A.P. gets Railway Zone in Vizag, Telangana gains Railway Coach Factory under Reorganization Act
In response to a Right to Information (RTI) query raised by this The Hindu Correspondent, the Ministry of Railways has explained that as part of executing the A.P. Reorganization Act, the department has undertaken these infrastructure development works. Sunil Prabhat, Joint Director/Efficiency and Research, Railway Board, while providing the details explained that the item No. 8, 10 and 11 of Schedule 13, related to infrastructure, of the Act are pertaining to the Ministry and execution of these projects are in different stages.
As per the item number 8, the foundation stone of new SCoR Zone has been laid by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi on January 8, 2025. Tender for SCoR Head Quarters Office building has also been awarded. Additionally, the General Manager has also been posted at South Coast Railway on June 5, 2025.
With respect to the item number 10 in the thirteenth schedule of the Act, Indian Railway has planned to develop a Rail Manufacturing Unit at Kazipet, Telangana which will be capable of manufacturing and maintaining a variety of modern railway stocks. The project has been sanctioned and entrusted to Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd.
When it comes to the execution of the item number 11 in the same schedule, the Railway Ministry has explained that, 'The new capital of Andhra Pradesh i.e. Amaravati is near to Vijayawada, which is situated on important rail route and is very well connected with Secunderabad. Moreover, to provide direct rail connectivity to Amaravati, a separate project, that is Errupalem-Namburu via Amaravati new line with 56.53 Kms has been sanctioned. Regarding better connectivity from Amaravati to Hyderabad and other important cities, a number of projects are in progress'.
Though, the RTI reply did not say anything about the Metro projects for Andhra Pradesh, the central government has also initiated Vizag and Vijayawada metro projects. Item number 12 of the same schedule in the Act mandates that, 'The Government of India shall examine the feasibility of Metro Rail facility in Vishakhapatnam and Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali Metropolitan Urban Development Authority within a period of one year from the appointed day and take an expeditious decision thereon.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Spike in Used Car Purchases? Here's What You Need to Know About Transferring Insurance
India's second-hand car market is booming. In 2024 alone, over 54 lakh used cars were sold—outpacing new car sales, which stood at 4.1 million. Several factors are driving this trend: the widening price gap between new and used vehicles, stricter emission norms pushing up prices of new models, and the rise of organised platforms that make the resale process easier and more transparent. However, amid the excitement of choosing the right model and finalising the paperwork, one important step is often overlooked—transferring the insurance policy. Why Insurance Transfer Is Non-Negotiable Under the Motor Vehicles Act, it is mandatory that car ownership must be transferred to the new owner within 14 days of purchase. While the Act doesn't explicitly penalise delays in updating the insurance, failing to transfer the policy can lead to own damage (OD) claim rejections because of mismatched ownership. This leaves the new owner financially vulnerable in the event of an accident. 'An untransferred insurance policy puts both the buyer and seller at risk. When making a claim, mismatched ownership details can effectively render the insurance void, as if there were no coverage at all.' – Mallikarjun Mallannavar, Chief Claims Officer at Royal Sundaram The Step-by-Step Transfer Process Transferring car insurance is simpler than it sounds—and it's one of the most important steps after buying or selling a car. Here's how you can do it: Step 1: Inform the insurer Notify the insurance company about the change in ownership as soon as the sale is complete. Step 2: Gather the required documents You will need the following documents: Form 29 and Form 30 (available from the RTO) Vehicle's Registration Certificate (RC) Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificate Existing insurance policy documents No Objection Certificate (if the vehicle was financed) Step 3: Submit the documents Submit these documents to both the insurer and the Regional Transport Office (RTO). Step 4: Vehicle inspection Depending on the insurer, a quick vehicle inspection may be required. Step 5: Pay the transfer fee A small fee is charged to process the insurance transfer. Step 6: Receive the updated policy Once approved, the insurer will issue an updated policy in your name as the new policyholder. What Happens If You Skip It? Apart from legal penalties, you may find yourself without insurance cover in case of an accident. Third-party claims, although mandatory, may be delayed if policy details don't match the ownership. The previous owner could also be dragged into legal complications if the car causes damage or injury after the sale. 'Failing to transfer the insurance can land the previous owner in legal trouble if the car is involved in an accident,' says – Mallikarjun Mallannavar, Chief Claims Officer at Royal Sundaram. 'That's why transferring the policy isn't just a formality—it's a crucial legal safeguard.' Final Thoughts As more Indians opt for pre-owned vehicles, understanding the legal and financial implications of car insurance is crucial. Insurance transfer is not just paperwork—it's a vital step to ensure continued protection. Whether you're buying or selling, make sure the insurance is updated promptly to avoid complications later. Note to readers: This article is part of HT's paid consumer connect initiative and is independently created by the brand. HT assumes no editorial responsibility for the content, including its accuracy, completeness, or any errors or omissions. Readers are advised to verify all information independently. Want to get your story featured as above? click here!
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
National Sports Governance Bill: Federations split over new law, concerns raised over sports autonomy
The story so far: 'Preparing for 2036 Summer Olympics, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes,' reads the aims of the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025. The Bill, which has been tabled in the Lok Sabha by Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya is likely to be taken for debate next week. The Bill has been heralded by some sports federations as 'visionary, transformative and furthering sports in India', but several others remain skeptic. BCCI remains non-committal India's top cricketing body — Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI), has opposed any efforts to be dragged under the ambit of Right to Information (RTI), citing it does not depend on government funding for its functioning. When asked about its stance on the Bill, BCCI General Secretary Devajit Saikia told The Hindu, 'Currently, it is too premature to comment on the Bill as it is going to be debated by MPs in Parliament. The BCCI will take a call once a final draft is passed by the Parliament'. Federations differ on government interference In October last year, Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P.T. Usha had first raised concerns over the Bill citing government infringing on the IOA's independence. She had stated that the National Sports Board – which will have powers to recognise federations, may 'lead to a conflict between the government and international sports governance bodies, particularly the IOC, which has previously suspended many National Olympic committees for excessive governmental interference'. Ms. Usha found herself in a dilemma recently after the IOA's executive committee members had refused to ratify Mr. Raghuram Iyer's appointment as Chief Executive Officer, seeking to bring of motion of no confidence against Ms. Usha. Upon prodding from the Sports Ministry, the members ceded and Mr. Iyer's appointment was ratified. Disagreeing with IOA's stance, Hockey India Secretary-General Bhola Nath Singh, while speaking to The Hindu, says, 'If there were any such provisions which enhance government interference into sports, the international Olympic Committee would not approve this Bill. This legislation follows international norms.' Terming the Bill as helpful for promoting sports, he asserts, 'All federations were consulted thrice while the Bill was being drafted.' He also downplays any concerns over former poll officials conducting sports bodies' elections. 'If my federation is run properly and you seek welfare of your sportspersons, it would not matter if EC is involved in federation's elections,' he opines. 'The bill is anti-sports, anti-India': Rahul Mehra The biggest pushback from the Bill is from sports Activist and senior advocate Rahul Mehra. His public interest litigation filed in 2010 against the IOA for non-compliance to the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 (Sports Code), resulted in the landmark verdict by the Delhi High Court in 2022. The HC had made compliance with the sports code non-negotiable and failure will result in derecognition of the sports body. 'This Bill gives Centre de facto and maybe direct control of all federations and the entire sports domain of India. Apart from the Chairman, members of the National Sports Board are going to be senior bureaucrats, people from the ministry and Sports Authority of India. This is like how the Election Commissioner is appointed by the Prime Minister and his nominee, leaving the Leader of Opposition powerless,' Mr. Mehra tells to The Hindu. The Delhi HC verdict had mandated appointment of 25% sportspersons in such federations, paving way for Dilip Tirkey to become the first international player to head a national body — Hockey India. However, Mr. Bhola Nath Singh's tenure as Vice-President Hockey India was cut down as the court did not allow a former President to have voting rights in the executive committee. 'Earlier, the government used to appoint an MLA or a sportsperson via the 25% quota in these federations to exercise indirect control. This Bill stamps that idea of control, legally,' explains Mr. Mehra. When asked if the Bill infringes on sports autonomy, Mr. Mehra says, 'If a court appoints an administrator when a federation is deep-rooted in corruption, conflicts and nepotism, these federations file affidavits saying they will be suspended and derecognized by the international bodies. We saw the Sports Ministry citing these in cases of Football and Wrestling federations recently. However, this same government has now made infringement a law. He also decries the relaxation of age barrier for members by the Bill. 'As per the Sports Code, age of every elected member in all these bodies across the board, whether be President, Secretary, Treasurer, any elected office bearer, be the executive Committee member cannot exceed 70 years. This Bill imposes this age limit only for the top three — President, Secretary and Treasurer and also relaxes this to 75 years, but in actual it is perpetuity. In one section, it says that if the member happens to be in the office of an international body, he can apply for exemption and that will be granted to him.' He adds, 'The Sports Code mandated members to retire after 12 years of tenure. He cannot transfer to another sports body. But this Bill gives 12 years maximum and then a four-year cooling off then another 12 years and so on. Why do you want the same people to keep, stay put in power? Once these politicians and bureaucrats man these bodies, they want those to be there for perpetuity. Whether BJP is in power or not.' He also points out that while the Sports Code only allowed a government servant to serve one four-year term, this Bill is silent on it. 'So that means the government servant can ask multiple can stand for election multiple times,' he says. A new National Sports Tribunal which will adjudicate disputes between federations and players is also not well-intentioned, says Mr. Mehra. 'Earlier, citizens like me could go to court and challenge the government and the federation. Under new provisions of the Bill, barring anybody other than an aggrieved person cannot challenge its decisions. They have taken away the jurisdiction of the High Court by transfering all pending cases to the Tribunal. With this they have decided to undo these contempts of court and petitions where they have absolutely no answers in the court,' says Mr. Mehra. However, he adds that he is not against the Tribunal as such. 'However, the intention behind bringing the tribunal is not quick, speedy, efficacious remedy to sportspersons and to people involved in sports. Disputes are usually between a sportsperson and a sports adminstrator with deep pockets. It's a mismatched fight. The longer you prolong, the more the fatigue and disenchantment amongst the players and they give up. Now in order to improve the system, you're bringing your tribunal. But you have no time limit to the tribunal deciding a particular time,' he notes. 'Every single step should have a specific time bound period. So a case when it comes should be decided within 30 days. Appeals should be decided within another 30 days. Then if someone wants, they can take it to the Supreme Court. In 60-90 days, your entire litigation is over,' Mr. Mehra says. The only two aspects of the Bill he agrees with is the constitution of a National Sports Election panel and the government taking a final call on participation of sportspersons in international events where matters of national security, public order and safety are involved. He cedes, 'As a purist, I would say sports and politics should never be mixed. But you can't divorce it from the will of the people. However, by putting something like this in writing, you are inviting trouble. Certain things you just leave unsaid.' In contrast, Mr. Singh says, 'For any citizen, the government is responsible for safety. What is wrong if it decides on stopping players from travelling to such [dangerous] locations? We have seen how well security preparations are in Pakistan. India is prepared to welcome all Pakistani players with VISA because government is responsible for their safety.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
China's rival Philippines eyeing more BrahMos as president Marcos visits India on five day trip
Philippines President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. will visit New Delhi for five days. He will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Discussions will focus on defence, maritime security, and trade. Philippines may acquire more defence equipment from India. Both countries aim to boost trade relations. India is expanding defence outreach in Southeast Asia. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Defence and maritime cooperation high on agenda Regional tensions and growing partnerships Trade crosses $3 billion, more economic cooperation planned Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's expanding defence outreach in Southeast Asia President of the Philippines Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. will arrive in New Delhi on Monday for a five-day State Visit to India. This will be his first visit to the country since assuming office. He will be accompanied by First Lady Louise Araneta Marcos and a high-level delegation comprising Cabinet Ministers, other dignitaries, senior officials, and business Marcos is scheduled to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday. Discussions are expected to focus on defence, maritime security, and trade cooperation. The President has shown interest in acquiring additional defence equipment from April, India delivered the second batch of BrahMos missiles to the Philippines, part of a $375 million agreement signed in 2022 for three BrahMos missile batteries. Philippine Air Force Chief Romeo Brawner said the country is exploring further purchases of Indian defence systems due to their "quality and affordability." Two more sets of the Indo-Russian BrahMos missile are expected to arrive over the next few Philippines continues to face maritime disputes with China in the South China Sea, referred to domestically as the West Philippine Sea. In response, it is strengthening its defence partnerships with India and Japan to promote stability in the trade between India and the Philippines has surpassed $3 billion. Both nations are seeking to enhance their trade relationship, including efforts to finalise a deal with the United States, which currently imposes tariffs of 25% on Indian goods and 19% on Philippine addition to the Philippines, two other ASEAN countries are reportedly in talks with India regarding the BrahMos missile. Indonesia is negotiating a potential $450 million deal, while Vietnam is considering a $625 million agreement. In 2022, India also supplied Vietnam with 12 high-speed guard boats under a $100 million line of credit, reflecting expanding defence cooperation.(With inputs from TOI)
