logo
Trump asserts dominance with 'big, beautiful bill' Senate passage: 5 takeaways

Trump asserts dominance with 'big, beautiful bill' Senate passage: 5 takeaways

Yahooa day ago
President Donald Trump eked out a nail-biting finish line to achieve his most significant legislative victory since returning to the White House with the Senate giving a thumbs up on Tuesday to his sweeping mega-bill.
After a weekend of caustic debate the massive proposal − dubbed the "big beautiful bill" by Trump − passed the Senate 51-50. It preserves the 2017 tax cuts; invests billions into the military and border security; and fulfills a major 2024 campaign promise by extending federal tax breaks for low-wage tipped workers, such as waiters and hairstylists.
Even with congressional majorities, however, the Trump administration had to twist a few arms of Republican holdouts and other allies who questioned if government spending was reduced enough.
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, reignited his beef with the Trump administration on Monday when he torched the bill will for increasing the national debt by a projected $3.3 trillion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Some GOP lawmakers joined Democrats in airing their misgivings about an estimated $1 trillion cut to Medicaid over the next decade, for instance. But in the end the president crossed the finish line with much of the measure left in tact after a marathon of votes and series of negotiations.
Here are the key moments from Trump's legislative accomplishment and what the fallout could be going forward.
The biggest point of contention orbiting Trump's mega-bill was Medicaid, which provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans.
Conservative supporters of the bill defend the reforms as much-needed cost savings that won't hurt the most vulnerable. They spotlighted efforts to keep states from spending health care funds on undocumented immigrants and defended imposing an 80-hour per month work requirement for able-bodied recipients aged 19 to 64, who don't have dependents.
But political observers of various stripes have called out how reductions to the program are unprecedented and estimated to remove millions from receiving its benefits.
"What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding is not there," Sen. Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, asked during a fiery June 29 Senate floor speech.
Progressive religious leaders were among the most outspoken and they demonstrated on Capitol Hill, carrying more 50 caskets covered with statistics of how many people would lose Medicaid and food stamps, which the CBO estimates will receive its own $300 billion cut over the next decade.
"This bill is theft in plain sight," Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin told reporters Monday. "...And despite this, Republicans are trying to push this through, because, let's be honest, they don't give a sh-- about the people who elected them."
Speaking of Tillis, the Tar Heel State Republican was a key holdout on the bill and over the weekend announced he was forgoing his reelection bid in the critical swing state next year.
It was "not a hard choice" given that lawmakers who pursue bipartisan solutions are an "endangered species" in Washington, he said.
Republicans understand the ramifications.
"Sen. Tillis is one of the most effective and collegial members that I have ever served with in the United States Senate," Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-K.y, a former Senate majority leader who is also retiring next year, said in a June 30 post on X. "His announcement is a big setback for the Senate and the Republican conference."
For years North Carolina has been a razor-thin state in multiple statewide contests and next year's Senate race was already forecasted to be a toss-up by reputable prognosticators such as Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball, at the University of Virginia, and the Cook Political Report.
Democrats are now salivating at the chance of flipping the seat blue without the battle test Tillis in the race, saying his departure is an early start to "midterm backlash" in 2026.
"Now Tillis isn't even running because he saw how extreme this bill was and refused to stand by and support it, which earned him the wrath of Donald Trump," Martin, the DNC chair, told reporters this week.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., had his hands full.
He wasn't the MAGA movement's first choice but the 63-year-old Republican leader kept most of the GOP herd together through a thorny debate to deliver Trump his defining legislative win.
In the final hours, Thune reportedly was working behind the scenes all night to strike deals on amendments that could secure Republican holdouts, such as Sens. Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, and Susan Collins, of Maine, who are considered moderates in the 53-member caucus.
Murkowski ultimately voted for the measure, but Collins did not. She joined Tillis and Rand Paul, of Kentucky, among the three Republicans who voted against the bill, forcing Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking ballot.
Thune also had to keep Trump's allies from causing too much trouble after facing pressure from MAGA activists who demanded he fire the parliamentarian for being a roadblock to some of their more ambitious plans in the bill.
Viewed by Washington insiders as a more affable conservative, the 6-foot, 4-inch all-state basketball player has been a Trump critic in the past. He condemned the Jan. 6, 2021 U.S. Capitol rioters; opposed Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results; and supported Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., to be the 2024 Republican nominee for president.
But with the help of Vice President JD Vance's tie-break vote, Thune bought himself some credit with the White House and perhaps some in the MAGA movement at a time when both are pushing traditional Republicans out.
The Musk-Trump relationship continues to deteriorate as their war of words escalated amid the final hours of Senate debate.
Musk, the world's richest person, unleashed a series of posts on X trashing the bill for adding trillions to the national debt. He called out Republican lawmakers, some by name, who voted for the bill after campaigning on cutting government spending.
The former White House adviser went further, vowing to use his deep pockets against GOP incumbents in the 2026 midterms.
"It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," Musk said in a June 30 post.
Trump didn't hesitate in returning fire with threats to sic the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE − which Musk previously led − on his former adviser's companies. He mocked Musk for receiving government subsidies and alluded that he might send the South African-born tech entrepreneur packing.
"We'll have to take a look," Trump said Tuesday when asked whether he will deport Musk. "We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible? He gets a lot of subsidies."
Time will tell if the remarkable public spat between the two will have any significant political fallout, or result in another apology by Musk, who in June expressed regret for a flurry of personal attacks against the president.
The Senate made plenty of changes, which means Trump's agenda must go back to the House where it could face further hurdles among hardline Republicans.
"The biggest one is just the deficit increase. I mean, we're already at $37 trillion in debt," Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Indiana, told CNN on Tuesday. "Our deficits are at all time highs, and it just doesn't seem like the Senate is serious about keeping the deficit flat."
The proposal barely passed the House in May, by a 215-214 vote which gives more conservative-leaning fiscal hawks a negotiating advantage should they choose to force Trump's hand.
Stutzman said that he sides with Musk in terms of the deficit concerns, saying other business leaders -- such as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon -- have expressed the same thing.
"That's why this really is a great opportunity for us to reduce our debt and deficits," he said.
Whether this can all happen before Independence Day, which is Trump's imposed deadline for Congress, remains up in the air but he isn't letting up.
"I think it would be very wise for them to get on board. It's a great bill," Trump said of remaining GOP holdouts during a press gabble on July 1 after landing in Florida to view the so-called "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center.
"I would say that they have to do it," he added. "If they don't do it look, they'll suffer the consequences."
Contributing: Sarah Wire, Lauren Villagran, Joey Garrison
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Senate gives Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' a thumbs up: 5 takeaways
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.
Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.

Boston Globe

time18 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Even some of Musk's own supporters have expressed doubts about the direction he now plans to take, preferring that he stay focused on the business ideas that fueled his net worth of roughly $400 billion. Advertisement But as his improbable bid to buy Twitter and front-and-center role in the 2024 election showed, Musk has defied expectations before. If nothing else, he could make life difficult for lawmakers he says have reneged on their promise to cut spending. Advertisement 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk wrote on X, the social media platform he bought when it was still named Twitter, this week. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' Musk, who didn't respond to a request for comment, has already identified his next target: the reelection campaign of Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), who opposes Trump's signature legislative package. Urged to support Massie by former GOP congressman Justin Amash, a Trump foe who declared himself an independent in a 2019 op-ed decrying the two-party system as an 'existential threat,' Musk replied, 'I will.' Representative Thomas Massie speaks to the media following a vote to stop a government shutdown at the Capitol on March 11. Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post Massie did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday about Musk starting a third party, but he posted a Fox News story about the chief executive's plans to donate to his campaign. 'An interesting thing just happened,' Massie wrote on X. With Trump already working to defeat Massie next year, the race in northern Kentucky appears to be the first to pit the two billionaires against each other. On Capitol Hill, where the Senate passed the massive tax and spending bill Tuesday afternoon, there were few signs of alarm about Musk. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma), when asked by reporters Monday evening about Musk's threats to punish Republicans who vote for Trump's plan, said the billionaire is not top of mind at the Capitol. 'Doesn't matter, doesn't matter at all, no. It's not even been a conversation of ours,' he said. 'I mean, if we ran every time someone said something about our election, we'd live in fear the whole time.' Advertisement Senator Markwayne Mullin bounces a rubber ball through the Ohio Clock Corridor on Monday, on Capitol Hill. Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post Unless that someone is Trump. Two Republican lawmakers who have been at odds with Trump both said in rapid succession this week that they would not seek reelection. Rep. Don Bacon (Nebraska), who has taken issue with Trump's tariffs and policy toward Russia, announced his retirement Monday. The day before, Sen. Thom Tillis (North Carolina) said he would not seek a third term after Trump vowed to punish him for opposing his legislative package. That leaves Massie as one of the only points of Republican resistance in Congress to Trump's agenda. Musk's decision to cast himself as a potential third-party leader raises questions about his political vision. It has just been in the last few years that he has evolved from Democratic-leaning Trump critic to staunchly Republican Trump acolyte. Trump allies mocked his latest incarnation. 'I think it's the ketamine talking in the middle of the night,' said Trump pollster Jim McLaughlin, referring to media reports about Musk's drug use that he has denied. 'Trump is the Republican Party right now. He is the conservative movement. There's not a hankering for a third party with Elon Musk.' A Gallup poll last year found that 58 percent of U.S. adults agree that a third party is needed in the U.S. because the Republican and Democratic parties 'do such a poor job' of representing the American people. Support for a third party has averaged 56 percent since 2003, according to Gallup. History shows that third-party candidates are rarely victorious. Ross Perot, one of the most successful independent candidates for president in American history, received about 19 percent of the popular vote and no electoral college votes. Advertisement 'Third parties are traditionally spoilers or wasted votes,' said Lee Drutman, senior fellow at the New America think tank. 'But if Musk's goal is to cause chaos and make a point and disrupt, it gets a lot easier.' Ralph Nader's presidential bid in 2000 was a classic example of a disruptive campaign, Drutman said, contributing to an outcome so close that Republican George W. Bush prevailed over Democrat Al Gore only after the Supreme Court weighed in. Ralph Nader acknowledges his mother at an event at the National Press Club before watching the election night voting unfold. Lucian Perkins/TWP The trend in the U.S. toward increased political polarization also makes it more difficult for third-party candidates, Drutman said. When Perot ran in 1992, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush were both running as centrists, allowing Perot to argue that there wasn't much daylight between the two major parties. By contrast, the differences between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in the 2024 election were much more stark. America's political diversity also complicates matters, Drutman said. 'If there clearly was a party in the center that was more popular than the Democrats or the Republicans, then someone would have organized it by now,' he said. 'It's not like we've just been waiting for Elon Musk to show up.' Musk entered politics in earnest during the 2024 presidential election. Beyond his massive financial investment, Musk frequently appeared alongside Trump at rallies and cheered him on over X. But since Trump's win, Musk's experience in politics has been turbulent. Earlier this year, the billionaire and groups affiliated with him donated more than $20 million in a bid to help conservatives take control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In the final stretch of the campaign, Musk drew derision for wearing a foam cheesehead at a town hall and for directing his America PAC to pay registered voters for signing petitions. A couple of voters won $1 million prizes. Advertisement But even with the race flooded with Musk's cash, the conservative judicial candidate — whom Trump also endorsed — lost by a wide margin in April. Musk's personal presence in the race did his candidate harm, said Barry Burden, director of the University of Wisconsin's Elections Research Center. Conservative voters appreciated Musk's money, but that wasn't enough to overcome negative perceptions of an ultra-wealthy outsider injecting himself into the state's politics, Burden said, adding that Musk's presence galvanized greater liberal turnout. 'A new party is going to benefit most from Musk if they can draw on his resources but keep him in the background,' Burden said. 'And if he can portray himself as an innovator and a tech entrepreneur — and somebody who is really contributing to the American economy and funding this new operation without being its front person — I think that's probably going to lead to the most success.' Musk floated his idea of a new party nearly one month ago on June 5, after days of criticizing the massive GOP tax bill as a measure that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Musk wrote, along with a poll. Since then, Musk has regularly posted about starting a new party and going after lawmakers who vote for the spending bill. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk wrote Monday. Advertisement A person who has served as a sounding board for Musk, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter, questioned Musk's ultimate strategy in undermining a party he had hoisted to victory beyond wanting 'to be in the driver's seat.' 'I agree our government is broken, but it's a tougher problem to fix than landing a rocket,' the person said. Paul Kane contributed to this report.

House members in mad scramble back to DC to vote on Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' after heading home for July 4
House members in mad scramble back to DC to vote on Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' after heading home for July 4

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House members in mad scramble back to DC to vote on Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' after heading home for July 4

Members of the House of Representatives from both parties were forced to return to Washington, D.C. to vote on President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' after the Senate passed it, Politico reported. With Trump exerting great pressure on Speaker Mike Johnson to get the bill to his desk for a signing before the July 4 holiday, the House plans to vote on the bill as soon as possible. That triggered a mad dash back to the nation's capital and comes amid a Republican rift over the amended bill — which would force cuts to Medicaid and makes states shoulder more of the cost for food assistance while extending the 2017 tax cuts Trump signed. Republican Rep. Nancy Mace posted that she and her team would travel back from South Carolina by van. We have secured a van for a DC road trip tonight to make it in time for votes on BBB tomorrow. Hoah! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 — Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) July 1, 2025 'We have secured a van for a DC road trip tonight to make it in time for votes on BBB tomorrow,' Mace posted. Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who is running for Illinois' open Senate seat, hosted a Zoom town hall as he drove 14 hours to Washington after his flight was canceled. We made it. Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law. — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) July 2, 2025 'We made it,' he said. 'Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law.' By coincidence, Rep. Derek Tran of California wound up stranded in the Pittsburgh airport, so he and fellow Democratic Rep. Chris DeLuzio of Pennsylvania drove to Washington and hosted a virtual town hall as well. Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin posted how his flight was canceled because of thunderstorms, so he would drive to Chicago to make an early flight to Washington. The bill passed the House of Representatives narrowly last month, partially due to the fact that three Democratic members of Congress had died. House Speaker Mike Johnson has scheduled a vote for the morning. The vote comes after the Senate conducted a marathon 27-hour vote-a-rama before passing the bill by a 51-50 margin with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie in the Senate. Three Republicans--Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina--opposed the bill. But many House members have criticized the bill. During a House Rules Committee hearing, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who criticized the bill last month but nonetheless voted for it, said the Senate 'failed' with the bill. Plenty of Republican members also fear the cuts to Medicaid could disproportionately hurt their constituents.

What the Halt in U.S. Weapon Supplies Means for Ukraine
What the Halt in U.S. Weapon Supplies Means for Ukraine

Wall Street Journal

time18 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

What the Halt in U.S. Weapon Supplies Means for Ukraine

The Trump administration's withholding of critical Patriot interceptor missiles and other weapons from Ukraine is a body blow to the embattled country's efforts to withstand Russia's mounting and increasingly deadly aerial assaults. Even before the decision, Kyiv was struggling to counter Russian technology, tactics and troop numbers. Russia is already deploying maneuverable ballistic missiles, able to avoid the vaunted Patriot air-defense system's radar, and launching record numbers of drones to bombard Ukraine every two or three nights. A halt in the supply of interceptors from the U.S. will heap further pressure on Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store