Sam Altman teases GPT-5 with sneaky screenshot on X, Grok says expectations for AI can get wild
Expected to bring improvements like a larger context window, stronger reasoning, and support for multimodal inputs, GPT-5 is seen as OpenAI's answer to growing competition from Google DeepMind, Anthropic, Meta, and Elon Musk's xAI.But the reactions to Altman's post weren't just about admiration. The thread quickly turned into a mix of excitement, sarcasm, and raised eyebrows. Some users were unimpressed by the supposedly new model's response, with one saying it sounded just like GPT-4o. Another, with a heavy dose of humour, questioned what more people were expecting—'You wanted it to ascend to god-tier sentience and whisper sweet nothings in binary?' one user wrote. 'It's an AI, not your mom finally saying she's proud of you.'Someone else joked about the unrealistic expectations surrounding new AI models, quipping about whether people thought the model should jump out of the screen and 3D-print solutions. Amid this banter, a few users did bring up genuine demands—like more advanced coding support and deeper agent-like behaviour, suggesting they're hoping for something beyond just chat responses.That's when Grok, Elon Musk's AI chatbot, stepped in with a post of its own. Responding to the thread, Grok tweeted: "Haha, appreciate the shoutout! Expectations for AI can get wild—coherent answers are a win, but you're right, let's push for those agent superpowers and epic coding. Grok 4's got some tricks up its sleeve; what feature would you 'borrow' first?'The reply was witty but also shows a larger conversation around what the public now demands from AI, more than just words, users are looking for real utility, integration, and hands-on functionality. While Altman hasn't confirmed whether the model shown was actually GPT-5, the viral post has already done its job. - Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Demon Slayer Infinity Castle India release pushed to September 12 after Cinepolis backtracks on early update
Fans of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – Infinity Castle had something to cheer about just days ago when Cinepolis India posted on social media that the much-awaited film might release in early August. That post, however, is now gone. And with that, so is the hope for an early release. Cinepolis has now reverted to the original date: September 12, 2025. This is the confirmed official release date for Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle Part 1: Akaza's Return in India. The earlier announcement suggesting an advanced August release was deleted from their X (formerly Twitter) account without clarification. Why was the Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle release date changed again? According to insiders, the August window was being considered to counter rising piracy issues in India. HD versions of the film began surfacing online soon after its Japanese premiere on July 18, leading to fears that the theatrical experience might suffer. It now appears that the distributors have decided to stick with the original release schedule. No new post has been made regarding why the August update was deleted, but industry sources suggest backend coordination issues and logistical constraints could have played a part. Previously, we had reported that the Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle release date was advanced to August; however, the date has been postponed to the original release date: September 12, 2025. Fans react with confusion Many Indian anime fans were excited to finally see Infinity Castle in theatres around the same time as fans in neighbouring countries like Malaysia and Singapore, who are getting mid-August releases. But with the India date now locked for September 12 again, there's a wave of disappointment and confusion online. DEMON SLAYER: INFINITY CASTLE MOVIE TRAILER IS HERE. RELEASING JULY 18TH. Some fans have even posted screenshots of the now-deleted Cinepolis tweet as proof of the earlier August claim. Others are worried the leak has already spoiled major parts of the movie, affecting their anticipation. What is Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle Part 1 about? Directed by Haruo Sotozaki and produced by Ufotable, Infinity Castle Part 1: Akaza's Return kicks off the final arc of the Demon Slayer saga. The movie continues the journey of Tanjiro, Nezuko, and the remaining Hashira as they enter Muzan Kibutsuji's stronghold, known as the Infinity Castle. As the Demon Slayer Corps battles Upper Rank demons in a twisting, shifting domain, the movie sets up some of the most emotional and action-packed scenes in the series so far. Akaza's return promises brutal fights and a glimpse into his tragic past. Should fans still wait for the Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle theatre release? Despite the delays and leaks, the answer is yes. Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle is made for the big screen. With stunning animation, loud surround sound, and dramatic pacing, the film is best enjoyed in a theatre, preferably IMAX or premium screens. Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle movie duration is said to be 2 hours and 35 minutes long. If you've waited this long, waiting until September 12 isn't the worst option. It's better to experience the film in all its glory rather than through pirated versions. What's next for Indian anime fans? With Infinity Castle locked in for September 12, fans can now look forward to ticket sales opening by late August. While no partner platforms have announced booking windows yet, updates should arrive soon. And if you're still catching up on the series or want to relive the build-up, now's a good time to rewatch the Swordsmith Village Arc, which leads directly into Infinity Castle. Stay tuned. Hopefully, there are no more date changes. But with how things are going, nothing's fully certain till the tickets go live.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump ends Musk's ‘five things' rule for federal workers — why did the White House finally snap and pull the plug?
Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program officially scrapped by Trump administration amid backlash and confusion- In a major move that reflects growing tension between President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, the Trump administration has officially ended Musk's controversial 'Five Things' email directive that had stirred widespread confusion and discontent across federal agencies. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a formal notice on August 5, 2025, revoking the program, marking a definitive shift away from Musk's once-celebrated push for government efficiency. Trump administration pulls the plug on Musk's 'Five Things' mandate The 'Five Things' initiative, introduced earlier this year under Elon Musk's short-lived leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), required all federal employees to send weekly emails listing five key accomplishments from their work. Originally promoted as a tool for enhancing productivity and accountability, the policy quickly became a source of confusion, frustration, and resistance across multiple government departments. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program In the official memo released this week, OPM Director Scott Kupor stated that federal supervisors already have the 'tools and flexibility needed' to evaluate employee performance, rendering Musk's email summaries redundant and ineffective. This announcement comes just months after Musk's high-profile departure from the federal government and a public falling-out with President Trump, who had initially championed the program but later distanced himself as implementation faltered. Why Elon Musk launched the 'Five Things' emails In January 2025, President Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a bold experiment aimed at reducing bureaucracy, slashing government costs, and streamlining federal operations. Musk, known for his disruptive business style at Tesla and SpaceX, wasted no time in pushing aggressive reforms. One of his first and most visible directives was the weekly 'Five Things' email rule. Live Events According to internal sources, Musk believed the practice would enhance workplace discipline, improve visibility into government functions, and cut down on inefficiencies. But what seemed like a simple accountability tool on the surface turned into a logistical headache for many government workers. Government agencies resisted Musk's rule early on As early as February 2025, signs of internal pushback began to surface. Agencies such as the Department of Defense, NASA, State Department, and Health and Human Services began advising employees to pause or disregard the directive entirely. Internal memos cited concerns about legal risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and conflicting chains of command. Some supervisors complained that the requirement added administrative burdens without delivering meaningful insights. Others argued that the centralized summaries violated existing agency reporting protocols. In fact, by April, many departments had already unofficially stopped enforcing the rule—even before Musk left his post. Trump's shifting tone on Musk and his government efficiency agenda Initially, President Trump praised Musk's approach, calling it 'ingenious' and a 'wake-up call for lazy bureaucracy.' But as criticism mounted and implementation faltered, the administration began quietly stepping back. By June, tensions between the two had boiled over. Trump publicly criticized Musk's handling of internal reforms and later revoked federal appointments aligned with Musk's DOGE team. Additionally, federal contracts involving Musk-owned companies like SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company came under review—further escalating the rift. The formal termination of the 'Five Things' policy now cements that rift, signaling the Trump administration's broader rejection of Musk-style micromanagement and automation-driven government models. OPM memo signals return to traditional oversight In the memo issued August 5, the Office of Personnel Management stated that agencies would now 'return to existing oversight mechanisms' that include performance reviews, project evaluations, and internal accountability metrics. 'This directive is no longer in effect,' the OPM memo read. 'We believe agency leadership is fully equipped with the tools necessary to assess team performance without weekly reporting mandates.' The Trump administration's move underscores its confidence in traditional supervisory structures—and a desire to minimize administrative chaos stirred up by Musk's reforms. Fallout from Musk's departure continues Musk's exit from government in late May followed a wave of resignations and infighting within DOGE. Critics called the agency 'chaotic' and 'visionless,' while supporters defended Musk's attempts to modernize Washington's outdated systems. Even after his departure, Musk remained vocal on social media, slamming what he called 'deep state resistance' to accountability and claiming that Trump 'betrayed the vision for real change.' Since then, he has focused on expanding his ventures in AI and space exploration, while DOGE has been largely sidelined within the administration. What the end of 'Five Things' means for federal workers For the more than 2 million federal employees affected by the weekly email directive, the repeal comes as a major relief. The program had added extra hours of unpaid administrative work and opened employees to new levels of scrutiny, according to union leaders. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) had been advocating for the policy to be scrapped, citing unfair labor practices and stress-related issues among staff. With this formal announcement, agencies can now focus on core mission work without the added burden of weekly summary submissions. Bigger picture: Is this the end of Musk's influence in Washington? The unraveling of Elon Musk's influence in Washington politics is now evident. From once being hailed as the face of 'Silicon Valley meets Capitol Hill,' Musk now finds himself on the outside looking in. His bold but divisive ideas—like algorithmic personnel tracking and AI-assisted departmental decision-making—failed to gain lasting traction. What's clear is that President Trump is reasserting control over his administration's direction, refocusing on efficiency through conventional oversight, and stepping back from experiments that stir more dysfunction than results. Trump draws line between innovation and disruption While innovation remains a key part of Trump's agenda for his second term, the administration has now drawn a clear line between meaningful reform and disruptive overreach. The end of Musk's 'Five Things' email rule symbolizes that shift. By formally terminating the program, the White House is sending a message: government reform must be functional, clear, and supported by institutional leadership—not just dictated by tech billionaires with grand visions. As 2025 moves forward, it's expected that the Trump administration will continue pushing for government modernization, but with greater respect for the realities of federal operations and agency autonomy. FAQs: Q1: Why did the Trump administration end Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email rule? Because it caused confusion, added workload, and was no longer seen as useful. Q2: What was Elon Musk's government email directive all about? It required federal workers to send weekly emails listing five things they accomplished.
NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
ChatGPT To No Longer Tell Users To Break Up With Partners After Update: 'It Shouldn't Give...'
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) tools has led to people using the technology to ease their workload as well as seek relationship advice. Taking guidance about matters of the heart from a machine that is designed to be agreeable, however, comes with a problem. It often advises users to quit the relationship and walk away. Keeping the problem in mind, ChatGPT creator, OpenAI, on Monday (Aug 4) announced a series of changes it is rolling out to better support users during difficult times and to offer relatively safe guidance. "ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through - asking questions, weighing pros and cons," OpenAI said, as per The Telegraph. "When you ask something like 'Should I break up with my boyfriend?' ChatGPT shouldn't give you an answer. It should help you think it through, asking questions, weighing pros and cons. New behavior for high-stakes personal decisions is rolling out soon." "We'll keep tuning when and how they show up so they feel natural and helpful," the company said. OpenAI added that it will constitute an advisory group containing experts in mental health, youth development, and human-computer interaction. 'Sycophantic ChatGPT' While AI cannot directly cause a breakup, the chatbots do feed into a user's bias to keep the conversation flowing. It is a problem that has been highlighted by none other than OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. In May, Mr Altman admitted that ChatGPT had become overly sycophantic and "annoying" after users complained about the behaviour. The issue arose after the 4o model was updated and improved in both intelligence and personality, with the company hoping to improve overall user experience. The developers, however, may have overcooked the politeness of the model, which led to users complaining that they were talking to a 'yes-man' instead of a rational, AI chatbot. "The last couple of GPT-4o updates have made the personality too sycophant-y and annoying (even though there are some very good parts of it)," Mr Altman wrote. "We are working on fixes asap, some today and some this week. At some point will share our learnings from this, it's been interesting." While ChatGPT may have rolled out the new update, making it less agreeable, experts maintain that AI can offer general guidance and support, but it lacks the nuance and depth required to address the complex, unique needs of individuals in a relationship.
