labour health secretary. In fact it's measurably more robust than the language that any Conservative health secretary could probably use, given Britain's political culture when it comes to the NHS. Tory ministers still seem to labour under the belief that they must continue to apologise for their party's decision to oppose the creation of the NHS nearly 80 years ago, just as Labour MPs who were born after the fall of the Berlin Wall seem keen to take personal credit for Nye Bevan's accomplishments. Streeting has proved time and again that, regrettably uniquely among his ministerial colleagues, he is prepared to speak the truth even when – God forbid! – it offends someone. Angela Rayner may currently be in pole position to replace Keir Starmer should he decide he's not up to the job, and has reached that position by telling her fans exactly what they want to hear – more social housing, higher taxes, etc. Streeting however seems to understand that the true point of leadership is to say what your audience does not want to hear but needs to. He proved that when he supported the use of independent (private) contractors to shorten NHS waiting lists and in his pragmatic and rational response to the Cass review. Now he's marching boldly into an arena where no Labour health secretary has had to tread since 1979 – the last time a health care union dropped tools in support of higher wages under a Labour government. But he's taking a big risk. How can he be sure that the public will back him rather than the phalanx of angry, articulate medics in white coats standing in picket lines outside hospitals next weekend? The point about Streeting is that he can't be sure, but he will do what he thinks is right anyway. The contrast with other ministers is refreshing and stark. Undoubtedly he is being lobbied daily by Labour backbenchers pleading with him to give way and offer residents yet another inflation-busting pay award to add to the one they got last year. 'Just say yes', after all, has been the central principle this Government has applied to virtually every pay demand since reaching office. And were the topic ever to be debated in the Commons, the whips would fear another populist revolt by rebellious MPs who mistakenly believe that they can escape the voters's judgment on their government by voting against it. Who will the public blame when the inevitable deaths start to occur? When a doctor isn't there to care for a critically ill patient, and instead abandons their post in support of a pay demand – 29 per cent – the likes of which is not only unattainable to them but every other worker in the UK? The BMA was previously a respected organisation with almost as much public prestige as the General Medical Council, the doctors's regulatory body. Now, thanks to its leadership's deliberate shift Leftwards, it is seen as just another trade union which, thanks in part to its new Left-wing chairman, Tom Dolphin, has taken issue with Dr Cass's four-year-long review into the medical care of young transgender people, questioning both her methodology and conclusions. And while the general public can usually be relied upon to support the 'heroes' of the NHS, claims for a 29 per cent pay increase cannot be taken seriously when most of the population is struggling on stagnant wages. Streeting faces two challenges. The first is that Keir Starmer will pull the rug from under his feet and order him to settle with the doctors. This would be humiliating for Streeting and add to the impression of an administration without direction or leadership. Therefore it can't be ruled out. The second is that the public blame him and not the doctors for the inevitable deaths and distress their industrial action will cause. This would be grotesquely unfair but can't be ruled out. If the Health Secretary can navigate both these hurdles and see the doctors return to work, he could yet prove that he has the mettle of modern political leadership.